They hugged?
I really think we need to come up with a different classification for people that would do something like this in the name of the same Christ I also serve. I mean, how is this at all Christian?
Sarah Hepola from Broadsheet (look out for the pun in that title) expounds:
...well, whom God made them to be.
After a Lutheran school expelled two 16-year-old girls for having "a bond of intimacy" that was "characteristic of a lesbian relationship," the girls sued, contending the school had violated a state anti-discrimination law.One of the attorneys arguing for the girls said that the court has essentially given these schools license to discriminate, and I have to agree. But that's only the superficial part of this, to me. This school did this because not because these girls vandalized the property, got into a fight or cut a class. They did it because they felt these girls were sinners and they wanted them cast from their midst. (Sorry for the biblical language, but apparently these people think that God loves all of His children - except the gay ones.)
The girls were expelled in their junior year for "conducting themselves in a manner consistent with being lesbians," said McKay, who added that the girls never disclosed their sexual orientation during the litigation. Hanson said the girls had been "best friends" and, citing their privacy, declined to discuss their sexual orientation. They are now in college, he said.
The dispute started when a student at the school told a teacher in 2005 that one of the girls had said she loved the other. The student advised the teacher to look at the girls' MySpace pages. One of the girls was identified as bisexual on her MySpace page, the other's page said she was "not sure" of her sexual orientation.
McKay said the website also contained a photograph of the girls hugging.
According to the principal, who called each girl out of class separately, both admitted they had hugged and kissed each other and told other students they were lesbians. The girls said they admitted only that they loved each other as friends.
Sarah Hepola from Broadsheet (look out for the pun in that title) expounds:
So, OK: It's a private school that wants to uphold a certain religious ethos. (The school is associated with the same religious denomination as Republican Rep. Michele Bachmann.) Should they be allowed to discriminate based on their shame-based ethos? I'll leave that for the courts to decide. (A lawyer for the girls hopes to take the case to the California Supreme Court.) But at a time when our school system is so embattled -- fingers crossed, economic stimulus plan -- and at an age when kids are discovering themselves and in the very place you might hope adults would be trying to sheperd them into an adult world, it's just a damn shame that a school would spend its valuable resources on this kind of witch hunt.Many often cite Matthew 7:1, often paraphrased as "Judge not, lest ye be judged". But you have to look deeper. Read on:
1 "Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.Considering that the church has had so many specks in its eyes, nose and mouth with regard to repressed homosexuality over the years, I have always found it sickly ironic how fervently they seek to judge those courageous enough to be whom...
3 "Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4 How can you say to your brother, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye.
...well, whom God made them to be.
Advertisement





Cross-posted at 1,369 lightbulbs.
January 28, 2009 5:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your link just brings me back to this post...
January 28, 2009 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
My bad. Here you go.
January 28, 2009 6:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yikes! I told lisb and barefooted I loved them the other night, does that mean we're lesbians?
January 28, 2009 6:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, guys...should have asked before I pulled y'all out of the closet with me!
January 28, 2009 6:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love you, still!
January 28, 2009 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Love your neighbor" those two girls learned. But I guess they were supposed to know never to say it out loud?
January 28, 2009 7:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I suggest the two girls, and other sexual deviates take their education needs to some institution which condones such licentious behavior.
It's a religious school. If you don't like it, don't attend. Otherwise, keep your overly long nose hung out over your own business.
January 28, 2009 8:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are cute. Are you Single?
January 28, 2009 9:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
We belong to opposing tribes.
January 28, 2009 9:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tribe? miguelitoh20 may or may not belong to a tribe; you however belong to a cult and represent yourself as belonging to my tribe. You are either a fibber and a cheat, or just ignorant and deluded.
January 28, 2009 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
...our tent isn't that big!
January 28, 2009 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
No wonder you're such a big free house proponent.
January 29, 2009 4:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice post Sci and good to see you back round these parts :)
January 28, 2009 9:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Much appreciated, sista. Hope you're well.
January 29, 2009 3:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
You only have to look as deep as their tax-exempt status and the political nature of their actions.
January 28, 2009 9:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Those girls would fit right in that religous school sponsered by Obama's church.
I understand the official school cheer at sporting events is "Rah Rah Rah, G*d damn America, Rah Rah Rah, G*d damn America"
January 28, 2009 10:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
You plan to persuade anyone? Or do you just like to piss people off? Care to define non-deviant sex? Can you prove you have only the purest church-approved desires?
Final question: why do people continually risk ostracism and worse for these "deviant" desires? Some choice. They must be way more fun than majority-style sex, to risk death in some parts of the world!
January 28, 2009 10:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, yeah, I may be a bit unsympathetic toward Jeffery Dahmer and his broad cohort of diviants, risking their lives pursuing their 'deviant desires'. Yeah, I see where you're coming from. Hope you don't live anywhere close.
January 29, 2009 9:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Most serial killers are hetero, and most serial rapists ditto. I'll see your Dahmer and raise you Son of Sam, along with Zodiac. Dahmer has nothing to do with anything, as a statistical outlier.
You dodge my question, and have nothing useful to say.
January 29, 2009 4:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
The irony of this poster using the picture and name of a woman is beyond, well....ironic to say the least.
A Democrat...really? Our tent is big, but it's not THAT big.
January 28, 2009 11:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
The irony? ... just ANOTHER republican, gay-bashing, homosexual tranny.
The gift that keeps on giving.
January 28, 2009 11:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Renaye, darling, next time you see Tom Metzger, tell him I said Heil! Ooops, I mean Hi!
January 28, 2009 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Renaye belongs to this church because it's pastor is as pure as the given snow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fibl2A3Ai7o
January 29, 2009 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
People, don't bother replying to people like this. When something this blatantly prejudiced is posted, just hit "Report Abuse" and move on.
January 29, 2009 1:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is good stuff Scientific.
You know, Science is back in now, did you hear?
January 29, 2009 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hola, Scientific.
Pointing out the hypocrisy of some religious organizations is really just too easy a target for your considerable skills. However, it's always nice to see it laid out in such stark terms. Rec'd.
January 29, 2009 11:34 AM | Reply | Permalink