« Hi-jacking the worlds food supply Part 1: Genetically altered plants creating "Super Weeds and Super Pests" | DonDi's Blog | Suffering the Wilsonettte Syndrome »
Hi-jacking the worlds food supply Part 2 : The "Terminator Seed"
Agriculture is thought to have begun around 8000 B.C., in the semi-arid mountains of Mesopotamia. Flint sickles and grinding stones discovered in the region suggest that the first farmers collected wild grains, which were developed over time into wheat and barley.Farmers learned to keep back a portion of the harvest for it's seeds, for the next years planting,think of it as a seed bank.You must take good care of your seed bank,keep it dry and protected and let nothing destroy the reproductive promise held in the seed.
When Columbus arrived in the New World in 1493, on his second voyage, he brought the seeds of plants known only in the Old World, among them wheat, onions, citrus, melons, radishes, olives, grapes, and sugarcane, and he took away seeds of plants known only in the New World, including corn, potatoes, tomatoes, peppers, pumpkins, squash, pineapples, and sweet potatoes. During the colonial period, the world's ecological boundaries were redrawn, as domesticated plants were carried far afield.
Now misguided biotech giants desire to redraw the ecological boundries again,but this time in a frightening and devastating way, a way that could destroy the natural seed banks of the world.
The TERMINATOR SEED
Gene splicing, first performed by Stanley Cohen and Herbert Boyer in 1973, allowed seed companies to offer a limitless range of products. Today's plant breeders can incorporate genes from plants that are not sexually compatible with each other. Indeed, because all living things share the same coded language of DNA, breeders can choose genes from outside the plant kingdom altogether--genes from bacteria, and even from fish, were used to create new kinds of genetically modified organisms, or G.M.O.s. This technology, in turn, led to a new type of seed company, the avatar of which is Monsanto, an agrichemical corporation headquartered in St. Louis, which is today the largest seed company in the world; other leading seed corporations include Bayer, Syngenta, and Dow, all of which have roots in the chemical or the pharmaceutical sector, rather than in the seed trade. Monsanto was not a seed company but a chemical company that saw seeds as a delivery vehicle for its product, which was genes.
In March 1998, US patent no. 5,723,765 was granted for a genetic engineering technology that the ETC group soon dubbed the "Terminator". The Terminator seed is an elegantly designed product of misguided science that programs seeds which mature but are steril.If commercialized,it will have a profound impact on agriculture and food worldwide,and on farmers everywhere who save seed one year to plant the next.The technology was jointly developed and patented by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and US seed company Delta and Pine Land. It's inventors have explicitly set their marketing sights on the millions of farmers who now save seeds from one season to the next. The Terminator seed has no redeeming agronomic value. It's sole purpose is to force farmers back to the commercial seed market every year. For patent-holders, it is a biological guarantee that farmers who use it will be forced to buy seed every planting season.In short it will keep farmers from saving seed and having seed banks.
Delta and Pine Land was bought by Monsanto August 2006,but the negative publicity,outcry and lawsuits resulting from the Terminator seed forced Monsanto into evasive action,some we will try to follow here. In 2000 Monsanto merges with Pharmacia and Upjohn, and ceases to exist. Later in the year, Pharmacia forms a new subsidiary, also named Monsanto, for the agricultural divisions. In 2002 Pharmacia spins off its Monsanto subsidiary into a new company, the "new Monsanto. In 2005 Monsanto purchases Seminis, the largest seed company in the world not producing corn or soybeans. In 2008 Monsanto purchases the Dutch seed company De Ruiter Seeds for about 855 million dollars.This is only part of the trail of deals and mergers, some fell through because of negative publicity, a lot of it coming from the group formerly known as RAFI (Rural Advancement Foundation International) which now has become the ETC group.Once again we see the desire to monopolize the worlds seed supply,the following is one example.
The Iraq Initiative
We will reap what they sow
This is beyond the realm of sanity ,to be tinkering with the worlds seed bank, what traits can be crossed over to unintended seed? What if the sterilization trait lofted on the wind contaminates some other seed, and that seed goes on to contaminate other seed. Monsantos roundup ready seed has already brought about "Super weeds" and "Super pests" what will this "Terminator Seed" end up doing? These companies issue statements saying what they always have, "everything is ok, we have solutions". One of these so called solutions they themselves have named appropriately, " The Exorcist Seed" which we will cover in part 3. It is hoped that at this point we are beginning to see that the real terrorists that we of this living world should be fighting are the Pharmaceutical Giants whose greed and incompetence, may eventually cause us to die silently of starvation, not so much different than the dinosaurs before us.
When Columbus arrived in the New World in 1493, on his second voyage, he brought the seeds of plants known only in the Old World, among them wheat, onions, citrus, melons, radishes, olives, grapes, and sugarcane, and he took away seeds of plants known only in the New World, including corn, potatoes, tomatoes, peppers, pumpkins, squash, pineapples, and sweet potatoes. During the colonial period, the world's ecological boundaries were redrawn, as domesticated plants were carried far afield.
Now misguided biotech giants desire to redraw the ecological boundries again,but this time in a frightening and devastating way, a way that could destroy the natural seed banks of the world.
The TERMINATOR SEED
Gene splicing, first performed by Stanley Cohen and Herbert Boyer in 1973, allowed seed companies to offer a limitless range of products. Today's plant breeders can incorporate genes from plants that are not sexually compatible with each other. Indeed, because all living things share the same coded language of DNA, breeders can choose genes from outside the plant kingdom altogether--genes from bacteria, and even from fish, were used to create new kinds of genetically modified organisms, or G.M.O.s. This technology, in turn, led to a new type of seed company, the avatar of which is Monsanto, an agrichemical corporation headquartered in St. Louis, which is today the largest seed company in the world; other leading seed corporations include Bayer, Syngenta, and Dow, all of which have roots in the chemical or the pharmaceutical sector, rather than in the seed trade. Monsanto was not a seed company but a chemical company that saw seeds as a delivery vehicle for its product, which was genes.
In March 1998, US patent no. 5,723,765 was granted for a genetic engineering technology that the ETC group soon dubbed the "Terminator". The Terminator seed is an elegantly designed product of misguided science that programs seeds which mature but are steril.If commercialized,it will have a profound impact on agriculture and food worldwide,and on farmers everywhere who save seed one year to plant the next.The technology was jointly developed and patented by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and US seed company Delta and Pine Land. It's inventors have explicitly set their marketing sights on the millions of farmers who now save seeds from one season to the next. The Terminator seed has no redeeming agronomic value. It's sole purpose is to force farmers back to the commercial seed market every year. For patent-holders, it is a biological guarantee that farmers who use it will be forced to buy seed every planting season.In short it will keep farmers from saving seed and having seed banks.
Delta and Pine Land was bought by Monsanto August 2006,but the negative publicity,outcry and lawsuits resulting from the Terminator seed forced Monsanto into evasive action,some we will try to follow here. In 2000 Monsanto merges with Pharmacia and Upjohn, and ceases to exist. Later in the year, Pharmacia forms a new subsidiary, also named Monsanto, for the agricultural divisions. In 2002 Pharmacia spins off its Monsanto subsidiary into a new company, the "new Monsanto. In 2005 Monsanto purchases Seminis, the largest seed company in the world not producing corn or soybeans. In 2008 Monsanto purchases the Dutch seed company De Ruiter Seeds for about 855 million dollars.This is only part of the trail of deals and mergers, some fell through because of negative publicity, a lot of it coming from the group formerly known as RAFI (Rural Advancement Foundation International) which now has become the ETC group.Once again we see the desire to monopolize the worlds seed supply,the following is one example.
The Iraq Initiative
For generations, Iraq's indigenous farmers have saved seeds from a previous year's harvest to plant the next year. To facilitate new crops, they have also informally swapped seeds with one another. A new amendment to Iraq's patent law, enacted by former Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) administrator L. Paul Bremer III, provides for the 'protection of new varieties of plants(read genetically modified) .To qualify for protection under the law, and thus to be legal for agricultural use, plant varieties must be new, distinct, uniform, and stable. The seed supply that Iraqi farmers have used for years cannot meet these criteria. So U.S. corporations, who have the means to modify and 'stabilize' the seed varieties, now dominate the market and can sell to farmers without domestic competition.The intellectual property rights that the patent law grants last for 20 years for crop varieties and 25 years for trees and vines. So, while the U.S. military occupation may be over within in the next two decades, the corporate occupation could last for generations.Iraq Seeding
We will reap what they sow
The group, the Union of Concerned Scientists, said it had detected tiny quantities of genetically modified seeds in most of the bags of unmodified corn, soybean and canola seeds it tested.If seeds do contain the traits, the group said, it would be virtually impossible for farmers to grow crops that are completely free of genetic modification. That could mean disruption of crop exports to countries that do not allow genetically engineered foods. It also makes it harder for organic farmers to supply customers who will not accept even tiny degrees of genetic engineering.
''The door to seed contamination is wide open,'' said Margaret Mellon, director of the food and environment program at the Union of Concerned Scientists, who added that her group's study was the first to systematically look at the issue. In a conference call with reporters, she said the genetically engineered seeds might have come from a mixing of seeds by farmers or seed companies or from pollination of seed crops by genetically engineered crops.
The Union of Concerned Scientists bought six varieties each of corn, soybean and canola seeds and sent samples to two commercial laboratories for testing. One laboratory detected genetically engineered seeds in three of six varieties of the corn and soy samples and some in all six canola varieties. The other laboratory found genetically engineered traits in five of the six varieties of each crop.
The genetically modified seeds were found in low levels, ranging from 0.05 percent to 1 percent. The traits detected were the ones used in widely grown genetically engineered crops -- herbicide tolerance and insect resistance.
Dr. Mellon said a bigger health risk would occur if genes now being tested to produce pharmaceuticals from crops were to get into seeds for food crops. Her group could not test for such genes because in general their identity is not known. ''If the door to the seed supply is open to contamination,'' she added, ''it is likely that drug genes will be able to pass through it, right to our breakfast tables.'' The Seed door is ajar
This is beyond the realm of sanity ,to be tinkering with the worlds seed bank, what traits can be crossed over to unintended seed? What if the sterilization trait lofted on the wind contaminates some other seed, and that seed goes on to contaminate other seed. Monsantos roundup ready seed has already brought about "Super weeds" and "Super pests" what will this "Terminator Seed" end up doing? These companies issue statements saying what they always have, "everything is ok, we have solutions". One of these so called solutions they themselves have named appropriately, " The Exorcist Seed" which we will cover in part 3. It is hoped that at this point we are beginning to see that the real terrorists that we of this living world should be fighting are the Pharmaceutical Giants whose greed and incompetence, may eventually cause us to die silently of starvation, not so much different than the dinosaurs before us.
Advertisement
















Looking forward to the Exorcist Seed.
Tampering with nature by genetic splicing...well, it's just wrong, DonDi. Then to profit from it is even wronger. And then to profit even more by killing the monster you made is the wrongest of all.
If there's one thing I learned from watching the A-Team (I LOVE Mr. T!) it's to always have a back-up plan.
Thank goodness there are some folks who have one.
http://www.seedsavers.org/
http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Svalbard_Global_Seed_Vault
Big Chem is getting away with slow murder.
September 5, 2009 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Too much of a blanket statement to be valid. In all likelihood you benefit from genetically modified produce. These include things like pest resistant and high-yielding crops. And if you want biofuels, understand that they are genetically modified almost by definition.
The pervasiveness of this technology in society is already such you can't ignore it -- nor live without it.
September 5, 2009 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
No I think tampering with nature is a must in these days and times CT.
I think that we should have all the dna swipes we can get of THE REPUB OLIGARCHY.
We can then better identify the menace.
I mean those who:
Believe that President Obama is not a citizen
Believe that My President is punishing our children with false propaganda from NASCAR
Believe that My President is a Muslim infiltrator
Believe that the world is six thousand years old
Believe that the speed of light is not a constant
Believe that that the capitalist oligarchy can best deal with health care
Believe that slavery was not a mistake
Believe that a vice president can award 100 billion in fake contracts to his own contract
ONCE WE GET THOSE SWABS OF DNA, THEN WE MUST ERADICATE THOSE WHO SHOW UP POSITIVE.
WE NEED NEW DEATH PANELS CT TO WEED OUT THE MENTALLY INCOMPETENT. Now!!!!!!!!!!
September 5, 2009 10:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Flower, thanks for giving these links.This thing is so deep and convoluted that I am just scratching the surface here. With the current struggle over health reform, bringing this up now may be a bit of bad timing on my part, but I felt everyone needed to know.
September 5, 2009 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's big, it's huge, DonDi. That's why I could never bring myself to start blogging about it. Where to begin? I'm glad you found a spot to start with and it is not bad timing at all. Is there ever a wrong time to not consider our sustenance?
Here's another link for you...
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_18999.cfm
September 5, 2009 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's sole purpose is to force farmers back to the commercial seed market every year.
This is really a fascinating bit of history really.
Talk about a marxist take of controlling the means of production.
Give a man a fish and he can have dinner.
Show a man how to fish at a commercial hatchery, and you can charge a fee.
tying this all to the corporate take over of Iraq's agriculture...
Wonderful discussion. Great corporate map.
FARMERS OF THE WORLD UNITE,
September 5, 2009 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not just Iraq's agriculture being overshadowed by Big Chem. It's all over the world.
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_19024.cfm
September 5, 2009 5:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
GOOD POINT FLOWER. I am with you. It is a GLOBAL PROBLEM.
September 5, 2009 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Flower, do you remember not long ago the reports of Indian farmers committing suicide, well that is tied into this seed extortion that caused them unbearable debt.I ran out of space but will try to get to it in the future.
September 5, 2009 11:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I do remember that, DonDi. I tried looking for further information because what there was at first was a very short mention in some rambling tirade that I didn't put much stock in. I wanted to find out the whole story about the farmer's committing suicide.
By all means, keep going with this. Break it up into as many pieces as you need to get the whole story out there.
September 5, 2009 11:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dondi:
A little video piece (poorly edited, but you will get the point) on the suicides and relation to Monsanto.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Av6dx9yNiCA
September 6, 2009 5:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
A significant aspect of the world's food supply is more than seed: it is water.
Access to clean water, access to cheap water.
We are already seeing signs of catastrophy on this front. A new documentary, FLOW, discusses this in greater detail. It is not surprising that some of the activists in this documentary are also protesting the practices of the sterile seeds. There is an intimate link.
Good blog, I hope you expand it to cover issues of water as well.
September 5, 2009 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Its the seed that the repubs are after CT.
I mean it is the precious bodily fluids.
I used to think it was the commies, but in reality it is the sugar sold by repubs.
HELP US OH LORD IN THESE PERILOUS TIMES.
September 5, 2009 11:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clearthinker, Thanks for bringing up water,I will take your advice and do some research on it.
September 5, 2009 11:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
My pleasure. You will find that water resources are an interesting battle ground. Much like trying to patent "life" (e.g. genome sequences), multinational corporations are trying to lay claim that water is a controllable commodity. For what it's worth, many of these corporations are European (not American) which should be brought out quite clearly. Why? It shows that the usual panacea that Europe is dreamed about by some of the left here really doesn't exist.
THE CORPORATION (a great little doc available for viewing on the Internet) does talk about the Monsanto seeds. If you haven't seen it already, check it out.
Finally, you should look at recent USDA statistics showing how the small farm has all but vanished. This is a critical point: our green revolution (and its worldwide) requires the genetically modified seeds to produce the higher yields and far more soil input for nitrates and such. We really end up overworking the land to ensure there is enough for the exponentially growing worldwide population.
Were everyone to go back to "organic" farming, you'd see yield levels drop and mass starvation the result. Our population is in overshoot and this is where the delicate balance on the world "stability" hangs.
September 6, 2009 5:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
More clues for your investigation (so I can put in more links):
Monsanto also provides growth hormones. Here is a little piece (lifted from OUTFOXED) showing the power of Monsanto Corporation and FNC.
You should also follow Vandana Shiva. She links global corporatization and the impacts on people's lives.
Have fun. ;-)
September 6, 2009 5:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you for this posting, which is a tremendous service to all. As rarely as this subject is addressed, it is, in my view, the one most serious issue of our times. Evil does not harshly enough describe the perpetrators of these crimes against the freedom of autochtonous farming societies worldwide, against our planet's genetic diversity, against our nutritional health, and against the freedom from genetic pollution passed on to posterity. These monsters are the worst in recorded human history.
September 5, 2009 1:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rather apocalitpic.
My takeaway is two points:
- commercial seed developers "forcing" farmers to stop their informal seed exchange and instead buy sterile seeds from the likes of Monsanto
- super seeds leading to super weeds.
Regarding the first point: do these companies literally force the farmers to take their seeds? Or do they offer something that makes more sense economically to a farmer? Such as for example pest resistance, improved ease of cultivation, etc?
Regarding the second point: what about antibiotics? Computer viruses that threaten government databases? Exploiting oil fields and evinroment in other countries but not our own? I fail to see how the example you cite is specific to the favorite scapegoat of the day and is not instead representative of something else..
September 5, 2009 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
When you keep buying up the largest producers of seeds, it becomes a moot point.
Agribusiness is high concentrated in a few corporations. You might as well say "avoid buying drugs associated with Pfizer".
Naturally, this leads to all kinds of illegal corporate behavior as well.
And naturally, there is a monkey-see, monkey-do philosophy as corporations tend to watch one another.
So, yes, the farmers are "forced" in a passive aggressive sense, to deal with Monsanto.
September 5, 2009 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Other links for reading:
Another big horticultural seed company bought by Monsanto
And this recent NY Times piece:
September 5, 2009 3:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JAXKIKehbc
September 5, 2009 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not sure I agree, perhaps I don't know enough. The post states that the farmers have been using informal seed exchanges, in effect barter.
Unless I missed something, it reads as if Monsanto appeared with an offer that, for the farmer, was superior to anything else available.
If there local or "good" global seed companies in Iraq that Monsanto bought up, I haven't seen it in the post.
September 5, 2009 3:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I only have this for you tonite:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRopmfinsWk
You want to meet up for a pizza sometime with a free hot dog?
September 5, 2009 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JAXKIKehbc
September 5, 2009 11:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lalo: believe it.
Monsanto has won cases in Canada that say if a farmer accidentally uses a genetically modified product (for example, pollen from a neighboring field infects his crop), he then owes Monsanto licensing.
It's complex to be sure, but a common sense approach is surely: I should have no obligation to worry about your IP. If you can't control where it ends up, then I shouldn't have to worry about not using it.
I think we would agree that since I'm required to monitor my own plants for your IP (even if I never got involved with you), I'm being forced to accept your seeds whether I like it or not. (And, of course, pollen drifts, etc. and so there is no way of preventing it infecting my field.)
You'd think the farmer should be able to sue Monsanto for contamination, but this wasn't the case.
Whatever happened to "finder's keepers"?
September 6, 2009 6:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hmmm, ok. I don't know much about GM foods and seeds but will look up the docu the RCT recommends below. I still don't understand one thing though - what is the problem exactly? Not in the typical left-wing "everything is the problem at once" fashion, but specifically?
The GM seeds are bad? Or the sterile ones are just a bad product specifically? Or that Monsanto can pursue unreasonable patent royalties?
September 6, 2009 8:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
The problem is that multinational corporations are slowly controlling things like water and genome sequencing -- things they didn't invent, but simply decided to "own".
Compare this to 400 years ago when the Indians were wondering how could you "own" land, when it was of the Earth?
At issue is this: are we headed to a situation where humans claim to have placed all aspects of life itself under rigid economic for-profit control?
If you look at some of the material, you will find that the multinationals are alsoplaying a game of "asking forgiveness rather than permission". Or as Vandana Shiva points out: the multinationals will say there is "no difference" in the plants when asking for no regulation in their sale, but then turn around and say the plants are "very unique" in prosecuting those who use them -- even those who use them through no fault of their own.
Or look at the case of Starlite corn -- where sterilization in humans seems to be the result of it. Well, it seems to have accidentally gotten into our food supply.
This is a huge topic, but the idea that there is choice if one wants to opt away from the multinationals is really not viable. The trend is quite clear.
September 6, 2009 3:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
As to the first point, Lalo...
No, these companies do not literally 'force' a farmer to buy their seeds.
In many places around the world, farmers save their seed from year to year. If one farmer buys and plants the modified seed, for whatever reason, and the pollen from his crop drifts over to his neighbor's heirloom seed crop, chances are good that the heirloom seed the second farmer saves to plant next year will be sterile.
He will plant it but will have no crop or no seed either for the following (third) year. He will have no choice but to find another seed source.
If he's lucky, he will have a local source for heirloom seed, but seeing that this would be three years down the line, most of the other farmers in the area will be in the same boat and they will turn to Monsanto or the like. So, it's not so much they are 'forced' to, but they have little choice if they want to remain in the farming buisness.
But, I think you already know this, Lalo. I think you are playing dumb.
If not, here, try this on for size if you're interested.
http://www.totalhealthbreakthroughs.com/2009/05/monsanto-vs-the-world-is-it-too-late-for-us-to-win/
As for the second point....I cannot connect the dots between super seeds/super weeds and gov't databases, oil fields and antibiotics.
So, I give up. It's time for supper here anyway....some good organically home grown sweet corn, open pollinated.....I hope. There's a big ole crop of field corn growing next door to me...who knows what kind of pollen drifted over.
September 5, 2009 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for this post. Food issues and what Monsanto is up to unites the left and the right. I had Raj Patel on my radio show a year ago. He wrote "Stuffed and Starved" and is finishing another book on GMOs and just bad food practices.
There is a very bad bill called Lugar/Casey aka The Global Food Security Act that gives 7.7 Billion to Monsanto to test GMOs in Africa. The African farmers don't want it. They know what is happening in India and Iraq.
My right wing callers hate Monsanto and call it Monsatan. That's why I think our new third party should be the "Food First Party".
http://stuffedandstarved.org/drupal/node/480
Another site is: http://www.foodfirst.org/
September 5, 2009 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
That would be S.384
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d111:1:./temp/~bdSgHS:@@@L&summ2=m&|/bss/111search.html|
It's on the calendar.
September 5, 2009 9:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks to both of you for some guiding links.
September 6, 2009 12:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Make sure you catch my additional links above. This is all out there -- and has been for a long time -- but it's useful to pass it along.
September 6, 2009 5:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Glad to see this addressed here. Watched "The World According to Monsanto". Scary stuff. You did some fine research here. Great job. I also hear "Food, Inc." is pretty damning. I haven't seen it yet.
Control the food and you control the world.
September 5, 2009 10:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for posting this:)
September 5, 2009 11:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
For those wishing to pursue this topic in greater depth -- and the links between agribusiness, globalization, and genetic engineering -- check out:
http://www.archive.org/details/Fed_Up_Genetic_Engineering
There are no easy alternatives. For those people that don't believe that the key to all of this is to stop population growth (and, in fact, collapse it) are fooling themselves.
September 6, 2009 5:37 AM | Reply | Permalink