Dennis Ross?! Guess the revolution won't be energized...
Post-revolution, the interval between useful idiot and useless idiot disappears, and the rose-strewn streets, so lately sites of delirious parades and energetic visionaries, become littered with riddled remains of the expendable.
I'm trying hard to hold onto my belief in hope and change. I think Obama and his people are very smart, and they attract other smart, talented - visionary - people. And we need them and we need that process to rescue this country. We have wars busting out all over, in addition to our own grinding atrocities in the Middle East and South Asia.
The trashed economy is staring us in the face. Our entire, global monetary system, for the past several years, has rested on a bubble, a giant puffball of speculation-driven super-trading that, in reality, had no value at all; like a fresh street whore, it was sought after only for a moment, and after each commission player chipped out his percentage and sent it a step higher up the paper trail, its actual bearing atomized.
Everyone is waiting for the next shoe to fall; everyone is expecting more bad news.
The one bright spot in all this was the impending Obama presidency, where business-as-usual was, like torture, lying and month-long vacations, disavowed.
That's why the news of Dennis Ross named as a likely special envoy to Iran comes as such a disappointment. I feel like a true believer betrayed - swept up in the night and dumped in the gutter with a bullet in my neck.
Dennis Ross! If ever there was a liberal-camp neocon, it's him. As Jim Lobe notes in his blog:
Needless to say, if the memo is genuine (and I have no doubt that it is) and accurate, Ross' appointment marks a major setback for those who had hoped that Obama might bring some fresh thinking to Middle East policy, particularly vis-a-vis Iran and Israel-Palestine.
Great. Don't dare start believing too much, lest ye be gob-smacked. There was something about Obama's silence on the Gaza incursion I took as defiance to the Israeli Lobby: He didn't go running to a live mike and swear fealty forever to our brave - and violent - li'l ally in the Levant. Now, that doesn't look like the indication, at all. Maybe... maybe his reticence just means he has nothing new to say.
I guess that was too much to hope for. A review of Ross' checkered resume is valuable, on RightWeb:
Ross's role in the Clinton administration was later assessed by the international relations scholars John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt in their controversial 2006 paper for Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy." Mearsheimer and Walt wrote, "During the Clinton Administration ... Middle East policy was largely shaped by officials with close ties to Israel or to prominent pro-Israel organizations--including Martin Indyk, the former deputy director of research at AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs Committee] and co-founder of the pro-Israel Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP); Dennis Ross, who joined WINEP after leaving government in 2001; and Aaron Miller, who has lived in Israel and often visits there. These men were among President Clinton's closest advisors at the Camp David summit in July 2000. Although all three supported the Oslo peace process and favored creation of a Palestinian state, they did so only within the limits of what would be acceptable to Israel.
And Martin Indyk, Hillary...Richard Holbrooke. What next?





You raise a lotta concerns. But I think there will be a new perspective on this mess. Congress, according to one article I read today, is not helping any and gave full support to Israel.
January 9, 2009 12:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
"And Martin Indyk, Hillary...Richard Holbrooke. What next?"
And Rahm as Chief of Staff (not cleaning floors)
And Lieberman keeping his Homeland Security Chair
And Joe "I'm a Zionist" Biden as VP
What next? Maybe John Bolton as Ambassador to Iran.
January 9, 2009 4:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Meet the new bosses. Change you'll find in the dictionary.
January 9, 2009 8:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Another day, another disgraceful appointment.
January 9, 2009 8:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
and I hear Obama has brought back the torture defender John Brennan. Hope you can find in the dictionary.
January 9, 2009 8:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Go suck pus, Curt. You don't speak for Americans.
"Reporter: Do you think that will come? Rep. Frank: I hope it will…But, ah, here’s a country, and remember that had been at truce and Hamas said, “no more truce,” and began to fire rockets into Israel. I don’t think America would sit back and not retaliate and they did; look, unfortunately in war, not unfortunately, tragically some civilians get killed. Israel does seem to have done a better job here frankly then we’ve done in Afghanistan in targeting combatants. They were aiming at the people who were firing the rockets and providing the physical security for the rocketeers.” Frank draws a direct analogy between the near-universal support among Americans for the war against the Taliban and Israel’s current operation against Hamas. That would make J Street the Barbara Lee of American Jewish politics."
January 9, 2009 10:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sagee:
Please, I don't agree with much of what SF Curt writes, and I don't agree with his assesement of Mr. Ross, who by the way was listed as one of Obama's advisors way back when when Hillary Clinton was still in the race (so his appointment will be of no surprise to me). In any event, this post, although a bit caustic at the threshold, is well-researched and well-reasoned, and we need to have more of these. If only our regular contributors would uniformly write with such respect for their readers. Sagee, why don't you give it a whirl and put some of that passion you have to pen? But please leave the pus-sucking out of it (Blech!).
Recommended San Fernando Curt.
Bruce
January 9, 2009 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
sagee and others - I have a couple of questions for you. What moral rights do the Palestinians have to resist and fight against the occupation? Obviously, not the right to suicide bombers and rockets aimed at civilian cities but do they have any rights to fight back. For example, with the IDF invasion of Gaza do they have the right to shoot soldiers? Do they have the moral right to shoot soldiers in the West Bank?
I am not being flippant with these questions I am genuinely perplexed and conflicted.
January 9, 2009 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
On Ross, from MondoWeiss:
January 9, 2009 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
"MondoWeiss" says
A friend says that Dennis Ross in Arabic means, Expletive you!
and I say, well that's an interesting rhetorical point, but right now I might be a bit more interested in what Farsi-speaking Shia tend to say about Ross.
January 9, 2009 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink