The Reid Legacy: Creates precedent that a chair be held for Independents that campaign for opposition?
Am i the only one that feels it may actually be more important to have a strong Speaker in the Senate for the coming Obama administration than it was during Bush? Couldn't (shouldn't?) Hillary just beat his ass down and take the gavel? Okay, pardon that. But the image of Obama and Biden in the White House with Pelosi runnin the House and Hillary runnin the Senate sure looks attractive in my political fantasy life.
Be that as it may, the lack of leadership that Reid has shown during the Bush debacle on critical issues must be seen in a new light given the result of the election. Building consensus around bending over for the majority was not the leadership this country seeks or deserves, nor has it been an effective strategy if one's purpose is to represent all of us and to uphold the constitution. The basic tenet that Reid has held is clearly "if you don't have the votes, don't take a stand." This has meant that the Democratic party has facilitated and enabled the very same policies that have brought domestic and global catastrophies. Cheney/Enron's energy policy, the war in Iraq, the looting of the treasury to pay off the Bush base in the form of the "tax cut", domestic spying, etc. On absolutely none of these did Reid lead his colleagues to stand, to a person, in opposition to class warfare, environmental destruction, or unprovoked war. Sane people everywhere and even the planet itself were sold out and given no voice, and the rationale was that it would hurt the party politically if the media took the administration side. No rape of justice or abuse of power or violation of our constitution was reason enough for Reid to lead Democrats to stand in unified opposition to the Bush administration, even after his popularity had faded. No sir, that is not leadership. That is aiding and abetting, and is recognized as such. And when the aiding and abetting becomes obvious and potentially prosecutable, as with the domestic spying program? Show "leadership" by hurrying through legislation that makes the crime retroactively legal.
And now it appears that Reid is unwilling to take a stand and rightfully revoke the chair, held by Democrats, that (Independent) Joe Lieberman still holds after campaigning against the Democratic party and casting aspersions on the judgement and character of our nominee, President-elect Obama. Given Reid's legacy thus far, this is just the icing on the cake. Unfortunately he may also be setting a precedent, and i don't want him doing that anymore --neither accidentally nor on purpose.
Can we get some leadership now, please?













Just to be clear, no decision has been made on Joe. Reid is not gong to make a decision until he speaks with the caucus.
So before you jump all over this wait and see what happens. Also Reid may well be telling Joe - "you can do the smart thing and step down yourself or you can let us humiliate you by firing your dumb ass."
November 7, 2008 9:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hear ya, but Lieberman is the least of it. When i look at Reid i see eight years of Bush aided and abetted by a person whose specific job it was to do the exact opposite, in addition to another elected official who failed to uphold the oath of office. Reid failed miserably at both of those things, and our world will continue to suffer for it. We deserve better.
November 7, 2008 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Specifically, what did Reid fail to do that someone else would have been able to do? Which votes did Reid make that you disagree with? Exactly how did he fail to uphold the oath of his office? Facts here, not just more generalised complaining without substantiation.
Quit your bellyaching about Lieberman, he's toast. Reid isn't going to roast him on a spit, unless Lieberman wants to take the battle public, which I doubt.
November 7, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
well lieberman took it public, and is threatening to caucus with the republicans.
"quit your bellyaching about lieberman"???
brilliant suggestion, you betcha, but no. he makes me sick to my stomach, so i'll keep right on "bellyaching" thank you.
November 7, 2008 10:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, screw Lieberman, and he's toast. It's your bellyaching about Reid I don't understand. Reid has worked hard in the last two years attempting to get something done about Iraq, trying to resolve the reprehensible issue of the detainees, and getting proper oversight put back into the FISA. Lieberman worked against Reid on all of these, but he was not always alone. Carper, Feinstein, Inouye, Landrieu, Both Nelsons, Pryor, Rockefeller and Salazar have often been on the other side too. Why no complaining about them?
Again, Lieberman is a scum-sucker, who refused to accept the democratic decision his his party in the primary. For that reason alone, he deserves derogations. Here, enjoy one of mine from 2006.
November 8, 2008 6:47 AM | Reply | Permalink