Palin's Dred Scott Moment
I just finished reading Palmer and Pringle's column on Palin's cavalier dismissal of research on fruit flies. Both are rather mystified by the use of this particular item by Palin:
Who wrote this speech? Was he or she as ignorant as Palin about the central role that fruit flies have played in the last century of biomedical research? Or was this a calculated slight to science and scientists -- a coded way of saying, "We don't care what you know or what you think"? We find it odd that, of all the examples of dubious expenditures of public funds, the speechwriters alighted on this one.Herein may lie the answer: Death by Bush and Fruit Flies
Advertisement





I have to say it does make me wonder if someone intentionall had her talk about autism research and then dis spending money on studies involving fruit flies which gave us some our leading information on autism...a setup? But the MSM didn't seem to notice...
October 28, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
I must say that it does bring to mind Bush's "borderline-incoherent ramble" on Dred Scott at one his debates.
October 28, 2008 12:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good point. Maybe you should change the title of your post to 'Palin's Dred Scott Moment'.
October 28, 2008 12:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Done! Thanks!
October 28, 2008 1:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for this post. I never understood Bush's reference to Dred Scott, and I couldn't imagine how Palin could go weird about fruit flies. You've nailed it. 170 or so hours left....
October 28, 2008 8:22 AM | Reply | Permalink