« Nailing it: "They prefer to insult your intelligence..." | PQuincy's Blog | Republican tactics: a mystery? »
Chickens roosting watch (Kristol edition)
One of the minor forms of relief available during our present economic difficulties has been watching Republican pundits squirm and twitch as they try to evade the history of their own rhetoric. Today's example, from William Kristol in the New York Times:
After discussing how Republicans have the Democrats just where they want them, trapped helplessly in Washington in charge of the White House and Congress while Republican governors are poised for, well, coping with a catastrophe, Kristol turns his laser-like thoughts to the economy. You see, the key is that Republicans need to tell a good story about why the financial meltdown is not their fault.
"I don't see why a commitment to free markets requires permitting banks or bank-like institutions to leverage their assets at 30 to 1. There's nothing conservative about letting free markets degenerate into something close to Karl Marx's vision of an atomizing, irresponsible and self-devouring capitalism."
Since it is exactly Mr. Kristol's wing of the Republican party that has spent thirty years since Reagan's "Government is not the solution, government is the problem" saying precisely that any form of regulation or oversight that goes beyond gentle avuncular suasion is tantamount to the rape of "free markets" (free markets which rule all, guide all, solve all problems, blessed be the free markets), his sudden turn is hilarious.
After all, who, exactly, does Mr. Kristol think will prevent banks and bank-like institions from leveraging their assets at 30 to 1. The government, of course! Regulation! In contrast, letting banks do as they will has been (at least according to three decades of Republican orthdoxy), an essential feature of the 'free market'.
But no: now it turns out that letting markets operate as 'atomizing', with each participant following only his or her own interest, is actually Marxist! I never thought I'd see Bill Kristol agree with Marx's critique of the policies and ideas of, well, Bill Kristol and all his Republican free-market absolutists, but now we've seen it. What fun!
After discussing how Republicans have the Democrats just where they want them, trapped helplessly in Washington in charge of the White House and Congress while Republican governors are poised for, well, coping with a catastrophe, Kristol turns his laser-like thoughts to the economy. You see, the key is that Republicans need to tell a good story about why the financial meltdown is not their fault.
"I don't see why a commitment to free markets requires permitting banks or bank-like institutions to leverage their assets at 30 to 1. There's nothing conservative about letting free markets degenerate into something close to Karl Marx's vision of an atomizing, irresponsible and self-devouring capitalism."
Since it is exactly Mr. Kristol's wing of the Republican party that has spent thirty years since Reagan's "Government is not the solution, government is the problem" saying precisely that any form of regulation or oversight that goes beyond gentle avuncular suasion is tantamount to the rape of "free markets" (free markets which rule all, guide all, solve all problems, blessed be the free markets), his sudden turn is hilarious.
After all, who, exactly, does Mr. Kristol think will prevent banks and bank-like institions from leveraging their assets at 30 to 1. The government, of course! Regulation! In contrast, letting banks do as they will has been (at least according to three decades of Republican orthdoxy), an essential feature of the 'free market'.
But no: now it turns out that letting markets operate as 'atomizing', with each participant following only his or her own interest, is actually Marxist! I never thought I'd see Bill Kristol agree with Marx's critique of the policies and ideas of, well, Bill Kristol and all his Republican free-market absolutists, but now we've seen it. What fun!
Advertisement





It's the beginning of the process of claiming they were just not being True Republicans. Like Sen. Jim DeMint saying the GOP should be about dispersing power.
Seems that True Republicanism is suspiciously similar to existing liberal policies.
November 17, 2008 11:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
I gave my rec'd simply for the joy of this phrase:
Especially for the "squirm and twitch" part. It reminded me of a scene from one Harry Potter book, where some poor soul was hanging upside down as the group of evil wizards met to plot and scheme.
November 17, 2008 4:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, TheraP. Finding the right words is important, and I'm glad I gave you a giggle.
November 22, 2008 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
what?
November 17, 2008 10:28 PM | Reply | Permalink