« A publicly optional quiz | San Fernando Curt's Blog | Why NATO? »

Stiffed by the TARP stiffs


The wolf was at the door again last night...

I could tell from the trail of unpaid TARP receipts left behind on the front walk this morning.

For all the hardball squeezing banks put their customers through, compounding costly penalities and late fees on every tardy payment, they sure don't bust their asses reimbursing federal bailout money they've gotten over the past year.

The number of banks that didn't make their monthly dividend payments on TARP funds skyrocketed to 29 in August, up from 18 in May. Banks can choose not to make payments during a given month, allowing the dividends owed to accumulate unpaid. Failure to pay may be a sign of financial distress. Obviously banks that are short of capital may decide to retain funds rather than pay off the TARP. [Source: The Business Insider]

Try this sometime: Tell your bank you can't make the mortgage payment this month because you're short of capital on, say, the grocery bill, and you need to retain funds. Next, get a stopwatch and time how soon it takes the bank to begin foreclosure process on your address.

Easy bet - it'll be faster than you can say "too big to fail".

Those titans that have emerged from the post-9/15/08 wreckage to be our new Croesean Overlords of Amercan Finance have been trumpeting their own swift TARP repayment schedules, although, oddly, none have fully repaid. The May "stress test" didn't exactly show the banking sector booming back after the meltdown, muting boasts by Goldman Sachs and other banks that they'd pay off the government money real, real soon. BB&T's yappy self-congratulation that it's on the verge of making it's final repayment installment has been repeated so long it's been relegated to the "believe it when I see it" cellar, along with bug-eyed alien anal probers and an NFL team for L.A.

Truth is, it may never be paid back. As Robert Reich points out today, Wall Street's current boom is nothing more than a Ponzi facade, a flimsy rally boosted temporaily by cheap money and shrinking overhead caused by... job cuts. That's right, the brokers are toasting unemployment lines as short-lived boon. But when the companies continue shrinking because jobless consumers can't buy their gimcracks, the high-rolling pyramid scheme will fall flatter than Bernard Madoff's credit rating.

The market coughs, the banking industry catches a cold, and we taxpayers come down with cholera.

In Senate testimony last month, TARP watchdog Neil Barofsky said,

Treasury is unlikely to get back the full amount of money lent under the Troubled Asset Relief Program despite a recent spate of repayments from large banks... The program "played a significant role" in rescuing the financial system from a meltdown... But it was "extremely unlikely that the taxpayer will see a full return on its TARP investment," according to his prepared testimony.

(Yale Finance Professor William Goetzmann) said "The intent of TARP investment was not that it was a great investment for the U.S. taxpayer," Goetzmann said. "The intent was to save the U.S. financial system, and that was going to cost some money." He said he expected to see differences in repayment emerge among banks of different sizes. Larger banks such as Goldman Sachs, which returned $10 billion in TARP money in July, are all likely to pay back the money fairly soon, but Goetzmann warned that many smaller banks may end up defaulting on their obligations.

Thirty years ago, the federal government began taking caps off interest rates to help American banks recoup losses they'd racked up the previous decade making bad loans to shaky foreign nations. Our banks were left holding the bag when those countries - many of them our banana-republic "allies" - defaulted. But with cooperation of visionary leaders in Washington, the sorry sack was passed to consumers in form of now-legal loanshark "vigorish". Forcing those least likely to afford such a burden the "obligation" of underwriting bad decisions by overpaid, larcenous jackasses has a long, storied history as permanent fixture in American essentia.

Now, big players in the financial industry can go directly to the public till to cover losses, this time for the crap-game "instruments' they sold and couldn't redeem. There are more shoes left to fall, more losses to be posted.

Get ready to be squeezed some more.


24 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Go ahead, boys. Smoke 'em if you got 'em. If ya runs out, we'll bring you more.

Ah, Capitalism! Ain't it Grand?

user-pic

It should come as no surprise that the crooks who run our nation's banking system are stealing from the taxpayers to cover their bad bets. What is horrifying though, is that the alleged political leaders of the Democratic Party from Obama to Pelosi to Reid are allowing this thievery to continue unabated. Not only that, but they have no plans for breaking up the biggest of the banks which constitute a virtually monopoly let alone a threat to our national interest. There is also no plan to even investigate, let alone prosecute the executives responsible for all the fraud and flat out larceny that led to the collapse of our economy. The people have every right to be livid about this looting of the treasury and need to demand that Obama and the rest actually do something about all this before it is too late. It's an outrage that they continue to serve as the lackeys of those fucking criminals while screwing every single one of us little people for the rest of our born days.

user-pic

Interestingly, Bill Moyers has picked up on the Marcy Kaptur thesis (she originally espoused in Michael Moore's "Capitalism: A Love Story") that the meltdown constitutes a financial coup d'etat, and now we're bankers' chattel. I'm trying to think of a worse fate. When I think of one, I'll be sure to post it here. Maybe... I don't know... waking up and finding the frozen head of Ted Williams in my bed?

user-pic

The frozen ass of Ted Williams?

user-pic

You pick your end, I'll pick mine.

user-pic

Couldn't say it any better. Beyond the thin patina of "change" talk, Reid, Pelosi, Frank, Dodd, et. al., are a bunch of bought and paid for corporatist shills and faux progressives. One can only hope that a new circle of hell is under construction to house these traitors of the working people of America. We will all inhabit a hell on earth when the grand larceny bailout collapses the world monetary system, and with it, the real economy that supports us all.

user-pic

You know Curt I just went on a rant about Scarborough lying about what rush has said in the past that might demonstrate that rush is a racist.

WHO CARES. Compared to the open goddamnable felony conspiracy to steal the assets of this country...hourly, daily, monthly and yearly. rush is nothing.

rush of course gets paid by the oligarchy that wishes to keep the conspiracy in play.

BUT THESE SINS ARE ALL THERE FOR ALL OF US TO SEE.

But I saw Senator Warren this morning and he has been moving on some real reform and Barney Frank has had it too.

Hopefully something is done. But the entire system should have been torn down and another system erected in its place.

user-pic

It's an odds on bet that financial reform will follow in the footsteps of healthcare reform. All the words and actions will be nothing but a smokescreen. And a little disguised one at that. Eventually all this will come tumbling horrifically down. Only then will the public finally 'get it' and demand the heads of the criminals who have taken over the country. I'd guess it'll look like a modern day French revolution. Maybe even with a little blood and gore to make sure the message doesn't go unheeded. You remember this chart? It pretty much says it all.

http://www.theatlantic.com/images/issues/200905/johnson-chart.gif

user-pic

“I don’t think it’s a bad thing that the bad loans occurred. It was an effort to keep prices from falling too fast. That’s a policy.” Barney Frank

Right. Stick it to the sheeple. They'll never figure it out.

user-pic

Please do me a favor, all--call or write to your peeps about this issue and also one other aspect which is that it appears that the mortgage bailouts to banks are structured so that they actually encourage banks to hold properties all the way into foreclosure instead of short-selling them to potential buyers. This means that properties sit empty, may be vandalized, languish on the market driving prices even further down and increasing the number of foreclosures, etc. And since the banks are being bailed out anyway, it adds up to huge contributions courtesy of the US taxpayer.

There are buyers, but by stalling short sales, the banks are not permitting them to buy.

This is not good news. Those who figure home prices need to come down anyway are not, imho, looking at the big picture. (And those who didn't want to be on the hook for their neighbor's extra bathroom are going to end up on the hook anyway.)

user-pic

You forgot to mention that the banks or holders of foreclosed properties are increasingly walking away from the tax obligation to municipalities on those properties. Adding fuel to the fire and shifting that tax burden to taxpayers. Who knew there was a tax cut for banks in this? Smart. Very smart.

user-pic

There is so much to mention, it's hard to mention it all.

I do believe though, that a great deal of the back and forth: "You're racist!" "You lie!" "Socialist/Fascist" stuff is deliberate churn whose effect (whether by design or not) is to distract from what is really going on.

We need to respond to the ridiculous, but keep our eyes on the banks and at the distribution of risk/power that is enriching the rich at the expense of everyone else.

user-pic

Bet you were following that story about the kid almost lost in the giant flying aluminum chef's hat and thought, "Boy, they couldn't do that in an Islamo-fascist state." Or this either:

NEW YORK, Oct 15 (Reuters) - Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS.N) opted to devote a smaller chunk of revenue to compensation in the latest quarter in what may be a sop to critics angry about a bonus bonanza so soon after the bank took billions in government funds. But the move also helped boost quarterly earnings.

And Goldman Sachs employees need not lose any
sleep, because they are still on track to receive an average of $630,000 each, rivaling their record bonus haul in 2007. Further, that $630,000 amount, which places the bank far ahead of rivals, is based on Goldman's full workforce,
including assistants and other support staff.

I was so sick with worry that these hard-working McDucks were going to miss a bonus this year, I 'bout crapped my pants. Like I would've done if a six-year-old floated by in a UFO balloon. Like that.

user-pic

What do you want to bet that in lieu of the bonuses that are postponed or otherwise re-routed to attract less attention, a business opportunity arises in which there is a market for "tin cups" to be sold on Wall Street (actually designed at Tiffany's and made wholly of investment grade silver) replete with Montblanc "pencils" to be sold.

Such is the contempt these people display for the real victims of this recession that I suspect such a trophy for their bookcase would be really quite attractive.

user-pic

And if one's bookshelf were already occupied by too many trinkets, that clever tin cup and pencils could be donated as a silent auction item for one's favorite charity, creating a nice tax deduction for the donator while generating cash for the needy.

It would be especially apropos if the charity were the society for the blind.

user-pic

Gold, man, sacks. And sacks, and sacks. Disappearing out the door while we thank heaven that little boy is safe. In his box in the attic of his house which will no doubt soon be foreclosed upon.

user-pic

What I find amazing/depressing, is that one of the roadblocks in the way of serious reform is Barney Frank. He's taking the Administration's already weak reform template and weakened it even more - against the consumer protections agency and against derivatives regulation. Can't someone give this guy a senate seat and get him off the banking committee, or something?

user-pic

Goodness gracious! On behalf of his liberal supporters (sycophants?), I must ask (rhetorically you understand) . . .

"On what planet do you spend most of your time?"

user-pic

I think Frank is terrified, and suspect that there's nothing deliberate about the weakening of the template. His comment after the failure of the mortgage cramdown bill was something to the effect that the banks run the place, period.

My personal belief is that this train wreck will continue until somebody figures out that we need to do simple, low-interest, no credit check required, short refinances at the year 2001 value of properties, so that people can stay in their houses.

user-pic

His comment . . . was something to the effect that the banks run the place, period.

And Frank's an enabler-in-chief: former deputy staff director of the House Financial Services Committee, Michael Paese, heads up Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Washington lobbying office. (That's JP Morgan-Chase's Jamie Dimon to his left).

Did the MSM ever report this revolving-door appointment?

For more obscurantist flummery, see, Frank bans Paese from direct contact with Committee members and staff.

user-pic

With all due respect, Erica, my personal belief is that this train wreck will continue until people start to hold their reps accountable and call out people like Frank as the blatant corporate shills they are.

Look, Frank is not just a wet spaghetti like Baucus who admits he's voting against his convictions in the interests of passing a less than perfect bill. Frank is OPENLY arguing against the CFPA, openly arguing against derivatives reform. Those ARE his 'convictions'.

There. You've done it. Made me join the caps lock brigade...
;0P

user-pic

Welcome to the DARK SIDE, Obey.

Next step? Be BOLD!

user-pic

Yoda warned me about this...

N000000OOOOOOooooo....

user-pic

Well, Obey, I hope your first caplock experience was as good for you as it was for me, and I want you to know I will always respect you.

It's a valid point about Frank--he may be just fine with everything that's going on. Whether he's pro or con is less important than the fact that he is not acting to tear power away from the Lucrescenti in the interest of ordinary people.

And you're right that the accountability has to come before the short refinances, because the banks and investors have proven they're not interested in bailing out ordinary people on their own.

The short refinances are just the tool by which the TARRP (Troubled Asset Relief for Regular People) program could happen.

Leave a comment

San Fernando Curt

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 37

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location North Hollywood, CA
  • Party Democratic
  • Politics Neo-Realist

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs Antiwar.com Salon.com
  • Favorite Books "Dreadnought" by Robert K. Massie "The Power and the Glory" by Graham Greene "Lamprey!" by Jerry Verlan "The Reichsfuhrer Calls You 'Bitchmeat'" by Turner Luce
  • Favorite Quotes "I just don't... uh... 'do' Middle Eastern fairy tales..." - My Own Li'l Bible "You seem ill - you must’ve come down with a severe case of dumb-ass." - Chip Rawlins, my college roomate

Bio

Making it happen here in the San Fernando Valley - sunshine, car-jackings and facial tattoos. Livin' the high!

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address