« Joe the Plumber says Obama tap danced "almost as good as Sammy Davis, Jr." | Ripper McCord's Blog | Why McCain is a Coward »

Good God, What's Happened to This Country?


If you haven't yet read the TPM frontpage items in the left-hand column titled "McCain's Legions" and "A Doozy" and watched the videos they headline, you will be stunned by the time you have.

Here it is 3:45 in the morning and I have just now finished watching the Republican Party complete its transformation into the Nazi Party of the United States. I despair for our nation.

When did it become acceptable for a leader in a major American political party to light an unquenchable wildfire of hatred in the hearts of followers? Apparently about the time that John McCain became the presumptive nominee for the Republicans.

I would seethe with anger at the profoundly heavy wedge that McCain, Palin and their party are driving into the soul of this country, but that emotion has been usurped completely now and is the sole province of the Right.


What folly the GOP has embarked upon! What disregard for the fundamental basis of our democracy: the deliberate, elective process that leads to the peaceful surrender of one authority and the peaceful succession of another all at the same moment. This, the most defining achievement of American political philosophy, is now the prey of wolves who have cast off their sheep's clothing and now salivate and gnash their teeth openly in their hunger for power.

I will not repeat here the vile epithets of the McCain crowd, for there is no need. You will hear them repeated soon enough. The fire will not be doused easily.

My country is as divided as surely as the North and the South came to blows 150 years ago. Yet this is no divide along some neat Mason-Dixon line. This is a crazy quilt of prejudice knit only of partisanship and stitched together feverishly by the top leaders and sleazy apprratchiks of the Republican Party. And it is terrifying to behold.

God save Barack Obama from my countrymen. God save my countrymen from themselves.

54 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

There's a petition running for congress to censure Bachmann:

http://www.censurebachmann.com/

PSSSSST...pass it on

user-pic

Done. Thank you for the tip.

user-pic

Better yet, if Bachman pisses you off that much, consider donating to her Democratic challenger.

user-pic

I wonder, though, how many people really are the hate-speakers as a percentage of the populace? It's probably greatly magnified by the media and misleading the rest of us into thinking it's a tidal wave.

No doubt about it, some people in this country don't like black people and the idea of even a half-black person being the President scares the beejesus out of them. They're kind of like the snake after you shoot it, and it lies there twitching. It still looks formidable, but it ain't going anywhere.

I was musing to myself this morning on what's going to happen to Fox News and all the hate-speakers if the Obama Presidency is very successful economically and foreign policy-wise. How are they going to cope with the success of somebody they hate and fear?

user-pic

Maybe that's not the point though. Maybe the fact that the campaign can spew hate to this degree is the real point. When a party leader questions whether the other party leader is a terrorist sympathizer, then hate follows. The percentage isn't the issue so much. There are a lot of people in this country. 40 million of them still think Bush is doing OK. That's a lot of people, even if it isn't a huge percentage.

user-pic

Sadly, I think the answer can be found in the way they treated the presidency of Bill Clinton. Since Republicans are zealots, facts hold no sway over their thinking.

user-pic

I have mixed feelings about what we're witnessing. On one hand, I share all of your concerns, Rip. On the other hand, I feel that this dark side of America is not being newly created by McCain/Palin, but is an old darkness now being exposed to light.

Obama's candidacy has been like a mirror on the character of our nation, showing us the goodness and the evil within us. This election will reveal which character is dominant. I'm actually glad that the McCain campaign has so clearly presenting Americans a fundamental moral choice for the future direction of the country.

While frightening to witness, the now exposed hatefulness of the Republican base offers voters a very clear moral decision. If Obama wins, and especially if he wins in a landslide, it will show that Americans have greatly rejected the old darkness in favor of a brave new future.

user-pic

Maybe we should look at the positives.

Race relations in the United States is constantly evolving. But as it's gotten better for people of color, racism has also evolved. It still exists in many concrete and abstract ways, but it has gotten a lot quieter. Now we have a chance to look it in the eye again.

I think it is naive of us to think that the McCain campaign is fully responsible for the hatred and barely contained violent undercurrent that we are witnessing. McCain is taking full advantage of it, and I, like many of you, find that disgusting. And I am also fearful that the violence will become more than just an undercurrent.

But this underground sentiment, this hate speech, this violence...it was gonna come up some time. The catalyst is not an old white man. The catalyst is a young African American man. The one running for president.

Please dont' think that I am suggesting that Barack Obama is at fault. But look at our history. Any time there have been systemic advances for people of color, there has been violence perpetrated by racists. I'm thinking an African American president in the United States is a pretty systemic advance.

But every time racism rears it's ugly head, it is diminished. Partly because racists do horrifying and hateful things that make reasonable people reject their ridiculous ideas and partly because it brings racism out in the open again and we, as a society, can not only have an honest discussion about it, but we can take further steps to eradicate it.

user-pic

I hope you're right. I truly do. There are forces for good right now, organized at the grassroots within the Obama campaign. So many of us who would stand up at a moment's notice to peacefully demonstrate our dedication to unity and justice and equality under the Constitution.

And I agree that mcShame does not have control over these bloodthirsty mobs he has incited. But that lack of control is worrisome. And it lies at his doorstep for condoning it.

user-pic

I actually had trouble getting to sleep after listening to the nasty stuff in that pre-rally line of people. Not all of them will leave similarly ignorant and racist progeny, and their percentage of the population will decrease.

But for now, it is a significant pool of possible threats to the likely president. McCain and Palin absolutely have to disavow, repudiate, and excoriate this hateful trash talk, and let it be known that they do not consider Obama anything except the honorable opposition.

user-pic

If that kept you up, try watching the interview Bill Moyers did last night with a guy who wrote about election theft. I had the misfortune of watching it right before I turned my lights out. I had to turn on the radio and listen to the BBC talk about world news (also bad, of course) to finally drop off to sleep.

His only advice in the end was to show up massively, including people who voted early; everyone should go to the polling places on election day just to show our numbers and catch it on film if there is any intimidation.

user-pic

I've concluded that with a race that was unexciting, they decided to do or say anything to excite their base. The base is now excited with a blood-thirst. Like the Roman circus where crowds cheered to animals attacking humans or humans fighting to the death.

It is sickening. And it unleashes and endorses the basest of human passions. The GOP has now endorsed chaos. What's next? Next they'll say that fascist control of society is necessary to restore the order they have destroyed.

God help us.

user-pic

Next they'll say that fascist control of society is necessary to restore the order they have destroyed.

TheraP -- I only saw this Think Progess post today and it almost made me throw up.

When giving a speech to the National Urban League McCain was asked what he would do to lower urban crime. His reply:

MCCAIN: And some of those tactics — you mention the war in Iraq — are like that we use in the military. You go into neighborhoods, you clamp down, you provide a secure environment for the people that live there, and you make sure that the known criminals are kept under control. And you provide them with a stable environment and then they cooperate with law enforcement, etc, etc. [8/1/08]
user-pic

It's worrisome, I agree. On the other hand, an awful lot of it is coming from people who are the political version of the rabid sports fan. They watch the games and make a lot of noise, but they don't actually do anything except be fans. I mean, there are some deeply angry people posting at this site, but they're not out doing a drive by of the local GOP precinct office or burning down the house of the neighbor with the McCain sign.

user-pic

Damn, Ripper, that's writin'. You've perfectly expressed the outrage and revulsion many of us are feeling as we watch this country slide into ugliness. Somewhere along the line the Republicans determined that a vote is a vote, no matter what sort of a filthy miscreant cast it. It was a short step from that cynical realization to this point. The vile Republican strategy of playing to the lowest common denominator--of dumpster diving for votes--has finally borne its evil fruit, and it is foul beyond belief. These people have no shame, no morals and no excuse. If John McCain somehow manages to win this election, American Democracy will truly and finally be dead.

user-pic

Thanks ripper, I feel a lot better now. I was thinking that it would be unfair to blame Obama for everything one of his wing nut supporters did. But you're convinced me that he, like McCain, is responsible for anything some crazy supporter says or does. Every crazy post written here against McCain, Hillary, Krugman, and many others are all Obama's fault. The t-shirts that say abort Palin, Obama's fault. The two Portland men who firebombed a McCain sign, Obama's responsible. Warnings to Sarah Palin not to come into Manhattan lest she get gang-raped by some big black brothers, part of the Obama campaign.

I will consider anything the craziest left wing nut says to be Obama's fault, knowing I have your endorsement for that position. Thanks ripper.

user-pic

Sure, I'm game to compare crazies. Add up all the creepy video you can find, and we'll see how it stacks up.

user-pic

I'm sure you are game since since you all spend a vast amount of time and energy searching for crazies and wing nuts or just plain old lies to spread here. I truly loved the Joe is a relative of Charles Keating lie but it didn't near match the Trig is Bristol's son lie. You guys are so creative.

At any rate its nice to see you endorsing the notion that anything any Obama supporter says no matter how crazy is Obama's responsibility and the full blame rests with him. Just as McCain and any other politician is responsible for whatever any of their crazy supporters say.

user-pic

Find me some sound files of people at a Biden or Obama rally making racist jokes, or threatening injury and death.

user-pic

,blockquote>I truly loved the Joe is a relative of Charles Keating lie but it didn't near match the Trig is Bristol's son lie. You guys are so creative.

Those were great, almost up to the level of 'Saddam is a threat to America and has drones of death and WMD vans' or "Mission Accomplished', 'heckuva job, Brownie','We don't torture', 'smoking gun mushroom clouds and smokin' 'em out of caves', or 'the fundamentals of the economy are strong', or lets give a gay prostitute named Gannon a press pass, or baloney about 'country first', 'ACORN is the greatest threat to our democracy' or in 2000 - 'counting the Florida votes would be be unfair to George W. and is unconstitutional'! ...those were really creative and led to lasing memories and nightmares of the Bush/Republican times we've had the last eight years and are just some of my favorites.

user-pic

Yup, both sides lie and McCain is responsible for any lie or statement from any wing nut that supports him and Obama is responsible for any lie or statement from any wing nut that supports him. I think I we're getting each others message.

user-pic

And are you too young to vote yet, or just not mature enough to understand what Ripper was writing about?

Did "lefties" make the Hillary nutcrackers? Is there anything slightly comperable to the monkey dolls with Obama's name on them? Are there robocalls about McCain's ties to Liddy, who gave directions on how to kill federal agents?

Gow up, kat.

user-pic

Eff you cville. I'm over 50 years old and I've been on the front lines of the battle for civil rights often enough to have walked away with black and blue marks on my body from cops. I once had 5 finger marks on my throat as a month long badge from one protest from some cop grabbing me by the throat. I've earned the right to speak my mind punk.

Did McCain make the Hillary nut cracker? Did McCain bring an Obama monkey doll up on stage? Did Obama call Palin a fucking bitch or warn her to stay out of NY or she'd get raped? Is Obama selling abort Palin t-shirts? Who gets blamed for the monkey doll and the threats of rape?

There's more than enough crazies on both sides and McCain is no more responsible for the right wing nuts than obama the left wing nuts. If you haven't seen it you're not paying attention or you're the one who's the kiddie. So you effin group up.

user-pic

cville:

Civil discourse is in the eyes of the beholder. This is what you wrote about Hillary Clinton on June 1, 2008, a Democrat supported by 18 million Americans who will be responsible, G-d willing, for the election of Senator Obama:

"I am watching MSNBC Breaking news and Hillary is talking about her FIRST TERM!

WTF?

She is asking them to "travel this final stretch with her, and to keep fighting!"

She is never going to admit defeat!

She is still hanging on!

She is crazy!

She is dilusional! (sic)

Can anyone believe this shit?"

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/06/breaking-news-hillarys-first-t.php

Hillary Clinton was crazy and delusional on June 1, 2008? Yea, we're the civil folks.

user-pic

Check out the comments in the post I cite and quote to above. Lots of civil stuff in there too. Gosh, I'm so glad we're the good guys.

user-pic

Gotta love the fact that the Internet is forever, right Bruce? Thanks for saving that one from the memory hole!

In a 24/7 news cycle, it's important to remind people -- as you have done so eloquently here -- that there are 365 days in a year...

user-pic

Oceankat:

There will be time after the election for an objective review of this campaign. Right now, the meme is that our brothers and sisters who are supporting the Republican are haters, and those of us who are supporting Senator Obama are blessed. Anecdotal diddies are the rage and all that is needed to establish proof of the ex parte hatered on the right side of the aisle in this great Republic.

Someone just asked you if you've been around the block. I have, I think you have too. I'm trying to keep my mouth shut, I'm casting my vote for Senator Obama as I would for any Democrat against a right-wing zealot like John McCain, and yet I still take solace in knowing that in my world, G-d has a place for each and everyone of us, regardless of political party.

In the meantime, it is kind of funny to read those who spew hatred on these pages everyday rail away about hatred. (this is not directed at Rip, whom I believe has come along quite impressively since the intra-family hatred directed at HRC and her supporters in the primary days).

I admire you oceankat for your willingness to swim against a very rough tide around these parts. FWIW, I don't hate John McCain or Sarah Palin or 99.6 percent of their supporters, but I wouldn't vote for either of them in a squillion years. That said, like you, I'm not afraid to say that the flames of downright hatred are fanned on the pages of TPM each and every day of this race, from the front pagers inclusive of the big guy, to the TPM Election Central folks, and to our brothers and sisters at the TPM Cafe.

G-d bless the First Amendment and what it stands for, and I guess we should be thankful that selective reading and hearing and watching is alive, and well, and pervasive. It energizes the base and helps us win. (wink)

Respectfully,

Bruce

user-pic

Thanks Bruce for weighing in. I wish I could say I was voting for Obama, I really do, but I can't. There's just some things that happened in the primary I can't let go of. I'm a little embarrassed to admit it but it is what it is. I can't imagine voting for McCain, I can't see myself voting for Obama. I'm just hoping the polls show such a gap that I can leave the president spot blank. I will be voting democratic the full down ticket.

But even if I was an Obama supporter I'd be posting much the same. Too much of what's posted here is just too far over the top for me to remain silent. I know that there's other sites that are just as distorted and hateful on the right, but I'm here. I was here before the democratic primary.

I certainly condemn the racist rhetoric of the right wing nuts. But there has to be some push back when some start to demonize what is likely to be only a few % points less than half the voters. I appreciate that there are a few here willing to speak up when that demonization goes over the line.

user-pic

So you'll sit on your backside and not vote at all?

user-pic
That said, like you, I'm not afraid to say that the flames of downright hatred are fanned on the pages of TPM each and every day of this race, from the front pagers inclusive of the big guy, to the TPM Election Central folks, and to our brothers and sisters at the TPM Cafe.

[emphasis mine]

Thanks for stating this clearly, Bruce. Just as only Nixon could go to China, only you have the respect of nearly everyone who posts here to say this with authority.

user-pic

But, oceankat, you don't have my endorsement to paint Obama with the same brush that John McCain and other GOP leaders have tarred themselves with.

Because while I agree that crazies exist on both sides of the aisle, you ignore the many quantitative and qualitative differences between Right-wing hate speech and Left-wing hate speech. There is just no equivalence.

I have not heard or seen the kind of vitriol spewed by McCain-Palin supporters at any Obama rally. I've been to two, including one today estimated at 100,000 people assembled under the Gateway Arch. Neither have news reports revealed widespread incidents of personal threats made openly against Sen. McCain or Gov. Palin, at whose rallies the threats aimed at Sen. Obama became so commonplace that even Fox News could not avoid reporting them.

One qualitative distinction lies in the character of the hate speech on the Right and the angry speech on the Left. There is a difference.

Hate speech most notably includes racial slurs, particularly those that might accompany a crime or assault. Few if any have been uttered by Obama, Biden or any Democrat, the opposite of the case with the Republicans. Indeed, while you are able to claim one or two isolated threats against the GOP ticket, McCain-Palin rallies have seen at least that number of actual assaults on journalists, who are routinely included in the invective leveled from the GOP stage.

Most importantly, and quite to the point of my post, I will quote myself:

When did it become acceptable for a leader in a major American political party to light an unquenchable wildfire of hatred in the hearts of followers? Apparently about the time that John McCain became the presumptive nominee for the Republicans.

For in no other campaign in modern history has a major-party ticket incited their followers to near-riot, issued accusations of treason and terrorism against their opponents, intentionally stirred racial hatreds for political gain or so brazenly questioned the patriotism of a rival. Not even John Kerry was accused of being "anti-American."

user-pic

Near riots? Now you're getting carried away. There have been no near riots. I repeat, there have been no near riots. It's all anecdotal stuff that is being used for political gain, and I think folks should take a deep breath.

I'm voting for the Democrat, and the guy who I genuinely believe, whether naively or not, wants to unify this nation.

user-pic

You think this is unprecedented? Four democrats pooled their money to make an ad that morphed Dean into Osama bin Laden. If McCain has gone over the edge perhaps you think he should pull back and make an ad like that. You know, back to the mainstream attack ads like those democrats in 2004.

Incited their followers to a near riot? You haven't got a clue. Here, Here is a near riot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hAx5G0I9mU

You know, I support the principle of those people in that video. They were attempting a non violent confrontation with illegal and oppressive government forces to support the first amendment guarentee of the people's right to free assembly. But they had no training on how to go about it or a clear idea of the principles of non violent resistance and no experienced leaders to guide them. It was a powder keg ready to explode and it was only luck that saved both the people and the cops from that explosion.

Have you ever gotten off your ass and away from your computer to actually do something to stand up against oppressive forces for your or anyone else's rights? It sure doesn't seem like you have any real experience at all. Perhaps you think all you need to do is vote for Obama and hand the ball off to him.

I watched everyone of those videos of McCain and Palin rallies and saw 99.9% of the people calm and quiet. Even in that most recent video of the line of people going into the rally very few yelled out anything and many of those didn't yell anything incendiary or offensive. Yelling or saying, as most did, that he's a socialist is not incendiary. Twenty quiet and calm people in a camera shot with one wing nut yelling. And that's a near riot to you.

Who were the people in that line yelling at? There was an anti McCain rally on the other side of that street. I heard yelling in the background but could never make out what they said. I've seen that game from both sides and I never was one to play it. A small group of right wingers protesting a large anti war protest march. They toss out incendiary remarks in the hopes of getting some of the peace marchers to lash back in anger and spout some nonsense like soldiers are baby killers while their cameras are rolling. You think the left wingers don't try the same tactics? Sure I support the rights of both groups to exercise their right to free assembly and free speech. But that doesn't mean I agree with rising the level of vitriol. I have little doubt that if there was a camera cherry picking comments from the other side of that street it wouldn't have been so pretty.

There's a lot more hateful left comments than those I mentioned. But I don't follow the wing nuts like so many of you do so you know, I can't make a list. I come across a lot of that nonsense in my surfing. I've seen many of the angry left rant about how they'd like to pull Bush out of the white house and string him up on the white house lawn. Red faced angry and spitting as they shouted. I just dismiss them all, crazy lefty, crazy righty, and I don't blame McCain and the Republicans or Obama and the democrats for them.

You keep tarring McCain and his supporters and you will end up hurting your self and your candidate. The vast majority of peaceful people at that rally and who support McCain will surely resent being lumped in with a few wing nuts and when Obama wins, as is most likely, they will not consider him their president and be likely to push back against him from day one. Republican politicians generally aren't into bipartisanship and you're helping them to set up the same game they set up for Bill 16 years ago.

user-pic

Please see my response below also,

But to the central point here. Yes, this level of vilification is unprecedented in modern times. Even my 86-year-old father said so today. He has never witnessed such a hateful campaign in all his life.

In my lifetime, I haven't either. And the point is not to vilify Republicans in return, but to point out that the McCain-Palin rhetoric revs up hatred for pure political gain at the expense of the country. If anyone kills Obama, the responsibility will rest too much with the GOP ticket. It isn't about what the supporters say. That's a symptom. It's about what the GOP candidates and their surrogates say. It's despicable, unprecedented and damaging to the country.

Get over yourself, oceankat. I've got scars from plenty of scraps standing up for people. But unlike you, I pick and choose who I stand up for.

user-pic

If you've truly been involved on the streets to push for change and you've seen crowd dynamics in tense situations than I apologize for saying you haven't got a clue. When you claim that any of those videos from the McCain Palin rallies show crowds incited to near riots, instead of assuming ignorance I'll have to conclude you're a bald faced liar.

user-pic

Let me know where I said the videos in question showed that. I guess I would take you more seriously if you had any record of calm, considered judgement.

user-pic

I guess I would take you more seriously if you had any record of calm, considered judgement.
---------------------------------------------------

I feel the same about you. Nice to end this in agreement.

user-pic

I, too, had difficulty sleeping last night. Lately when that happens, it's me being concerned that Obama isn't going to win, and that hasn't happened in quite awhile. Last night it was fear for our country.

I dread the atmosphere of hate being fed in this election. I don't know if I have become more sensitive to it with age, or if it is just getting nastier.

I am so embarrassed by the way the way my fellow Christians are behaving. I can't believe they think the Lord is proud of the filth coming out of their mouths and the division between people that they are promoting. WWJD? I'm pretty sure, not this.

user-pic

Sometimes, when I see stuff like that coming out of my country, somewhere deep inside me, I wonder if Obama and/or Hillary decided to run 4 years too early.

Maybe we still need another 4 years of Republican reign to finally bring our great nation crumbling into civil and financial destruction before we are prepared to recognize the true nature of the modern GOP and make a change. Maybe if Obama wins the election by anything less than 60% percent of the popular vote, he should just concede to McCain...

But then I think about all the good, honest, hard-working people who would be most adversely affected by 4 more years of GOP rule and I snap out of it.


However, I think if I were China, Russia or Iran, I'd probably be rooting hard for McCain and holding out for some sort of disastrous event to take Obama out of the race.

user-pic

I have two words to answer that question:

Supreme Court


Really, the fact that anyone can support a republican after the way they have behaved this last 8 years makes me really wonder! If McCain won, then President Palin would have the country so fearful in 4 years that elections would be suspended.

The time is now, the person is Obama, and the way is to vote that sucker in by such a landslide that McCain's loss will be second in importance only to the humiliation of what he has done to himself and his former "honor."

user-pic

You know, I don't agree with your assessment of China, Russia, and Iran either. Do you think they want the world to end? Do you think they want the "End of Days?"

They all want power, but perhaps they want power in a peaceful world. What is wrong with that. Russia, China and Iran are not inherently EVIL - as much as Bush et al wants everyone to believe in the good/vs/evil country meme.

And do you really think they want to deal with that ditz Palin when McCain keels over?

user-pic

Although I believe a McCain/Palin presidency would be very bad for the U.S., I don't think that anybody believes it would lead to the "end of days". There are enough sane actors in this country to prevent total disaster, especially in the current environment.

But, I do think it would be more along the lines of a deadlocked nation unwilling to recognize its mistakes, realizing no real progress resulting in a slow, debilitating malaise that gradually eats away at the U.S.'s financial, military and cultural power as nations like China and Russia slowly rise in power at our expense.

I think we are useful to countries like China in the same sense that detritus is useful to fungi.

user-pic

And those sane actors would be where...???

But, I do think it would be more along the lines of a deadlocked nation unwilling to recognize its mistakes, realizing no real progress resulting in a slow, debilitating malaise that gradually eats away at the U.S.'s financial, military and cultural power as nations like China and Russia slowly rise in power at our expense.

Seriously, the financial and cultural powers of the US have already taken a major hit, probably beyond any point of return, while our military power has been stretched beyond thin. But why do you necessarily see any rise to power from China and Russia as a zero sum game to the US? (By the way, many see the 'rising powers' as China and India.)

Has power now been found to be in finite amounts, available only to one country, maybe two?

I find it interesting that while the US still believes in its unipolar moment, much of the rest of the world is moving on. These countries are talking about societies in an International world that are based on co-operation instead of competition. McCain, of course, seems fairly clueless to that idea and would not accept it anyway. I think Obama gets it, but knows better than to articulate it right now. But the rest of us Americans, real or not, should start thinking about it if we care about the future of the nation.

user-pic

Took the words right out of my keyboard, CVille Dem.

user-pic

Thanks, Ripper, you captured my feeling pretty well. I was seriously shocked by the video, and I don't think I shock too easily. I'm left with a sick feeling, and very glad to have a place to discuss it.

I lived through the Harold Washington election in Chicago in 1983 (Chicago's first black mayor), when the racism was so thick it felt like the city could explode at any minute. In Nov 2007, we marked the 20th anniversary of his death in office from a heart attack, and there was a lot of reflection on what has and hasn't changed. Of course race relations in Chicago are still not great (and we're certainly not going to solve the results of hundreds of years of American discrimination in one city), but I think we can say that attitudes have changed substantially. Perhaps the candidacy of Barack Obama, our beloved Senator, is one example of that. A younger generation of journalists asked some of the people involved in the Washington campaign some questions that people my age could never ask, because our feelings are still so high: if you had it to do over again, would you let things get so polarized, would you behave the way you did? (It took my breath away that the question could even be asked; this is a benefit of having new generations who weren't directly involved.) Most people said that having a black man as mayor had seemed horrific at first, but that in fact it had not been all that different, and that they had learned a lesson and were not the same people they had been 20 years ago. It was very clear that progress had been made on at least some levels.

I agree with Orlando-- the racist sentiments and fears are there, McCain is merely the willing instrument for bringing them out. It was similar in the Washington campaign, a previously-not-particularly-evil opponent, Bernie Epton, found himself willing to lead a racist campaign for mayor with the slogan "Before it's too late." (seriously. that was the slogan, on TV and everywhere.)

So some of it is racial. What I know from Chicago in those days is that it is not all hatred; a large part of it is fear, genuine fear. In Chicago, some white people seriously believed that Washington, once in power, would do to white people what white people had done to black people. The guy in the video who says Obama would have Sharpton and Wright in his cabinet probably really believes that, and is scared by it, how it will effect his life. The best we can hope for is that he keeps his mind open at least a crack, so that when that doesn't happen, he can gradually-- over the course of a few years-- let go of some of his fear. Obama is just the person to enable this; can we help in any way?

Another part of it is, sadly, the polarized state of our politics over the past few decades. I'm left with more questions than answers. Books have been written about this, and I need to read more of them. Can we disagree on serious matters, which have serious consequences, and still agree on where the limits of civilized discourse are? That is what I think we have lost-- any boundaries on reasonable behavior in a democracy. How do we get them back? Is there anything in our own behavior we need to examine? What role is the media playing?

When I think back over the decades to decide who started it, I just go back and back. The Right Wing attacks on Clinton were preposterously over the top. Were we on the progressive side hysterical over Reagan? I can't honestly recall-- I don't think we were anywhere near what the Repubs did in the 90s, but I could be wrong. In the 60s, everyone was hysterical, as I recall, and the Left certainly did its share, though we also did many important things that changed the country permanently for the better. The 50s, McCarthyism. I guess my reason for trying to sort through this is, I wonder if it was ever better? Is this really a new low? Or does it just feel like it because we are living through it? (Is it better if it isn't new?)

And then I go back to the Chicago experience, and I tell myself, we are living through interesting and eventful times. The probability is that this is a major breakthrough in race relations, it just isn't clean and pretty while we are going through it. We expected it would be ugly and hard in places, and so it is. The Harold Washington days were exhilerating and excruiating, and there's no reason to think the Obama days will be otherwise.

What remains amazing and encouraging is that enough has changed in America that we are on the verge of electing a black man, and not by a small margin either.

(Sorry to go on at such length. It was therapeutic.)

user-pic

I don't recall the Tribune endorsing Washington during the mayoral race. Their current endorsement is a major indicator of new times. Harold didn't have a cooperative city council and was in Clinton's position, while Obama is likely to have majorities in both houses, possibly filibuster-proof.

I am afrraid that might be enough to scare the "he'll put minorities in positions above white people" type into action. When all of the imagined "Washington" is apparently part of the conspiracy, it might panic the survivalists and unreconstructed racists.

They might have to get used to being pulled over for driving while white.

user-pic

They might have to get used to being pulled over for driving while white.

Gurgle.

The best of all possible worlds would be majorities in both houses. After all of this time, the Democrats actually have good policies ready for healthcare, energy, infrastructure, foreign relations, economy, etc. that need to be passed more or less intact so that they favor effectiveness rather than efficiency, the latter having brought us neither. Once they're watered down to fit some idiotic conservative ideology that the conservatives themselves don't believe in, they automatically lose most of their effectiveness before hitting the starting gate. GRRR.

That was a short 2 cent rant. Thanks.

user-pic

Meanwhile, as the cockroaches on the right try to tear this country apart, Obama brings us together:

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Hope%20And%20Change/408

Ripper, were you there?

user-pic

Yes. It was historic. Breathtaking,

user-pic

Corporate mnedia , where are you?

Kudos to Chris for allowing Baughman to hang herself. Will this be mentioned on the sunday shows? Questions, as always begging for answers.

user-pic
Have you ever gotten off your ass and away from your computer to actually do something to stand up against oppressive forces for your or anyone else's rights? It sure doesn't seem like you have any real experience at all.

Yeah, I have. Here's a partial list:

* Started alternative newspaper in high school to press for student rights

* Marched 8 miles up a mountain in Asheville, N.C., in 1981 to protest Reagan environmental policies while Interior Secretary James Watt was speaking there.

* Stood between two Native Alaskans in 1987 while they circled in a one-sided knife fight. When they tumbled to the curb on 4th Street, I grabbed the hand of the one on top and with the knife and slammed his hand against the curb until he dropped the knife—before he could stick the other one a second time in the gut. I saved a life that night.

Or would you rather have some examples from recent decades, oceankat?

user-pic

I have to say I wish I had never watched the video, I found it extremely upsetting. When I saw the man with the monkey, I almost cried. It has weighed on me since. I thought we were so far beyond all this. It isn't that I haven't seen hate like this before, it's just thought that we had become a better people than that.

user-pic

It is depressing that the divisions are even here, on these message boards. There is simply NO comparison between the hideous racial crap coming out of the repubs and the dorky garbage coming out of the dems. The people in those lines are mean, cruel, and most of all, frighteningly stupid. Both McCain and Palin fan those fires...admit it. ACORN, Ayres, Hussien,socialist,unAmerican,re-distribution of wealth, and "that one.". At an Obama rally, people booed something he said. He stopped it immediately..saying "we don't need that, we need you to vote"...
The MSM is just as bad. They must...if there is some egregious hateful action on the part of mccain's campaign, they must find an 'equally' crappy action on thepart of Obama's campaign. Never happens.
Has anyone heard the robo calls coming out of the mccain campaign? Does Obama have anything like that going on? I really doubt it.
The people who will save this country from us 'boomers", are our children. Race does not mean anything to them. Thank all the Gods you believe in.

user-pic

Good points made on both sides of this by people I respect.

Imagine this little thought experiment. In St. Louis yesterday at the 100,000 strong Obama rally a supporter within earshot of Obama calls out "Kill him!"--whether in reference to McCain, or a person McCain once worked with who at one time long ago engaged in horrific acts of domestic terrorism which McCain had nothing to do with and has openly condemned is unclear.

Can anyone imagine a) Obama not immediately speaking against such an abhorrent sentiment? b) Obama saying anything which a reasonable person might conclude fostered that sort of thinking among members of the crowd?

I can't.

There may be divergence among participants in this thread on what exactly "the bigger picture" is in this context.

One campaign seeks national unification and runs an issue-based campaign. The other stokes race and ethnicity-based fears, anxieties and hatreds which exist in latent form in the minds and hearts of many of our fellow citizens, seeks largely to avoid discussion of the issues, and adopts what should be widely seen as a transparent vote suppression strategy "grounded" in fraudulent anti-fraud rhetoric.

Are there Obama supporters here who engage in hateful rhetoric towards McCain, Palin, and, yes, Hillary Clinton earlier on? Yes. Calling Hillary Clinton a b**** should be beyond the pale. There is no male equivalent term. Use of the term in this context fosters and reinforces a sexist double standard that remains widely applied to females in positions of authority in our society. Calling John McCain "methusaleh" is a vicious age-based personal attack made by people who might otherwise be found condemning racist rhetoric by the other side. Plenty of shit to go around by supporters on both sides.

While I'm ready to stipulate that it is illegitimate to hold the candidates responsible for anyone's conduct but their own, it seems to me to make a large difference whether one candidate does nothing to encourage and in fact condemns hateful rhetoric while the other side deliberately fans the flames and refuses to condemn the most vicious and hateful public rhetoric of its supporters.

Most of the mainstream media refuses to condemn editorially the McCain/Palin campaign for these actions and lack of actions, which are morally reprehensible, and should be morally disqualifying, conduct on the part of someone who is seeking the office of the presidency. (The editorial criticism of McCain I've seen has stuck to the much safer ground of his choice of Palin as his running mate.) And most of the MSM reporting I've seen remains hopelessly wedded to the he said/she said journalistic convention which for at least a day into the ACORN news cycle failed to provide the obviously relevant DOJ/US Attorneys' firings context.

Sinclair Lewis didn't have such a large impact on getting regulation of conditions in the meat-packing industry adopted 100 years ago by writing tepid critiques of abuses reported by "some critics of industry employment practices". He made a stink about it. That is what Josh and his staff have been doing.

I have no way of proving this but I think better internet sites such as tpmcafe have had a substantial impact (still not enough) on MSM coverage of this campaign. That is what muckrakers do. And bless them, for we desperately need them, never more so in our hours of greatest national need.

If McCain/Palin are able to pull out this election, based not on any ideas or proposed solutions to our problems they are offering, but on late efforts to stoke racial and ethnic fears and a vote suppression gambit, then it will be a travesty and we will all be the losers, regardless of what one believes on the issues.

Leave a comment

Ripper McCord

user-pic

Following: 14
Followers: 15

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location St. Louis
  • Party Liberal Eco-Communal Welfare Party
  • Politics Enlightened self-interest

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs TPM, HuffPo, MediaTalk, dagblog, Sincere Babes Gone Wild
  • Favorite Quotes "My name is William Barr Wells and I'm running for president on the Bull Moose Party ticket." — WBW
    "I do not think it means what you think it means." — Inigo Montoya
    "Marry me, Ripper." — Dream babe
    "Life is a bowl of cherries."— 2000 Year Old Man
    "Some men see things as they are and say 'Why?' I dream things that never were and ask 'Why not?'" — RFK

Bio

Born on a mountaintop in Tennessee. Greenest state in the land of the free...

The rest is history.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address