IS NOT COLLIN POWELL "THE NEW MEMBER" OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY?

The former Secretary of State of a Republican administration, Collin Powell, voted for candidate Obama, currently President.  And now, Mr. Powell is pretending he is qualified to preach "inclusiveness" to the Republicans on national television on a Sunday morning.  Powell has a vested interest in the current administration which he unabashedly supports, and cannot impartially criticize the Republican Party without the taint of partisanship.  Why would he want to see Republicans succeed in 2012 when he already has invested his political interest in the success of the Democratic Party?  Powell should just leave the Republican Party and join the Democrats with whom he is already more comfortable.  What makes him think he should be listened to, as he is combating Republican principles and ideas at their core, while eulogizing Democratic ideology, politics, and policies?  This cannot do - not from a long-corrupted pretense of "Republican credentials."  No offense to the former Secretary of State, but he surely is not influencing the conservative Republican base who understands what is really at stake in this counterfeit debate.   Why would Republicans need to go to "the other side" in order "to remake their image?"  This is not a matter of "image making" but of substance regarding the enduring moral principles, eternal spiritual values and constructive nation-building beliefs we hold dear for the survival of this nation and for an America thriving, with a life-affirming political prosperity and economic freedom.  Republicans do not abandon foundational conservative principles and ideas to suit transient purposes rooted in marginal, contrary, failure-prone, vote-getting impulses. 

The real truth is that, to Powell and the Democrats whom he has decided to join, "inclusiveness" only means capitulation to the extreme leftist agenda of population control via infanticide and abortion, homosexual sodomy and lesbianism as they continue to wage fanatical warfare against religious liberty, freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, freedom of expression and the God-instituted nuclear family and attempt to mobilize a militant advocacy of more State and federal government control over local affairs and individual lives.  Why do they always resort to government activism to reverse time-tested, constructive, traditional religious morality and then hypocritically vociferate the cynical diatribe that "you can't legislate morality?"  We witnessed what kind of treatment Miss California, Carrie Prejean, received, because, as a Great American, she stood for her beliefs, as she freely expressed her God-given right to her own opinion.  Facts are, no homosexual or lesbian "partners" have ever given nor will ever give birth to any child.  Homosexual or same-gender "relations" are unnatural, abnormal, disease-producing, and destructive of the general welfare.  These abominations are already condemned by all religions on the Earth, especially Judeo-Christian moral teachings and commandments.  Again, what does Powell mean by "inclusiveness," as he already voted for Obama and has already joined the Democratic Party for all practical purposes? 

The Republican Party does not have an "identity crisis" and it does not need to "remold its image" in order to deform its foundational principles to fit the opponents' negative criticism and counter-historical advocacy.  Powell should just gracefully "bow out" with disadvantage to none and disparagement of none.  Did not Senator Lieberman change party from Democrat to Independent?  And did not Senator Specter change party from Republican to Democrat?  Powell should just openly change party and join the Democrats rather than pretending he can impartially critique the Republican Party as a loyal, belonging-member, with the best interest of the Party in mind.  Mr. Powell, the former "Republican" Secretary of State, goes to media programs from a Democratic Party allegiance and criticizes the Republican Party for not being "inclusive."  So the Democratic Party is more in line with his own thinking, he should just publically join them and be done with it - then, with no contradictions, he'd be truly himself.