Stupid Question Number One
[This is post is not mine, but quoted in it's entirety from Aron's Israel Peace Weblog]
"What should Israel do? Just sit on its hands while Hezbollah rains missles on it?"Answer: Exactly! The statement that Hezbollah has been constantly attacking Israel over the past six years is just a big lie. Since Israel withdrew from Lebanon, the border has been quite calm, except for very minor incidents and skirmishes.
It was precisely the calm border that was putting Sheikh Nasrallah under increasing international pressure to disarm. His main excuse not to, was that Hezbollah needed arms to defend Lebanon against Israeli agression. But what is he defending if no attacks on Lebanon are taking place?
Nasrallah also prides himself in scrupulously abiding by international law and only responding to "Zionist provocations." In fact, Hezbollah did start this incident by firing some Katyushas and capturing the Israeli soldiers. But the massive Israeli attack gave him the legitimacy to respond to Israeli violence with counter-violence. When he bombs Haifa and Israeli gun-boats, when his soldiers fight against Israeli ground troops, he can now honestly claim he is defending Lebanon against Israeli attacks.
The best Israeli response would have been a diplomatic one - to use this incident to point out that Hezbollah is armed to the teeth and out of control. Israel's restraint would have put Hezbullah in a bad light, and legitimized the central government's demands against Hezbullah. The international community could strengthen the Lebanese government and help it disarm Hezbullah, without it being seen as a "collaborator" with Israel.
Force is always an option. In fact, the threat of force is usually far more effective than its actual use. But Israel never said, "put your arms down or else." Instead, Israel acted like a big, scared bully and started firing in all directions. The result is that Israel, not Hezbullah, is seen as out of control and the Lebanese central government has been weakened. Despite the anger of many Lebanese against Hezbullah, many more support its actions. It will be far more difficult to bring pressure to bear to disarm Hezbullah now, since it is once more basking in its role as the defender of "Arab honor" against "Zionist aggression." Any government trying to disarm Hezullah, will be seen as "collaborating with the Zionists."





I would just like to correct the answer. Hezbollah did and admits to kidnapping the soldiers, but Israel threw the first bomb. That was their response. You kidnap our soldiers and we kill your innocent civilians. That just doesn't seem just to me. I don't think that this has anything to do with Hezbollah(except for the fact that they prevent Israel from expanding their stolen property into Lebanon). This kidnapping was the excuse that Israel was waiting for to attack Lebanon again. Maybe the Jews are running out of room on the Palestinians' land, so they need some of the Lebanese land. Give it some time and the world will consist of only America and Israel and only of the people that they approve.
July 24, 2006 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Understand, I'm talking about Israel, not "The Jews."
If I've got no patience with zionist bullshit I've got even less with sloppy white wise-assery. watch your mouth.
But while you're here: read my friend Em.
July 24, 2006 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
No Hezbollah hasn't been constantly attacking Israel. Why, before the latest incident, Hezbollah hadn't launched a rocket attack for almost a month.
http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F10810FE345A0C7A8EDDAC0894DE404482
July 24, 2006 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Flyovers? Israeli kidnappings? Shebaa farms? The occupation? Gaza?
And give me a link I don't have to pay to read.
July 24, 2006 4:33 PM | Reply | Permalink