« Haiku Advice for Republicans | Orlando's Blog | A Powerful Noise is a Powerful Film »

Penguins and Dragons and Reason, Oh My: A Visit to the Creation Museum


Because of distance and three adorable and energetic kids, my best friend and I rarely have the luxury of spending time alone. But last Friday, we had the pleasure of spending an entire afternoon together. After lunch, we found ourselves at the Cincinnati Art Museum, and after wandering the galleries for about a half-hour, I asked an innocent question about other museums in the area. With a mischievous grin, my friend informed me that the Creation Museum was just a short drive over the state line into Kentucky.

It took us less than a second to decide to ditch the art museum and head south. I suggested that we might want to sin as much as possible before we got there, going so far as to ask if she wanted to make out. She thought that because there was unlikely to be a confessional or a Catholic priest at a fundamentalist museum, committing sins was kind of pointless.  So, we didn't make out. But I swore a lot on the way, just in case.

As we drove the half-hour distance, we laid out some ground rules. We know ourselves very well, my friend and I, and we laugh a lot--especially over the ridiculous and the unintentionally ironic. The last thing we wanted to be was openly rude and disrespectful. There could be absolutely no eye contact or talking during the visit.

At a quick stop for gas, I was horrified to realize that they would know immediately that we weren't members of their clan. I'd forgotten about my Obama bumper sticker. We spent some time discussing whether it would be necessary to park down the road and walk, but as we neared the museum site, we realized that wouldn't be possible. The Creation Museum is located on a sizeable campus in the middle of nowhere, complete with the 70,000 square foot museum as well as a petting zoo and botanical gardens that I'm sure are lovely in the spring, summer, and fall.

Plan B was to sneak the car into the parking lot and find a spot I could back into so as to hide my bumper. Unfortunately, there was a traffic guard, and he directed us down an aisle where he had full view of my allegiance. I still backed into a spot because I didn't want to take any chances but all my worry was for nothing. The traffic guard was absolutely lovely to us as we walked by him and into the museum. I would have preferred if he hadn't offered the "God bless you, ladies," but when in Rome, right?

Upon entrance, we were greeted, or more like accosted, by a docent-type, who was also lovely, if a little earnest. He talked to us for five minutes that felt like twenty, but he was kind. He tried his best to convince us that we should hang up our coats, since it was a long walk through the warm museum and we'd end up carrying them. But I was wearing my "Blasphemy is a victimless crime" t-shirt, so I demurred. Just kidding. I was freezing. He tried really hard though, so I felt bad.

It was a slow day at the museum, so the docent stayed with us all the way down the entrance hall from the coat check to the ticket counter where we dropped $46.00 for two tickets. He let us know, helpfully, that if we decided to purchase an annual membership, the price of the tickets would be applied to the membership fee. You might be thinking at this point that $23.00 per person is sort of expensive. And I suppose if you're looking at it from the position that you're paying to visit a place that is unmoored from reality, you might have a point. But from my perspective, we were paying for an anthropological experience, so to me, it was worth every penny. Plus, my friend paid.

After purchasing our tickets, we were directed to stand in front of a green screen, look up at some dinosaurs above us, and give the photographer our best frightened face. Had I known then that the reason dinosaurs are extinct is that people killed them to show off, I would have put on my best badass face instead. But I'm getting ahead of myself.

The entrance to the Dragon Hall Bookstore was off to the left of the beginning of the exhibit hall. I wondered for a second at a Christian museum perpetuating what I thought was a pagan myth, but my questions would be answered later. See if you can guess how.

Before I get in to the actual content of the museum, let me say that the exhibit itself is very well done. It has the feel of a natural history museum and makes effective use of multimedia and animatronics to tell its story. It's the kind of place where kids won't be bored to tears, and it tells its story in about two hours, which for me is a sort of museum witching hour. After two hours in a museum, I'd better be getting a nap or some coffee or I'm going to get cranky.

After we entered the exhibit hall, we were pretty much left alone to our wandering, encountering only three or four other groups of people. So we were safe to look and read and listen as we were led through the book of Genesis. We carefully examined everything except the evidence against global warming. It was toward the end and at that point, our capacity to be intellectually indulgent was waning.

We were also fairly proud of ourselves to have mostly kept to our "no eye contact, no talking" rule, with only a couple of slip ups and snickers. There was just one time when we had to move to separate corners of a room until we were able to stop ourselves from shaking with silent laughter. To be fair, it was my friend's fault. A video explained that tectonic plates were basically riding on top of the oceans and that, just like when ice cubes are dropped into a glass of water, external stimuli (i.e., the great flood) could cause the plates to shift. The premise prompted my friend to wonder out loud if everybody in Australia jumped up and down at the same time, whether the island would bob. 

Speaking of Australia, I was very concerned how, without evolution as an explanation, the kangaroos got to the island after getting off of Noah's ark. The museum did address it, but it was the only answer that didn't fit well into their framework of logic. In case you're wondering, to me, that framework boiled down to the following:

  1. I used to have a bike.
  2. I don't have a bike anymore.
  3. Therefore, I am a fish.

But inside the museum, the framework was fairly consistent. Everyone has the same facts, we were told, but we don't all have the same starting point. From the Biblical starting point, it is supposed to make perfect sense that dinosaurs and penguins lived alongside Adam and Eve, and every other creature that has ever existed, in the Garden of Eden.

The genius of the museum is that at every point where doubt started to creep in, the doubt was addressed. For example, just after I wondered about how kangaroos got to Australia, my question was answered, in the framework of the Biblical starting point. My friend wondered about how the tectonic plates shifted and a few minutes later, there was the explanation. It happened again and again during the course of two hours. Whenever you started to wonder, your doubt would (purportedly) be erased.

Doubt is clearly an enemy, as it usually is when trying to disseminate a belief that is contrary to human experience. Another enemy is reason. Frequently in the museum, we came upon comparisons of human reason vs. God's truth.

  • Human reason says the Grand Canyon was carved out over millions of years of slow erosion as the Colorado river wound its way through. God's truth says it created in a few weeks by the force of water during the great flood.
  • Human reason says that Homo Sapiens evolved from Homo Erectus, and before them Neanderthals, and before them Apes. God's truth says that all creatures were created on the sixth day and there is no such thing as evolution. (But, as a neat aside, there is such a thing as change, which species undergo to meet changing conditions in their environments. But it's not evolution, so please don't call it that.)
  • Human reason says that dinosaurs became extinct over 65 million years ago. God's truth leads us to conclude that they were actually on the ark and later (when they were called dragons), they were driven to extinction  by people who killed them because dragons were scary. Or alternatively to show off.
  • Human reason says that the world is millions of years old. God's truth says that it is 6,000 years old. And please don't bring up the footprint they just found and dated to be 1.5 million years old, because that is not a fact, but a conclusion reached by starting at a different starting point.

The heartbreaking genius of the argument is that there is no place for any evolution, even of thought. There is an answer for every "what if" and absolutely no room for unanswered questions. Unanswered questions lead to thinking and thinking is bad. Knowing is good and we know God's truth. Going around in that circle for two hours hurt my head a bit.

There are so many fallacies in the museum's logic that it is impossible to address them all. I encourage everyone to visit, if only to gain a greater understanding of how far some people will go to delude themselves. Also, if you love irony like I do, you can visit the bookstore to lay your eyes on a copy of the book The Fallacy Detective: 36 Lessons on How to Recognize Bad Reasoning

The good news is that, at the museum, I got a "get into heaven" card. All I have to do is sign the back and I've got my ticket. To my friends: I would have picked up cards for everyone, but there was a sign that said I could only take one. Sorry. I'm sure you'll meet nice people in that other place.

And finally, I leave you with the hopeful news that at least some of the museum creators and curators have a sense of humor. In one still empty space a sign was posted, "This space still evolving."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cross posted at Dagblog.com, where whether to legalize pot is a recent topic of conversation. Dinosaurs on Noah's Ark and pot. Hmmmm.


44 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Enjoy heaven.

user-pic

I haven't signed it yet. It's a tough choice. Eternal paradise or friends and family.

user-pic

sounds like the fallacy of the false dilemma!

user-pic
I used to have a bike. I don't have a bike anymore. Therefore, I am a fish.

Speak fer yourself ya heathen! I am a chicken.

A fish, geez!

It's rather disturbing to me that a parent would knowingly take a child there. Maybe we need "adults only" ratings on delusional reasoning. Sounds like the Creation Museum would get a XXX rating.

user-pic

Yes. One of the few times we encountered other people, I overheard a father telling his two kids, "Now when you do your science project, you'll be teaching your teacher something."

Oy.

user-pic
user-pic

Fred Flinstone museum. I will be damned. I am speechless.

But I believe you two ladies had a good time.

hahhahahaha. I dunno. I cannot stop laughing.

user-pic

Recommended for your wonderful storytelling and ability to move me to tears...I'm going to go delude myself about something now, or maybe just lick my wounds...It's not like I was born this way and can't help my situation. I've chosen to be a Christian, and along with that comes the need to accept the derision that comes with the decision.

Yeah, my feelings are a little hurt, but I'm a big girl, I'll get over it...

user-pic

Andrew Sullivan makes a useful distinction between Christians, who try to follow the teachings of Christ, and Christianists, who adopt the trappings of Christians to pursue a political agenda.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1191826,00.html

user-pic

Donal, thank you for the link...that is a powerful article. I have been mulling over a post on the subject, would you mind? I don't want to steal it, if you would prefer to do it yourself.

user-pic

Go to it.

user-pic

Here's the thing, stilli. There are plenty of Christian people in the world who are also reasonable--who know that the Bible can't, and doesn't, account for every single thing that has ever happened or will ever happen in the world. In those people, there is room for questions. There is room for doubt. There is room for being comfortable with not being certain about something. It's the certainty that I mock. I'm willing to make room in my worldview for the fact that science could be mistaken. Science is mistaken all the time, because it's based on trial and error. But I'm also willing to believe that the Bible is wrong, and in fact has been proven to be as well. That doesn't mean God doesn't exist. That doesn't mean I can't believe in God. These folks, the certain ones, seem to me to be absolutely terrified to let go of their absolutes because they think the world of doubt is scary. I think it's cool.

user-pic

P.S. I'm sorry I hurt your feelings.

user-pic

I wanted to say in my comment that I knew you didn't mean to hurt my feeling (because that's what I think!) but I didn't want to be presumptuous. I also didn't want to ignore the subject, because I don't want there to be any tension or discomfort between us.

In rereading my comment, what I ended up doing was being a little flip, which is not what I intended.

I like to think I am one of the more enlightened Christians...I hold open the possibility that we have misconstrued a large portion of the Bible while holding onto my core belief in God and Jesus. It is a balancing act that requires a lot of "faith" and ability to compartmentalize things in my brain. Sort of like you have to do when you are reading a great political thriller that has 3-4 story lines going at the same time and you have to keep small facts hanging in limbo until they all come together in the end.

Thanks for your apology...not needed or expected, but appreciated and accepted, nonetheless...I know your comments weren't personal.

user-pic

The Bible was never written as "proof" of something. It was collected, over a long time, like you might amass memoirs of your family. Putting in letters from people long gone and poems and ravings and laundry lists. But it's all part of something that gives you a sense of your history, your family's origins and wanderings, their hopes and dreams. There's a sense in which it "speaks" to your heart. But was never really meant to be like geometry proofs.

If Jesus were among us today, we'd have to look among the poor and the outcast. The sad thing is that these fervent folks simply can't stand back and see reality. As you so well describe.

user-pic

O, I managed to finagle a promise from the Pope via Des for a lifetime of sin and depravity with no eternal consequences. So at least I'll have someone to keep me giggling up in heaven. YAY!

user-pic

When the time comes, maybe we can surf Australia all the way to the pearly gates.

user-pic

You can always go back to my blog on indulgences. They are forever! And they are plenary. And that blog confers them! Every time!

user-pic

I have to say what is probably obvious but I'll say it anyway. Creationism is about making a religious narrative true and thus the existence of God, true. The existence of God is a necessary part of establishing power and status. Those who are rich or thru other means hold high status in society, contrary to conventional wisdom, do not "earn it". They are allowed to have such status by those around them. Earning high status is an illusion of semantics. High status is allowed by society itself thru narratives about Gods and the "order" of the universe, which operates much like a machine in these narratives. It is both logical and reasonable but not truthful, and I think there in lies the difference.
Capitalism and free market ideology is another narrative that operates the same way, with a similar function. The narratives help people accept the social hierarchy. Its and easy system for the intelligent and unscrupulous to manipulate. So the next time someone tells you the are rich because the deserve to be and you are poor because you deserve to be, they are engaging in a logical fallacy of having earned their status. We in the west did away with "divine right of kings" after gross abuse of those with such status. Stop falling for false narratives about the order of the universe. It's time we did away with the high status of the ultra wealthy, under whose abuse we are suffering once again.

user-pic

Here's something that a lot of people seem to have forgotten, if they ever knew it: you can be a Christian, i.e. a follower of Christ, WITHOUT BEING A FUNDAMENTALIST. Very few of the hundreds of Christians I'm acquainted with feel compelled to believe that every single word of the Bible is literally true, and that there are no contradictions or inconsistencies in it, and that everything that ever was, is or will be is in there somewhere. Furthermore, every one of the many Christians that I know moderately well would consider this creationist "museum" to be beneath contempt.

So please, everyone out there, don't assume that everyone who professes to be a Christian is also a believer in Biblical inerrancy. As Paul himself said: through a glass darkly ...

I'm curious: what is on the front of that get-into-heaven card?

user-pic

Unless it is a prayer to ask Jesus into your life, they'd best get rid of it!

user-pic

It was more of a pledge, really. But if it's that easy, I guess that explains why many people who claim to be Christians don't live their lives much like I was taught to in all those years of Sunday school and confirmation classes.

user-pic

I agree Margaret. People forget. 1.5 billion Christians and 1.1 or 1.2 are Roman Catholics. That is why I usually quote my Catholic Bishops Bible.

All the footnotes represent fifteen hundred years of research. And the Catholics, at least their educated leaders, do not take the literal approach to the Old Testament.

And neither do the Jews.

This is a ridiculous fabrication from illiterate white southerners centuries ago.

It is silliness.

Where in the New Testament, Does Jesus castigate scientists?

user-pic

Ridiculous, I agree, but many quite literate people are fundamentalists, such as seminary-trained clergy who read New Testament Greek as easily as the morning newspaper.

The history of this doctrine - Biblical inerrancy and/or infallibility (there is a difference) - is quite complex. Stop me before I write a treatise on the subject.

user-pic

I could join you in your treatise. I watched intelligent people slowly "convert" to creationism. They literally saw it as conversion step. They had advanced degrees and were practicing pastors and teachers of future pastors. Scary!

user-pic

It's interesting, this whole thing about creationism. It's like the fundies want to say to people: Show me your faith by handing me your mind.

And I think back over the gospels and I wonder: When did Jesus ever ask for someone's mind? He did a lot of confronting of those who wanted to control the minds of the people. But he simply gave - love, healing, teaching.

Creationism is mind-control. Pure and simple.

user-pic

The museum sounded expensive till you mentioned the 'get-into-heaven' card. Smokin' deal!

user-pic

=D

user-pic

Loved the post, O. Thanks for a good chuckle. I've got to visit this place!

user-pic

Thanks, Frizz. We laughed a lot too, on the way there and the way back (and only a little at the museum). I feel weird about mocking something that is so important to the people who work there, because they were so nice to us. But then I remember a) it's their job and b) they feel as sorry for me because I don't live their kind of life as I feel for them because they don't live mine. Not much common ground to be found there. But at least we could be polite to one another.

user-pic

Wonder what they'll say about the Erectus footprint, looking quite modern, that dates from 1.5 million years ago? It's that fast rock, hardens while-U-wait.

The Bible simply can't be literal, of course. any Christian has to come to terms with that. As does any follower of any creed that holds its scripture to be divine, either Word of God, remembered by Humans (Christianity), or Word of God, spoken by Him (Islam).

What did the lion eat while in Eden? Its intestine is too short to digest veggies.

user-pic

They would say that carbon dating is a fallacy and the footprint is a fossil from the flood. Also, that the lion ate plants because before Eve ate the fruit, all animals were vegetarians.

I. Am. Not. Making. This. Up.

I paid very close attention until the global warming part.

user-pic

And no plants were poisonous, and they didn't have sex, either, I bet. No mosquitoes (Spawn of Satan), no bacteria, no insects that lay eggs in other, paralyzed insects, no death (means no births, presumably, or the place would get crowded). And no good stories---Twain said Heaven for climate, Hell for Society.

(Reportedly Mendel told his students not to let on to the Abbey's hierarchy that plants had sex, too.)

Like all good art, the contradictions and paradoxes in scripture are useful generators of new ideas, witness Augustine, Aquinas, and such. But the most civilized versions of all religions are the least dogmatic. If the weakest form is the healthiest, what does that say about its factual value?

user-pic

What a wonderful adventure, beautifully told. Thanks for giving me such a vivid re-creation of your experience. When you use the care to go to heaven, do you pass Go and get $200.?

user-pic

Care ... jeez, nothing screws up humor more than bad spelling. Card, not care...

user-pic

This reminds me of my Bible Study with my carpooling Jehovah's Witness. A very sweet lady who worked with me at my old company in California realized that I'd had my car repo'd and she offered me a lift to and from work every day. I learned in the car one morning that she was a Witness. When she learned that I was an Agnostic, she offered to give me Bible Study in the hopes that I would "learn something", and "find faith".

Feeling beholden to her (she wouldn't take gas money), I agreed.

She gave me these little hardcover books with pictures in them.....Jesus was a handsome, young, manly bearded man.....and platypuses were compared to fish with the explanation that no way in hell could they have ever once been of the same family.

I tried so hard not to laugh when I questioned her beliefs, it would have been so cruel, but, needless to say, I left her in tears one day on the way home from work when I assured her that there was no way I could ever become a Witness, and I ended the Bible Study.

user-pic

Though I was baptized a Catholic and attended a seminary in 7th grade with the idea of one day becoming a priest; by the time I entered 9th grade, the idea of organized religion was anathema. My immediate family was not devout, but the extended family was; so we would keep to ourselves when it came to religion and religious expressions.

Every saturday morning, the Jehovah's Witnesses would ring our bell and my dad would essentially run them off with the disdainfull remark,

"Take your doorstep preaching somewhere else!"

Even at the age of fifteen, I appreciated a directed use of irony and never passed up a chance to use it.

One saturday morning a group of Witnesses who had not been in the neighborhood before knocked on our door and I yelled to the rest of the house,

"I'll get it!"

Opening the door, a trio asked me, almost in unison,

"Have you accepted Jesus in your Heart?"

I explained I was baptized a Catholic, though we were a rare sect and practiced a form of Catholicism from the early Church befire Constantine.

I could tell they knew little of Constantine or what I meant by the early church. They then went on a little sermon about Jesus knocking on the door, but there is only a handle on the inside and the owner is the one to open the door to Jesus (meaning, the door was our Heart).

I responde that the Catholicism we practiced found God and Jesus everywhere and we sought to engage God in all of our lives. In fact, it was imperative upon us to convert the unbeliever and it was God's Providence that brought them to our door to be converted.

They looked a little confused.

We had a fat siamese cat and an equally fat rabbit that thought they were siblings and would rough house or just lay about together the siamese was named Buddah and the rabbit was named Rabbi, (I was tasked with naming them when they became our pets, but I wasn't that prescient, in spite of the results), they were both "crashed" near the sofa behind me.

"In fact," I said, "God is represented in this very house by two emissaries from Heaven." Turning with a regal sweep of my hand and an equally regal intonation of voice, I announced loudly,

"All bow to Buddah and Rabbi!" I pointed to the cat and rabbit.

They just stood in the doorway, dumbfounded.

"All bow to Buddah and Rabbi!" I insisted. I walked over to the slumbering pets and announced again, "All bow to... "

As Iturned back to the door, I could see the trio, literally running down the street.

user-pic

Mr. Putnam: they probably thought you were Damien from "The Omen".

user-pic

That's funny, because The Omen came out around that time.

user-pic

That method works! Not the identical method. But the method of indicating one's faith. I once flummoxed two who were in their mode of asking questions by reporting that I was sure God was so forgiving that he would never condemn anyone. How could God not forgive? If God is love. Something like that. Anyway, I stumped them by having believe in a God of love and forgiveness.

user-pic

Did they educate you about:

(1)Giant Sequoia trees are the oldest on earth because all the other trees were drown in the Great Flood.
(2)The huge stalactite/stalagmite formations in caves like Carlsbad Caverns were formed in just a few years in the Great Flood.
(3)Sediments with shells in the Himalayas were washed there by the Great Flood.
(4)The extinct volcanoes in the NW Hawaiian Islands and the hotspot under the SE located Mauna Loa got there because the Great Flood.
(5)Petrified wood, like the giant stone logs in Arizona were turned to stone in only a few years and washed there during the Great Flood.
(6)The glaciers that formed the Great Lakes were washed away during the Great Flood.
(7)The sand sediments of these glaciers, like Long Island, were not washed away in the Great Flood, or if they were people dredged up the sand and left it there because they liked to play on the beach.
(8)God creates new types of flu virus every year to keep his hand in the game of creation.
(9)Although it looks like the pyramids, and most other old stuff, have not been eroded as much as the Grand Canyon, it is because the Great Flood missed Egypt and was just pretty awesome in northern Arizona.
and ??

user-pic

"Doubt is clearly an enemy, as it usually is when trying to disseminate a belief that is contrary to human experience."

My favorite line!

user-pic

Doubt is by no means an enemy to everyone. To paraphrase Tillich: doubt is not the opposite of faith, it is an element of faith.

Thinking Christians embrace doubt.

user-pic

Orlando, what a great blog and a great thread!

I just loved your story. But I fear they may not have jobs for long. In this economy people will quietly worship creationism at home - for free. I'm betting the place will close down the road. You'll be glad you got there when you could!

Leave a comment

Orlando

user-pic

Following: 85
Followers: 67

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location Midwest
  • Politics Progressive

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs Dagblog.com TPM washingtonmonthly.com americablog.com
  • Favorite Books The Mists of Avalon; The Poisonwood Bible

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address