Critics rave for 'Health Care in B&W' !
"Health Care in Black & White" will premiere here at 6 p.m. Eastern Saturday night, but the critics are already raving!
WHAT CRITICS ARE SAYING
✯✯✯✯✯ "... a taut sci-fi-drama-suspense-thriller-political-love story that will make you laugh out loud!"
-- Mipperc R. Cord, New York Postal
✯✯✯✯✯ "Two latex-gloved thumbs up!"
-- Ecrim o Rppcrd, At the Flickies
✯✯✯✯✯ "Jimmy Stewart and Peter Sellers enliven the screen as if they weren't dead!"
-- Crimp Redcrop, LA Old Times
✯✯✯✯✯ "... a high-contrast salvo in the battle for health care"
-- Cmdr Roc Peipr, Stars and Bars
✯✯✯✯✯ "... a lyrical, liberal vision of the past, present and future"
-- Doc Mcripprer, USA Yesterday
✯✯✯✯✯ "Filmmaker Ripper McCord is the new D. W. Griffith!"
-- McRipp Corder, TPM Bistro
✯✯✯✯✯ "'Health Care in Black & White' is a transfusion of fun!"
-- Gene Shalit, Today Show
✯ "Don't let your children see this!"
-- Michael Medved, Discovery Institute
Watch the trailer on Youtube now. (Hit the little HQ button below the vid for even more big-screen excitement!)
















You multi-media genius, you!!!
I can't wait to see it, but will there be showings after Rosh Hashanah? (which starts tomorrow at sundown) ;-)
Thanks, Ripper.
September 17, 2009 4:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've edited the post to reflect a Saturday night premiere. So just check my blog if it doesn't hit th e Rec list by Sunday.
September 17, 2009 5:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Very sensitive. Thanks! (BTW, our high schools are playing their football games tonight - Thursday - instead of tomorrow for the same reason.)
September 17, 2009 11:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
REALLY, REALLY FINE. A FINE EXPOSITION.
A fine collection of symbols.
What a craftsman.
As if you need it. But I am compelled to render unto you the Dayly Blog of the Day Award for this here TPMCafe Site, given to all of you from all of me.
I mean it. I am impressed.
s
September 17, 2009 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you. I accept this award on behalf of ...
September 17, 2009 5:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
And you realize this was just the trailer, right?
September 17, 2009 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
104th view, first rec. You have a perfect five a average so far. :-)
September 17, 2009 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
May I add my chicken review?
(4 toes up....way yp!)
Rec'd
=D
September 17, 2009 7:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ripper - It's unfair just to post the positive reviews and omit the negative ones. Such as:
"Health Care" is sick - PRM (Physicians for Remunerative Medicine).
"Should Be Rescinded Without Further Notice - Insurance for Fun and Profit
"It's so stupid, 46 million don't even get it" - U.S. Noncensus Bureau
September 17, 2009 10:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why hasn't the term,
...become the way we refer to all non-Pulbic Option bills? Why hasn't it gone viral?
Remember "The blame game?" "If you don't agree with the President (Bush) you don't support the troops," The Democrat Party," "Death Tax," "Flip-flop," "Marriage penalty," and on and on.
Guess what? Using repetitive terms like that works! We need to label these pro-insurance "reforms" over and over again to associate them with the fact that the only winners are the insurance companies. I said all along that the "Death Tax" should be renamed the "Paris Hilton fair taxation bill."
But this is more important! Come on, guys, it is time to pile on here with truth!
September 18, 2009 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
You want a good repetitive term? Health care "relief". We need relief from the high cost of health care. I still want that happy ending Ripper even if it takes until Thanksgiving.
September 18, 2009 9:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's good, but we need a simple negative moniker to hang on bills like Baucus'.
"Are Insurance Executives worth dying for?"
"Say 'No Way' to The Party of No"
"Insurance -- Great -- until you get sick!"
"Lose your job; lose your health care -- only in America!"
September 18, 2009 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not everything in Baucus's bill is terrible. Like changing how the IRS treats (we'll tax them) very high end (over $21,000 a year) health insurance plans. Top execs at Wall St. firms get $40,000 a year plans tax free that cover just about anything their expensive accountants say they cover and I'm tired of subsidizing them. It also changes Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs) and Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) which as currently constituted are a couple of Republican gifts to the wealthy. Cutting those Baucus provisions out will make it harder to raise more cash for better subsidies and make it revenue neutral. So let's mesh the good stuff in his bill with the good in the HELP bill. It might wind up better than HR 3200.
September 18, 2009 6:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree that Baucus' bill has one or two positive points. He would not have been able to show his face without them. His OverLords -- the insurance industry -- allowed them because they won't affect them directly. They'll still rake in the bucks even if big honchos' have to pay taxes on their benefits.
Baucus is bought and paid for and his bill should be boiled in oil.
It is not too late for health care reform! Take Baucus back to his home state and let him get an earful!
Let's have a national referedum on this! There is not one person (unless they work for the government) who can get sick with a chronic illness, and who doesn't have to worry about losing his/her insurance once they are too sick to work. THEN try to get decent insurance as an individual.
The time is NOW. The way is Public Option. The Time Is NOW!
September 19, 2009 10:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
For everyone on the left or right who has ever said "We want the same health care plan congress has" Baucus more or less gets us there. It does it by taking away perks only the rich and/or powerful get instead of giving those perks to us but it does raise money from them to help make the plan revenue neutral and makes it fairer for us all. Instead of paying for 85% of their premiums we taxpayers - congress's employers - will only pay about 70%. Like employers doe for us.
It's never been too late for health care reform. Despite all the sturm and drang from the right nothing has much has changed. We still have enough votes in congress to pass a good bill. 4 out of 5 bills passed so far are pretty good and even Baucus's bill has those provisions that can be incorporated into the final bill to make it better. Support for reform is still overwhelming.
The public option by itself as written in any of the bills won't do much to bring down prices. Too few people are eligible to sign up for it, it will only be a base plan, and it won't open until 2013 anyway. While I want a public option too we need more than that shiny object we're all obsessing on. Like the following:
There are provisions in most of the bills that will outlaw the rotten insurance company practices you cite. But cutting costs by doing away with fee for service on the provider side is very important too and we should push for those to go into effect immediately instead of just setting up demonstrator projects and study groups to examine how to do it.
September 20, 2009 11:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Can't wait Ripper!
September 18, 2009 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great video! I need to learn to edit stuff like that.
September 18, 2009 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink