Owning
"Own" is misleading. We
need a different verb for it.
Your own home: the
American dream. It's yours. You got the mortgage, paid money down and X dollars
a month for thirty years, it's paid up. Your house.
As long as you pay the ever-rising
property tax.
You sort of own it.
If you get poor, get
old (practically the same thing), lose your job, if inflation creeps up on you,
the County will sell your tax, which means the County will sell your home. Some
places you have a year to pay it off after the tax sale, some places not. When
you get behind in your taxes, you are evicted.
There are people, there
are companies, that make money buying taxes, getting properties at tax sales
for peanuts. It's a business, perfectly legal. Business is business.
Think about
condominiums. You buy a condo in
The common areas, the
hallways and so forth, belong to the association, which owns the building and
grounds except for the apartments. You are a member of the association. Your
share, if it is a large building full of people, is less than one percent. And
of course there are costs: management, maintenance and repairs, painting, things
the association (a democratic institution) decides must be done to the bushes,
the play area, the pool.
What you have bought is
the right to use your apartment as long as you keep up the payments--keep up
the payments!--and don't offend the neighbors.
House, farm, apartment,
what you buy is the conditional right to use a property so long as you can keep
paying for it one way and another, and the right to pass this right to your
heirs. If you have enough money and don't get old and forgetful and alone,
probably you can keep using it. This is property ownership. It sounds a lot
like rent.
There are some things
an American can pretty much own outright. Your car, once the payments are made,
is yours; your right to drive it is conditional, but the car is yours. Owner's license,
driver's license: if you don't have one or the other, you can't drive the car.
Insurance. Inspection.
Always there's the
question of money.
Your car is yours. If you can't drive it you
can find a place to keep it for free, if you don't mind backwoods, mountains,
deserts, and the like. If you're recently homeless, maybe you're living in your
car, which you truly own if it is paid up. Maybe the whole family: husband,
wife and children. It's good to have a place of your own. The authorities look
down on this, though. You'll be able to keep the car, but your children may be
confiscated.
Your clothes are yours,
including shoes, watch, earmuffs and so forth.
We've always known that
we can't take it with us; nowadays a lot of us can't have it while we're here,
either. A lot of folks are fired. A lot of people are living on the streets.
The
Who owns the world,
anyway?
















I have taken a renters mentality to it all. Even my clothes, I know one day we will abandon each other. Unless I see cash at the end of our time together and then I say I 'owned' it. Only past tense in my book- can't get ahead of myself again.
March 14, 2009 8:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
You forgot an additional source of poverty: "layoff".
The rent that I pay to Franklin county, Ohio for our (under 2000 sq ft) home is $425 per month.
Fortunately my wife has income, since my income since being laid off is rather smaller than that rent payment.
This is why I favor taxation related to economic activity rather than possession: I am happy to pay taxes which are a reasonable fraction of income. But it is *absolutely impossible* for someone without income to pay *any* taxes unless that individual can pay the taxes from a precious savings account.
P.S. I am optimistically expecting to recoup investment of many thousands of hours in the business I've been starting in the years since being laid off. This is not a story of indolence...
March 14, 2009 9:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Owning real property is considered an economic activity, I guess. If you don't produce with the property it cannot pay for itself. Retirees are definitely in this "boat". They no longer get wages for productivity, they live off investments in the larger sense (savings, SS, annuities, ...). This was ostensibly one reason prop 13 was passed in California, to limit property assessments which relate to property taxes.
If you don't have the income to live on, you have to pay out of your accumulated wealth, or find someone to lend to you whether secured by that wealth or not.
March 14, 2009 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's the rent-free future for too many of us. Taxes are the deal we make with society to maintain roads, infrastructure, schools, etc. I don't begrudge paying taxes, though I would support a sales tax based tax structure, (with obvious exemptions for food, medicine, etc.),to take pressure off the lower income households. I have a couple of acres of scrub desert land where I keep a small airstream, just in case things get really bad, (taxes on the land are about $200/year).
March 15, 2009 1:04 AM | Reply | Permalink