« Browner, Younger and Smarter | stlfilmaker's Blog

Progressive Left - Is that "whine" with your cheese?


I enjoy a good glass of wine to end the day, perhaps a nice crisp Cabernet Sauvignon. But my gut tells me that the wine producers are getting a lot of orders from inside the beltway. And the ahem "whine" requests are ironically coming from the so called "Progressive" wing of the Democratic Party. What amazes me is that these are supposed to be the intellectuals, the ones that "get it". Yet, their hand wringing over the "Clintonian" look of the Obama cabinet, or President Elect Obama's decision not to actively campaign in the Georgia Senate runoff election is extremely disappointing. They continue to question President Elect Obama's change mantra as if competence is not a component of change, as if they fail to grasp the concept that the idealistic realities of a primary campaign and general election, may give way to the more sobering realities of the Oval Office in real time. They seem to have forgotten that the sixteen month Iraq withdrawal timetable introduced by then Senator Obama and supported by the left has been effectively adopted by both Bagdad, and the Bush Administration. And that Bush holdover Gates will be charged to manage that withdrawal. If you listen to the whine from the left, one would think Gates will secretly work to lengthen the conflict.

As I wrote in my blog Browner, Younger and Smarter, the Obama coalition that reflects that title, turned to Obama primarily because of their perception he would bring competence back to the White House. As it stands now the liberal wing of the Democratic Party seems to have gotten the case of "yes buts" meaning - yes Larry Summers, Paul Volker, Tim Geithner, and Hillary Clinton are competent, high quality picks, but whaaaa, what about us?

What about you on the left? During the campaign, those on the left, as well as many independent voters, decried Senator McCain's pick of Sarah Palin as the anthesis of "Country First". Now as it appears that President Elect Obama is making country first decisions, choosing direct reports who have respect on both sides of the aisle, as competent, intelligent policy technicians with gravitas both at home and abroad to pursue Obama's policy directives. The key formulation is these will be President Obama's policy objectives. No matter whose administration these individuals served under before, and their past political loyalties notwithstanding, President Elect Obama has made it crystal clear, they now work for him.

As a person who wrote in October 2006 that Senator Obama should stand down and give way to the inevitability of Senator Hillary Clinton, I understand the error of underestimating Barack Hussein Obama. Barack Obama is a very astute politician - a fact ought not to be "slept on". This is not a man who will allow his reports to undermine his vision. And let's be clear Rahm Emanuel, David Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett, will be in the room when every key decision is being made, protecting his backside.  As for Obama's own political instincts recall that then Senator Obama understood the potential danger of Reverend Wright long before the media picked up on his speeches, and put distance between him by not allowing him to speak at his announcement rally in Springfield, he turned down public financing as it became clear to him he was sitting on a cash cow, and decided against the town hall debates with Senator McCain in order to get his message out with more clarity. Senator Obama while having the most liberal voting record has been moving toward a more pragmatic, and realistic centrist position since he won the nomination. Why, because that's where the country is. The country rejected writ large the failed policies that were driven from the extreme of the right, and President Elect Obama is wise not to allow the political pendulum to drift dangerously to the left. Remember his oft stump remark, this election is about "big things" and as the days and weeks have passed since his election, those "things" have gotten even bigger.

Senator Obama needs Republican support; he needs John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell and John Boehner, as much as he needs Harry Reid, Ted Kennedy, and Nancy Pelosi. As Karl Rove mentioned President Obama will have about 180 days before the first Congressional break, he can't hit the ground running by marginalizing the Republican Party, or governing as if they don't exists. That is change we can believe in. This is change that makes sense. As for those on the left who feel they are shut out? The aforementioned troika of gatekeepers Emanuel Axelrod, and Jarrett are positioned to provide a listening ear to views of the left, and make sure that their concerns, and input is included in the process.

Members of the left, we should all raise a glass to the victory of Barack Obama, and a return of competent government, but let's not sully that glass with bitterness based on unrealistic views of what change means.

 


3 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I think its going to be a helluva lot less bipartisan because Pelosi is setting the stage with a much more liberal framework than Obama:

Centrists are grumbling that their growing ranks aren’t represented in the leadership team that Pelosi shaped through back-room arm-twisting. The so-called Blue Dogs, while publicly celebrating President-elect Obama’s commitment to “pay-go,” are wondering when the stimulus balloon stops expanding.

There is also growing speculation that pay-go will be waived for healthcare legislation, which is expected to cost hundreds of billions of dollars.

“Everyone had and will continue to have a seat at the table,” said Pelosi spokesman Nadeam Elshami. “Her record has been that she’s a pragmatist who gets things done.”

On the day after the election, Pelosi assured that “the country must be governed from the middle.”

But as she spoke, Waxman was seeking to move things to the left. He spent the day making calls to fellow members asking them for the gavel of Energy and Commerce, where the heart of the Obama agenda will be hammered out. About two weeks later, the environmental left prevailed over the business-minded centrists when Dingell, the champion of the auto industry, was ousted.

I think it will be a completely lefty legislature with an overpowering hyper-lefty Pelosi bullying her fellow-party members to such a degree some will even endorse the Republicans to spite her. I don’t think any Republicans will have any say, they’ll try and bargain some quid-pro-quo, but its going to be Pelosi’s way or “hit the road”. I wonder whether she will even accommodate Obama if he seems “too bipartisan” or inclusive.

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/anxiety-among-democrats-as-pelosi-tightens-her-grip-2008-12-02.html

user-pic

.

Yowzer . . .

A wee bit of Pelosi Obsessive Syndrome?

QUACK!

~OGD~

*Steerin' clear of the bottom-feeders in the Café since June 2005*

user-pic

.

I don't drink but I do like 'cheese' . . .

Very interesting take . . .

And -- so was your previous post, Browner, Younger and Smarter . . .

Back in the day (1966) when I was, as you say, "young, brown and smart" instead of the saying, "don't get it twisted" it was a little more in the face and less politically correct as is pointed out here in Silly as it Seems ...

Now that that I'm old, brown and smart my attitude remains consistent as it has over the past 40+ years.

Never trust a representative any further than you can throw 'em.

Constantly hold their feet to the fire.

You want my vote? Work for it...

And I'm a "leftie..."

~OGD~

*Cruisin' thru the reeds in the Café since June 2005*

Leave a comment

stlfilmaker

user-pic

Following: 0
Followers: 1

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

  • Favorite Books Hot Flat and Crowded Without Remorse The Godfather The Autobiography of Malcolm X

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address