My Local Paper Has Lost Its Mind
The front page of The Mobile Press-Register, above the fold, reads this: AMERICA NEEDS TO WAKE UP. It's an editorial from the publisher of the paper--Mr. Howard Bronson Jr. This is what he writes--on the front page, mind you, above the fold.
Easter editorial: America needs to wake up
Sunday, April 12, 2009Editor's note: The following editorial was written by Press-Register Publisher Howard Bronson Jr.
On this Easter, let's all sit back and look at where we've come from, where we are today and where we're going in the future and, hopefully, get back to our roots and ask for God's help in directing us through these stormy times.
For the past century, America has been the guardian and protector of freedom around the world. We have sacrificed blood and treasure to save Europe twice. We have freed the people of Bosnia. We have freed the people of Iraq. We have stood up against totalitarianism in Vietnam, and stood down the Soviet empire during the Cold War.
We are currently involved in a war on terror that was brought upon us because radical militants in the name of al-Qaida decided that we are the devil incarnate and need to be wiped off the face of the Earth.
We are the most generous country on the face of the Earth -- not only to our own people in remarkable charitable giving, but in an abundance of charity around the world through our foreign aid. We have been the economic engine of the world that has provided not only for the United States the greatest prosperity in the history of the universe, but the greatest growth and prosperity of any land.
We are currently at the most dangerous time in the history of this country. We have rogue states with missiles and nuclear devices that can threaten the world, and our response is to cut back our missile defense.
We have an economic downturn in this country brought on by politicians who are not motivated by the good of the country, but by their greed to be re-elected. Their behavior is just short of treason. Does anyone remember Karl Marx said that we would destroy ourselves from within?
Our economic troubles were brought on by a political class that, in order to buy votes, decided everybody should have a home whether they could afford it or not. It was a nice sentiment, but one that could only lead to a housing bubble when the bills came due. The result has been the collapse of the housing market and the economic downturn.
Now we have an administration whose dream is to install every social program that any liberal has ever dreamed of into our American way of life -- the same programs that have socialized and stagnated Europe's economy for years. The cost of these programs, as analyzed by the Congressional Budget Office, would take the sum of all the deficits run by all of the presidents up to this current time, and double it.
The game plan for this administration is clear: Institute all of these social welfare programs, run up a tremendous debt and then let inflation pay down that debt with our savings.
The net result will be that all the people who have worked, been responsible and saved will lose everything that they have accumulated. Taxes on our children and grandchildren will have to be so high to maintain these programs that the standard of living in this country will have to go down.
We are on the verge of possibly destroying the greatest experiment in democracy, free enterprise and wealth creation the world has ever known.
If ever there was a time to ask for God's help and direction, it's now. We need to pray for leaders who will step forward, tell the American people the truth and not just what they want to hear, consistently stand up to the lies that are told by others and be prepared to take the criticism that will surely come, but remain steadfast because they know that they are doing the right thing for the common good -- not only for this country, but for the world.
Once I was done reading it, I read it again--still in shock. All I could think of was all the angry locals screaming "Amen!" I decided I needed to write a response. They probably won't publish it. But they've published my letters before, so I thought it was my responsibility. I want to share with the Cafe Community what I wrote. At least here, I know my work won't be cast aside as liberal bullshit.
Mr. Bronson,So that's all. I gave it my best. I wish I could do better. But I feel like I've done my part.
This morning I read your editorial. I take issue with the two central premises and the conclusion. Premise 1: The administration's game plan is to "run up tremendous debt and then let inflation pay down that debt with our savings." You misconstrue the purpose. Have you seen the unemployment numbers? We are near 9% right now, and that only takes into account those who report themselves as unemployed to the federal government. That ignores those who have given up looking for work, those who are under worked--wanting to work more, and those who simply have not officially claimed themselves jobless.
What you neglect is that free market principles assume full employment. Without full employment, concepts like 'debt', 'savings', and 'inflation' are worthless. If unemployment continues to grow, then the customer will continue to withdraw. If the customer continues to withdraw then more and more businesses will be unable to maintain their employee's wages. This degeneration produces a cycle which--if not attacked by tremendous force--will spell the end of our social fabric. Inflation ought not be your primary concern. If unemployment spirals out of control, then it is deflation which you ought to fear. As demand for goods and services becomes more and more unaffordable, businesses will be forced to lower prices further and further. The result will be a supply of goods and services worth near nothing. Government spending, therefore, is an absolute necessity. You may disagree with the way in which the administration is spending--and that is fair, but that they are spending unprecedented amounts is quite rational.
Premise 2: "the net result will be that all the people who have worked, been responsible and saved will lose everything that they have accumulated." Again, you assume that inflation is the great threat. You must remember that the great threat--because of unemployment--is deflation. If the government does not spend unprecedented amounts, then the value of all our goods and services will plummet. If that happens, then everything all the people have accumulated will be worthless anyway!
Conclusion: "pray for leaders who will step forward, tell the American people the truth and not just what they want to hear." Well then let me start. The law of supply and demand is the foundation of free market theory. When demand drops to dangerous levels, the market drops to dangerous levels. The most rational option, then, is to supply demand. And the federal government is the only entity which can do that right now. Once unemployment is under control, then entrepreneurship can retake the helm. But until that time, the federal government has to take the wheel.
Michael B. Hill
















Great response, MBH. You've definitely done your part. Bronson sounds like he's related to Bachmann, btw.
April 12, 2009 9:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
HAHAHA!!! So true. Next up: armed revolt!
April 12, 2009 10:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
MBH: I feel your pain.
Two years of living on the Gulf (in Pensacola) reading this kind of editorial, unable to escape Fox news -- which played everywhere, including the post office -- was close to driving me away, anyway, even before Ivan.
Let us know if your letter is published, and what response it elicits.
You're a brave man.
April 12, 2009 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oops. Response is below.
April 12, 2009 10:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you! My family used to have a home on Santa Rosa Island. Erin and Opal took care of that. But, you're so right. Fox (and accompanying mindset) is everywhere 'round these parts.
April 12, 2009 10:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Great response. Taught me a few things.
April 12, 2009 10:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you Viva!
April 12, 2009 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
At least you still you have a newspaper. Which seems better? A newspaper with these kinds of ideas or no newspaper at all?
April 12, 2009 11:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
To tell you the truth, I would rather no paper than a paper which serves to push propaganda. Wouldn't you?
April 12, 2009 11:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Although I read the internet I think many people in small towns need a newspaper for a sense of their community. The small local news seem really trivial when on the screen.
April 12, 2009 12:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree that a local paper provides a sense of community. But if its abused, then it's no longer about community. It's about an agenda.
April 12, 2009 4:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ten to one that my local paper picks up this editorial and runs it here this week.
Yes, Fox News is usually on at my U.S. Postal Service office too.
Happy Easter to All!!
April 12, 2009 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
That kind of begs the question...why are there televisions running in Post Offices? Is that what our higher priced stamps pay for? I can't even stand the overhead MUSAK in my Dr's office. If you have to wait on line, many of us would like to be able to read; or heaven forbid -- think quietly to ourselves!
April 12, 2009 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not to break you wings or whatever but isn't that spelled MUZAK?
It has so much more Pizazzzz that way.
April 12, 2009 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I speleed it ever whcih way, and it never looked rite. Thanks!
No matter how it looks, Muzak sounds terrible!
PS - That Luna moth was on my front door last Spring. Isn't it beautiful? They are getting rarer and rarer.
April 12, 2009 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
CVille, that is really cool. I assumed it was out of a National Geographic! Great picture!
April 12, 2009 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm printing off your reply and using it for reference. Please let us know when they print your excellent rebuttal.
In our small community, we too have the same sense about our paper which in truth is really the publisher's 'newsletter'. (i.e. This week, little news but five out of eight pages were pictures of local athletic events and the 'paper' only publishes every other week!)
I believe it's the type of abuse you've cited that is the reason many do not bemoan those that are ceasing publication.
Where have all the journalists gone? Long time passing.
Thanks MBH rec'd.
April 12, 2009 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you Aunt Sam! You're so right. Journalism is like another branch of government. Without a well informed populace, the right people will never become legislators. I think we're getting there though Auntie!!!
April 12, 2009 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
There is nothing like making the facts fit your cherished prejudices, and this editorial gets an A for its efforts in promoting exceptionalism and racism all in one shot.
Your response was brilliantly limited to the economics of unemployment and inflation, but I wish someone would take on the bigotry that runs rampant in the beginning paragraphs, also. I hate to see it just left unchallenged.
Let us know if you get an airing.
April 12, 2009 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great point. I just wanted to stay a single tracked as possible--hoping it would get me a better chance of publication. But you're right, it's laced with extreme prejudice.
I'll be sure to let you know if it's published.
April 12, 2009 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good Letter.
I hope Bronson's letter gave you a big push to the permanent left. *;o)
April 12, 2009 2:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
HAHA!!! My definition of 'center' is far left in most people's book. I just think that progressive politics ought to be central in politics.
April 12, 2009 4:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
You missed the most egregious flaw in the editorial:
If ever there was a time to ask for God's help and direction, it's now.
There is no time when it is appropriate to deny our own responsibilities and to beg an Invisible Superman to save us from our own foibles.
April 12, 2009 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good point Tankard. That really hit me hardest the first time I read through. But I wanted to keep my response as matter-of-fact as possible--in hopes of getting published.
April 12, 2009 4:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's really nice of you to say.
April 12, 2009 7:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Go away, kid. Yer outa yer league.
April 12, 2009 7:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
The "Invisible Superman" tag was a new one for me. Are you mocking people for believing in God?
April 12, 2009 8:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't mean to be offensive, Bill. I really don't but I don't think you and I have much to offer each other in the way of debate. Please try not to bother people, but if that is not in the realm of your capability, please bother someone else.
April 12, 2009 9:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are you mocking people for believing in God? Is that what your comment was meant to do?
April 12, 2009 10:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's an old Russian expression, "Pray to God, but keep rowing." I'm sick and tired of people believing because they prayed they don't have any other responsibilities for anyone else. "Hey! I sent you prayers! You can't get any better then that?!?!" Yeah, how about a hot meal and a dry place to sleep. I sold my house, my car, and my child died of cancer anyway. Then they sent my job to China. You prayed for me? Yeah, that's great."
April 13, 2009 3:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's not what was said in the article. I believe Tankard was taking it out of context. It was asked that people pray to God to ask for help and direction. That's not the same as telling people to sit back and relax because God will make everything alright. Even Presidents have said things like this before.
April 13, 2009 6:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Praying and asking for direction suggests there needs to be an answer before anything can be done. I am proposing people will be waiting a really long time for the answer. I would also suggest that based on partisan demonization, that the "answers from God" might be ignored even if they were incredibly obvious.
Will the Reich celebrate that not one, but three perfect shots found their mark on the high seas to liberate a brave Captain? I'll be waiting.
If the Right had any real patriotic sense, and could recognize that it was this country of liberals AND conservatives that just pulled off this amazing feat, they would be celebrating in the streets. I'll be waiting.
Instead we hear of Americans who are not real, and that people should be armed and dangerous. We are threated with the destruction of America on the front page.
April 13, 2009 1:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree that asking for God's help and direction implies that there needs to be an answer before anything can be done. Lots of presidents, including the current one, have asked people to pray for God's help.
April 13, 2009 8:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
We were not alking about what the President is asking. We were discussing what the publisher is asking.
April 13, 2009 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
ok - sorry I brought up the President. But that doesn't change the fact that the publisher is asking for God's help. That's not the same thing as asking for God to come down from the skies and do the work for us. It's pretty common for people to say such things.
I didn't appreciate Tankard's sarcastic comment
April 14, 2009 12:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good defense, Bill.
April 14, 2009 3:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nicely done letter -- well reasoned and reasonable. That must have been tough. Especially when you got to the part about the Holy Savior coming down on a cloud to drop a wad at the mall.
My general reaction to screeds tends to be apoplectic rage. Let fury have the hour, as Joe Strummer said. That's why I generally avoid the toxic editorial page in my South Carolina local newspaper-- hell, I usually cut out the Sudoku and consign the rest to the recycling bin.
But you're making me reconsider. Maybe I should actually read the paper, including the op-eds, and respond like an engaged citizen. Thanks for the inspiration.
April 12, 2009 4:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Recommended for deciding to speak up and take a stand.
April 12, 2009 4:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Blue, thank you! It's hard to do. Because the opinions are so uninformed. I find it teaches one patience. I promise I really want to say, "you local idiots, this non-sense is hurting the country." It's great practice to calmly and matter-of-factly approach a rebuttal.
April 12, 2009 4:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is why your avatar is a Zen garden and mine is a ludicrous cartoon villain. Rock and be mindful, my brother.
April 12, 2009 5:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
My response would have been shorter.
Dear Mr. Bronson,
Thank you for taking the time to reveal that your newspaper is run by narrow-minded non-intellectuals, with you at the helm, for the benefit of the ever-decreasing segment of the population that feels the same way you do and will ignore any reality in the service of your prejudices.
I always felt that your newspaper might, despite its right-wing editorial bias, report the news in an unbiased fashion. Your choice to run this fact-free, offensive opinion piece above the fold on the front page, where news should be, demonstrates what a false hope that was.
I can find my news elsewhere. Please cancel my subscription.
April 12, 2009 6:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
If they don't publish mine, I'll use that one. Great call!
April 12, 2009 7:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks.
If you haven't done so you may want to check out what Harper's Scott Horton has to say about newspapers in Alabama, especially as they relate to the Don Siegelman (Sigelman?) case. Pretty interesting stuff.
April 13, 2009 12:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
recommended... well done!
April 12, 2009 7:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you Jade! I greatly appreciate it!
April 12, 2009 7:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
MBH - I must say that I mainly agree with the editor. I don't disagree with you that the government must spend money to recussitate the patient, but the size of this spending is bigger than we've ever seen.
If Obama's plan was to simply get the economy to recover and create net new jobs, he wouldn't need a spending bill this large.
April 12, 2009 7:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree that it's larger than we've ever seen. But I wonder why you think less would be sufficient?
I think you're assuming that the money spent is simply going out and is then gone. I think it's more appropriate to think of the money spent as investment.
April 12, 2009 8:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's only an investment if we get something back. And nothing I've seen so far makes me very optimistic about our potential return. Congress has a very bad track record at their return on invested capital.
Our spending under Bush and the prior Congress had already been growing at an extremely alarming rate and we didn't see improvements in important areas like financial regulation or education. Now it feels like we're just throwing more money at the problems. And we haven't even started with healthcare yet.
April 12, 2009 8:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
So how much spending would you consider sufficient?
April 12, 2009 8:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well I have not seen any real detail on where all the new spending is going and what of the old spending is being redirected or optimized. I look at the historical growth in spending and wonder if we need to increase this large base so dramatically. Nothing I've seen or read would indicate that the size of Obama's budget is an "appropriate" size and not too big.
I look at the projected deficit and national debt both as a % of GDP and compare that to where we've been under prior recessions.
We've had to spend our way out of prior recessions in the early 80's, early 90's, mid 70's, etc.
During all these other recessions post WW-II, our Deficit/GDP has ranged 2-6% area. Now with Obama it's going to go north of 10%.
And our debt/GDP - it has historically been in the 40-70% range. Obama's plan takes this up to the high end of that range.
I get even more scared when watching Meet The Press today and very left-leaning guests from NPR said they were worried about the size of the national debt under Obama's plans. Yikes
April 12, 2009 9:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I sent the editorial to a conservative friend of mine. He and I have been having a heated email debate this weekend. He says he wants me to know that opinions like this exist, that there are people with "real concerns," that some think Obama is a "Marxist" and some are still worried about his "Muslim background."
I can't figure out what his point is. He says he doesn't agree with them, that he's just reporting it to me. Why? I know these opinions exist. Fine. So does garbage. Both are parts of a modern society.
These people probably still believe the Clintons killed Vince Foster. They certainly didn't voice any objections to the Bush presidency. In God's name, why would I take anything they have to say remotely seriously?
Millions of people think we're on the wrong track. Big effin deal -- that's their right. They're also a pretty small minority. They lost. We won. They screwed up. We're fixing it. What they're really scared of isn't that we're wrong but that we're right.
April 12, 2009 7:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Doc, that's a great point. Wow! That is their greatest fear. That we are right. Unless they are absolutely insane, they know that their policies destroyed the economy. In order to overlook that fact, they must focus all attention on the ideas of the left as incorrect. That's all they have left. If we are correct, then what? Admit fault? Totally detach from reality?
You're right Doc, they're scared to death.
April 12, 2009 8:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
My Guest Column in the Stuart (FL) News today
[RE The "Republican Tea Party"]
Some are undeniably reluctant to come to terms with a new American Agenda, uncomfortable with priorities that place health-care solutions for citizens ahead of corporate welfare. Americans said no to energy policy created behind locked doors. Consumers noticed when secret energy policy produced record-setting energy prices, while equally shortsighted policies handed out tax benefits to corporations that sent jobs overseas. All the while real wages spiraled down.
Voters rejected politicians who had one slogan for every problem for eight agonizing years, more unchecked corporate welfare and tax cuts, tax cuts, tax cuts, for the rich.
More than 69 million Americans said yes to President Obama's priorities. Education spending that will make college affordable for an additional 3.8 million low- and moderate-income college students, in his first budget year.
We were happy to hear that, once again, the needs of citizens were on the table. Candidate Obama offered this on health care: "Every American has the right to affordable, comprehensive and portable health coverage. My plan will ensure that all Americans have health-care coverage through their employers, private health plans, the federal government, or the states." Americans said emphatically ... yes.
Budget director Peter Orszag characterized President Obama's budget priorities this way: "(Our budget) will bolster education and clean-energy priorities while also providing for an overhaul of the health-care system." We welcome an administration whose energy policy isn't hypnotized by the fossil fuel industry. Green America is a policy for the future; drilling in every national park is no longer Job One.
One last thought: It's a poor parody of the original revolutionary Boston Tea Party, when the party that has been tone deaf to deficits, tone deaf to Katrina victims, unable to find money for Walter Reed Hospital and veterans' needs, suddenly notices budget deficits. Were they concerned about tax money lost to war profiteering? Did they investigate or prosecute any of the no-bid contracts? When the small-government crowd built the largest U.S. embassy ever, in Iraq, was there no outcry for the poor taxpayer's pennies then?
April 12, 2009 8:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
The only people who say their taxes rise were those making over $250K, and that was simply to return them to the rate they paid during Clinton. Our economy wasn't all that bad then. What's their point?
April 13, 2009 3:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think where your argument with Mr. Bronson falls apart is where you fail to realize what he, probably inadvertently, let slip in his 'editorial'. That being that he has obviously had direct contact with extraterrestrial life forms as revealed in his statement: "We have been the economic engine of the world that has provided not only for the United States the greatest prosperity in the history of the universe, but the greatest growth and prosperity of any land". It's hard to argue with someone with that much information at his beck and call. ;)
Great blog MBH, and along the lines of calling on dieties... Bless you for writing the letter. Let's see if he's man enough to print it.
April 12, 2009 10:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
HAHAHA!!! I know, I felt my knowledge severely limited in comparison to this fellow. My judgments are limited to a few hypotheticals within one country on one planet. This guy has awareness of the economic situations and the United State's impact in all galaxies!
Why would they publish my paper? My scope can't compete with his!!!
Gracias Miguel.
April 13, 2009 9:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good job!!!
April 13, 2009 8:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you RonP!
April 13, 2009 9:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
I find some of the positions taken by some of the columnists in my local paper to be "reality challenged" also :)
April 13, 2009 9:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
tlees, maybe there should be a journalist evaluation equivalent to a driver's test. If you can't pass, you can't legally write. :)
April 13, 2009 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
"This degeneration produces a cycle which--if not attacked by tremendous force--will spell the end of our social fabric."
The deflationary spiral you fear will spell the end of our social fabric?? I would challenge that as gross exaggeration, while at the same time challenging whether our current social fabric ought to be saved. Overconsumption based on insane borrowing... this is the economic face of the fabric you wish to preserve?
"If the government does not spend unprecedented amounts, then the value of all our goods and services will plummet."
There is some truth in that, but it's also reactionary and not the whole truth of the matter. It's not value but price which plummets. Values may shift because of price shifts, but that's a separable factor. The problem is that inflation and deflation are not uniform and universal - they don't "float all boats".
And while deflation is staring us in the face, whether for better or worse, in the long run it is consumer price inflation related to monetary inflation (Fed printing money thus making money too plentiful and eroding the full faith and credit of the government which backs money) which is a big and legit worry to many.
So, I'm not clear on what cause you are supporting in your reply to the editor.
April 14, 2009 3:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's right to call "the end of our social fabric" a gross exaggeration.
Price plummets and then value likely follows as a by-product of the price plummeting. I think that's correct. I did not develop that premise as patiently as I wish I had.
Inflation is a long-term concern. I would agree with that. What my reply is aiming at is the notion that "inflation" is the means towards economic recovery. I'm attempting to argue that employment is the means towards recovery. If spending and inflation are by-products of spurring the labor market, then so be it. But the administration's game plan is not inflation. That's what I intended to be the main thrust of my argument--employment as means to recovery, not inflation.
April 14, 2009 6:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think price can lead value or vice versa. People stop valuing stuff so the price drops. The supply goes up, then competition can drive the price down if the market is elastic.
Unemployment is important in some ways, not so in others. Given the massive safety net of Unemployment insurance, unemployment is not as hard on the economy as it would have been in the 30s. I hear people get 60% for awhile. That keeps spending going a fair amount.
If only Obama were serious about employment in the near term. The stimulus package won't peak in effect for another 12 months or more.
April 14, 2009 10:03 PM | Reply | Permalink