OMINOUS DANGERS WITH "TREATIES"

     The President of the United States is constitutionally empowered to "make treaties" with the advice and consent of the Senate. Article II to the Constitution of the United States reads:

      "He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two-thirds of the senators present concur;"

  Article VI, Constitution of the United States of America reads (with emphasis):

 "This constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; AND ALL TREATIES made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, SHALL BE THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND; and the judges in very state shall be bound thereby any thing in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding."

So, you see, the major problem with treaties is that they have as much weight as the Constitution of the United States, in that treaty provisions, per Article VI to the Constitution of the United States, supersede the specific laws of each and every State in this Union, and State judges must obey treaty provisions regardless of State or local laws to the contrary.

This provision of Article VI appears to conflict with Amendments IX, X and XI. In Amendments IX and X, powers not delegated to the federal government are retained by the people or the States, respectively. And in Amendment XI, even the judicial power of the United States is restricted in scope so as not to extend "to any suit in law or equity . . . commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States . . . by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State." This Amendment was intended to prevent federal courts from acting in favor of a particular State against the rights of individual citizens, so that justice may be properly obtained. However, there is the "other side of the coin."

Since Article VI prevents the Supreme Court of the United States from intervening on behalf of a State, even if that State is sued at law or equity in a treaty-related legal action commenced or prosecuted against it by "Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State," then who shall protect a State of this Union against treaty provisions that violate that State's constitution or the inalienable substantive or due process rights of citizens thereof?

There is a grave danger looming over the heads of individual citizens, with our leftist representatives or senators running to the United Nations to promote "treaties" that both internationally and domestically undermine the constitutional and parental rights of all Americans,--such as the so-called "rights of the child,"--because the policies therein could never pass constitutional muster were they to be proposed in State legislatures or Congress.

In that so-called "U.N. legislation," they intend to change the age at which a child is considered a minor, to so-called "empower" children for legal actions in courts of law, as well as changing the very foundation of American self-government whereby parental authority in directing children's spiritual, moral, vocational and professional education cannot be abrogated.

In short, in the United Nations, leftist fanatics are attempting to transfer adult rights to immature and innocent children who do not even have the capacity to understand or apply these legal obfuscations, except that their devolution will have been controlled by self-interested adults obsessed with taking control of those children's lives, hence, their camouflaged advocacy to make children "enemies" of their parents. U.N. personnel and their respective treaty representatives in member countries would therefore have more rights over American children than the American parents of those American children.

American children do not belong to NGOs or "non-governmental organizations," nor to elected politicians who can be "booted out of office," nor to delegates from United Nations member countries.

 In addition, there are problems occurring in other parts of the world which Americans have already resolved here, by the rule of law, such as "child labor," "child slavery," "child sexual abuse," etc . . . And if these instances require United Nations action in other countries where these odious problems still exist, then the U.N. has to work with those respective nations in order to undertake local policies that address resolution of those crimes against children. But the U.N. or parasitic NGOs cannot "lump" all children all over the world into one "grab bag," in order to extend their tentacles in power grabs from which they will certainly profit. American parental rights are inalienable and must be faithfully preserved.

In all these instances, it is necessary to remain vigilant so as to protect American sovereignty, and by that, secure protection for the inalienable rights of all American parents which are already guarantied by the Constitution of the United States and its Bill of Rights.