Unprofessional, dishonest editing of a TPM report
When this TPM post about VoteBoth's numbers was initially posted, it included this line:
I'm not against the editorializing inherent in "it can't be denied;" this is a blog, for heaven's sake. I am against the fact that no more than an hour later that line (which I placed in bold type) was quietly removed, with no record of it ever having existed, and a "Late Update" was added that included this:
It took an hour to discover that, yet at first the reporter thought (independent of any investigation whatsoever, it seems) the number was undeniably large.
Keeping a record of what a post said from the beginning using strikeout text or footnotes allows the readers here to evaluate the bias and the integrity of the individual reporters. Not including that record and trying to hide it with sneaky edits is fundamentally dishonest in a news organization.
Those are very good numbers, it can't be denied. The group yesterday announced that former Hillary adviser Lanny Davis had joined the effort.
I'm not against the editorializing inherent in "it can't be denied;" this is a blog, for heaven's sake. I am against the fact that no more than an hour later that line (which I placed in bold type) was quietly removed, with no record of it ever having existed, and a "Late Update" was added that included this:
25,000 signatures on a petition is really not that impressive.
It took an hour to discover that, yet at first the reporter thought (independent of any investigation whatsoever, it seems) the number was undeniably large.
Keeping a record of what a post said from the beginning using strikeout text or footnotes allows the readers here to evaluate the bias and the integrity of the individual reporters. Not including that record and trying to hide it with sneaky edits is fundamentally dishonest in a news organization.




