Obama's Era--"Post-Nothing"

Barrack Hussein Obama's resume´: high school graduate, college graduate, community organizer, law school graduate, Senator, President. Neither he, nor his "czars" can prevent a free people from talking about politics and his administration's social agenda.

President Obama is not the typical American teen-ager who grew up into a successful adult after working his way up from selling newspapers, working at his neighborhood grocery store, or serving in the military, while "getting an education" about the American way of life. Truth be told fearlessly, he grew up as a teen-ager being raised by a white mother and then by white grandparents. Obama is not a so-called "typical black American." He confessed he had to learn how to relate to the black community. The movement to elect Obama as President is atonement for past sins; it is propitiation for past wrongs; it is a wishful thought of "shoving every thing under the rug" regarding the shame of past racial discrimination. In that way, it has worked very well in assuaging "white guilt," and by that, has destroyed all excuses from "minorities" complaining about circumstances conducive to social failure. But racial name-calling refuses to go away. Habits die hard! The democrats live in a world of fantasy which they would like to impose by force of law on the American people.

In short, President Obama has had a privileged life remarkable only for lack of experience in his formative years that would have enriched his capacity to discern the true foundation of American self-government. Nonetheless, Obama is an intelligent man whose eagerness to please has distorted his ability to gauge the real motives of his entourage, the fanatical agenda of which, appears to have escaped his trustful inclinations. The majority of Obama's mentors and advisors, friends and counselors come from the old school of socialist-Marxist liberals who were waiting in the shadows for an opportunity to strike, therefore, transforming Obama into "the horse" on which they rode in to access the halls of power. Unfortunately, the contradictions continue. Though Obama's election was supposed to end "the blame game," Jackson and Sharpton continue to flame its obsessive twitch, lest the black community might rise up and assume responsibility for black kids beating another black kid to death with railroad ties. All of Obama's agenda belongs to the white liberal leftists waiting for "right timing" in order to orchestrate the so-called "take over," as Anita Dunn so flauntingly put it.

James Madison in No. 51, Federalist Papers (Publius) understood the relationship between human flesh and earthly power. Far from being naïve and "pollyannaish," he put it this way:

"The interest of the man must be connected with the constitutional rights of the place. It may be a reflection on human nature that such devices should be necessary to control the abuses of government. But what is government itself but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions."

America's Founders believed that government which governs best, governs least. Self-government based upon religious morality and moral conscience to guide human actions, while keeping "the hook of legislation" only as a necessity. Laws should be enacted only in the face of unavoidable necessities that could not be accomplished in any other way except through legislation. Child labor laws that protect children from exploitation, civil rights legislation that granted the right to vote to Black Americans were such cases. But imposing an abnormal behavior, such as the homosexual agenda upon the American population, is not an unavoidable necessity. This must be said, for President Obama had a special meeting with homosexual groups promoting their sexual abnormality in the guise of a need for public law.

President Obama does not attend church on Sunday, but took special time to meet with homosexuals in order to promise them that he will by all means attempt to impose their agenda upon the American people. This is worth noting. And we must also ask why do leftist liberals always rely upon the force of government in order to achieve their social but illegal objectives?

The trend which we have witnessed during the Obama administration is that many fringe groups with social aberrations that Americans have rejected for decades on end due to their extremely immoral and destructive nature have found refuge in the Obama administration, from socialized medicine to abortion, from human embryo stem cell research to the homosexual agenda. If indeed the aim was to provide medical care to 36 million uninsured Americans, why not extend Medicaid state programs in order to accomplish the same locally?

The homosexual minority has shown extreme militancy in enlisting the assumed force that public officials can exert upon the population at large. But congressmen and women cannot just "agree among themselves" regarding an agenda in the guise of "law" to which all Americans must submit. Members of organized crime can also "agree" to rob a certain bank, but it is still unlawful. Of course, Congress is a constitutionally legal branch of government, duly elected by the American people, and is not a branch of organized crime; but its members cannot agree on something only among themselves, just in order to make it into a law to be imposed upon the whole population. There has to be a moral standard by which to judge whether something is a good or a bad law.

To America's Founders, it was not too difficult to understand that absolute power corrupts absolutely--men are not angels and they must be obliged to control themselves, especially as government, due to the fact that government, as a power-wielding institution, tends to have the characteristic of finality in imposing its will upon the people at large. The leftist ideologues having understood this so well, always seek the "government avenue" in order to accomplish their unpopular and widely rejected objectives. Anita Dunn's political philosopher Mao Tse-Tung was a "revolutionary" but also a killer of dissenting Chinese whose children were forcefully enclosed into "re-education camps" in order to get brainwashed into Marxist-socialist ideology--does not that reflect the whole approach of the Obama administration? Obama's academics call it "sensitivity training."

Thus, Obama, a man "who hasn't lived," or rather, "has lived so little," surrounds himself with ideologues, zealots, extremists, and petty closet dictators who pretend to promote the free press but demonize people who disagree with their forceful ideas, who promise "transparency," but legislate opaque and unread socialist policies that had been dormant for more than 40 years, since the Johnson administration.

The word for democratic forms of government is openness, not so-called "transparency." Glass is "transparent" but can hold a door shut as strongly as brick does. But an open door policy is known to remove all barriers to public scrutiny.  Let the naïve be doomed to obsolescence and failure--for the force of inaccessible and unexamined so-called "legislation" to which the American public had no input or given consent, is tantamount to government tyranny. It is immoral and cowardly to accept government pronouncements without examining their truthfulness and consequences, a lesson which President Obama and his cohorts of leftist ideologues must learn. We have no tyrannical oligarchies here in America; we do have freedom of conscience, freedom of worship, and a free press; and we do have freedom of speech--inalienable rights from almighty God.

Fox News is legitimate, constitutional, lawful, legal and right in expressing its opinion! Rush Limbaugh does exemplify "The American Way," and he does not need so-called "sensitivity training" or Maoist "re-education camps." Anita Dunn needs to learn the names of America's Founders and their lives of sacrifice in the creation of this great country, at a time during which, in AD 1776, all heads of state were kings or monarchs with dictatorial powers.

The Obama administration is out of step with the majority of Americans who cherish the wisdom of the ages as well as welcome constructive changes that correct past national errors. None of the promises made by Obama during the presidential campaign, among which, were post-racial civility, open government processes, and respect for faith-based institutions, has been fulfilled. The nation is polarized more than ever before--his "lieutenants" or "czars" are in search of "subjects" to whom to dictate; but this is America. We have no kings or oligarchs here--but only representative democracy based upon self-government.

President Obama whose formative weaknesses are most demonstrative in his lack of living experience in the American creed has attempted to compensate for his dearth of traditional authority by resorting to hiring former academics whose credentials involve the censoring of views that adhere to America's Judeo-Christian foundation, hence, the proliferation of so-called "czars" for almost every facet of American life. This is unprecedented and in need of opposition.

We must again re-affirm the First Amendment in the light of tendencies that, if continued unchecked, will corrode America's capacity for self-renewal.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Thus is my petition herein to redress grievances! Let the "Maoists" come! They will never win--not here in America, not while Jefferson, Madison, Jay, Washington, Lincoln, etc . . . yet live!

 *******************************************************************