Meditations on Press Insensitivity to Economic Collapse
The inestimable Atrios laments the lack of awareness or acknowledgement among the press about the severity and difficulty of the recession. It's something I've pondered for awhile, too. I vividly remember the coverage of the thousands of people who lined up to apply for jobs at the then-new Chicago Sheraton Hotel in 1992. In the 1960s, the press played a critical role in surfacing what was then the greatest income inequality and poverty in generations (today's conditions have far eclipsed those). Contrast the silence on economic suffering with the attention lavished on the crypto-racist teabaggers, people whose primary political philosophy is "I've got mine, get yer own!"
Part of the reason is the success of the press, of course. The newsmedia has become an elite institution, something it wasn't in the early years of television and radio. The media elite are increasingly well-educated and well-paid, two things that tend to insulate you from the sufferening of the less fortunate.
But even worse, I think we see in the current media insensitivity the real lasting impact of the Reagan years. Reagan's chief domestic policy was "if you're poor, it's your fault." Worse, he demonized people needing public assistance as "cadillac-driving welfare queens." Under Reagan, Bush, Clinton, the Republican Congress, and W, poverty again became a moral failing, a convenient reason not to care about poverty and its deletrious effects on individuals and society. Johnathan Chait's masterful takedown of Ayn Rand and her "philosophy" makes the same point. If there's one trait the Teabaggers all share, it's a fierce defensiveness of their own status and success (even if it's very marginal in absolute terms) coupled with a violent refusal to help out the less fortunate, successful and pulled-together among us.
Most of the current news media came of age in Reagan's time, and no matter what they think their personal politics are, they demonstrate the same judgemental selfishness that Rand glorified and Reagan popularized in the way they cover and don't cover our current economic calamity. Before he dies, Tom Brokaw should write a tome on his successors in the media and title it "The Most Selfish Generation."
















The press do love to bemoan the decline of newspapers, though.
September 15, 2009 2:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good links and pretty plausible explanation. Highly rec'd!
September 15, 2009 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
What economic collapse? We're coming out of an ugly recession, made uglier by the Bush Administration's ongoing efforts to prevent a recession from occurring. If we had taken our medicine in 2001, this wouldn't be so bad...
But there's no economic "collapse", just an ordinary but severe business cycle downturn.
September 15, 2009 6:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I must disagree that the media is ignoring this. Yes, it does get sidetracked with things like the President calling Kanye West a jackass or Limbaugh's latest loony lies. But the media is loudly trumpeting our great recovery. El Jeffe is right. What recession? Ben "What, Me Worry" Bernanke announced the so-called recession was in its last throes today. Isn't that great news?! It's almost more satisfying than making fun of Kanye West.
Hellen Thomas started to shout out something at Bernanke's presser. She got off, "You L-!" before Rahm Emanuel hit her with a shoe. Of course, not everything is perfect. It never is, is it?There are a few people out of work and may be more to lose their jobs. And a few people have lost their houses or retirement or life savings, etc. But people went shopping in August! (Thank you, cash for clunkers). And most important of all, the stock market is Up! -Up! Up! UP! UP! UP! Stockholders will no longer have to live out of their Escalades.
Also, our "shadow banking system," those financial derivatives, CDS's and other junk paper, are going to be regulated (somehow, someway, sometime). This market will be "simpler, smaller, less opaque" after some sort of regulation-like thingy and likely "will not return to the size it was before." Of course, know one knows how big it was before because information like that would cause secretaries to faint from the vapors and higth-rise construction workers to walk off the end of beams in a trance.
But, that's the banks' problem. It has nothing to do with the economy and this Great Recession, right? Bernanke, as always is right on top of things. I don't know about you, but I'm going right out to celebrate with a few toasts to our financial Supermen- Bernanke, Geithner, Summers and boss (I just need to save up a little scratch for a few months to pay for the drinks).
September 16, 2009 2:06 AM | Reply | Permalink