« Amazing Audience Video From Obama's Denver Speech | ryoma's Blog | Who Will Dubya Pardon? »

Lieberman Would Wield His Gavel... Against Obama? Or Just To Avoid Retribution?


Steve Benen suggests that Joe Lieberman's motive for begging to keep his chairmanship could be somewhat sinister:

[T]ake a moment to consider what the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs actually does: it's the committee principally responsible for oversight of the executive branch. It's an accountability committee, charged with investigating the conduct of the White House and the president's administration.

As chairman of this committee for the last two years, Lieberman decided not to pursue any accusations of wrongdoing against the Bush administration. Lieberman's House counterpart -- Rep. Henry Waxman's Oversight Committee -- was a vigilant watchdog, holding hearings, issuing subpoenas, and launching multiple investigations. Lieberman preferred to let his committee do no real work at all. It was arguably the most pathetic display of this Congress.

And yet, now Lieberman acts as if keeping this chairmanship is the single most important part of his public life. Why would he be so desperate to keep the gavel of a committee he hasn't used? I'll let you in on a secret: he wants to start using the power of this committee against Obama.

But Ezra Klein takes a slightly different view in response:

I don't think that's quite right. Rather, Lieberman wants to keep his committee as a hedge against retribution. So long as he controls Governmental Affairs, he's not the sort of guy Democrats want on a warpath against them. Elsewhere, they can take him seriously, or screw him over, largely as they please, which most would probably find a preferable alternative.

(via Sullivan)

6 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

NO GAVEL for LIEberman! He can stay in the caucus, I don't care about that... but if he keeps his chairmanship, that will be inexcusable.

Chris Murphy (D-CT05) for US Senate in 2012.

user-pic

Here Here.

I know Chris Murphy. HE ran against the same woman I did (Nancy Johnson), but with MUCH happier results. Had I stayed in CT, I would have done all I could to help Murph win the senate seat in 2012. He is a great guy, young, intelligent and with energy to burn. The world needs more Chris Murphy's...andn the senate needs him iin 2012.

On second thought, if he makes that run, I just may move back to CT!

user-pic

Thanks for posting this. I have been shouting this point, since the election. There is no way Lieberman can keep the Homeland Security Chairmanship. He would continue to work as a right-wing mole and use it to investigate Obama, without a doubt. I say, strip him of all privilages, but let him stay in the caucus. The little dweeb will undoubtedly switch parties and then have to face the wrath of his own constituients back home.

user-pic

Is there anything at all about his behavior since he was elected as an independent to suggest he is NOT a Republican?!? Anything at all?!? The guy has made his choice by his deeds. Show him the door. He's already a Republican.

user-pic

Dude's out of here. They can finesse it however they feel they must. But, Lieberman must be stripped of his Chairmanship by January 20.

user-pic

I like Murphy, campaigned for him, but I think Lamont should get the nod. If Joe Lieberman wasn't such a pathetic loser, he would have stepped aside when Lamont won the primary.

Help keep up the pressure:

http://liebermanmustgo.com/

Leave a comment

ryoma

user-pic

Following:
Followers:

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address