Memo to Obama: Keep the Focus Outside Washington DC
After months on the campaign trail, newly inaugurated President Obama
may have hoped to work
from home, govern from the White House and spend every evening with his
kids. Fuhgetaboudit. After just a few weeks it is obvious
that Obama and associates in the White House and the Cabinet have to
keep traveling around the
country, with the President himself going out of almost every week like
a medieval king in the preabsolutist era making a "progress" from
region to region. The United States is in crisis
while DC talking heads remain as irresponsible and out of touch as
ever; they are like the aristocrats of Old Regime France well after the
revolution had started. To escape the aristocratic death grip,
Obama must do all kinds of outreach --
including to Republicans with real world responsibilities -- in the
states and cities across the country that are grappling with the
concrete human and business realities of this gathering depression, as
well as living out the consequences of the terrible policies of the
past several decades.
Along with others like Andrew Sullivan, I have been amazed at the brazen obstructionism and sheer solipsism of GOP "leaders." The Gregg psychodrama is only the latest: despite massive electoral defeats and ideas proven to have bankrupted the country, quite literally, DC Republicans think it is all about them. They demand to keep their influence even though the voters heard and repudiated them; they want perks and policies to remain largely the same, as if November 2008 and the big crash had never happened. They posture and obstruct(McConnell, Steele, Boehner, Cantor) and even explore their own wimpy self-doubts on a national stage (Gregg). All of the rest of us are supposed to worry about their feelings and participation -- not about what works for America in a national emergency. The David Broders of the DC press establishment feel the GOP pain above all.
But of course, an analyst like me should have seen this coming, even more than the fledgling Obama adminstration. Crises bring out the worst in challenged elites, not the best. The United States has been building a pathological interest group and media system for several decades. It privileges Talking Heads with no responsibilities, especially those who take extreme stands. And DC is a city of elites always jocking to seize and stay in power. Of course defeated Republicans are doing little more than denying their own failures, and looking for the closest megaphones to trumpet themselves. And media outlets with dwindling budgets are happy to oblige. It is easier to call up an obstructionist for a colorful quote, or have him on on TV to eat up air time, than to actually figure out what is happing in a scary crises and explore what might work to turn things around. Even Chris Matthews on MSNBC -- who was interesting if not always right during the election -- has been guilty of sheer stupidity in this game; and CNN is almost as bad as Fox.
Obama and leading Democrats need to break this pathological cycle of GOP extremism married to media expediency, find ways to keep it from setting the national agenda. The way to do it is not to abandon outreach -- including to Republicans -- but to go out across the country again and again, to cities and towns in red and blue and purple areas, and talk to folks dealing with real problems. That includes Republican governors and mayors, who will have a much harder time just doing obstructionist posturing, because they have to address the problems of real citizens and businesses. Going out of DC and the northeast corridor gets the regional and local media into the game -- outlets much more likely to focus on concrete issues and let the President and citizens in town halls be heard. It allows Obama and the Democrats to highlight the real-world effects of the stimulus, what works in coming months, and honor officials and citizens on the front line who make things work.
This is also the formula for taking Wall Street titans out of the driver seat, focusing on the real economy not just the daily stock market. And it is a way to hear and respond to real-world Democratic and liberal and labor constituencies, rather than just to advocacy elites who might be tempted to push to extremes. Obama needs to keep the Democratic focus on mainsteam programs for most middle class and less privileged Americans, and on economic programs that stimulate new investments. He cannot be destracted by every little priority of liberal advocacy groups.
So keep going out there, President Obama, doing town halls and holding policy discussions in Colorado and Ohio and Maine and North Carolina -- even in Texas and Kentucky (talk about the breakdown of the electric grid in Mitch McConnell's home state, where folks need to hear what a difference public infrastructure investment could make!). Force those DC press corps people out into the real world, too.
And stop scheduling Washington DC "summits." That upcoming one on "fiscal responsibility" is a really, really, really bad idea. Like your opening obsession with intra DC "bipartisanship," Obama, it is just going to privilege your enemies and give them another microphone to oppose programs like Social Security that help millions of regular Americans without taking responsibility for fixing things like corporate pensions and broken health insurance that are failing most families.
Keep the focus on the places all across America where you won the election and inspired hope and volunteerism -- and that will help you lead the country through this huge and scary crisis, a struggle of many months and years. Leaders of good will across the land will join you in that endeavor, including volunteers, Democrats, Republicans and Independents, and responsible business leaders and regional bankers. Put them front and center -- and tell the extremists in DC to get a life.
Along with others like Andrew Sullivan, I have been amazed at the brazen obstructionism and sheer solipsism of GOP "leaders." The Gregg psychodrama is only the latest: despite massive electoral defeats and ideas proven to have bankrupted the country, quite literally, DC Republicans think it is all about them. They demand to keep their influence even though the voters heard and repudiated them; they want perks and policies to remain largely the same, as if November 2008 and the big crash had never happened. They posture and obstruct(McConnell, Steele, Boehner, Cantor) and even explore their own wimpy self-doubts on a national stage (Gregg). All of the rest of us are supposed to worry about their feelings and participation -- not about what works for America in a national emergency. The David Broders of the DC press establishment feel the GOP pain above all.
But of course, an analyst like me should have seen this coming, even more than the fledgling Obama adminstration. Crises bring out the worst in challenged elites, not the best. The United States has been building a pathological interest group and media system for several decades. It privileges Talking Heads with no responsibilities, especially those who take extreme stands. And DC is a city of elites always jocking to seize and stay in power. Of course defeated Republicans are doing little more than denying their own failures, and looking for the closest megaphones to trumpet themselves. And media outlets with dwindling budgets are happy to oblige. It is easier to call up an obstructionist for a colorful quote, or have him on on TV to eat up air time, than to actually figure out what is happing in a scary crises and explore what might work to turn things around. Even Chris Matthews on MSNBC -- who was interesting if not always right during the election -- has been guilty of sheer stupidity in this game; and CNN is almost as bad as Fox.
Obama and leading Democrats need to break this pathological cycle of GOP extremism married to media expediency, find ways to keep it from setting the national agenda. The way to do it is not to abandon outreach -- including to Republicans -- but to go out across the country again and again, to cities and towns in red and blue and purple areas, and talk to folks dealing with real problems. That includes Republican governors and mayors, who will have a much harder time just doing obstructionist posturing, because they have to address the problems of real citizens and businesses. Going out of DC and the northeast corridor gets the regional and local media into the game -- outlets much more likely to focus on concrete issues and let the President and citizens in town halls be heard. It allows Obama and the Democrats to highlight the real-world effects of the stimulus, what works in coming months, and honor officials and citizens on the front line who make things work.
This is also the formula for taking Wall Street titans out of the driver seat, focusing on the real economy not just the daily stock market. And it is a way to hear and respond to real-world Democratic and liberal and labor constituencies, rather than just to advocacy elites who might be tempted to push to extremes. Obama needs to keep the Democratic focus on mainsteam programs for most middle class and less privileged Americans, and on economic programs that stimulate new investments. He cannot be destracted by every little priority of liberal advocacy groups.
So keep going out there, President Obama, doing town halls and holding policy discussions in Colorado and Ohio and Maine and North Carolina -- even in Texas and Kentucky (talk about the breakdown of the electric grid in Mitch McConnell's home state, where folks need to hear what a difference public infrastructure investment could make!). Force those DC press corps people out into the real world, too.
And stop scheduling Washington DC "summits." That upcoming one on "fiscal responsibility" is a really, really, really bad idea. Like your opening obsession with intra DC "bipartisanship," Obama, it is just going to privilege your enemies and give them another microphone to oppose programs like Social Security that help millions of regular Americans without taking responsibility for fixing things like corporate pensions and broken health insurance that are failing most families.
Keep the focus on the places all across America where you won the election and inspired hope and volunteerism -- and that will help you lead the country through this huge and scary crisis, a struggle of many months and years. Leaders of good will across the land will join you in that endeavor, including volunteers, Democrats, Republicans and Independents, and responsible business leaders and regional bankers. Put them front and center -- and tell the extremists in DC to get a life.
Advertisement
















Awesome.
And for each and every trip he takes, he should invite both senators and the congressperson representing the district, regardless of party.
Either the republicans will keep slapping away his hand, or they will start to pay attention to the voices of their own constituents, begging for Washington to understand what is important.
I was listening to NPR this morning and Mara Liasson said the withdrawal of Gregg is a huge blow to the Obama administration. I laughed out loud. The first thing I thought about when I woke up this morning was the fact that yesterday my company announced they were eliminating a department of over 100 people. That is what directly impacts my life--not who the commerce secretary is going to be.
So, from a Washington insider perspective, maybe it was a blow. But the voters are paying attention now, and our concerns really couldn't be further from what the pundits deem important to talk about.
February 13, 2009 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely, and along with Gregg, I have serious doubts that most people are all that torn up about the issues with other Cabinet/administration members, though you'd think it was the impending apocalypse reading the melodramatic pinings of op-ed pieces.
February 13, 2009 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
wow! what a great phrase!
February 13, 2009 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
I always enjoy your posts and they are right on! The Summit is a bad idea and will provide another GOP platform but taking it to the streets will work wonders for Obama's agenda!
February 13, 2009 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, Theda. I want to see Obama "take it to the streets" because it'll be good to hear widespread public support for mainstream programs, but it may be even more critical for him to hear about NEW approaches.
What most strikes me about the Obama/FDR comparisons is that Obama is effectively entering office in late 1929 or 1930. FDR had had almost 4 years worth of people coming to terms with the fact that the initial responses to the Crash were too weak, and he could see & build upon years worth of new ideas & social experimentation.
Right now, the "DC Summits" are, as you say, only going to strengthen the elite. But they'll also further lock him into battles around older ideas. We may prefer some of those ideas to others, but right now... he, and we, need MORE than this.
February 13, 2009 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course, it would be nice if, before he took it to the streets, Obama had something to take.
So far -- Nada.
February 13, 2009 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'd suggest a hat.
If the crowd turns ugly... you got protection. And if they get happy, a bit of that old time religion whoops 'em up... take up a collection.
I'd give this guy a call. He knows the schtick.
February 13, 2009 11:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
.
Stop *playing* stupid ...
It's not what he takes to the streets. It's what he receives from the streets.
So ... are you on the street or are you above it all? If you are on the street, so far you've added -- Nada.
If you're above it all, maybe a poke in the eye will help...
~OGD~
February 13, 2009 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
What's he getting from the streets in holding events structured by political operatives in D.C.? Scripted questions from pre-screened people who receive scripted answers - and that's going to bring about change? We know as much as the media in this country allows us to know and some of us are too busy trying to keep food on the table to know that.
February 13, 2009 2:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
.
Ah Boo Hoo . . .
What? Do we have another individual here standing high above it all watching the great unwashed on the street?
Now run along, it's happy hour, and pee on your own chip dip.
Waaa ...
~OGD~
February 13, 2009 7:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Another slam dunk post by Theda. Thanks!
I also think he should set up a project that's easily attainable over the next 10-12 months for all of us to enjoy and distract from the financial devastation. What about a national contest for high schooler's asking for Alternative Energy inventions? The Top 10 Winners each month get to go to the White House? Something, anything that we can be proud of *producing*.
PS - I'm thrilled about Gregg's punk-out. Democrats need to own business as an issue. I'm tired of conceding it to the Republicans.
February 13, 2009 11:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
If the militant extremist Republicans can really and truly be counted on to propose to solve the Crawford Crash troubles by smashin' Social Security and dismantlin' Medicare, why, give them as many microphones as possible!
In the real world, though, I fear they are not yet quite so far around the bend as that, though maybe Dr. Limbaugh will herd them there eventually.
Meanwhile, it seems to me that the bipartisanship shtyk should be persevered with, and especially as long as one can count on the bozos to slap or bite any hand stretched out to them. It will be when (if?) they start respondin' like adult human bein's rather than AEIdeological wind-up toys that the present course will need to be reconsidered.
To moan about "a really, really, really bad idea" may itself be a symptom of Washingtonitis. Making progresses through the shires is an excellent idea, but it won't really be the end of the world if there is the occasional conference at Whitehall or Hampton Court as well.
Happy days.
February 13, 2009 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Another smart one by Theda. This strategy of continuing to take it to the people also reminds me of something Nate Silver said the other day: it forces the MSM out into the 'real world' on a regular basis, and when they're covering those human interest stories in Peoria, Evanston, etc. their narrative becomes much less slanted toward the GOP talking points or the usual narratives of party conflict (for as we all know, reality has a well-known liberal bias).
February 13, 2009 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
So keep going out there, President Obama, doing town halls and holding policy discussions in Colorado and Ohio and Maine and North Carolina -- even in Texas and Kentucky (talk about the breakdown of the electric grid in Mitch McConnell's home state, where folks need to hear what a difference public infrastructure investment could make!). Force those DC press corps people out into the real world, too.
It works, it really works. Cable covers the New Prez like the Beatles. During the last year of his presidency, whenever w came on the telly, two thirds of the viewers CHANGED THE CHANNEL.
Two months from now, the vast majority of the electorate will know that some reps were appointed to the cabinet. They are not going to remember the name of one of the last conservative Congressmen to represent the NE. Hell, the electorate does not even know what the Secretary of Commerce does let alone its relationship to a clause in the Constitution that was not even recognized until the '30s.
Not that I hold any prestige, but I liked your post. A lot.
February 13, 2009 11:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
.
How many times did folks hear this?
Obama:
Let me count the ways...
~OGD~
BTW -- Thanks for the great comment here from Theda. Every now and then folks need an intelligently stated course correction.
February 13, 2009 1:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
So many people, who could not make it to the inauguration, will be thrilled to go out and cheer Obama. Just seeing the man on TV, stringing together sense and dependent clauses, all with that great smile, brings me to tears every time!
He could easily turn out millions of us. If he just asked everyone who wants change to please just go outside and stand in the street with your neighbors, and if google earth took the photos, you'd see blocks and blocks and cities and counties and states of people standing there - proving he's got our support.
February 13, 2009 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
.
Yes but . . .
It would actually exhibit that he has the ability to get neighbor talking to neighbor, and in turn neighbor helping neighbor.
~OGD~
February 13, 2009 1:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gosh, what a side-effect! :)
February 13, 2009 2:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
.
And . . .
I also know you already realize that Thera.
~OGD~
February 13, 2009 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wouldn't it really be thrilling to see your neighbors all responding to such a call? I bet if he did it on the spur of the moment, at dinner time, we'd all be able to show up with a pot luck as well!
You're always one step ahead of me, unless I'm one step ahead of you. But I notice we're always heading in the same direction! :)
February 13, 2009 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Theda Skocpol throws her slops out the window and the people below yell up their thanks - "another smart one by Theda" and "another slam dunk post". Great analysis, great advice from "analysts like" Skocpol who "should have seen this coming"...what in the world prevented her from "seeing this coming"? She tells us that "along with others like Andrew Sullivan" she's completely "amazed at the brazen obstructionism" of the GOP and the media's collusion in their agenda.
The reason why the GOP drives the media is because liberals have failed over the last twenty years to stop the calumnies, the lies, the misrepresentations, the foolish fixation on habits and clothing and speaking abilities of democrats. It was the Andrew Sullivans, the Chris Mathews, the Gene Robinsons, the E.J. Dionnes who either drove the debilitating discourse or failed to speak up while it was going on and contributed to it by ommission and continued to do so during this primary/election season. Chris Mathews "who was almost always right" and "interesting" has now fallen to the complete stupidity of obstructionist, one sided media representations - the same Chris Mathews whose show is and always has been dedicated to the obstructionist, trivialized pursuit of all that is meaningless and unneccesary in political discussion - and Skocpol didn't see this coming. "Like...Andrew Sullivan" she is "amazed" at the obstructionism of the GOP - the same Andrew Sullivan who built his career on obstructionism and the destruction of the democratic party. What should be "amazing" to Skocpol is that Sullivan is amazed when he has facilitated this kind of criticism for more than twenty years.
Now Skocpol tells us that Obama should "get out of Washington D.C.", that to get out and "meet with the people" will reset the media's agenda in reporting and commenting on the political discussion. They'll simply be forced to look outside of D.C. for fresh, new coverage of politics from the advantage of the "town meetings" in fly over country, coverage driven by local media, more informed and less biased than the D.C. media gang.
The "town meetings". This is where Skocpol really starts to fling the slops - she tells us that this is where we can hope to find new strength and belief in this administration - Obama's willingness to take it to the people in town meetings across America. The same "town meetings" that are orchestrated, planned, funded and scripted by political operatives in Washington D.C. - political operatives who plan the stage setting, determine who in the press will have access, who pre-screen the "little people" in the meeting and what questions will be asked and what the answers will be, long before the local media even knows that a meeting will be held. Look out, Washington D.C. elites, your days of setting the political agenda and discourse in this country may well be over - the people rise up in the glorious tradition of the American town hall meeting to ask their scripted questions and receive the scripted answers that will set the elites in this country trembling with fear. These town meetings will also force the media to get out of D.C. - they'll ride in an airplane together, sleep in the same hotel, ride the same press bus to the same meeting and ask the same "little guy" the same questions.
And so Skocpol tells us, the social revolution will begin - all those local officials, the average joe banker and business person, the republicans, the independents, they'll all rise up in a rebirth of that self-empowering vehicle of social change, the local town meeting. That is of course, if those pesky liberal advocacy groups will stop distracting Obama with every little thing like civil rights for all, not some groups, or any other selfish cause such as abortion rights or any other rights these pesky advocacy advocacy groups seem to think are important.
Oh, and Obama, don't hold those "summit meetings" where you bring to D.C. those elites who actually have power and try to sway them or influence them in accepting your plans and programs. Skocpol thinks they're time vampires and open mic nights for criticism by the elites of D.C. According to Skocpol, you don't need to know what the "extremist elites" are thinking and saying, you need to know only what your own political operatives are thinking and what words they're putting into the mouths of the people.
Those in power? Fuhgetaboudem...
February 13, 2009 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. Glad you got that off your chest, BevD. I hope you feel better.
February 13, 2009 3:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why would it make me feel better? What would make me feel better is if "analysts" such as Skocpol would stop trying to bullshit us and herself with the political claptrap of "town meetings" and "taking it to the people". Revolutions are made by the "elitists" and "extremists" not the people. Maybe Skocpol should get out of Harvard yard once in awhile - she's part of the "elites" from ivy league schools who have done more damage to this country than we can ever imagine.
"Elitists" - who's she kidding, she's one of them. For generations now, we've gotten our masters of the universe from these self-absorbed, self-contained elitist schools, where they all think alike because they're all trained alike by the same graduates of the same schools who attend the same conferences with the same people every year, year in and year out.
Where do these elitists in D.C. come from? The same elitist schools who pride themselves on their elite status. Why would Obama change the status quo - he's from it, he was trained by it and that is what he is comfortable with - the last thing they want is advice from the great unwashed.
February 13, 2009 4:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
It sounded like you had a lot of pent up anger and I though maybe blowing off steam would help.
What would you like to see instead of what Theda is suggesting, Bev? What is it that she's "not getting"? I know you were not an Obama fan. Is your problem more with Obama than the elite schools. Bush had people from distinctly non-elite schools and you can see where that got us.
February 13, 2009 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shouldn't everyone be angry? If Skocpol really doesn't understand how these town meetings work, then she shouldn't be giving advice to Obama. If she does know how they work then why is she bullshitting us in representing it as a method for Obama to learn what the little people are thinking?
Don't people think anymore about what they're reading and who is writing it? Don't people read critically and skeptically? Here we have an elitist from an elitist school popping off about the elitists in Washington D.C. Where do you think those elitists come from? Who do you think has been educating them?
Why should intelligent people have to pretend that these so-called town meetings are anything more than prolonged political commercials orchestrated and scripted trained operatives? Why should we put up with such obviously inane comments such as "Chris Mathews...always interesting" slipping into obstructionist political dialogue? He has been entertaining "political obstructionists" on his show for the last TWENTY years - she didn't see this coming? "CNN is almost as bad as FOX", does she think that at one time they weren't and now in light of this latest crisis they've slipped into obstructionist discourse?
Does she not recognize the irony of one elitist lecturing another elitist and instructing him to ignore the elitists? Doesn't anyone else recognize it? The obstruction in our political discourse is that we have completely lost our ability to connect the language of politics to reality. We pretend that events such as political town hall meetings are meaningful and real and elections are decided by the "people" social change comes from the grassroots. If anyone should know better it's Skocpol and if she doesn't then what does that say about the elites who are teaching the elitists?
Why should anyone encourage Obama to engage in phony town hall meetings when what he should be doing is rolling up his sleeves, calling anyone and everyone who might have a way out of this catastrophe and reading every book and paper he can find that might possibly be something other than continuing what he always do - keep throwing money at something and hope a miracle happens.
Why more people aren't angry is a mystery to me.
February 13, 2009 6:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess I don't see things the same way, Bev. Elitism doesn't make me angry because I don't see it as the primary problem we're facing these days.
February 13, 2009 6:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
The primary problem isn't elitism, it's the damage caused by elitists. If you want change, then you have to change the way people think, how they're educated and by whom. The last thing we need is more advice from them.
Stop the corruption, curb the power abuse, enact term limits, reinstate the laws and regulations that curbed the abuse of power, get rid of lobbying and the currying of favour by means of financial reward. Stop throwing more money at the black whole of militarism and invest in something that will give the taxpayer a tangible return like health and education and start telling the people the truth - it is exactly these things that got us into this mess.
February 13, 2009 7:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can you say what you're trying to say in a simpler way? I'm not sure I follow you.
February 13, 2009 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sure, I can put it very plainly. I am sick and tired of being bullshitted by elitists from elitist schools with elitist values and traditions who are part of the very elitist group they are decrying for their out of touch elitism.
Skocpol urges Obama to take it out of D.C. and into small town America with his town meetings - is there anything more elitist than the town meeting organized, structured and screened by political operatives from D.C.?
Skocpol will never get it, because Skocpol is part of the problem.
February 13, 2009 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm thinking that this whole Potemkin-town meeting idea you have may be a little paranoid. Am I being too elitist quoting Potemkin? I'm also thinking dismissing ideas because these people went to a certain school is a bit of prejudice. Obama was a community organizer. He's really been with the unwashed. Now he may have to rub elbows with the DC folks, but that is where things change, or where the changes we want to see come about are made. The other part of the hcange we want involves removing more of the Republicans. If they are not all the same, they did all vote the same in the house and while there were three who could come to terms with the StimPack, they were only reading the writing on the wall since in '08, not a single republican won in New England, whether they were a challenger or an incumbent, there were no winners.
February 13, 2009 6:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is what you took away from my post - I'm prejudiced because "ideas came from the same school". I'm paranoid because I have no faith in the town hall meeting format, I think they may be orchestrated events instead of the Norman Rockwell magazine portrayal.
People don't want change, they want things to go back the way they were, with democrats in charge.
February 13, 2009 6:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are those the only two options? A symphony of appearance by political operatives and Norman Rockwell? Both of those are fantasies.
What are you suggesting? Maybe we should start there rather then characterizing things.
February 13, 2009 6:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, the fantasy is the belief that by holding phony town meetings, Obama is actually going to learn something from the people and that they will learn from him. Without and honest exchange of thoughts and opinions and an unflinching look at how we got here and why, all the phony town meetings in the world aren't going to change anything.
February 13, 2009 7:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess I am not convinced yet these meetings are complete charades. I'm guessing there is some theater there, but that Obama is really listening and then taking actions that he feels are within reach. He has to work with the tools that are in DC. He does not get to replace them all in one gigantic sweep.
February 14, 2009 1:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Wenn das der Führer wüßte"
February 14, 2009 8:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. I think somebody is in dire need of getting laid.
February 13, 2009 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, I didn't say a thing so leave me out of it. OK?
February 13, 2009 6:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
;-)
You're not the only one. My post came very close to causing a self-inflicted wound.
February 13, 2009 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes! If Obama sells the American people on his policies, the disloyal opposition and his own blue dogs will fall in line so fast your head will spin. Or if they don't they will reap the consequences.
What's more, Obama seems to discouraged any outside support. His put-down of General Clark comes to mind. Clarks comments were the last of any comments by anyone but Obama during the campaign that I remember.
There are labor groups and root groups and surrogates who are able and willing to jump in, but it seems they are suppressed - in the interest of what - bi or non partisanship? Or does Obama need to control the message to the point he doesn't trust others?
But instead of Obama/Democrat surrogates the airwaves are awash in rightwingnut surrogates spewing their lies and their hatred every chance they get. So in addition to Obama's personal outreach, he needs to let loose some of the other people who can help him sell.
February 13, 2009 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Theda, While I too don't quite get how a smart woman like you can be "amazed by the brazen obstructionism... of the GOP leaders" -- whatelse could we expect from them? I think you are genrally on the right track with this post. People have hungered for a leader that asks us to participate, take responsiblity and be accountable. We've got one and now we have to do our part. Yes, he should get out into the communities talk to people and deal with the local leaders, Repub or Dem, who have to deal with these problems and are motivated to solve them in order to stay in office. He and his supporters need to at least try to help the media face it's serious shortcomings in providing honest reporting backed by serious research, rather relying on the "opinions" of the same self agrandizing egomaniacs who will say anything -- the more outrageous the better-- to get air time. What I've tried to do in a small way is to use e-mail to immediately challenge every instance that I spot of mistatement or an anchor allowing a blatant falsehood to go unchallenged. One person writing e-mails won't make a great difference, but if everyone who observed an example of this shoddy work by the news meida contacted the networks, and if they don't respond the sponsors, then eventually it may make a difference. It's crystal clear that if we want a better world each of us is going to have to work for it and do everything possible to help this president in what is a gargantuan job. It's been less than 4 weeks, it's a new job and the list of problems to be addressed is almost beyond belief. He can't do it alone so we'd all better do our part. We also have to give him a little space to find his way and undertand that people who take risks (and now is really the time when we need a risk taker with new ideas) will make mistakes and the best of them will learn from those mistakes. He is trying to do his part, we need to do ours.
February 13, 2009 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hope that Obama is greeted everywhere with the clanging of pots and pans like the people of Iceland did. Naomi Klein talks about the outrage around the world from Latvia to Greece concerning the awful stimulus packages that are rewarding the same old finance real estate construction cabals. http://www.alternet.org/workplace/125566/naomi_klein%3A_public_revolt_builds_against_rip-off_rescue_plans_for_the_economy/
I want to see more real outrage and real democracy, but watching orchestrated Town Meetings with Oprah like give-aways to the needy is creepy and smacks of what Sheldon Wolin calls "inverted totalitarianism" i.e. it looks like democracy but it is all a controlled image and message. Creepy.
It's time to retire all these pundits who have had their day. Time for new voices. Read Glenn Greenwald today for a real eye opener about who is controlling whom. http://www.alternet.org/workplace/126867/obama_and_liberals%3A_a_counter-productive_relationship/?page=3
February 13, 2009 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sheesh, bringing outsiders to DC to discuss responsibility is a BAD idea???
Giving a voice to all sides is a BAD idea???
Letting fools show their foolishness in public debate instead of using whisper campaigns and media hacks to distance themselves from their foolish corruption is a BAD idea?
Maybe your post is a bad joke.
February 13, 2009 4:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Presidents are like sharks they have to keep running their campaign or die of suffocation
February 13, 2009 6:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
A few initial thoughts
I would be interested in what "every little priority of liberal advocacy groups" refers to concretely. It would be interesting to see what "liberal" priorities should be 'deprioritized'. It is not that I oppose the idea, I'd just like to know WHICH of these priorities should take the back burner.
Second, the idea of holding 'summits' outside of Washington DC, like holding an "economic summit" in the 'rust belt' and so forth, implicit in the column, is a very good one. And I agree that when Governors like Crist shock their fellow GOPers with their statements about something like the stimulus bill, Obama shouldn't hesitate to underscore this victory by appearing with them together on national TV (whether they come to DC or, preferably, Obama goes to FL is less important). The "bipartisan" consensus Obama spoke of was ALWAYS a contrast between the people and the polarized political elites. It is amazing how many columnists write as if Obama, now called "Bam" in the NY Post, didn't know that Washington politics was polarized, and that he is now 'learning his lesson'. There may be a grain of truth (as in the hope of 80 Senate votes) to this, but goals and fact expectations should not be equated by the talking heads of the media.
Third, it is up to PROGRESSIVES to mobilize, and grab media attention. We can be just as newsworthy, IF we mobilize in a mass way. So far what I have seen is fragmented efforts among progressives, many of the efforts (like Progressive States Network) quite excellent, but nothing unifying, as the Rainbow Coalition was. It is HERE that the idea of conflicting priorities -- and a broad vision -- needs to be worked out strategically before we can expect a progressive overall program out of DC
February 14, 2009 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink