<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>SED&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/stanleyd/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/stanleyd/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/stanleyd//5594</id>
   <updated>		2008-11-05T16:38:11Z	2008-10-22T00:32:32Z	</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>




	
	<entry>
		
	<title><![CDATA[SED recommended Report: Threats To Obama Rose As Palin&apos;s Crowds Grew More Frenzied by Greg Sargent]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/report_threats_to_obama_ruse_a.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.243067</id>
  <published>2008-11-05T19:00:59Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-05T19:01:38Z</updated>
	</entry>
	




	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.243005-comment:3275275</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/minnesota_senate_race_not_over.php#c3275275" />
		
		    <title>SED Commented on Minnesota Senate Race Not Over -- AP Retracts Projection Of Coleman Win by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-05T16:38:11Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-05T16:38:11Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Last week or the week before I called Senator Reid's office and asked what action is being considered regarding Sen. McCain's behavior toward a fellow senator. I reminded the person  how it is always, "…my good friend from across the aisle" or "My esteemed colleague…" or some other rhetoric intended to shield the antipathy one holds for the other. I asked if a line had not been crossed. I noted other instances of sanction or admonishment for "members" who trash fellow senators. </p>

<p>The response from the office was, "Nothing is being considered." Surprise! I was told the senator would be advised of my call. I asked that Mr. Leader be advised that WE believe it is unacceptable to refer to Mr. Obama as a "terrorist," etc. (Commie, Marxist and Socialist had yet to be applied.) We want action!</p>

<p>Sure, nothing will come of the cal. If there's nothing done about Stevens, Young or Joe, why should our nation's "Greatest Hero" be challenged for such un-American behavior?</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://12.238794-comment:3242845</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/nm_gop_lawyer_pushing_voter_fr.php#c3242845" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[SED Commented on <![CDATA[<img src="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/images/pat-rogers-muck.jpg" vspace=5 hspace=5 align=left>NM GOP Lawyer Pushing Voter Fraud: It's "Single Greatest Wedge Issue Ever."]]&gt; by Zachary Roth]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-22T00:32:32Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-22T00:32:32Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Patrick Rogers may be a worse character than one might imagine. His firm is the number one firm in New Mexico and as a result there is little resistance to his actions. He and they do pretty much what they can get away with. So I would not look for a prosecution for conspiracy or even a mild rebuke from the bar for his traitorous attempts to undermine the electoral process of the USA.</p>

<p>We had first hand experience with Mr. Rogers as opposing counsel in a matter litigated from December 2003 until August 2008 (the appeal). We had counsel whom we fired, who explained at the outset of our legal battle that he had prevailed in a matter with Mr. Rogers during Rogers' stint as counsel to the GOP and that Rogers would be trying to "even the score." Our counsel appeared to be more interested in his relationship with Mr. Rogers than with the matter for which he was retained.</p>

<p>Mira, estamos in Nuevo Mexico and there "aren't a lot of laws" out here to get in the way, or so we've been told by $200+ per hour lawyers. After the trial phase of our family dispute (a civil matter), Mr. Rogers notified our counsel to seize our passports, as we were a "flight risk." It sounds a bit unconstitutional of course but consider the source. Rogers' courtroom antics bordered on criminal except for the fact its New Mexico and New Mexico's national ranking for judicial conduct and fairness in the judicial system is right there with it’s ranking in literacy and education –– at the bottom –– it's no surprise that Mr. Rogers would have free reign in New Mexico.</p>

<p>Seriously, if you had met this man you'd realize there's no stopping him. When you read Mickey and Pat's correspondence to Rove and others and follow the chain of events leading up to dismissal of Iglesias, ask yourself if he can do this, what's to stop him, congress? Right. Think subpoenas ignored by Rove, Bush's cleaning lady and Cheney's COS and then remember, Finegold and Schumer. How about Biden in the AG Gonzales hearings, "You're the real deal!" and "I like you…" as a path toward justice in 21st Century America.</p>

<p>No, I think reading about Rogers is fun for me and I know he deserves worse than "disbarment for life" and I know what a treacherous individual he is, but this is 21st Century USA. Europe calls us the “New America.” Look at the looting of the Treasury, watch Wall Street bonuses and dividends be paid out of Treasury dollars and buckle in, enjoy the ride, as the destination is always the same. You get off the ride and you’re still standing in sawdust on the Midway of the Carnival. If you’re more inclined to the Italians, the "Bread and Circus" are great, “…join us in the fun at the Coliseum.” Rogers will pass though unscathed.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    



</feed>

