Israeli Murders Palestinian in Terror Crime: 'I Decided to Murder an Arab'
[cross-posted to Tikun Olam]
The face of Israeli hate has once again reared its ugly head. A recent immigrant from France who had also lately become religious lured an East Jerusalem taxi driver to his death in what appears to be a nationalist inspired hate crime:
The 26-year-old Tel Aviv man accused of murdering an East Jerusalem taxi driver on Monday, Julian Soufir, told police, "I decided to murder an Arab."Police said their initial investigation revealed that the suspect, an immigrant from France whose family lives in Netanya, went to Jerusalem on Monday morning to find a taxi driver to murder.
They discovered the murder of Taysir Karaki, 35, from Beit Haninah north of the capital, almost by chance after they stopped two young men walking down the middle of a Tel Aviv street at around 4:00 P.M., near Yonah Hanavi Street...
The body of the East Jerusalem man was discovered in an apartment [there] on Monday afternoon. His throat had been cut, and his body bore the signs of a severe attack.
A preliminary police investigation revealed that the dead man had been invited to the apartment by the 25-year-old Israeli...
The motive behind the murder seems to be nationalistic, as the suspect said that he had killed the taxi driver over his Arab nationality.
Neighbors said that the suspect had recently become religious
The victim appeared to have no political affiliation whatsoever and little involvement with politics. He leaves behind a widow and two young children:
Karaki's father, Yasser Karaki, told Haaretz his son, who was married and the father of four children ages six to 12, had driven the children to school and set off for work at 8:30 A.M. "He was a good guy, he was not involved in politics; all he wanted to do was make a living for his children," the elder Karaki said.The few dozen friends and relatives who gathered on Monday at the Karaki house seemed shocked at the idea Karaki was murdered for nationalistic reasons. A neighbor, Wahib Liftawi, said the police called his nearby grocery store.
"They told us Taysir had had an accident and we should go to the police station in Neve Yaakov," Liftawi said. "Khaled, Taysir's brother, went there and then to Tel Aviv to identify the body. We heard on the news that French people took him to Tel Aviv. They asked him to help them to the apartment with their luggage and then they stabbed him. Allah will not forgive them; he was a good boy."
For many Israelis, this incident be merely a one-off event perpetrated by what they hope will turn out to be a mentally deranged individual. It will not resonate. It will not fit any pattern. It will not involve much soul-searching. This will be because of the protective shell covering Israelis that prevents them from interacting or empathizing with Arabs.
We will have to see what influences played upon the terrorist. Where did he get the idea that killing an Arab was a laudable endeavor? Was he a follower of extremist settlers as previous Jewish terrorists have been? We shouldn't jump to conclusions till we know the facts. But previous similar crimes make us wonder whether this one will fit the pattern of Jewish extremism. And no doubt Soufir will join the ranks of Jewish 'martyrs' (at least in the eyes of the Kahanist crowd) like Eden Natan-Zenda, Yigal Amir, Baruch Goldstein and too many others who struck a blow for Jewish "justice."
Haaretz quotes an Israeli Arab Knesset member making a cogent point about how this crime fits into Israeli Jewish attitudes toward Arabs:
MK Ahmed Tibi (Ra`am-Ta`al) said...that "an atmosphere of incitement, hated of Arabs, and the escalating racism in the country are fertile soil for this crime," and added that " the court will probably find mitigating circumstances for the murderers."
No doubt he is correct. Jewish terrorists often serve much shorter sentences than Arab terrorists. And the treason case against Azmi Bishara could also have served as a trigger for the crime. Maariv and other Israeli media were braying for Bishara's head and Jewish Knesset members were calling for him to be kidnapped and tried for treason. This is precisely the type of incitement to violence Tibi is talking about.





I'm not sure "hate" is the right word. Perhaps madness .
As at Virginia Tech and Columbine the killer was acting because of his personal devils altho no doubt his choice of victim was dictated by the dehumanization of the palestinians to which he was exposed.
I admit that I didn't have similar reservations about the term "hate crime" in the case , for example , of Emmett Till. Perhaps because those were committed by groups of men rather than a single sick individual.
And yes I know there weretwo killers at Columbine but that would take me off in another direction that I don't want to
go right now.
May 15, 2007 5:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Richard,
I understand and empathize with your frustration over this brutal tragedy. But we ought not give in to total despair that it will be dismissed in the fasion of "c'est la vie." Ha'aretz also reports,
May 15, 2007 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's typical cutting edge stuff. Y'see, crank up the hate machine loud and long enough, there'll always be hotheads at the cutting edges that take it to... the cutting edge as it were.
All the mellow and middle class haters then throw up their hands in horror and say 'not us, we may have talked about the Palestinian problem but we didn't advocate actually killing someone.'
But then it keeps happening, and the shock starts to wear off, and it gets more and more acceptable, even heroic, at the fringes.
And finally, all those middle class haters are just shrugging their shoulders and saying 'we don't advocate this stuff, but what can you do. It's only what they deserve.'
May 15, 2007 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sadly, this sort of event is not as uncommon as we in the U.S. tend to think it is. The wikipedia article, "Violence in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict...", states that from late 2000 through early 2006 there were 4209 Palestinian deaths as a result of the conflict (there were 1113 Israeli deaths in the same period). The figures are thought to be conservative.
Of those Palestinian deaths, 72 were at the hands of illegal settlers. Yet these Israeli terrorists often receive reduced sentences for these murders, and we rarely hear of this Israeli terrorism in the U.S. media.
It's also worth noting that in the same period there were 892 Palestinian children killed by Israelis, 83 Palestinians killed as a result of Israeli shelling, 117 Palestinian deaths that occured as a result of Palestinians in urgent need of medical care being stopped at Israeli checkpoints and prevented from getting to a hospital, and 253 Palestinian bystanders killed during Israeli extra-judicial operations aimed at terrorists. Adding up these numbers makes it clear that the number of Palestinian innocents killed by Israelis is significantly higher than the number of Israelis killed by Palestinian violence in the same period.
The often vaunted "support for Israel" among the U.S. population is, in my view, a result of an inadequate understanding of the true dimensions of the conflict. Our media has failed to present the I-P issue fully.
Know your enemy well, for in the end that is who you become. ~~Old Chinese Proverb
May 15, 2007 2:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The often vaunted "support for Israel" among the U.S. population is, in my view, a result of an inadequate understanding of the true dimensions of the conflict. Our media has failed to present the I-P issue fully."
The "failure" is a result of the hasbara machine that is quite organized and regularily targets reporters and/or media outlets that don't support an Israel-centric version of reality. The basic formula is that any account of Israeli actions against her enemies must include a litany of the designated enemies' actions against Israel. The reverse is never demanded by the arbiters of fair and balanced coverage of the related conflicts.
A interesting note of how important getting the right message out was illustrated in an article in Ynet during the stupid summer war written by the head of Israel's Foreign Ministry Public Affairs Department.
excerpt:
"The problematic starting point Israel's public relations efforts must contend with, as we learn from international public opinion surveys, is the mental infrastructure of the Western-European news consumer, with Israel perceived as an aggressive, uninhibited attacker that is almost as fanatical and radical as its opponents across the border.
The foreign press presence in Israel also holds on to this perception. We want them to view the conflict through Israel's eyes, while they are able to view Israel only through the lenses of the conflict.
An example of this is the Israeli spokespeople during the war. One of the myths associated with Israeli public relations efforts for generations is the centrality of the speakers: If only we find someone like Abba Eben or Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel would be able to win the battle over media coverage and public opinion.
Contending with images of Beirut
During the month of war, this myth fully collapsed: The State of Israel deployed coherent men and women featuring clear messages and boosted by the Israeli consensus who submitted to hundreds of interviews on dozens of TV channels.
In CNN alone, Israeli government spokespeople submitted to 400 minutes of interviews in the first two weeks of the war, constituting about 10 percent of the total airtime dedicated to the war.
On the other hand, Arab spokespeople were only interviewed for 30 minutes. Did the fact that Israeli spokespeople received so much more airtime than their opponents decide the outcome of the media war? The answer is negative. After all, the Israelis were not required to contend with their Arab colleagues, but rather, with the images of destruction and victims from Beirut."
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3299876,00.html
This example is just the barest teensy tip of the iceburg re "brand Israel".
May 15, 2007 3:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Naturally the Israelis work to present the best possible image. What else is new ? So do the Arabs but they just get it wrong.
Somewhat analagous to the dems in the last two presidential elections . See Michael Tomasky in the current NY Review of Books. The Repbulicans ate our lunch.
Are they to be blamed for that ? Certainly not . Bob Shrum chose not to respond to the swift boat nonsense because he didn't believe in advertising in August ! Our response was for Mary Cahill to call W's campaign manager and plead with him to call off the swifties. Uh, OK..
We blamed Rove and whined about dirty tricks when the problem is that they ran a smarter campaign .
Sure there were plenty of Rep dirty tricks , and the sun rises in the east. And there have been plenty of Israeli actions which many Israelis consider disgraceful .
But that ain't why they're both winning. It's because they're smarter.
I have many criticisms of the Israelis which don't include criticizing them for doing a smart job of explaining their case.
Conversely , think of Arafat. By many standards , including mine , he behaved bravely ,trapped in his compound in Ramahla . It could have been a helpful story: nobly enduring privation and danger for his people, etc. Now remember his interviews on CNN when no matter what he intended , the message he repeatedly conveyed was that he knew how to stop the suicide bombings , wasn't doing it , and was lying about it.
Compare with Gerry Adams , equally with blood on his hands but a concerned look into the camera and a statemanlike response when asked about the most recent IRA execution( which of course he'd approved).
I agree that the Arab case has been put abysmally
in the US. And maybe if it had been put well
the MSM wouldn't have carried it . But we'll never know will we since it never has been put well and probably never will.
And I don't blame the Israelis for that.
May 16, 2007 4:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Please give a source for the "72 Palestinian deaths at the hands of illegal settlers" from another source. Note that the article's neutrality is disputed. Also note that the founder of Wikipedia now says it is unreliable and has left them. I don't recall anyt numbers like that and I have been in Israel throughout the entire period of the terror war. Also, how many were at the hands
of "legal settlers"? You left that category out.
May 16, 2007 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is a link to an article from Ha'aretz about an Arab who was arrested for conspiring to kill Prime Minister Olmert:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/860717.html
It must have been all that Arab "hate speech" that incited him to do it. What do ya think?
May 17, 2007 5:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, Zionista, for pointing out the Jerusalem mayor's essential decency toward the dead man's family. That is a hopeful sign.
I too am sorry that Wikipedia doesn't provide a source for that claim that 72 Palestinians were killed by settlers. But I'm willing to bet that the figure comes fr. B'Tselem, whose record in compiling such statistics is impeccable.
The fact that the Wikipedia entry is disputed only means that ultra-Zionists don't like Wikipedia articles which reveal the truth about the imbalance of suffering in the I-P conflict.
As for Jimmy Wales leaving Wikipedia, why don't you provide a source for that wild claim?!
Richard Silverstein
Tikun Olam>
May 21, 2007 4:19 AM | Reply | Permalink