An Emergency Fix for Nuclear North Korea

When North Korea's "Dear Leader" Kim Jong-il gave control of the State Security Department to his youngest son, Kim Jong-un, just a few weeks ago, Korea-watchers more or less unanimously agreed that the succession of leadership in the DPRK had been decided.
This could be very good news, but...
Nobody really has the least idea, because the sort of reporters who would have the sort of contacts to develop a story about the personality of Kim Jong-un no longer exist, and our own "intelligence" apparatus is staffed by clowns in white socks who can barely make contact with a wall, if they lower their pointy little heads and run at it from a distance of three feet.
Like so many other sons and daughters of kings, billionaires, and dictators, Kim Jong-un attended the International School of Berne in Switzerland, which currently accepts children as young as 3 years old and shepherds them through all three stages of the International Baccalaureate.
Next stop, Harvard or Pyongyang.
Dozens of kids will have interacted or roomed with Kim Jong-un at ISBerne, and since gossip is even more popular than polo among the hobbies of the ultra-rich, there's significant and theoretically accessible info embedded somewhere in all those royal brains, but we won't get at it, because the profession of "society reporter" now belongs to ten thousand freaky little bloggers, and none of them knows anybody.
So we're left with incomprehensible sources, like Kenji Fujimoto, an ex-cook in the Kim Jong household...
(Kim Jong-un) has superb physical gifts, is a big drinker and never admits defeat.
This makes him sound like a head-banging soccer-yob from Belfast, or... what? Some kind of muscle-bound meatball, eager to hurl every missile in his father's tiny arsenal at Honolulu, Seoul, and Seattle, until the entire Pacific Rim has been incinerated.
"We're winning! Pass the booze, and let's shoot some hoops!"
This is probably the scenario to bet on, if you can find a sucker dumb enough to bet against it, but we may not even get that far, since Kim Jong-il still running the show in North Korea, and that guy is dying fast. The roly-poly dictator of just a few years ago is now a shrunken old man, and isn't he just the kind of megalomaniac to take us all with him, when he goes?
Kim Jong-il has already exploded an atomic bomb as big as the "Little Boy" which destroyed Hiroshima in 1945! (This was a one-day story in the American press.)
Now Kim Jong-il is threatening to launch a long-range Taepodong-2 missile (which can carry an atomic bomb) at Hawaii next week! (This was a one-day story in the American press.)
What to do? You may be surprised to learn that there's a very simple answer.
North Korea has been offering to scrap its nuclear-weapons program in return for a "non-aggression pact" ever since 2003, but the brain-dead morons who ruled American foreign policy from 2003 to 2008 were too absurdly stupid to accept this beautiful deal, and now Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are still too absurdly stupid to give a half-crazy, dying dictator one piece of paper before he launches a long-range missile at Hawaii!
So if you're listening, Hillary and Barry...
Give Kim Jong-il the fucking paper!
And you might as well throw in a little something for the heir-apparent, too, and I may have just the ticket, because our estimable ex-cook and sole source about Kim Jong-un, Kenji Fujimoto claims the kid really loves basketball, plays all the time, and after every game...
Jong-un would then gather up his teammates and, like a coach, analyze the game they just played: "You should have passed the ball to this guy, you should have shot it then."
So invite Kim Jong-un to Washington, put him on a basketball court with Barack Obama, Michael Jordon, and Kobe Bryant, and let him talk about coaching with Phil Jackson, and make him very, very happy, because...
A little basketball and one piece of paper is cheaper than nuclear war.
















So you support my primary stance after all, that we should have chosen my first pick, Paris Hilton, since she knows simply everybody (and may even have a VHS tape rolling around somewhere).
And now in the spirit of killing 2 birds with one stone, we can make Kevin Johnson our Ambassador to North Korea, which will indeed give us $800K of value. (Whether he'll have to wash Kim Jong-un's car is yet to be decided).
And now I get to re-sing my atomic ditty:
"My father was rear gunner on the Enola Gay,
Slept with a nuclear payload one fine day,
And from that union there came three,
Des-olation, Des-ecration and the other was me
Yo ho ho!!! And the other was me."
If he can get Kim Jong-un to sign for the Kings, we may averted WWIII!!!
June 30, 2009 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Paris Hilton?
The right ambassador to North Korea was Elizabeth Taylor...
But it ain't who we send that saves us, it's who we get to visit, and how much fun they have...
June 30, 2009 11:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Again, Paris Hilton, though I understand Elizabeth Taylor has a good healthy drug stash, but bring on Lindsey Lohan and Amy Winehouse and we have a winning cocktail.
June 30, 2009 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I especially liked your comparison of our intelligence apparatus to "clowns in white socks who can barely make contact with a wall, if they lower their pointy little heads and run at it from a distance of three feet".
June 30, 2009 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, you read his posts that close? Don't you know it'll give you cataracts? Oh, I see, already did.
June 30, 2009 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Only the ones with the pretty color pictures.
June 30, 2009 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sick of these goddamn bloggers crapping on guys with white socks. Besides, it's just bitter.
'Cause we got all the hot chicks in high school.
July 1, 2009 2:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm with you.
It's only the old appeasement/coddling, enabling charge that needs countering. But I personally don't give a damn how it looks.
June 30, 2009 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly right, IMHO.
American foreign policy is dominated by phantom charges like "weak on defense," in the same way that drug policy is dominated by "soft on drugs" and economic policy is dominated by the phantoms of "socialism" and "big government."
These bogeymen are the permanent government of the United States, no matter which party may temporarily occupy the White House or attain a majority in Congress.
June 30, 2009 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Funny what slogans will do.
June 30, 2009 11:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Slogans?
I don't exactly disagree with calling those things "slogans," and I haven't really thought much about what to call them.
But the few little words in a slogan like "soft on drugs" are obviously only the visible or conscious manifestation of (apparently) irresistible unconscious political and psychological forces, and maybe we need a different word to describe the massive influence which those words exert on American politics.
Somebody says "soft on drugs" and somehow those three little words put hundreds of thousand of people in prison...
"Soft on defense" creates ten thousand nuclear weapons...
All those things are slogans, all of them are memes, but the very few of them which dominate issues like disarmament must have something in common, which makes them such incredibly powerful and apparently permanent features of the American unconscious.
The impression I have is like something slipping into a black hole, and the power that pushes it over the event-horizon is infinitely smaller than the power which prevents it from escaping forever after.
Black holes in the collective unconscious!
And maybe this is a process which slowly proceeds in every civilization, as one subject after another finds a black hole that fits, and disappears forever from reasonable discussion, until nobody can think straight or talk straight about anything any more.
July 1, 2009 12:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Let's give them a working title of Black Hole Memes.
July 1, 2009 10:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not bad!
Maybe one of us can blog on this specific subject. Is there any way for the collective consciousness or unconscious to escape from those things, before they suck us all into oblivion?
I don't know.
July 2, 2009 8:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Might be worth noting that North Korea can threaten to hit Hawaii with a Taepodong-2 missile all it wants... but no Taepodong-2 missile can actually hit Hawaii. They are rated for 4,000-6,500 kilometers... Hawaii is more than 7,000 kilometers from North Korea. Not to mention that: 1) there is no sign that North Korea can launch a missile dependably half that distance, 2) there is no sign that North Korea has the appropriate technology for a nuclear missile delivery system, and 3) that having placed an 8,900 pound warhead (the weight of the comparable "Little Boy" warhead) on the missile that the missile would still be able to go any significant distance with that additional load.
June 30, 2009 4:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
etoipi's claim that a contemporary atomic device with destructive force approximately equal to the bomb which destroyed Hiroshima would weigh about 8900 pounds beautifully illustrates the absurdity of one-stop wikipedia "expertise" about subjects like atomic weapons.
A gun-type nuclear weapon in 1945 was constructed like a cannon, and how would a one-stop wikipedia "expert" ever imagine that in the next 64 years nuclear weapons-design would actually... make a little progress?
But for anyone who actually wants to form a reasonable opinion on this subject, there are useful charts and lists all over the internet, which accurately represent the weight/yield ratios of atomic weapons.
For example, a W-19 device produces approximately the same yield as the 16 kiloton device which destroyed Hiroshima, and only weighs 600 pounds.
etoipi's claim about the absolute range of Taepodong-2 missiles is equally silly, but I've already wasted enough time with this... whatever, and somebody else can deal with the rest of his or her misinformation, or not.
June 30, 2009 4:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hear terrorists are searching out ways to deliver nuclear weapons, such as stealing the Enola Gay out of the Smithsonian Institute. Presumably they only need to take off, not land... FBI has an alert out for dark skin people of Middle Eastern descent renting Dr. Strangelove and studying bomb release techniques at the conclusion, specifically cowboy whoops and guffaws.
Personally I think it's easier to release say a Hannah Montana movie on the populace and watch the slow disintegration of cerebral matter as the plague spreads across the continent like a creeping rash (Alaska and Hawaii saved for once), more insidious even than hacking fumes from gas containers.
June 30, 2009 5:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hijack the Enola Gay!
Harharharhar!!!
But once there's a bomb in the Enola Gay, you can even forget about taking off! You don't need no stinking flight school whatsoever!
You're already there!
June 30, 2009 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
"No matter where you go, there you are" - Buckaroo Bonzai
Truer words never spoken.
June 30, 2009 6:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe truer words may, in fact, have been spoken.
I'll get back to you once that's been confirmed.
July 1, 2009 2:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
If they have, I'll just feed them anti-truth serum and we're back at square one. Your turn to throw the jax.
July 1, 2009 4:19 AM | Reply | Permalink