<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>postprandial&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/pp/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/pp/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/pp//7515</id>
   <updated>	2008-11-06T20:33:41Z	</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://14.243280-comment:3278172</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/06/party_of_palin/#c3278172" />
		
		    <title>postprandial Commented on Party of Palin? by William Hartung</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-06T20:33:41Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-06T20:33:41Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>If the Republican brand becomes exclusively the party of Palin/Limbaugh, there's likely to be an emergence of the alternative political party to represent the view of the Buckleyite conservative libertarian wing of the party far more capable of attracting the large centrist bloc.</p>

<p>It would be both logical and ironic for the emergent party to adopt the Whig brand of olde.  The logical bit would be the good fit to the olde Whig doctrine and constituency.  At the end of the day, the Republican party remnant would very likely go the way of the olde Whigs.  That would be the irony bit.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    



</feed>

