I noticed in another string some criticism of a post I made sometime back. I ask the critic to consider other possibilities. Would a group of women who support Hillary with all their hearts grow tired of the mob mentality at TPM? Would they want to accomplish two things by throwing one stone?
They could cause some discussion of the differences between the health care plans of Hillary and Obama, while showing how utterly shameful and gullible the Obamanauts are at TPM. If memory serves, it was Billy Glad who said "what's the difference what it is, it's an important discussion." Think more than one and you're closer. Think about a bunch of Hillary girls fed up and laughing at a bunch of dummies who think a picture has a personality. 
You people are worried about trolls? Get a life. If you didn't love them you wouldn't be here and you wouldn't have any bags to kick around at home. Now, I leave all you magnificent pundits to talk quietly among your selves. 

I noticed in another string some criticism of a post I made sometime back. I ask the critic to consider other possibilities. Would a group of women who support Hillary with all their hearts grow tired of the mob mentality at TPM? Would they want to accomplish two things by throwing one stone?
They could cause some discussion of the differences between the health care plans of Hillary and Obama, while showing how utterly shameful and gullible the Obamanauts are at TPM. If memory serves, it was Billy Glad who said "what's the difference what it is, it's an important discussion." Think more than one and you're closer. Think about a bunch of Hillary girls fed up and laughing at a bunch of dummies who think a picture has a personality. 
You people are worried about trolls? Get a life. If you didn't love them you be here and wouldn't have any bags to kick around at home. Now, I leave all you magnificent pundits to talk quietly among your selves. Jerks.

Is anyone going to discuss today's ARG polling. More than a week ago Clinton and Obama were tied. Today she up 20 points.

I've been supporting Obama since the campaign began, but of late I'm getting nervous. What matters most is winning an election and stopping four more years of Bush policies in Iraq and securing health care, among many other issues.
Perhaps the Clinton argument has merit. If Obama can't compete in states with large electoral counts in the general election, then Clinton is a better choice. After all, what does matter mathematically is not a nationwide poll of democrats but polls and results from states considering the weight they bring in electoral counting.
I know one thing for sure. It's time to stop supporters in each camp from constant attacks. It seems that many posters on various sites enjoy these attacks far more than discussing issues. Where, for example, are the detailed posts about health care or the mortgage crisis.
I have to say that it was the nastiness and silly stuff of the Obama supporters on this site that made stop and think about my choice. I still may go for Obama in my upcoming primary, but unless I see more detailed offerings from Obama's people and supporters on issues and how he can win the general, I may go for Hillary.

I'm new to this blog. Reading the so-called "recommended blogs" and the "recent blogs" I'm curious what many good blogs don't appear as recommended while quite a few really silly ones do. Why?