Schumer's-Carper's Opt-Out Public Option Compromise
What people simply don't realize is that Social Security and even Medicare is not completely universal. Regarding Social Security the Big Railroad Retirement Pensions did not participate and neither did many others like the Post Office, some State (public and state teacher trusts) employees like Colorado's PERA or Wisconsin's WEA.
If some states for whatever reason politically or what not do not want to participate in what is unquestionably a better financial formula to manage healthcare (or as Obermann puts it "stave off death") than by all means let them try. Like a number of states that underfund and underappreciate public and collegiate education, there will be state societies that will gravitate to the bottom of the social-economic ladder while other states more progressive will gravitate near the top.
Putting together a research report as to why Colorado's major metro areas experienced greater job loss than other cities even though Colorado didn't have major auto or manufacturing business it became clear that the state still didn't have the depth or breath of a wide variety of industry sectors like Boston & Dallas (comparable Denver), Madison & Austin (two cities comparable to Colorado Springs) that not only included new tech firms, but also a deeper commitments to education, engineering, healthcare and finance.
If it takes the form of "choice" to trojan horse what is fundementally necessary for this nation to move forward where 2/3's of the states "Opt-In" with possibly 80% of the populace than so be it. Eventually state legislatures become very practical and rational when faced with the prospects of not being able to pay for things.
















"Eventually state legislatures become very practical and rational when faced with the prospects of not being able to pay for things."
Or stay in office.
October 8, 2009 3:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well you put a happier face on this horse's behind of a compromise.
LETS HOPE YOU ARE CORRECT.
I mean it. No satire. You may have one hell of a point here.
October 8, 2009 7:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
I grant you even the Missouri Compromise was a horse's ass compromise as was Social Security initially----where after passage it was not until 1939 when the first recipient of benefits didn't take place until 1939 (and $50.00 a month), which was moved up by subsequent legislation.
Listen if states like LA, ND, SD, NE, KS, SC, AR, WY, MT, ID, OK, AL and MS want to opt out because of cultural or political reasons, misguided as it is, how far will you think they will want to go down the path of bankruptcy?
Sure even my daughter said it could divide the nation but I think like the Stimulus Funding there will be much huff and puff from those more interested Shrill Politics and then begrudgingly sign a bill opting in.
October 8, 2009 9:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know what? Screw em. If that is what their legislatures wish to do. Good for them.
CHEAPER FOR US.
I got to admit, I am damn mad about all this, but you really cool me down on this one.
I have to get back and advertise this. Might piss off my friends.
But I like this more and more and I think about it.
The people will eventually rise up in the states that have such blood thirsty reps.
October 8, 2009 9:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
If the Public Option that gets into the final bill, and it will be in there, is a strong one, and it had better be, the states that want the option to opt out and do so will realize their mistake soon enough. If they wanna pass it by, let 'em. Some kids can only learn the hard way. ;o)
October 8, 2009 10:02 PM | Reply | Permalink