« The NRSC And NRCC First Prepare For 1020 Elections, Now 1010 Elections | sluggahjells's Blog | Campaign 2008 Flashback: McCain Green Screen! »
It's Official: Roger Simon Is The Dumbest "Neutral" Pundit In Washington D.C.
(Crossposted at The Whole Delivery)
Conservatives are meant to say some crazy things, but you'll expect a neutral columnist like Roger Simon wouldn't.
But after that MySpace quality dreck that he wrote two weeks ago and the last week's "What the hell were you watching" hit piece on Obama's Cairo speech (I'm not even going to bother linking it, Simon officially stamps his title as the dumbest pundit in Washington D.C. with this title off his latest masterpiece:
If there was a bachelor's degree from stupidity, Simon would go well beyond even a magna cum laude. And even more appalling to the eyes is seeing the picture he uses for clinching column for his award:
And with that photo, he brings this up
If there was a bachelor's degree from stupidity, Simon would go well beyond even a magna cum laude. And even more appalling to the eyes is seeing the picture he uses for clinching column for his award:
And with that photo, he brings this up But you can see why Democrats are nervous. Roland Burris, a political hack, muscled his way into the U.S. Senate by nakedly playing the race card, and now everybody is jumpy about any comments that seem to indicate one race should be favored over another. (Unless it is white people being favored, in which case there is rarely a controversy.)Oh my goodness, oh my goodness, the Burris connection. Simon sees a connection, and you have to see it because they ARE BOTH MINORITIES!!!
Roger Simon truly has earned this award, and that is saying something in this political landscape. The dumbest pundit in Washington is surly Hackio's main hack.
From TWD, Goodbye and sigh.
Advertisement













I don't know; you make a good case, but: Chris Matthews is so dumb, he thinks Joe Scarborough is smart! And that Newtie Ging-Grinch is "the smartest guy in DeeCee"! "Dumbest Pundit" is hard in such a wide field of dumb pundits. Maybe you should try for weekly awards?
June 11, 2009 6:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe I should, but we know that Matthews shouts off the mouth so much and Gingrich is so a lying and dishonest partisan who has done that his entire political life.
The reason why I make the case for Simon is because he is suppose to be a "neutral writer" who isn't prone to being such an idiotic hack.
Maybe I will add the word "neutral" pundit to make him even more worthy of this award.
June 11, 2009 7:07 PM | Reply | Permalink