9/12
It's that time of year again. We memorialize and pontificate, endlessly, about the attacks of eight years ago. There's little more to be said, really, except to note the new skyscraper in the World Trade Center "footprint" - meant to defiantly announce to America-haters everywhere that we won't be bowed by a bunch of suicidal student pilots - isn't getting built... At least, not as quickly as everyone hoped back in the days when we were so shaken by the hideous atrocities we waved the flag like WWII gold-star mothers and allowed our nation and sons and daughters to be hijacked into wars that benefit this country not at all. The slow economy, it seems, will respect no emotion, no matter how deep, and assuage no memory, regardless how scarred and painful.
Here's my problem: I now see 9/11 as an incident, not a condition. I don't see Islam - radical or otherwise - as my enemy. The perpetrators are criminals, and if there is such a thing as equitable justice here on earth, they someday will be punished for their soullessness.
But who will punish us for our's? We've made war - with all its attendant blood and horror - without provocation, and now we have an army stationed, apparently permanently, in the middle of the Middle East. The oil fields and Israel are secured from invasion by any regular military, of any nation, in that most restive of regions.
Wasn't that really the apocryphally corrupt warrant for Operation Iraqi Freedom? Really...?
Osama bin Ladin, meanwhile, is free to hide in his caves and occasionally transmit to us another rambling, threatening update. For the "interests" that would keep us knee-deep in our costly, bloody quagmires, he's worth much more alive than dead, since he fulfills a role as our new, all-purpose supervillain. Whenever we need more tit for our entrenched, always-ravenous military-industrial complex, the skinny, bedraggled mad-man of the mountains is held before our eyes and shaken like a viper's rattle. Look out! Neo-Hitler!
All the people who died in 9/11 add up to just about a third of American dead in the Battle of Okinawa 64 years ago. One battle, in one theater of that war. So... I'm not sure how sanguine I can remain about all this hocus-pocus. Sept. 11, 2001, was a vast tragedy, to be sure. But we live in a world of vast tragedies, and this catastrophe has been used too much, too cheaply, for purposes disgracefully detached from the real, personal impact of the violence and horror that day. It's now for family and friends of victims to memorialize. It's a national nightmare, not just for them, but their grief knows little comfort; it will always tear and bleed. And it is genuine.
Otherwise, the date should be relegated to "big" anniversaries - 10th, 25th, etc. The Bush Administration pulled 9/11 out of its emotional-manipulation bag every time it needed support for one of its ugly schemes from the American people, or, at least, from the feeble, pliable American media.
In the aftermath of the towers' falls, the Pentagon immolation, and the somehow stirring disaster in that lonely Pennsylvania field, we were dazed, jarred and hopelessly confused. In the interim, we let our vengeance lead us by the hand into darkness. The abyss opened, and we stepped in. We've killed, shredded, raped, rocketed and maimed. We've kidnapped and tortured. We've locked our fellow human beings into dungeons and thrown away the keys. We've chewed up our own Constitution, and our own humanity, and crapped them out to stink at our feet.
Enough.
















And it is genuine.
Indeed it is. Indeed it is, Curt. Thanks for honoring them. As an East Coast resident, a native New Yorker, and a very lucky person in that no one I know personally died, I thank you on behalf of those I know that did know loved ones and friends that did die that way.
Their grief and trepidation is real.
A publisher I work for has a parent company in the South someplace. A day or two after 9/11, in which the parent company was well aware that this little publisher on the Connectiut Shoreline indeed employed people personally affected on 9/11, they sent out a company wide email asking them to write about the experience to be posted in their company newsletter.
I assume they were trying to be compassionate, but you have to wonder.
September 12, 2009 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's some uncomfortable truth in what you reveal, Curt.
As a simple example, 9/11 affected the East and West coasts differently.
Moreover, many East Coasters even forget that Washington DC also had a building slammed into. And that a plane went down in PA.
So, there is definitely an issue of "what is important to me is important to all".
On the flip side, most of America never understood - and still don't understand -- the "paranoia" of Russia as a result of WWII. Look up Stalingrad and think about 9/11. We pale in comparison.
The last real tragedy on this nation of any serious magnitude was the Civil War. At that time, the war was being conducted by the two largest armies on the planet. That fact escapes people, but when you want to understand the enmity between the old South and the North, you need look upon the fact that the South was the battlefield for most of that war. That type of experience will last generations.
In that sense, 9/11 is an excellent time to remember: how much it moves us and, still, how much smaller it is than any number of other calamities people and nations have endured.
And that ground zero in NYC still sits, 8 years later, as a big hole in the ground.
Some perspective on that? It's just a few months short of the time between launching Alan Shepard in a sub-orbital lob to Neil Armstrong stepping on the Moon.
We are a nation that has lost it's way. We overly concern ourselves with the trivial, like shouts of "you lie" in a joint Session of Congress, when so much real work sits by the wayside.
It's time to use 9/11 to remind us to get moving again. Time is running out.
September 12, 2009 6:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you, clearthinker, for this comment. I haven't read a better one, nor one more sobering.
September 12, 2009 10:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are welcome. Your blog inspired it.
September 13, 2009 3:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Because I live in New York, I would like to correct a few of clearthinker's stock misapprehensions.
Rubbish. I'm not sure how you can claim to know what East Coasters "forget," but I have yet to see any comprehensive research done on the subject nor have I personally met anyone from the East Coast (or anywhere else) who has forgotten about DC and PA.
No, actually, it's not a "big hole in the ground." Again, you have no idea what you're talking about.
To equate the space program with a city planning effort for a memorial is classic apples and oranges.
The rest of clearthinker's comment is a snore.
September 13, 2009 9:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
But it was a real tragedy, of great magnitude.
It is easy to compare events and say one was worse than another, and clearly 50,000 dead in a day or week dwarfs the events of 9/11/01.
But as anyone who remembers that day as clearly as I do, the images of the towers falling, a city shrouded in debris, the loss of so many innocent lives....It was an event of epic proportions. It's not the numbers that died that make it so, but the shocking suddeness and violence of it all. We watched as another average Monday morning turned into the first page of a new chapter in American History.
September 13, 2009 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Except September 11, 2001 ... was on a Tuesday.
The memory does fade...
September 13, 2009 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
And to second what you're getting at, part of what makes it stand out is that:
a) it was an attack on CIVILIANS. The comparisons that others make are to MILITARY events. Seeing regular people head off to work, or get on a plane, and die so violently and hatefully is hard to get over. It makes us realize that at any given moment we could be doing something utterly mundane when the building blows up around us without cause or reason.
b) it was an attack from an amorphous enemy we couldn't single out and retaliate to. We're a country that has a nuclear arsenal that could annihilate the world dozens of times over, but we still believe in justice and a swift and proportional response. Japan attacks us and we mobilize and go to war. The South seizes a fort and the war is on. McVeigh and Nichols blow up a building and the FBI brings them to justice. On 9/11 we were attacked by people without a country who organized this from caves in the Middle East. There was no real country to blame, we couldn't find their caves, and how do you send the cops after people in a cave in a foreign desert? There was no real justice to be had, and we're a country that CRAVES justice. We never got the satisfaction of true closure and vindication. And the wound, once raw and bleeding, is now stinking and infected.
Americans want the protection of civis romanus sum - don't f**k with our people or the wrath of the Empire will come for you with devastating force. Well, we devastated a couple of countries, but the people who are truly AT FAULT for slaughtering thousands of civilians were never brought to Times Square for their public executions. That is why this is so hard for our national psyche to come to terms or heal.
September 13, 2009 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
William T. Sherman practically invented the modern notion of making war on "civilians" because he saw that in a modern industrialized society, there were no such things as non-military targets. His March to the Sea is predicated on the notion that he wanted to destroy the Confederate's capacity to make war by supplying it's army.
You may also want to look up the targets that the United States chose for atomic bombing in WWII. The fact is that the US had such control over the Japanese skies that there were hardly any targets left of real value.
Also look up Dresden, Germany -- a non-military target with such an intense bombing that Kurt Vonnegut (who survived it as a POW) wrote an entire book inspired by the experience and the waste of war.
This is not a list to cry that the US has been unfair during war -- all nations do it. It's only to point out to an American audience that we do it too.
Bin Laden, also, knew what he was doing: by creaming the financial centers, he, like Sherman, did very real damage to our ability to make war. Did it knock us out? No. But panicking the US markets was very valuable to his goals. He also almost single-handedly changed the entire air travel economics in the US.
It was a very well thought out plan with military objectives -- far more than pure "terrorism".
September 13, 2009 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
All very true and accurate, save it was Napoleon who broke the fourth wall and targeted supplies and civilian infrastructure.
September 13, 2009 1:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Except you're giving war-time examples. We were not aware that there was a war declared on us when the planes crashed into the towers. Not that atrocities that happen during declared wars aren't atrocities...
Also, they happened to our civilians. In two cities we thought were invulnerable. With our own airplanes.
I'm not saying it was so unusual in the grand scheme of history, but it's hard to feel an emotional connection to Sherman's march. It's NOT HARD AT ALL to ache at the memory of people in Illinois waiting in long lines to donate blood and toothpaste because we needed to do something to help and didn't know what else to do. It's not hard at all to get ANGRY about the fact that 8 years later Bin Laden is still out there plotting because we went into Iraq instead of hunting for him.
In other words, this is personal. So, yeah. It's different.
September 13, 2009 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Only we have been "at war" by having strong influential involvement in local government and politics since the days of FDR... who was quite clever in having the US scoop up the oil rights despite the area being mostly a British mandate after WWI. Here is another book to take a look at from someone in the know. You may also want to read a little Chomsky about this area. His website is a good place to start:
http://www.chomsky.info/
Americans wouldn't tolerate the infiltration of our own government with another's at the level that we've been involved in. Naturally, once the oil has dried up, we will be out of there... because nation building is mostly a hoax to justify another agenda.
September 13, 2009 9:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would disagree on these points:
Why would we need to blame a country? So we can declare war on all of its citizens, even if only 12 people were involved?
We DID find them in their caves. We let them go so we could invade another country that had nothing whatsoever to do with 911
Are you sure we're a country that craves justice? Take a look at what has been going on - torture, outing a CIA agent, bogus wars, detention without charges, politicization of the Justice Department, people "packing" guns at discussion events - This is a country that CRAVES justice? I don't think so. This is a country of pussies who are terrified of anything they don't understand.
September 13, 2009 4:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. What we crave, as an aggregate, is the ability to exploit other nations' resources and labor without admitting that it is our embarrassingly powerful Government, whose actions we are willfully ignorant of, that makes this possible.
September 13, 2009 4:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't confuse the government and its citizens, and please don't deliberately convolute what you know I'm trying to say to score some cheap argumentative points on a blog.
After Pearl Harbor was attacked we had a defined enemy - the Japanese and their allies the Germans. Men enlisted, and a draft got started, and the public mobilized - factories, victory gardens, scrap drives, bond drives - you name it. And we didn't stop until we decimated both enemies - one with a two-front assault, and the other with nuclear weapons. We celebrated that "victory" with mass public celebrations even while two continents were destroyed. We did not distinguish then between the government that planned the attack on our harbor and the people we vaporized with our mushroom clouds.
After 9/11 we didn't have a target - the gov't didn't confirm for days that it was even Osama bin Laden (although CNN was running the rumor right away). Yes, we needed a country to blame so we would have someone to fight. Someone did this, and we didn't have anyone blame. Of COURSE we needed someone to blame. It's much easier to mend and heal (or someone to vent our collective helpless anger on) if we can see warplanes bombing the shit out of the people who planned it and everything they hold precious. Yes, we absolutely wanted a country to blame so we could obliterate them back to the stone age. And if that crime had been perpetuated by a nation's military instead a group of guys hiding out in caves, you'd better believe we would have leveled the country and brought its leadership for a public execution in New York. Absolutely we would have. And we would have felt better.
Instead, we got into wars we don't understand. And, instead of giving us something productive to channel our heartbreak and anger towards, our esteemed President told us to shop. So we did. And with nothing else to do we sat back, terrified, and let the government do it's damnedest to "protect" us because we didn't know what else to do. And in the name of "protection" the government wiped its ass with our Constitution. We let them because we were scared, mourning and didn't know what else to do. Of course it's easier to let GW wiretap and torture if it means finding our unknown enemy before they could do this again.
So without a specific nationality to stick in internment camps, we tapped and tortured to figure out who the enemy is. Or rather, WE didn't - our government did. Would we have protested if we'd known it was happening at the time? Would it have been so secretive if it had been an actual country that attacked?
When I say we "crave justice" I don't mean we crave fairness for everyone. I mean, we crave fairness and restitution for ourselves, and we definitely crave vengeance.
September 13, 2009 6:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pearl Harbor was a Japanese attack. A war was already going on with Germany. That has NOTHING to do with OBL and the 911 attacks, which was fomented by a rogue bunch of zealots, and should have been treated as such. But because as you say, "We just didn't know who to attack," we had to attack somebody!
Is that how an honorable SuperPower acts? The most powerful country in the world lets the instigator of its worst terrorist attack ever go free in order to settle petty personal grievances? Based on lies? What happened was unconscionable, and I can still hardly believe it. Tens of thousands dead, and Iraq a colony of Iran all because of selfishness and ignorance. To even mention Pearl Harbor in this context betrays an enormous lack of knowledge.
You keep saying we "just didn't understand." Well we agree on that!
But ignorance is no excuse.
September 13, 2009 8:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK, I re-read what you said. Is your point that after Pearl Harbor we HAD an enemy, and after 911 we didn't? I'm trying to get your point here. If that is it, then, what comes after?
My point is that the attack was just that, and its perpetrators should be brought to justice. No war necessary.
Your point?
September 13, 2009 8:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
My point is this:
People try to diminish the import of the 9/11 attacks by pointing to the numbers compared to other great losses of life in history (see all the numbers and examples cited above). However, smaller numbers don't change the significance of the event for our national psyche. To summarize my many arguments above: it was PERSONAL. To reply that Sherman did worse to civilians, or we are guilty of doing worse to others doesn't change the fact that THIS happened to US.
The resulting fear and anger were given no real outlet - we weren't asked to do anything besides spending money. We didn't have a true enemy to rally against. bin Laden doesn't feel REAL anymore, and that might have been different if there had been a real enemy, a whole country, to identify and fight. Fighting makes us whole - not killing, per se, but coming together to fight.
People who didn't know better fought against muslims in general, and used their ignorance to feed bigotry against anyone who was different. People who DID know better fought back against the bigotry because it was immediate. Consequently, the government used the fear, anger, and misdirected rage on all sides to wage war against Iraq and to use tactics that we would not have otherwise supported. But we were scared and distracted and lacked the resolve to fight our own government. Don't believe me? How else did W win re-election?
Had 9/11 been an attack from a COUNTRY I think we (our country and our world) would be in a far different place now because we would have had a true enemy to identify and fight. The abstract nature of terrorism fosters the fear and uncertainty we still deal with politically.
To attempt to dismiss 9/11 on numbers, or by attacking our own culpability in the events that preceded and followed dismisses the import of the event and underestimates it's ongoing ripple effect. Long and short of it is, this is very, very personal. When it affects your family, friends and country it's hard to be kind and rational.
I am not excusing any atrocities that were carried out in our name, BUT I am saying it's unfair to dismiss the import of the event and it's continued impact on our national psyche. "In the wake of 9/11" has become a trite phrase, but that doesn't make its significance any less important.
September 13, 2009 10:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, there is definitely an issue of "what is important to me is important to all".
Yes this true. I think however it is more a case of cynically exploiting a national tragedy for partisan political gain.
In the basest of political terms 9/11 was a great gift to the previous administration.
September 13, 2009 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. It's clear that 9/11 handed a group of neocons in the GWB administration a perfect excuse for Iraq -- which was openly and clearly an objective from them as stated in their think tanks in the 1990s.
September 13, 2009 9:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
9/11 is a story of towers falling and the people inside being killed, but a large part of that story are the heroes who went into those buildings in an effort to reduce the lives lost, and who lost their own. Who were these people?
New York Yankees! New York Mets! They were blue collar men and women working well-paid union jobs who went to work as professionals to save white collar workers, paid salaries far in excess of theirs. How ironic the Right would hold their heroism hostage without acknowledging who they really were. And how sad that we recreate history to suit our ideologies, rather then to honor these people for being the great Americans that they were.
September 13, 2009 2:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Your own story has a lot to be desired as well -- and is puffed for your own particular ideology. I suggest some reading? Of course, that is only the tip of the iceberg. Huge numbers of mistakes were made that day -- not surprising given the unprecedented nature of the situation. But what laypeople tend to gloss over is that many of the professionals, up and down the chain of command, made significant errors - and these could have been avoided. I'm still not even sure the turf battle because NYFD and NYPD frequency spectrum has been solved... eight years later. The tragedy of the deaths of those in the building is that while some of the people's fates were sealed immediately, hundreds of others lost their lives needlessly.
September 13, 2009 2:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
I suggest you do some reading, clearthinker, since you yourself are a layperson. You can start with all 503 interview transcripts from the first responders who survived that day. You might learn something, although I seriously doubt it.
September 13, 2009 9:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
You speak of the muddle of bureaucracy, and pass right over the hundreds heroic stories of those first responders. Yes, problems were rife, and the preparations inadequate, but depsite that hundreds of brave men and women disregarded their own safety to try and save lives, and many lost their own lives for it.
September 13, 2009 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
No... many of those "heroic efforts" were mistakes by the firefighters -- against orders. These men were brave but the little known fact is that bravado often takes over reason in situations like that. (It's easy to fall into it -- I have during some first-responder situations I've worked in.) That's why those elements are now part of FEMA briefings and training -- you have to listen to the Incident Commander. They were ordered to pull back for a reason... many died needlessly. It was horrific.
September 13, 2009 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Giuliani refused to fund radio equipment updates for tye NYFD in spite of admitted problems. A sizeable chunk of the problem was nit disobedience to orders but the lack of adequate comm on the ground.
But blame the plebs, Dr. Strangelove. It suits you.
September 13, 2009 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know nothing.
September 13, 2009 1:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is not only a false assertion on its face, but a wholly false characterization of what happened in New York City on 9/11, as the interviews I linked to will attest to in sad detail.
What you will learn by reading the interviews is that the first responders who followed orders to the letter perished.
Those responders who rejected "orders" and used their instincts or common sense survived. They are guilt-ridden for not following orders and confused about why others made fatal choices that seemed so obviously wrong to them (like setting up a command post inside the lobby of the south tower, which was on fire).
Read the interviews. Just read them. They are difficult but required reading. For one thing, you might learn how to survive in an emergency.
September 13, 2009 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
In the aftermath of the towers' falls, the Pentagon immolition, and the somehow stirring disaster in that lonely Pennsylvania field, we were dazed, jarred and hopelessly confused. In the interim, we let our vengeance lead us by the hand into darkness. The abyss opened, and we stepped in. We've killed, shredded, raped, rocketed and maimed. We've kidnapped and tortured. We've locked our fellow human beings into dungeons and thrown away the keys. We've chewed up our own Constitution, and our own humanity, and crapped them out to stink at our feet.
I hope you do not think this trite Curt, but this is such a fine paragraph, a complete thought. I hereby render unto you the Knightly Blog of the Day Award for this here TPMCafe Site, given to all of you from all of me.
And think about it. w was able to rouse a good solid segment of our 300 million into two wars without even the slightest ease with rhetoric.
He would just go out or send his staff out, mumble really poor prose and get the votes.
Really brings me to the point of nihilism. At least sometimes.
Fantastic post Curt.
September 13, 2009 4:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Co-sign. Beautifully written, Curt.
September 13, 2009 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you for this, Curt. Your eloquence far outshines anything I can say in response.
I've often thought, as have others, that bin Laden couldn't in his wildest dreams have imagined the impact those planes slamming into buildings and into American soil would have on our society, on our economy, on our psyche. It was an impact rippling far beyond the devastation and the loss of lives.
The hatred we felt, the vengeance we sought (badly), the overriding fear that clutches us still--it has changed us, possibly forever.
Holding an anti-government Tea-Party Rally the day after commemorating 9/11 tells me that what happened on that day did not draw us together, did not make us a better people--in fact, it managed to do just the opposite.
The collateral damage is hatred. I don't know how to fight against it, I only know it's growing and threatening to consume us all.
September 13, 2009 8:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
The terrorists accomplished their mission. Not because we let them in the sense that there were intelligence fuck-ups and they managed complete their attack. They accomplished their mission because we let them destroy our collective soul. Every time some asshole preaches hate based the fear the attacks generated, the terrorists win again. Every time another chip is knocked out of our civil liberties, the terrorists win. Every time our government tortures or illegally imprisons or otherwise perverts the principles our nation was founded on, the terrorists win. We are letting them win. Again and again and again.
September 13, 2009 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely right, CL. Our response to the attack on us, supposedly against us and everything we stand for? The Orwellian "Patriot Act," thus capitulating to the enemy by surrendering our Rights as weak-kneed cowards unwilling to stand tall and fight back; to get in their face and say "This system of democratic rule and respect for human rights is worth fighting for!" It's no mere coincidence that it has all been downhill from there as you so aptly point out.
September 13, 2009 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Fine writing, Curt.
As someone who lived on 15th Street and 8th Avenue on September 11, 2001, however, I have to disagree about the act of memorializing the people who lost their lives on that day. (I do agree, btw, that conflating their deaths with war is obscene and outrageous.)
What happened in New York was unique, devastating, and unforgettable, especially for those of us who were within smelling distance of ground zero.
New York City as a place is jam-packed with historic memorials, museums, statues, plaques, engravings, cornerstones, flagpoles, cemeteries, art exhibits, parades, and multiple names for streets, parks, and buildings honoring dead people (not all of them famous) or long-ago events.
Immediately after 9/11, some parts of Manhattan (like Union Square and a brick wall of Saint Vincent's Hospital) were plastered with laser printouts displaying photographs of missing people and mini bios describing who they were, where they worked (like Cantor Fitzgerald), and that their families missed them. These 8-1/2-by-11 pages were taped to every conceivable vertical surface by the families of the missing. It was a beautiful, spontaneous, and profoundly sad outpouring of desperation and grief. These ad hoc memorials remained for about a week, maybe two. Life goes on.
I don't think you can or should expect people to blow off 9/11 memorials for just the "big anniversaries."
I do think you can and should keep a wary and cynical eye on politicians who mean to exploit it.
September 13, 2009 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Curt, you have threaded a very tricky discussion here with aplomb - and with a mastery of the language.
The horror of the losses on that day are palpable, yet we cannot pretend to know the impact this had on the families of the victims or even for those in NYC who lived through the attack and its aftermath.
Yet, the politicization of this tragedy - the use of this tragedy to sell us on the need to commit more murder and mayhem in response - is a despicable act that will haunt us all for a long time to come. As ramona points out above, we responded to a craven, soulless act by surrendering our own soul, and the consequences of that are seen in the increased anger and hatred that informs so much of the body politic today.
I cannot help but think of a young child standing at a funeral memorial honoring her father, a fireman who died after entering a building ablaze with jet fuel. Somehow, jingoistic chants of "USA! USA! USA!" would provide little consolation or even contextual sympathy to the abject grief that child is experiencing.
September 13, 2009 11:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
I thank everyone who commented here and added their own insight, especially ClosetLuddite, Ramona and SleepinJeezus, for pointing out the corrosive legacy of that day is the nesting hatred we allowed to infect us. And it has, truly, poisoned our public interchange.
Readytoblowagasket: I didn't intend to diminish the weight of loss and tragedy borne by those who survive the innocents killed that day. In a way, they are all of us, but especially, overwhelmingly, those who knew and loved the people murdered, their families and friends, and even acquaintances and co-workers.
One other point: It's easy to nitpick in hindsight about what should have been done or not done by public officials and emergency personnel before and after 9/11. But it is impossible, I think, to fault in any way, the firefighters and police, the paramedics and all the rest, who ran into and up those towers of ash. In the History Channel's astonishing 102 Minutes That Changed America amateur video shows a thin, fragile line of firefighters, slung with hopelessly insufficient fire hoses and oxygen tanks, pacing up to the last WTC tower standing. The camera pans up to the impossibly tall building, its top obscured by thick smoke from the inferno that would soon collapse it. As much as 9/11 still haunts, their astounding heroism - grim and determined - inspires. That's true of first-responders everywhere, in NYC that day, and in the scorched hills above me now.
September 13, 2009 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
That made me cry.
September 13, 2009 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I now live on the west coast but I was 90 miles or so from the Twin Towers and the attack was excruciating. I lost no one that I knew in any of the three plane impacts. But we all lost our naive insulation from the bloodiness of oil that day and the awful, sheer horror was as palpable for me and everyone around me as were the incredible acts of bravery. I will never forget my youngest arriving home from high school and after school job remarking that the objects falling from the flames in the television coverage were not building parts but actual humans jumping.
We need to disconnect this tragedy and horror from that of the war on the Constitution which followed it.
September 13, 2009 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink