<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>pilikia&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/pilikia/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/pilikia/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/pilikia//3900</id>
   <updated>	2009-08-31T19:05:21Z	2009-08-31T19:03:55Z		2009-08-31T18:59:40Z	2009-08-31T18:52:54Z	2009-08-31T18:50:01Z	2009-08-31T18:49:23Z	2009-08-31T18:48:27Z	2009-08-31T18:48:13Z	2009-08-31T18:44:34Z				2009-08-31T18:41:44Z	2009-08-31T18:40:32Z	2009-08-31T18:40:01Z	2009-08-31T18:38:12Z		2009-08-31T18:35:15Z		2009-08-31T18:32:25Z	2009-08-31T18:19:22Z	2009-08-31T18:18:15Z		2009-08-31T18:15:17Z	2009-08-31T18:07:05Z	2009-08-31T18:04:55Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>








	
	<entry>
		
	<title><![CDATA[pilikia recommended I Might Have Saved Teddy Kennedy&apos;s Life by clandesdun]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/clandesdun/2009/08/i-might-have-saved-teddy-kenne.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/clandesdun//1041.286857</id>
  <published>2009-08-26T22:09:21Z</published>
   <updated>2009-08-26T22:11:01Z</updated>
	</entry>
	






	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/robert_reich//4885.286669-comment:3574657</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/robert_reich/2009/08/ted-kennedy.php#c3574657" />
		
		    <title>pilikia Commented on Ted Kennedy by Robert Reich</title>
		        
			<published>2009-08-26T11:37:26Z</published>
			   <updated>2009-08-26T11:37:26Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Over at the WSJ Thomas Frank has a column advocating that Obama channel his Harry Truman in the health care fight. Its a good idea, but Obama should also channel Teddy Kennedy, whose energy and effectiveness were unrivaled in legislating progressive policies.  Or as Frank says in today's column:</p>

<p>"After I listened to a few angry town-hall meetings on the radio, the situation was clear to me. Democrats had to meet this pseudo-populist challenge by rolling out the real thing, the New Deal vision that is their party's raison d'être."</p>

<p>"Maybe Democrats are afraid it will hurt their standing with those generous fellows on K Street if they channel Harry Truman and say what needs to be said: That government can be made to work for average people. But it will hurt even worse if they refuse to say it."</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    




	
	<entry>
		
	<title>pilikia recommended Ted Kennedy by Robert Reich</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/robert_reich/2009/08/ted-kennedy.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/robert_reich//4885.286669</id>
  <published>2009-08-26T06:15:00Z</published>
   <updated>2009-08-26T06:55:03Z</updated>
	</entry>
	




	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009://14.286436-comment:3573413</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/08/24/the_real_debate_about_health_care/#c3573413" />
		
		    <title>pilikia Commented on The Real Debate About Health Care by Howard Dean</title>
		        
			<published>2009-08-25T12:46:38Z</published>
			   <updated>2009-08-25T12:46:38Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Dr. Dean--To answer your question:  Yes! We should offer Americans under the age of 65 the same kind of health care choices we give those over the age of 65.  And just as critically: Yes, we can do it.</p>

<p>Isn't it interesting that the same Republicans who pushed through both a massive unfunded tax cut in 2001 and the costly Iraq war (also not included in the annual budget for 6 years) will not support health care reform that covers all Americans?  If they don't value public health care plans, why don't they resign en masse from their Federal health plans, from Medicare, and from the VA benefits that some of them are participating in?  </p>

<p>I think that arch-conservative Winston Churchill was right in his view of state-funded national health care in Great Britain:</p>

<p>"The discoveries of healing science must be the inheritance of all. That is clear. Disease must be attacked, whether it occurs in the poorest or the richest man or woman simply on the ground that it is the enemy; and it must be attacked just in the same way as the fire brigade will give its full assistance to the humblest cottage as readily as to the most important mansion. Our policy is to create a national health service in order to ensure that everybody in the country, irrespective of means, age, sex, or occupation, shall have equal opportunities to benefit from the best and most up-to-date medical and allied services available."  </p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/robert_reich//4885.286044-comment:3570543</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/robert_reich/2009/08/why-the-gang-of-six-is-decidin.php#c3570543" />
		
		    <title>pilikia Commented on Why the Gang of Six is Deciding Health Care for Three Hundred Million of Us by Robert Reich</title>
		        
			<published>2009-08-21T21:00:07Z</published>
			   <updated>2009-08-21T21:00:07Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p> Obama may be talking a good game for healthcare reform, but seem ready to be rolled by the Republicans, Blue Dogs, and health corporations (pharma., health insurance). When liberal congressmen hesitated at approving his Afghanistan/Iraq defense budget, the White House issue forcefully pushed back, warning of consequences in the next election cycle. There has been no such pushback against Baucus and the Bluedogs. So its self evident that if Baucus is leading a charge against the public optio, Obama and the White House agree with that. </p>

<p>I'm an Obama supporter who worked for him long and hard in 08. Now Democrats are trying to mount effective campaigns here in SC for Governor (held by Sanford) and Senate (Demint) in 2010.  And thats where I get off the bus. I will not support Corporate-dominated Republican-lite Democrats with my volunteer time or money.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    






	
	<entry>
		
	<title>pilikia recommended How Pharma and Insurance Intend to Kill the Public Option, And What Obama and the Rest of Us Must Do by Robert Reich</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/robert_reich/2009/06/the-public-option-smokescreens.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/robert_reich//4885.273861</id>
  <published>2009-06-06T02:19:00Z</published>
   <updated>2009-06-07T00:29:50Z</updated>
	</entry>
	






	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/robert_reich//4885.270714-comment:3470926</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/robert_reich/2009/05/the-health-care-cave-in.php#c3470926" />
		
		    <title>pilikia Commented on The Health Care Cave-In by Robert Reich</title>
		        
			<published>2009-05-18T18:18:49Z</published>
			   <updated>2009-05-18T18:18:49Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Reich is right in saying that without heavy pressure from the White House and public the public option will not succeed.  Right now, the signals from the WH are less than encouraging.  But Emanual, Axelrod, and Obama may be overestimating their continuing support from their base and the 60+% of Americans now favorably inclined toward him.  As a campaign worker for Obama and avid backer of Obama's changes so far, I can say categorically that if he doesn't support a public option (or something better), he will lose my vote, not only in 2012, but in the congressional elections of 2010.  </p>

<p>Yes, its a litmus test. And its such an important issue, that I would rather vote for a Republican if she or he promised true health care reform after another failed Democratic effort.  Some Republican politician somewhere might figure out that it will take a Republican (aka Nixon goes to China) to take on the corporate health care and insurance industry and achieve true change.   Whats truly discouraging is that all of Obama's personal tales of the broken health care system may have been campaign rhetoric.  I see no sign of a President's realistic understanding of how insurance companies, health care system game the system and will continue to do so unless confronted by true competition.   </p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    







	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/pilikia//3900.262856-comment:3417526</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/pilikia/2009/03/healthcare-reform-while-were-w.php#c3417526" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[pilikia Commented on Healthcare reform: While we&apos;re waiting for the bank rescue to fail (or succeed) by pilikia]]></title>
		        
			<published>2009-03-24T14:28:22Z</published>
			   <updated>2009-03-24T14:28:22Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Not blaming Medicare, but Medicare, like the private insurance giants (Blue Cross/BS, etc.) rewards procedure-intensive specialists rather than primary care physicians or specialists who focus on thinking/listening/frequent visits like infectious disease doctors. Medicare is actually preferred by many of the physicians I know here in South Carolina, because at least the reimbursement rates are decent--BC/BS and other private insurers have an incentive NOT to pay claims--more profit for them.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    






	
	<entry>
		
	<title>pilikia recommended Bigger Than the Both of Us by Josh Marshall</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/03/bigger_than_the_both_of_us.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009://2.261936</id>
  <published>2009-03-19T18:30:31Z</published>
   <updated>2009-03-19T19:01:21Z</updated>
	</entry>
	




	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/robert_reich//4885.261540-comment:3407871</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/robert_reich/2009/03/the-real-scandal-of-aig.php#c3407871" />
		
		    <title>pilikia Commented on The Real Scandal of AIG by Robert Reich</title>
		        
			<published>2009-03-16T03:43:22Z</published>
			   <updated>2009-03-16T03:43:22Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Right on the money, as usual, Robert.  I think something that Kevin Phillips said the other day on Huffington Post was also quite germane:  "Before Bernanke went to the Fed in 2006, for Pete's sake, he was chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers under George W. Bush. Imagine if FDR had retained Herbert Hoover's chief economic adviser and loyal Republican Fed Chairman in 1933." </p>

<p>As far as Geithner is concerned, he played a key role in initiating the bailouts of Fall 2008, working closely with the Bush administration.  So with Bernanke heading the Federal Reserve and Geithner as Sec. of Treasury, we have two men who were key factors in developing the disastrous polices from 1999 to 2008.  This does not seem like real change.  Unless President Obama changes course pretty quickly, he's going to be led off the cliff by his own economic advisors.  </p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    




	
	<entry>
		
	<title>pilikia recommended The Real Scandal of AIG by Robert Reich</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/robert_reich/2009/03/the-real-scandal-of-aig.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/robert_reich//4885.261540</id>
  <published>2009-03-15T02:48:00Z</published>
   <updated>2009-03-16T21:26:06Z</updated>
	</entry>
	




	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/astral66//2668.258718-comment:3388658</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/astral66/2009/02/bobby-jindal-undertaker-1.php#c3388658" />
		
		    <title>pilikia Commented on Bobby Jindal, Undertaker by astral66</title>
		        
			<published>2009-02-25T17:42:37Z</published>
			   <updated>2009-02-25T17:42:37Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Exactly, as he approached the lectern, I thought "undertaker."! And his manner was exactly as you described. Weird. </p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    




	
	<entry>
		
	<title>pilikia recommended Bobby Jindal, Undertaker by astral66</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/astral66/2009/02/bobby-jindal-undertaker-1.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/astral66//2668.258718</id>
  <published>2009-02-25T16:27:44Z</published>
   <updated>2009-02-26T01:34:42Z</updated>
	</entry>
	






	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009://9075.254975-comment:3362764</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/goodbye-tom-daschle.php#c3362764" />
		
		    <title>pilikia Commented on Goodbye, Tom Daschle by Matthew Cooper</title>
		        
			<published>2009-02-03T19:27:11Z</published>
			   <updated>2009-02-03T19:27:11Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Re: "Makes you not run for the leadership."</p>

<p>Actually, the lesson could be, "makes you not want to go along for a million dollar a year joy ride with the first corporate bazillionaire who comes along" three seconds after you leave your Senate Majority leader post.</p>

<p>Agree with the previous posters who bemoan the classic insider gossip-mongering of Cooper.  Is this really what TPM has come to-- "Who's in, who's out, what the real behind the scenes story is!"  --without discussing the propriety of Daschle leaving the Senate and literally a day later, signing on for a car and driver and a million bucks a year for duties which included....what?  That's what I'd be interested in reading about.  <br />
</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    










	
	<entry>
		
	<title>pilikia recommended No Drama Obama Team vs.  Lieberman, the Drama Queen by pilikia</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/pilikia/2008/11/no-drama-obama-team-vs-lieberm.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/pilikia//3900.243917</id>
  <published>2008-11-11T17:32:04Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-11T18:14:29Z</updated>
	</entry>
	



	
	<entry>
		
	<title>pilikia recommended Alaska Finds More Uncounted Ballots by astral66</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/astral66/2008/11/alaska-finds-more-uncounted-ba.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/astral66//2668.243828</id>
  <published>2008-11-11T01:55:05Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-11T02:08:11Z</updated>
	</entry>
	






</feed>

