Rick Warren's Maculate Misconceptions
Many of the members here at TPM Cafe are offended by Obama's choice of Rick Warren to give the invocation at his inauguration. The bad feelings about Warren stem largely from his open support for California's recent Proposition 8, as well as his vocal opposition to homosexuality. Truthfully, I knew little about Warren before Obama's choice caused an uproar. The reason I know of Warren at all is because Warren often hyped his book, "The Purpose Driven Life", with the story of how Ashley Smith, who was taken hostage by Brian Nichols after he'd murdered four people at an Atlanta courthouse, convinced Nichols to give himself up by reading from the book.
"I asked him if I could read. He said, what do wouldn't to read? I said, well, I have a book in my room. So, I went and got it. I got my Bible. Then I got a book called "The Purpose Driven Life." I turned it to a chapter that I was on that day, which was chapter 33. And I started to read the first paragraph of it. After I read it, he said, stop, will you read it again? So, I read it again to him." - Ashley Smith
Was Warren purposefully driving book sales with a fable?
You might remember Ashley Smith, the woman who was taken hostage a few months ago by the Atlanta courthouse shooting suspect. Well, in a new book, she admits giving Brian Nichols methamphetamine from her own stash to put him at ease. She says she refused to take any that night. Nichols held her hostage after allegedly going on a shooting spree which left four people dead, including an Atlanta judge.
Thomas Roberts, CNN News, September 27, 2005
While reading up on Warren over the last few days, I ran across many amusing things he has said. Clearly, he's not a leader of the pack over in the IQ bell curve's right-sided deviations.
I think if people know the real story about Terri(Schiavo) -- they think that she's on life support. She's not. They think she's brain dead, she's not.
This is a woman who is not dying, at least she wasn't, until they started starving her. She's in a vegetative state. That is not brain dead, and doctors will tell you person can live in a vegetative state 15, 20, 30 years.
CNN Larry King Live, Interview With Rick Warren, March 22, 2005
Rather odd description, since what caused her persistent vegetative state may have been anorexia. Here's an interesting Warren spin on Easter:
Easter is the greatest significant event in history, in fact, it split history into A.D. and B.C. Even people who don't believe that Jesus Christ died and was resurrected for our sins use Easter as a reference point every single day of their life. When you write a date April 3rd, April 4th, 2007, you're using this -- what's the focal point? It's Easter, because God came to earth and split his try into A.D. and B.C., it's the most significant event.
Encore Presentation: What Would Jesus Really Do?, CNN News, April 8, 2007
Easter is observed the Sunday after the first full moon on or after the day of the vernal equinox...sort of. The Roman Catholic Church has decided through ecclesiastical convention, that the day of the vernal equinox used for auguring the dynamic date of its celebration will always be March 21, even though in reality, it can be either the 20th or the 21st of March. Easter is celebrated just after the beginning of spring on a variable date determined by moon phases, using a constant for the determinant equinox, which may or may not be accurate. This is illiterate fuzzy-bunny paganism, not Christianity. Warren's knowledge of Greek Philosophy is remarkably poor for a theologian.
Well, first, there are historical evidences for the text. The Bible itself is the most historically attested book in history. This is true. You can take this in any encyclopedia. For instance, you know, we base a lot of our things -- we read Shakespeare today. Did you know that there's not a single original manuscript of Shakespeare in exist, not one. They're all copies of copies of copies, same thing with Plato, same thing with Socrates.
CNN Larry King Live, Interview With Rick Warren, November 22, 2004
Any copies of Socrates'
Writings would be miraculous. Which of the several different versions of the Bible does Warren assert is the one that has been "historically attested" to be accurate? Since he is associated with a Baptist sect of Christianity, shouldn't he be making attestamental nods to Martin Luther's schismatical Biblical Addendum that changed "durch den Glauben": to the diametric: "allein durch den Glauben"?
Divorce statistics are quite bandied around. People say that half of all marriages end up in divorce. That's just not true. 40% of first marriages end up in divorce; about 61% of second-time marriages end up in divorce; and almost 76% of third-time marriages end up in divorce. So the odds get worse, and what's balancing this out when we hear 50% end up in divorce is just not true. Most - the majority of marriages do last, but what you have is these people whose second third and fourth time are getting divorced, and so the divorces keep coming in to equal the marriages.
Warren is a revisionary historian from the blind faith school. Here's another excerpt from the same BeliefNet interview:
But the issue to me is, I'm not opposed to that (gay marriage) as much as I'm opposed to the redefinition of a 5,000-year definition of marriage. I'm opposed to having a brother and sister be together and call that marriage. I'm opposed to an older guy marrying a child and calling that a marriage. I'm opposed to one guy having multiple wives and calling that marriage.
Pastor Warren, needs to spend a bit more time reading the Old Testament if he believes that there is a 5000 year definition of marriage that does not include incestuous, child and polygamous variants. There are non-Christian historical traditions of child marriages; there was for generations, a well-defined divine right to incestuous marriage, that caused hemophilia and imbecility in European monarchies, and polygamy has been around for all of human history. There is also some evidence that same-sex unions have been around for much of the last 5000 years.
One of the most telling indications that Warren isn't a high-wattage bulb is exemplified in his statements about why it took him over twenty years to realise that HIV wasn't only caused by two guys playing stable the pony in the back-forty corral:
Warren: (W)e've had a three-day conference, Larry, on what the church can do about HIV AIDS and for the last two, three days we were -- we had about 2,000 leaders from around the world, 17 countries and about 38 states. And, they came in and my wife Kay (ph) and I did this conference for three days. We actually had about 60 speakers, some of the doctors who discovered AIDS, kind of the who's who of authorities on that.
King: In the past, Rick, you will admit the evangelicals and a lot in the church didn't look at AIDS.
Warren: Oh, yes.
King: Didn't deal with it and in fact called it God's revenge against gays.
Warren: Yes, yes. Well, you know, they were wrong and we were wrong to be quiet. I never called it that but we were wrong to not speak up. The fact is AIDS is not a gay plague. AIDS is a human plague and it involves -- actually more women have AIDS than men do. You know the face of AIDS in America is usually a white, gay guy but the face of AIDS around the world is a black or brown woman and, to me...
King: And most in Africa.
Warren: Mostly in Africa. To me it really doesn't matter. The question isn't how did you get it? It's what do you do now? I mean if I'm driving down the street one day on the freeway and I see somebody laying on the side of the road bleeding to death and I go over to them, my first question is, was this your fault? No, I just help the guy, OK. If I go into the hospital with a cardiac, coronary, I don't want the doctor coming up saying, oh, been eating too many Krispy Kremes?
King: Well, wouldn't you admit though that that's one of the things that turned a lot of people against the church?
Warren: Oh, I think you're right.
King: When they took this attitude of I'm right and you're wrong.
Warren: No, I absolutely think you're right and actually in this conference we were calling the church, to use a biblical term, to repent to basically say we were wrong. We were just flat out wrong about this and it's time to speak up.What I told these people at the conference was, you know, AIDS, I think it's an evil disease in that it sucks the life out of people. It's a terrible, terrible disease. But there are some evil attitudes that people have toward people who have AIDS too. There's the attitude of avoidance, which is -- I don't even want to talk about it. It has to do with sex or homosexuality. I don't even want to talk about it. There's the attitude of distance, don't get near me. There's the attitude of intolerance. I don't like you. I hate you. And, there's the attitude of ignorance or superstition. I'm afraid of you.
CNN News, Larry King Live, Interview with Rick Warren, December 2, 2005
Warren seems to have found a soulmate for his wife, and together they make a good anecdotal argument disproving Intelligent Design:
[Begin Videotape]
Kay Warren: I was flipping through this magazine and there was an article on AIDS in Africa. And I didn't care. I didn't know. I thought it was a gay disease.
There was little box in the middle of the article that said 12 million children orphaned in Africa due to AIDS. And it just absolutely rocked my world to think that there could be 12 million children anywhere orphaned due to anything.
Soledad O'Brien: Those children are now Kay Warren's purpose. This pastor's wife is now an AIDS activist and world traveler.
In Mozambique she met a woman named Juanna (ph).
Kay Warren: She was literally under a giant tree, skeletal, emaciated. She was just this bag of bones.
Soledad O'Brien: Later, Rwanda.
Unidentified Male: We're now in Kibuye, and we're going to the district hospital.
Kay Warren: Hello. How are you? Nice to meet you.
Soledad O'Brien: Everywhere Kay goes she finds more children alone, left to raise themselves.
Kay Warren: This is a picture of a little girl, a child head of household. Both of hers parents have died of AIDS and her 15-year-old brother is taking care of her.
Soledad O'Brien: In Uganda, orphans gave her drawings and letters.
Kay Warren: "I am 10 years old. I lost my parents' love when my father died, and now I am in a school for orphans."
Soledad O'Brien: Not long after joining the fight against AIDS, Kay waged her own battle, first against breast cancer, then against skin cancer.
Kay Warren: I know what it's like to be so sick you want to die, and it has -- it has increased my empathy and my ability to relate to people who are sick.
Rick Warren: Twenty-five years ago the first case of AIDS was detected.
Soledad O'Brien: Today the Warrens are hosting their second International AIDS Conference at the massive Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, California. More than 2,000 church leaders are attending.
Rick Warren: Three issues that caused evangelicals to come late to the -- to the issue. The first was we didn't realize how big it is -- big the issue was. Second, I think, as Kay pointed out, it involves sexuality, and a lot of people just are uncomfortable talking about heterosexuality or homosexuality. And third, I think that we've been too involved in other issues.
Kay Warren: We want to move past that, we want to demonstrate the love of Jesus Christ. We're sorry for that. Can we move forward?
Soledad O'Brien: Kay has apologized several times for the church's earlier attitudes about HIV and AIDS. The Warrens say they've permanently changed perceptions at their church and they're hoping to change perceptions at other churches around the world.
Kay Warren: I want the church to be known what it's for, not what it's against.
[End Videotape]
















Thank you for this, PCA.
Wow, this guy knows little about the Old Testament, little about church history - especially the early church, and even AD/BC. BC was dated for the "birth" (presumed date) of Christ. Then again many, many evangelical pastors do little more than believe they have a call and just start preaching!
It's pretty staggering! You've amassed a great case here.
Kudos for all the work!
December 21, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, at least they are able and willing to admit they're wrong about an issue.
That goes a long way toward mitigating their 'ignorance.' No?
December 21, 2008 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was surprised at how softly homophobic Warren actually is. He's still somebody who implies sexual orientation is a conscious choice, whereas I take a much different view, based just upon my own personal maturation. I am unabashedly heterosexual in my orientation, yet have never been repulsed or disgusted when gay men have made physical advances. Uninterested, and a bit uncomfortable have been the emotions felt, but on the plus-side, it provided some insight into how women could feel about unwanted physical attention from me. I believe there is a strong probability that a person, who has consciously chosen their sexual orientation, has erred in the decision, and lives in fear of their deeply repressed nature lurking within.
December 21, 2008 12:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are you inferring you think Warren maybe a repressed homosexual? It's possible. I have often wondered at some of the more vociferous rants of anti-gay bigots, myself.
Sexuality can be confusing. In my younger years, I went out with a very interesting young man, after a few dates the inevitable happened and I arrived home in the wee hours of the morning to a worried roommate. She asked me where I'd been, I told her I had been on a date with "Ed," her response shocked me. She said, "if you don't want to tell me where you were that is fine, but don't lie about it." Confused, the next morning I sought out a mutual acquaintance who knew all of us, what my roommate could have meant, she said, "Oh, she doesn't believe you because Ed is gay."
Go figure.
December 21, 2008 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is an interesting discussion and I find the hypothesis intriguing: that someone who has struggled with homosexual impulses might think homosexuality is a choice. That does make some sense. It also might indicate why such a person would be against gay marriage.
Apparently about a third of pastors, according to a survey of Warren's church, have problems with addiction to pornography. Again... makes you wonder.
December 21, 2008 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, I've never even looked at it in that light, but you may be on to something there.
December 21, 2008 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I read several comments by Warren in the last couple of days that causing me to think he would make a fine text-book case study in an introduction to Freud class, and I don't even care much for Freudian psychoanalysis. I can sense: transference, projection, displacement, reaction formation, rationalization, repression, sublimation and denial in his comments about human sexuality. How many of these can be potentially attributed to just one small excerpt from my post:
Warren often quickly drifts off into food analogies whenever the subject of sex is brought up. He claims he is hard-wired by God to be a heterosexual, yet adamantly dismisses an idea that God also hard-wires homosexuality. He makes exaggerated claims about a desire to have a great number of female sexual partners (hundreds). He speaks of instincts and urges that would be wrong to realise. He even made an bizarre argument that a natural homosexuality is oppositional to evolutionary theory. He believes that God created one man for one woman for life. What does he read in the Old Testament anyway? He cites it often enough. Maybe reading about all of those concubines and virgin girls as God given spoils of war makes him uncomfortable.
December 21, 2008 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, frankly, I think for some people it may well be a choice. But I don't think it is a choice for everyone.
As usual, there are no absolutes when it comes to humanity. I have never, even in my more drunken moments, felt attracted to other hens, but I know hens, especially younger ones, who do have these feelings.
It may actually be an evolution thing. As the world gets overpopulated, the incidence of non-breeding homosexuals will rise, thus reducing population. I wouldn't be surprised if in other animal populations that the tendency exists.
Or I could be full of it, I don't know.
=D
December 21, 2008 1:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was about to suggest that maybe we will see an increase in the percentage of homosexuals as the world gets more crowded, but you beat me to it. Balance is a powerful force... though I suppose it more likely that we'll just run out of food and die of starvation or wars over resources.
December 21, 2008 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Probably FrizT. Mother Nature is a powerful force, as well.
December 21, 2008 2:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Warning: ravening ahead. proceed at your own risk
For over a decade now, I've often wondered if there was a direct relationship in the evolutionary process between a higher mutation frequency, and a population's exposure to an increasingly toxic environment. A non-constant rate of mutations which is not purely random, in which disproportional upward spikes could be correlated to abrupt and drastic global geologic changes, seems to be a better explanation for fluctuations in the rate of evolution, than wide-spread species die-off opening expansive and unexploited niches for surviving species to evolve into.
The recent observed uptick in wild amphibian population mutations could be a current example of this. While most would perceive a superfluous and non-functioning extra leg growing out of a frog's back to be a monstrous abomination, in an environment where a more reactive sun caused greater frequencies of cancerous backs in the population, an extra disposable limb acting as a shield could greatly increase a member's longevity, and along with it, provide more opportunities for transferring the mutation in offspring. A disposable limb on the back might also be an advantage in an environment that afforded less water to use as a defense against natural predators.
There has been an anecdotal increase in the rate of mutation amongst some fish species too. Recently, parthenogenetic reproduction has been observed in two captive female sharks. Many fish species that live in the effluence discharged from urban areas have seen a greater frequency in gender-bending, the cause speculated to be from prescription drug hormones and steroids disposed in the sewage waste streams. There have been many cases of gender flipping observed, and lately an increasing population of androgynous individuals possessing fully functioning sets of both male and female genitalia. Then there is this mutation, which some people may find frightfully sobering.
A common misconception about evolution's "fittest"
is that the term is synonymous with "stronger".
Since human evolution has involved a large expansion in cranial capacity, along with more complex higher cognitive processes, and a lesser degree of outward physical attribute changes, it might be reasonable to predict that an unsustainably large population of humans, and its attendant pressure on the population's survival probability could easily be the cause of a great fluctuation in sexual preferences tending towards homosexuality.
December 22, 2008 2:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting hypothesis. I'm gonna ignore the last paragraph. Most mutations in general are as I recall from some ancient genetics courses non-beneficial to the species. A side bar to the hypothesis might be that the effect of the increased toxins due to population, wipe out most of the population leaving a smaller mutated population to try again. That said, I hope I never meet that shark coming toward me on a dark street after a night of carousing. Gives the whole 'land shark' skit a whole new meaning.
December 22, 2008 5:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
ack!
Well, nice to know I'm not too crazy. Yes, it seems to me that teenagers today are far more comfortable with same sex relationships then we ever were.
It's all good.
December 22, 2008 7:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bwakfat, the only problems I had with expressions of homosexuality, was in a brief period in my life: the 3 semesters I got shipped off to a religious boarding High School out in southern Ventura County, California. It had a few hundred students, and was coed, but the dorms were strategically placed at polar ends of the campus. Cross-gender student interactions occurring outside of scheduled events, and under the watchful eyes of many evil thinking faculty members was expressively prohibited. The campus had several landmarks clearly delineating its mid-point, and this was a the bright gender-based borderline. Being caught on the wrong side of it after dark was a crime resultant in swift and public humiliating retribution, plus multiple sessions of mandated counseling delivered by a ghoulishly pale and listless childless pastor/wife tag team. I was the only boy of five kids in my family. My boarding school experience during adolescence was pretty disgusting. The effeminate male students were targeted with a nearly constant barrage of insulting sexual innuendos. Many other male students participated sexually-laced group rites of passage that were borderline sadistic fraternal hazing. At Christmas break in the 10th grade, I informed my parents they'd have to come bail me out of a California Juvenile facility if they sent me back, because I would never attend the school again, and would just hitch my way out on the Ventura Freeway. I was serious, very fortunate my parents comprehended this, and attended public High School for half of 10th-12th grade.
So even the brief period in life when when I was troubled by expressions of homosexuality, it was never the fault of anyone I thought might possibly be gay.
The semester after my attendance, the school was scandalised by the ordained minister music teacher with a divinity degree from a church university. As a part of his one on one musical lessons, he impregnated two students, who didn't narc him out until their gestations had advanced to self-evidence. The two girls' private music lessons were scheduled one following the other in the post-class afternoons, and since they were individually taught, the parents had ponied up fees in excess of the standard tuition.
Some Of That Old Testament Styled
Psalmistry In Our Modern World.
December 22, 2008 11:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Southern Ventura County?
Villanova?
Wow, I went to a Catholic school not too far from there.
December 22, 2008 11:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just outside of Newbury Park: Hells' Gate at the mid-point between Thousand Oaks and Camarillo State Hospital
====================
Well, I'm up in T.O.
keepin' jive alive,
And out on the corner
it's half past five.
But the subways are empty
And so are the cafes.
Except for the
Farmer's Market
And I still
can hear him say:
You're all just
pissin' in the wind
You don't know it
but you are.
And there ain't
nothin' like a friend
Who can tell you
you're just
pissin' in the wind.
Neil Young
"Ambulance Blues"
On The Beach, 1974
====================
December 23, 2008 12:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
If I recall correctly, Neil Young lives in Woodside, now.
=D
I grew up a bit south and and a bit east of Thousand Oaks. Small World.
December 23, 2008 12:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
I had good times there too. The school was a significant landholder of undeveloped hill/valley land, in which they raised a small herd of horses, as well as boarded a few for a fee. I had often ben around cowboys and horses growing up in pre-corporate Vegas, and was able acquire after-school employment from the Red-Neck Cowboy who ran the venture. There was a small on-campus stable, and frequent opportunities to volunteer for solitary duty up in the hills: fence running, water-hole clearing, moving the herd into laid-fallow pasturage. It was beautiful country. When I get back down that way, it's unrecognizable. A developmental tsunami of flooded similarity; never-ending suburban subdivisions constructed using 4-model plywood templates in a pre-planned absence of diversity, exteriors thinly spray stuccoed in 3 shades of light salmon pink and frosted with cheap mass factory produced tiles, flavoured faux Mexican clay. That's still a far better fate than was suffered upon the high-desert wastelands out Apple Valley and Yermo way.
December 23, 2008 1:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, I know how you feel. Last time I was there it didn't feel like home anymore.
I have a friend in Lancaster. I visited her and the shock of seeing all those rooftops blew me away.
Then I drove to San Jose, via California 1, and the brownness hit me. (It was summertime.)
I do like the east. Green is so.... green. Except for the winter, (and I really am not liking that so much right now)
Wow, I like to complain, LOL. I do like the North Coast of California. Maybe I haven't spent enough time there. And Kings Canyon, naturally.
=D
I haven't been to Las Vegas for 30 years or so, it has changed quite a bit, I have read.
December 23, 2008 8:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Given his weight gain, PCA, his veering off to food analogies in the face of sexual content must be a frequent occurrence, which he puts into practice!
December 21, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
mmmmmm donuts.....
No! Not the long skinny ones! The kind with a hole!
(sorry)
=D
December 21, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
You must choose:
JellyRolls
OR
Cream-Filled Twinkies
December 22, 2008 2:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
NOW WE DON OUR GAY APPAREL
FA LA LA FA LALA LALALA
December 22, 2008 6:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Whew, great insights PCA. I am willing to wager that in the not too distant future it will be revealed that we have another Pastor Ted Haggard on our hands.
Then you can say you called it PCA. You put together all the clues. Bookmark this blog for future reference. LOL
December 22, 2008 12:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's position seems to be that he is/will be president of all the people and his inaugeration should be enjoyed by all of them including people with whom he normally disagrees.
That seems OK to me.
December 22, 2008 12:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Clearly, he's not a leader of the pack over in the IQ bell curve's right-sided deviations." This was a delightful post to read PCA. Thanks for putting it together.
December 22, 2008 1:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
in the past
there have been accusations
that i am anti-semantic
December 22, 2008 3:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
: )
December 22, 2008 4:22 AM | Reply | Permalink