Mr. Obama, your cannon is loose
Next time President Obama leaves home, he should turn off the lights, lock the doors and, for God's sake, make sure Joe Biden's mouth is shut.
While the President was out of town in Russia this weekend, as run-up to the upcoming G-8 summit, the Vice President dropped by ABC's "This Week" yesterday and beat to death with a verbose monkey wrench any sense of calm that may have pervaded the Administration's domestic and foreign policies.
In a welter of contradictory double-talk that at times verged on Sarah-Palinesque rambling, No. 2 managed to undercut a crucial element of public faith invested in Obama's tenure by blurting that the economic meltdown was much more severe than the Administration had anticipated.
"We misread how bad the economy was, but we are now only about 120 days into the recovery package," Biden said... "The truth of the matter was, no one anticipated, no one expected that that recovery package would in fact be in a position at this point of having distributed the bulk of the money." [Washington Post]
In this wash-out year, when our economy is struggling for life from day to day, the stock market may not take such news so well. When all efforts should be turned to soothing scaredy-cat old ladies on the trading floor - where buy-sell frenzies are set off by any bump in a perennially spooky night - Biden dumps this bauble on the table. "Hey... know what?... we didn't see how bad things were! Yuk-yuk!" Key move, Joe.
Most attention on Biden's blabbery appearance was carjacked by his apparent seal of approval for an Israeli attack on Iran. With the Persian state quaking from internal strife over contested Presidential elections two weeks ago, that could be all we need to permanently cork up any chance of diplomatic rapproachement with Tehran. At least, that's one outcome of several dazed interpretations possible from Biden's opaque, car-salesman explanation of why Israel was free to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities...
Whether we agree or not. They're entitled to do that. Any sovereign nation is entitled to do that. But there is no pressure from any nation that's going to alter our behavior as to how to proceed. What we believe is in the national interest of the United States, which we, coincidentally, believe is also in the interest of Israel and the whole world. And so there are separate issues. If the Netanyahu government decides to take a course of action different than the one being pursued now, that is their sovereign right to do that. That is not our choice.
So, if Israel attacks - is that in our best interest? Or Israel's best interest? And if so, apparently, it's OK... because any boon to Israel is desirable, since it benefits... Israel. Thanks, Joe. At least we know who's first in line for perks at diplomatic soirees and international incidents.
This isn't a big surprise, since Biden has been a chronic "friend of Israel". On Capitol Hill, that means handing our trusty Mideast ally a Bic lighter and can of gas if the Israelis indicate they intend - respectfully, of course - to burn down our house.
But how much has really changed in the past few days? It would seem, to cooler heads, that all the passions aroused by Iran's roiling election aftermath amounted to an internal concern of the Persian state - and no one else. Here's our priority: We need to get together with Iran and talk about this nuke thing with no planes in the air, no missiles launched. There are powerful interests who want to scotch that approach; negotiation would accomplish de facto the same result as a nuclear Iran, namely, dissolution of Israel's domination of the region. Israel is, after all, the only nuclear power in the neighborhood, and very accustomed to getting its way without this silly peace-talk stuff.
Happier remarks from this relentless hack have the U.S. pulling out of Iraq, according to the deadline, come hell or high water, although his "Iraq's on its own" kiss-off was blunt.
Asked what happens "if the violence flares up again," the vice president replied, "Well, that's going to be a tragic outcome for the Iraqi people. We made a commitment." Stephanopoulos then asked, "are we going to put our lives on the line again," if violence flares back up in Iraq, and Biden flatly said "no."
Well, it's not as if anyone, at this point, expects American troop levels there to fall below 50,000; it'll be adventuresome, tropical duty in the new American Raj. Maybe someday Yankee gas-bags will sit around gentlemen's clubs, sipping gin and tonics, and baring old battle scars from legendary Fort Mesopotamia. Yes, the Iraqi people will be on their own. But if the dread terrorists - enemies of freedom, so threatening to our homeland - even THINK about f*ckin' with the oil fields, they're toast. There are guns, there's butter... and then there's the Petroleum Age, after all.
But for all of us breathing air unrarified, the toughest news is on the economy. Even though words are parsed and language treads softly, it's not good: As your leaders, we don't know when the son-of-a-bitch will bottom out.
Despite a $787 billion stimulus package approved earlier this year to rescue the failing American economy after an historic financial collapse late last summer, figures released last week showed that the national unemployment rate has reached 9.5 percent, and that the economy is sloughing nearly half a million jobs a month.
Biden refused to indicate whether a second stimulus was in the works, saying such a move would be premature. Critics on the Left have advocated doing just that - to different degrees - as well as boosting government presence admininistering troubled private companies getting a turn at the federal tit. Meanwhile, the administration's rescue plans have been assailed by the Right, which offers little more than its favorite bag of magic beans - tax and spending cuts.
But the troubling nature of this endless plummet is especially grating given the fact that we're rescuing the very banks and credit firms responsible for the catastrophe. Betting the housing market would never drop in value, bad loans were made, foreclosed homes were resold at disgracefully inflated prices and everyone at the trough partied short-term... 'Till the bubble burst.
Joe's been one of our peerless leaders for three decades, and did his share to make sure business got a fair shake and the rest of us got the business. He is legendary as friend of lobbyists. Biden has a piece of the blame here, and that's another aggravation prick in his clueless chatter.
If he can't warn us about imminent train wrecks, he can at least refrain from triggering any.
Mr. Vice President: Can it!
















Here's Joe professing his Zionism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUxjI8-DUHg
It's pretty obvious how his interview yesterday would be received in Israel, but some people have been convincing themselves that Joe was implying a warning to Israel if they did attack Iran.
Yeah right.
July 6, 2009 3:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Careful, Curt, Joe is considered "serious" among Washington Insiders.
And after Obama deplored the treatment of protesters in Iran and the importance of pictures of Neda in bringing up visceral reactions and managed to come up with a joke or 2 about the Uyghers (13 of whom are still sitting in Gitmo for no good reason after 8 long years), how long do you think we'll wait for Obama to opine on the righteousness of freedom-loving Uyghers to resist the mass government-mandated Han immigration/cleansing of their homeland?
Moral relativity and diarrhea of the mouth remain fixtures of the Washington scene as always.
July 6, 2009 6:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not to mention constipation of the brain.
July 7, 2009 8:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ha I was smiling at the tittle and knew what you were talking about before I even opened the page. One good thing about Old Joe is he seems to be incapable of duplicity, one bad thing is he cant keep it to himself. I had a sister in law just like him, she would blurt out whatever she thought, which might have been honest but not always prudent. I would have preferred to remain in ignorant bliss about being stupid and ugly, but for her verbose honesty.Sometimes silence can be a more productive choice. Nice work San Fernando Curt.
July 6, 2009 7:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Whether we agree or not. They're entitled to do that. Any sovereign nation is entitled to do that. But there is no pressure from any nation that's going to alter our behavior as to how to proceed. What we believe is in the national interest of the United States, which we, coincidentally, believe is also in the interest of Israel and the whole world. And so there are separate issues. If the Netanyahu government decides to take a course of action different than the one being pursued now, that is their sovereign right to do that. That is not our choice."
My parsing of Biden is different than yours: He states that as a sovereign state Israel can judge if it is mortally threatened and if it so judges, take appropriate action. But that is not our judgment and no pressure is going to get us to change our choice since we believe that our current course of action is best for both the United States and for Israel, whether they like it or not.
July 6, 2009 11:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
We'll add that to the possible interpretation list. There is also a possible translation in Huntz Hall Dialect:
"Me an' Slip was in da back uh da pool room. And we wuz talkin'. An' we decided dey wuz gonna do what dey wuz gonna do, an' the same for us 'cuz we wuz on da same page."
July 7, 2009 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bill Maher may have said it best about Biden: Stop giving external voice to your inner monologue!
Exactly right, Bill. Just because we think something doesn't mean we must speak it. My mother in-law has that problem, but she is 84. It's inexcusable for a professional politician at Biden's level and with his experience.
July 7, 2009 9:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Tourette's Palindrome?
July 7, 2009 10:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Tihshit. Maddogoddam. Kcufuck. Ssipiss.
July 7, 2009 11:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Youbetchameous
July 7, 2009 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, I didn't see anything too terrible about what he said, especially on the economy. It isn't the Vice President's job to prop up the markets with happy talk, after all.
Markets are supposed to discover prices. Politicians and other folks with policy authority shouldn't attempt to interfere by lying and acting cheery. That's called market manipulation, and it's mostly illegal.
July 7, 2009 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
It isn't the Vice President's job to erode market confidence, either. Here's a rewrite:
"Stabilization of the economy and restoration of jobs are taking longer than we forecast, but these possibilities were built into our recovery package. We have options, and another stimulus is one of them. We've always said it will be a long haul."
Not: "Woo-eeee! It's BAD! Never saw that comin'!"
July 7, 2009 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's another idea:
Anyone with a brain knows that there will be serious changes that have to made in the country... wait until (a) foreigners stop buying our junk bonds resulting in (b) skyrocketing costs of fuel (no longer paid in petrodollars) leading to (c) rising food costs.
Obama hasn't brought up any of this. It's such an overwhelming message, he has to be very careful about approaching this.
Therefore, Biden - the known "loose cannon" -- floats a few trial balloons in public. Testing reaction and giving Obama a chance to comment on them.
Allowing for the start of a tremendous shift in what comes from the White House.
Carefully orchestrated? Yes. But Obama has always shown a masterful approach to the media.
Or maybe not.
Just a thought.
July 7, 2009 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
One quibble: Our bonds aren't junk. We borrow only in our own currency, so there is no substantial risk of default. At worst, we'd be in for a substantial bout of monetary inflation.
Foreigners might nonetheless choose to diveersify their holdings (many already are) due to concerns over the future value of the U.S. Dollar relative to other currencies. A drop in the value of the dollar would be the obvious result of our current fiscal profligacy.
I hope you are correct about Obama. But criticizing Biden for basic honesty is a bit silly.
July 7, 2009 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
More quibbling:
We print our currency, so saying that we borrow against it, is not a statement of confidence. The closest commodity the US dollar is based on is oil -- and that's because of an agreement with Saudi Arabia. As their oil fields run dry, our dollar looks far more stable -- especially as we print more of them!
July 7, 2009 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, no, no.
The oil economy is the one thing keeping the dollar remotely stable despite the ongoing profligacy of Washington. Think of it this way: every dollar held by an oil state is a dollar we got to print, and spend, without having to accept the concomitant inflation.
Obviously, long term escalation of borrowing isn't a good thing. I agree, and I think we should stop spending so much money immediately. That isn't going to happen in this Administration, which is more into, um, "empathy" than thinking things through.
I was making the narrow point (hence a quibble) that an actual default isn't ever going to happen, because we can print the money to cover the debt. Hence, our bonds aren't "junk".
July 7, 2009 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink