Obama critics like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck are not "racist."

Facts all of you desire to ignore is that every president in the United States of America has received criticism during his presidency regarding policies the American people disagreed with.

How come Hillary Clinton did not make it as the presidential nominee of the Democratic Party when she had clearly won the popular vote? You would cringe, rant and rave if you heard the real truth from me. You would no longer call it "psychoanalysis." Why did white liberal democrats want a "black president" first, before a white woman president?

Check this out! Were our white liberal students "white haters" because when they protested against the Vietnam War white-Johnson and white-Nixon were president, respectively? This would be illogical nonsense, wouldn't it?
Ridiculous? Were the Blacks who demonstrated in the streets for their civil rights all "white haters" as well?

One day soon a woman will become president--will every American male who criticizes her policies be accused of being "woman haters?"

One day a Hispanic American will be president who will have policies attracting opposition--will you then accuse every dissenting American of being "anti-Hispanic?"

Then an Asian American will be president etc . . .

You might as well "rewind the tape" and save it for those future times! Unless you come to your senses and recognize that public officials are not kings or nobles here -- that they will get criticized regardless of their gender, ethnicity or race.

O! You will accuse dissenters and critics of being "racist" only if these "minority" presidents are liberal leftist "democrats" like you? You would rather have the silence of the cemetary and the pollyannaish adulation of the graveyard in order that your atonement-candidate of choice succeed at all costs?

I don't see you advocate we should return all the lands we stole from the American Indians since 1492; but rather you engage in such hypocritical exercises as to adopt some of their "primitive" (your words) religious beliefs - like "trees have spirits" -- as if this would right all the wrongs they've suffered! Spin management! Yes, the so-called "new age religion" put together Hindu philosophy (cycle of life, reincarnation etc...)and American Indian religion in order to pretend all historical wrongs have been righted by simply engaging in some "window dressing" and "crowd pleasing" gyrations to which all liberals then subscribe. McDonald hamburgers are still pretty good, aren't they?

Political correctness is spiritual terrorism -only spin management while propped-up spinmeisters are making a lot of money by having liberals toe the line with your deceptions -- Al Gore has made 100 million dollars from "global warming" while millions of Americans are unemployed.

Your accusations are so spurious. Mark my words, one of these days you will complain that the White House should change its name to the "Black House," or to some other name in order to become more politically correct! Yes, it's going to happen because leftist liberals push their aberrant political ideology to ad absurdum conclusions that border on the edge on inanity.

It is not right to dehumanize people like Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck, or people who attended the "tea parties," just because they oppose the administration's policies. That's the American way -- free exercise of inalienable political free speech rights!

It is not right to disparage Fox news because it disagrees with administration policies. The news they broadcast is as real as CNN. Fox News then, is real news.

And CNN and other news organizations are no more real news than Fox News just because they agree with Obama's policies. In that sense, CNN, ABC and NBC might as well move their headquarters to the White House. The only reason administration officials praise CNN, is because CNN reporters don't devote time to critical analysis of their policies to the same extent they assaulted previous republican administrations; but rather, CNN, ABC and NBC spew out benign soporifics intended to sustain an unspoken agreement for adulation of the atonement-candidate-of-choice to which they mentally submit while fantasizing all of the American people should "park their brains" and just "pad themselves on the back" for having elected a "minority", or rather, "their minority" to the White House.

In a representative democracy based upon self-government where the people ELECT their public officials, things work differently in reality. Political criticism demonstrates a vibrant representative government where "government of the people, by the people and for the people" remains responsive to the real needs of We, the People!

Read more »