The Phantom of "Corruption" in Afghanistan (Updated)

Chief Ajmal Khan Zazai (second from right) on the way to Kabul
Hillary Clinton has been chattering brightly about fighting "corruption" in Afghanistan, and isn't that a beautiful idea? If you're looking for a target that nobody will defend, "corruption" is just about as unpopular as cancer, which is certainly a very bad thing.
Corruption!
Boooooo!!!
Honesty! Transparency! Good governance!
Hurrah!!!
And how difficult could it possibly be to eliminate what Americans call "corruption" in Afghanistan? Eliminating corruption is everywhere and always a simple two-step process:
1. Create a self-examining bureaucracy with lifetime job-stability and a university-educated bourgeoisie to staff it, and then...
Whoa! What's that first step again?
Create a self-examining bureaucracy with lifetime job-stability and a university-educated bourgeoisie to staff it, and then...
Whoa! How the heck can you create such a thing in Afghanistan, where all good things have inevitably passed through the sticky fingers of tribal chiefs for thousands of years?
And now it's time for a very brief excursion into the reality of Afghanistan...
SP: Your own father was assassinated, I understand, under orders from Mullah Omar. You yourself have survived two attempts on your life. Can you tell us about your father and what you and he are fighting for?Chief Zazai: My father was Chief Raiss Afzal Khan Zazai; he was murdered in 2000. My father led our Zazi tribes in the fight against the Soviets and later he organized the Tribal Chiefs from three provinces (Paktia, Paktika & Khost) in order to upraise against the Taliban. Some ex-commanders were visiting him at our family home and there they carried out this heinous crime. I have not found who gave the orders yet but the motive behind this was to bring a full stop to this movement and also to frighten the rest.
My father was one of our country's first industrialists. He and my uncle founded the first Afghan transport company, Mrastay Transport, using old British Bedford trucks. His company, Wazir Ltd, exported raisins, dried fruits and Afghan carpets to Russia, Germany and Britain, while importing vehicles, appliances and medicines.
I highlighted the last paragraph of my excerpt from Steven Pressfield's outstanding blog as a relatively simple indication of how money flows in Afghanistan.
The chief owns the trucks.
And Chief Ajmal Khan Zazai of Paktia Province is a star among tribal chieftains in Afghanistan... a good friend of the United States and blood-enemy of the Taliban and all who openly or surreptiously represent the Taliban, and that is what Chief Ajmal Khan Zazai means by "corruption."
Chief Zazai: We are up against a level of corruption that the Coalition commanders still can't or won't understand. You cannot imagine the pressure I, Amir Mohammad [commander of the fledgling 80-man Tribal Police in Chief Zazai's home district] and our Chiefs are under. The TPF guys worked for five months and only received one month's salary. The Tribal Police are totally under-resourced, no weapons [other than their own] or proper clothing. Can you imagine how we are surviving?SP: Who exactly is the enemy? I don't mean the "far enemy," I mean the "near enemy."
Chief Zazai: The Afghan people ask over and over, "Why don't the Americans do something?" The answer is the Americans' hands are tied by the need to support a corrupt and hopelessly compromised regime. Here is what I mean: in my district, a new border Police Chief has been appointed. This man has been on the payroll of the ISI Pakistani military for 30 years. Two weeks ago the Zazi Chiefs protested against this appointment. About 20 elders went to Kabul to meet with the Interior Minister. He refused to even see them!
SP: What does such an appointment mean in day-to-day terms? How does it affect your Tribal Police Force?
Chief Zazai: These officials go to meet with the Americans and poison their minds against the TPF. I spoke to the [American commander in the Zazi Valley] for two hours over the phone and explained to him why the Tribal Police Force was formed and what is the agenda behind this program, and still he was telling me to talk to the Governor, the District Administrator and the border Police Chief. I said I will not speak to these corrupt men who are doing everything in their power to dissolve the TPF and turn everyone against it.
Details! Who cares about details when Washington has a beautiful new buzz-word, "corruption," which allows our wishy-washy President and the advertising genius who created him to waffle wherever their focus-groups tell them to waffle?
But if you're looking for real resistance to the Taliban which won't dissolve like the morning dew just as soon as the last Marine brigade pulls out of Afghanistan, then what you find is Chief Zazai's union of 11 tribes in Paktia Province, and in every one of those 11 tribes, the chief takes a taste of all good things, and owns the trucks.
That's what Americans mean by "corruption," and I have to confess...
A self-examining bureaucracy with lifetime job-stability and a university-educated bourgeoisie to staff it isn't really the only way to eliminate "corruption."
Instead you could install a gang of self-policing fanatics like the Taliban.
Update: Although the United States continues to make impossible demands on Karzai's national government in Kabul, events have forced our delegation of idiots to recognize the primacy of tribal associations...
American and Afghan officials have begun helping a number of anti-Taliban militias that have independently taken up arms against insurgents in several parts of Afghanistan, prompting hopes of a large-scale tribal rebellion against the Taliban.The emergence of the militias, which took some leaders in Kabul by surprise, has so encouraged the American and Afghan officials that they are planning to spur the growth of similar armed groups across the Taliban heartland in the southern and eastern parts of the country.
So while our official policy continues to emphasize the creation of a strong central government, we are radically undermining that same project by supporting the establishment of independent militias, a device than which nothing could be more inimical to national control.













Thanks Ruta. Brilliant. Succinct. They keep setting them up, let's all keep knocking them down.
November 21, 2009 4:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, if we just give our army another 40,000 troops and maybe a few trillions more in cash, we should be able to get it all under control within the next thirty years, don't you think?
Oh, wait... the deal is we will lose the war if we DON'T give the army another 40,000 troops and a few trillions in cash.
There's a difference in how this is stated; a difference that did not escape me as McChrystal reported the latter case to the President.
Thanks for this, ruta. You pose a number of troubling questions that make one wonder just what the hell we can ever hope to accomplish in Afghanistan.
November 21, 2009 4:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is hard to ask, Ruta. I've read everything three times, including all the links. Are you saying that each side is calling out the other as "corrupt?" Since there is always skimmed off the jobs? And that Zazai owns the trucks? I remember hearing a local claiming that the Taliban were just part of the economic scenery. It made me wonder about who picks up the trash, and sees to other services. In Iraq, it was a way of gaining allegiance to one faction or the other.
Where did you get this? It's great:
1. Create a self-examining bureaucracy with lifetime job-stability and a university-educated bourgeoisie to staff it, and then...
I taped Moyers last night on LBJ and Viet Nam, lots of tape recordings of him and different players and non-players. The conversation is astounding in terms of the relevance to this stupid, unwinnable, nonsense war.
I will further embarrass myself by asking:
What part in the equation does a potentail oil pipeline play at this point? I can't believe that oil interests have given up long-term; they were so far along the road, and a competing one with the Russians is going online two weeks from now. It's not a question you have to answer; I keep getting yelled at when I ask it at the Cafe.
Hearing LBJ speaking of their adherence to Falling Dominoes caused me to wonder again. Oil dominoes? Taliban dominoes? Al Queda dominoes?
:-}
November 21, 2009 6:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't even think the word "corruption" applies to anything in Afghanistan, not even border-guards looking the other way while raw opium floods across the borders. There's nothing to corrupt! Those guys never get paid a regular salary! There is no "system" to fuck up!
The question I always ask myself, wendy, when I look at pictures of Afhanistan is...
How the heck does anybody live there?
Look at that landscape behind Chief Zazai. I can't even figure out how a goat could make a living in it, much less a human being.
About the geopolitics of pipelines through Afghanistan, I don't have a clue. As a practical matter, any pipeline across that fractured country will always be vulnerable in a hundred different places.
IMHO we're more or less locked into the current near-monopoly of Russian energy supplies to Europe, a condition of abject dependence about which even well-informed Europeans remain in deep denial.
November 21, 2009 7:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, dear. My go-to person on mideast oil used to be Antonia Juhasz; I can't find her lately, and she used to answer emails, even. She seemed glad there was Interest in her work!
I just listened to another half hour of LBJ tapes; he agonized, but did the Military's bidding in the end. Knowing that it was all worthless. "If we send 150,000 more trops, soon it'll be another 150,000 troops." and he speaks of the Republicans and Goldwater blowing him out of the water for being 'weak.' Remind you of these Dems? "Can't abandon the South Vietnamese people' (now even some Dems claim it's 'the women' we can't abandon) balanced with "the only way to win is a White Man's War' (what zipperupus said was the True Legacy of Viet Nam--kill everyone who wasn't white, and piss off all of Asia forever.
So many tout the adage that "we must learn history in order not to repeat it," yet we repeat shite constantly. Thanks for anwering. Glad I at least have a beer to cry into.
November 21, 2009 8:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
As far as I am concerned, this is the best thing you have posted so far.
November 21, 2009 6:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, moat.
November 21, 2009 7:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's what Sarah Cheyes said in March.
I don't maintain that she's right and that those who have a different view are wrong. (And she may have changed her view since altho when I heard her being interviewed a few weeks ago she sounded much the same.) Just that her's is a position that merits serious consideration. She's paid her dues.
November 21, 2009 9:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Like everybody else who knows anything about her, I totally admire Sarah Chayes, and agree with her about almost everything...
I spent a couple of years in Washington sleeping on sofas and riding the bus to Capitol Hill day after day with a suitcase full of estimates, bids, and details about the availability of everything you need to provide electricity and clean water in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the main difference between what I proposed for those two shit-holes was that in Iraq I wanted to give it all to the mosques, and in Afghanistan I wanted to give it all to the tribal chieftains.
But Sarah Chayes lives in a different world from ordinary people like me, and I don't mean that sarcastically, because she has made most of that world for herself, with her brilliantly conceived and executed projects in Kandahar.
I was looking for the shortest distance between a shit-hole and a minimally decent place to live. Sarah Chayes is looking for a better world, and actually building a better world around her.
But there aren't many like her, to say the least, and in the short term I still believe that my plan would have lit up a lot of villages before Sarah Chayes can change Afghanistan from the ground up, as much as I hope she succeeds and believe that massive support for her and even a few more like her could achieve what none of the rest of us now imagine.
November 21, 2009 10:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks
November 22, 2009 5:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sic Semper Tyrannis is run by Pat Lang -- one of the 'serious' people. He moderates comments but your post here belongs in the discussion of legitimacy following the rather dire topic
"Conceptualizations of Insurgency and its Effects on the Counterinsurgency Policy Process."
November 21, 2009 11:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great post, Ruta.
Like Wendy Davis, I, too, was struck by the poignancy (and the insanity that thereafter prevailed) revealed in the LBJ Vietnam tapes on Fridays's Bill Moyer's program.
And now I'm confused.
Because when you say: "Create a self-examining bureaucracy with lifetime job-stability and a university-educated bourgeoisie to staff it, and then..." then I understand why the leadership of country like Afghanistan is "corrupt."
But our leadership has term limits. SO WHY ARE WE?
November 22, 2009 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
We're only corrupt at the top. Clean water comes out of your tap. The garbage gets picked up. Our bureaucracy still works. Our politics doesn't.
November 22, 2009 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, not everywhere.
November 22, 2009 2:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm late to this blog but it's well worth reading and thinking about, so I've rec'd it late anyway.
I can only say one thing about Afghanistan: Obviously we want Afghanistan to fail.
November 23, 2009 12:45 PM | Reply | Permalink