What to do about Joe?


I think it is time to call Joe Lieberman on the damage he has inflicted on the Democratic Party and more importantly on our nation.

For those of us who were around in 2000, back when Josh put up his first tentative posts, during the Florida recount, Joe Lieberman was no where to be found. When Dick Cheney and the Republican pitbulls (no lipstick) were spewing their venom, Joe Lieberman was AWOL. The VP nominees sole role in the run up to the election is to be the guy carrying the big stick. But good ole Joe, couldn't even swat Dick Cheney in the debate when he was serving up softballs like how he made all of his money in the private sector (no mention of the government contracts he got for Halliburton, feeding from the public trough). Nor did he stand up to the Republicans when they were breaking every rule on ballot eligibility for things like ballots being faxed in AFTER election day. Yes, Joe must have been thinking of himself even then.

So, where did Joe's inaction lead us? Well for starters, President Bush, 9/11 (President Gore would have read the memos), the Iraq War, Guantanamo, eavesdropping on American citizens, Enron, and the massive failure of the investment banking industry (Al Gore was a populist before it was popular). Yes, one could lay all of this and more on the doorstep of Joe Lieberman because he wasn't the tough, loyal Democrat that was needed back in 2000. And I do.

Kick him off his committee chairs NOW. If he has any remorse for his actions he will still caucus with the Democrats, but to be honest, Joe only cares about Joe. So lets all man up and give Joe what he deserves. 

What to do about Joe?


I think it is time to call Joe Lieberman on the damage he has inflicted on the Democratic Party and more importantly on our nation.

For those of us who were around in 2000, back when Josh put up his first tentative posts, during the Florida recount, Joe Lieberman was no where to be found. When Dick Cheney and the Republican pitbulls (no lipstick) were spewing their venom, Joe Lieberman was AWOL. The VP nominees sole role in the run up to the election is to be the guy carrying the big stick. But good ole Joe, couldn't even swat Dick Cheney in the debate when he was serving up softballs like how he made all of his money in the private sector (no mention of the government contracts he got for Halliburton, feeding from the public trough). Nor did he stand up to the Republicans when they were breaking every rule on ballot eligibility for things like ballots being faxed in AFTER election day. Yes, Joe must have been thinking of himself even then.

So, where did Joe's inaction lead us? Well for starters, President Bush, 9/11 (President Gore would have read the memos), the Iraq War, Guantanamo, eavesdropping on American citizens, Enron, and the massive failure of the investment banking industry (Al Gore was a populist before it was popular). Yes, one could lay all of this and more on the doorstep of Joe Lieberman because he wasn't the tough, loyal Democrat that was needed back in 2000. And I do.

Kick him off his committee chairs NOW. If he has any remorse for his actions he will still caucus with the Democrats, but to be honest, Joe only cares about Joe. So lets all man up and give Joe what he deserves. 

Place Your Best on Palin's Withdraw


As it becomes more and more apparent what a catastrophic pick Sarah Palin has been for VP, one wonders just how long she will be on the ticket. I think it is pretty safe to bet that she will not be there on November 4th. But how will they dump her? Will she choose to spend more quality time with her daughter? Will she decide she is too much of a distraction for Senator McCain?

What do you think and when do you think the hammer is coming down.

Here is my prediction: By September 7th, Palin will have stepped down from the nomination for VP. Her reason will be twofold. 1.) To spend quality time with her daughter. 2.) She will go on about how she now understands what HRC went through and says that it is those mean liberals who are making her step down, just like they drove HRC from her candidacy.

Mark my words...

A Heartbeat Away from the Presidency


Fade in to a black and white picture of Joe Biden working into the night in his Senate office....

Voiceover lists Biden's many accomplishments within the Senate and concludes "Qualified"

Fade into a sign that says (whatever the town that Palin was the mayr of), Population 5,844. Camera drives through the quaint little town...Voiceover says "3 term mayor"....and concludes "Qualified???"

 

 

What Digby Said....To quote Atrios


As Duncan Black would say... "What Digby Said" http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/dont-want-to-say-i-told-you-so.html Sheesh... I am troubled by this move to apologize for a rational statement by General Clark. We as Democrats have got to quit falling for the scare tactics of these bloviating blowhards on the right. Until we stop, we will have another election like 2004.

For Senator Clinton Supporters; Keep the Faith


For anyone whose support of Senator Clinton is wobbling, for whatever reason, just read this commentary and watch the video.
Just watch this

I am renewed.



 

The Shame of the "As Far As I Know" meme


I really wonder how many people actually saw Senator Clinton and the now famous "as far as I know" moment on 60 minutes. To be honest, I didnt until today. Like many folks posting on this site, I assumed what I heard was true. But I was shocked when I actually saw it on YouTube.

You can see it here.
Shame on ANYONE who thinks this is anything more than someone hounding Senator Clinton  for an answer they were hoping for. I challenge any Obama supporter to explain this for anything other than what it is. Of course you have to actually view the video first. It takes exactly 1 second for Senator Clinton to say "no, of course not". But that isnt enough for Steve Kroft. The most important thing is to listen to the intonation of Senator Clinton. Just listen. And I challenge anyone to explain your previous scurrilous remarks.

Senator Clinton; I got your back!


Many folks have decided on their vote for today, Super Tuesday, as a chance to make history. And indeed we will. What I am looking for in a candidate is this:

I want a president who will be able to withstand the Right Wing Hate Machine (RWHM).
I want a president will read the memos.
I want a president who is a policy wonk who makes decisions not based on their gut but based on research and close advice.
I want a president who has already made difficult decisions and who can withstand the flak for them
I want a president who understands that hope is great but grasping the reality of politics in America is greater

My candidate is Hillary Clinton. I dont care who the RWHM wants to run, I am going to vote for the most qualified candidate. And Senator Clinton; when the hate machine fires up its engines, dont worry, because I got your back. The American people will have your back. Because we are tired of it and we wont stand by this time.

Changes in the White House


Cheney will retire for health reasons before 2008, he has become such a liability not only for Bush's legacy but for America that he will need to go. Rice moves to VP and Negroponte will move to State. He has taken a deputy position there recently in preparation for these moves...

Remember, you heard it here first!

What will Bush Do on Wednesday?


If we have a resounding, overwhelming victory at the polls, what do you think the President's reaction will be? For my money I think he will continue to be the spoiled frat boy he has been for his entire life. Anything that goes wrong will be blamed on the fact that he now has those 'terror loving' Democrats in the House and Senate. Of course, now he has the perfect excuse to pull out of Iraq and blame the entire mess on the 2006 election results. The grand Wurlitzer of right wing talking points will do nothing but back him up of course. Bottom line: Look for an increasingly petulent little wise-ass in the White House. Bitter over the rejection and out for revenge where ever he can take it.

War on Terror Myth


It seems the Bush administration has done nothing but encourage the story that we havent been attacked since 9/11, when Al Qaeda declared war on America. It is true, we havent been attacked on American soil since then and that is an important fact, but the jihadists declared war on America much earlier than 2001. They actually declared war on America back shortly before the first attack on the WTC. It was that attack that marked their first offensive move on American soil. What the right does not want you to know is that there was no attack on American soil again until 9/11. That was the SECOND attack on America by the jihadists. But what people dont seem to want to admit is that it was 8 years between attacks with constant vigilance keeping them at bay. This includes the Bojinka conspiracy that is being bandied about in the media now. The new administration wasnt in office for 9 months when 9/11 happened. They were warned but refused to take terrorism seriously. Cheney took his time convening the new terrorism task force he insisted on chairing and Bush's response to the PDB of August 6th, is legend now...back to vacation and upbraiding the messenger with "well you have covered your ass now". 9/11 was on Bush's watch. Period! Just incredible how the legend has grown about Bush's vigilance versus the sad reality.

Les Ismore

user-pic

Following: 2
Followers: 1

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address