She wunk'd at me...
She came in a cipher, and she left that way. Her "answers" to Gwen Ifill's spongy questions were as substantial as Quaker Rice Cakes, and had all the improvised spontaneity of a Pope's funeral.
Sarah Palin's handlers and the compliant American media considered it a victory that she didn't soil herself and run for the ammonium carbonate. Too bad few outside the loop felt that way.
This just isn't the year for Little Mary Sunshine glad-handing and "hey, sailor" winks. More than any other time in memory, voters want - need - specifics. Less wink, more wonk - comprende?
Palin's rote, memorized script responded to questions that weren't asked, as if she'd showed up at a different debate. When the subject was about foreign policy in Africa, she talked about... energy. When she was asked about nuclear proliferation, Palin practically blinked and said "buffalo".
Meanwhile, Joe Biden stealthily established his humanity by choking up a bit when refering to his family's tragedy. A slim ray of real, basic decency showed through his customary facade as Washington Insider No. 1.
If that was planned, the Obama people are geniuses. They are successfully executing an effective, "anti-Rovian" tactic - setting quiet traps into which blustering opponents blunder. They've sold their tax reform plan the same way, steadily attracting a working-stiff electorate ready for a class-war offensive of their own.
On MSNBC last night, Pat Buchanan, apparently swept away by Palin't "style", went a little bonkers - suggesting that the financial collapse was the only factor in Obama's widening margin in voter polls. But the charts don't reflect that; they show McCain's stock steadily falling after the GOP's expected post-convention bump in early September. And that was weeks before the credit industry and Wall Street laid their eggs.
The key to the election, as Buchanan is fond of saying to advance a much different point, really is Obama, or, more to the point, Obama's announced policy of shifting the burden of public revenue off the backs of the working class. From the perspective of those making less than a quarter of a million a year, this "redistribution of wealth" - as per Palin's accusation - seems pretty fair.
The Obama campaign's other talking points - end the war, reform health care, police the greed that has so rotted high finance - are the ones resonating with voters this year. Palin offered no specifics simply because she didn't dare: A McCain administration seeks to extend the Bush-Era status quo for as long as possible, and plainly outlining that goal will go down like a carbolic acid cocktail among this year's restive citizenry.
But the media seems as unconscious as the GOP of this slow, unrelenting sea change. The talking heads appeared genuinely flummoxed that snap polls following the 90-minute debate showed Biden clearly winning. They couldn't understand it! She was so... polished.
Palin was dipping deep in the Reagan Bag, even, at one point, using the line "there you go again", as well as doggedly reminding listeners of her origins far, far away from the Beltway establishment.
She defined herself as a "maverick" - many times - without ever telling us why we should consider her so. Words do matter - but sometimes their value is on the cheap side.











