A Dangerous Game: Playing Politics with Iran


Congressman Mike Pence (R-IN) and Congressman Howard Berman (D-CA) have introduced a resolution expressing support for Iranian citizens, condemning the violence in Iran, and spouting off about the importance of free and fair elections.

Berman said, "It is not for us to decide who should run Iran, much less determine the real winner of the June 12 election...but we must reaffirm our strong belief that the Iranian people have a fundamental right to express their views about the future of their country freely, and without intimidation."

When I read this statement, my immediate thought was, "Why?"

Why must we reaffirm our belief in freedom of expression and democracy? It's not exactly a big secret that the United States holds these beliefs. And, current decade notwithstanding, we can be pretty good at working with longstanding and emerging democracies around the world.

Where we fail, again and again, is trying to overlay not only our ideals but how we put those ideals into practice onto countries whose cultures and traditions are different from ours. Our leaders have not, over the long term, shown much imagination when it comes to understanding that other socieities might have their own path to achieving such important ends as freedom and democracy.

Smart, experienced foreign policy experts of all political persuasions have suggested that President Obama has taken exactly the right approach to the situation in Iran, and that any strong response by the United States could be used by the Iranian government against the protesters. Yet, conservative members of the House and Senate, as well as conservative talk show hosts, have been insisting over and over that the President is not going far enough; that he needs to decry the election results and make demands.

In my opinion, these people don't know anything about Iran, don't care about Iran or the Iranian people, and couldn't care less what position they're advocating for as long as it's the opposite of what the President is doing. That's become the Right's MO on all issues since Obama took office. Whatever Obama says is wrong--reason, public opinion, and even public safety be damned.

And here we go again. Iran is reaching a tipping point. After the Ayatollah's speech today, protests are now increasingly dangerous. What will happen on Saturday, when protesters return to the streets? I don't know, but I fear the worst. I fear that the government will put down the protests, brutally and violently.

Pence, Berman, and the like are behaving as if they are blind to this potential outcome. They see an opportunity to score political points, and if it results in the deaths of tens or hundreds or thousands of citizens in a country so far away, who cares? The goal is to undermine the President for the benefit of the Repbulican party.

Such naked narcissism takes my breath away.

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cross posted at Dagblog.

The Abortion Debate


We've had quite a month in South Bend. When the President accepted the invitation to speak at Notre Dame's commencement ceremony, the media jumped all over the supposed re-ignition of the abortion debate.  

Randall Terry came to perform an Operation Rescue--with Alan Keyes in tow. I'm not sure who was rescued, but I did notice that they were very good at getting arrested, pushing around strollers with blood-drenched plastic dolls, and publicly displaying graphic images of aborted fetuses--on trucks, on airplane banners, and on posters. They were also pretty good at pissing off the locals. 

Terry and Keyes promised an army of protesters 20,000 strong, that would line the streets surrounding campus. Terry said, "My goal, and my challenge to everyone, is to create such a political mud pit here that Obama chooses to not walk through it in order to speak."  

I wanted Randall to tell you how that worked out for him, but he was a little busy this morning what with the arraignment and all, so I'll have to fill you in. I'm not so good with the math, but I don't think 300 equals 20,000. Even still, I can see how 300 angry white people (plus Alan Keyes) holding pictures of cut up fetuses and calling random passersby "murderers" is jarring. The media sure liked it. The protesters got loads of press coverage. Locally, the police handed out "No Trespassing" signs so that the people who actually live on the street where the out-of-towners were camped could have them arrested if they stepped onto private property. I saw one guy interviewed who was running his sprinklers. With a twinkle in his eye, he told a reporter that the water was nourishing his lawn. And the sidewalk. 

I've been a bit busy in April and May, so I didn't get a chance to watch much of the coverage. What I did see concentrated more on whether Notre Dame was committing mortal sin with the invitation or whether the anti-Obama Catholics were committing mortal hypocrisy. Guess which one I pick. 

Read more »

Meet Your New Roommate or Obama's Plan to House the Guantanamo Prisoners


Sometimes, I get confused when people use slang or terms of art. I'm more of a straightforward, un-fancy communicator. I'm ashamed to admit it might be something I have in common with our former president--although I tend not to make up my own words.

Something I am less ashamed to admit is that I don't always follow some of the terms bandied about on the blogs. One of those terms is "strawman." I'm from the Midwest. Out here, strawmen live in fields and they don't generally talk, which makes it difficult for them to participate in arguments.

But, I'm proud to admit that today, for possibly the first time, I feel I have an absolute grasp of what "creating a strawman" means. Thanks, Republicans!

See if you can follow the trail of metaphorical straw. (Side Note: Real strawmen leave a straw trail too, only it's not metaphorical and it makes me sneeze.) From what I'm hearing coming out of conservative mouths this week, here's what I've got so far:

  • President Obama is going to close the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay.
  • There are bad men who have been living there for many years.
  • We will have to find a new place for the bad men.
  • During the campaign, then-Senator Obama and his staff saved money by asking supporters to allow out-of-town campaign staff to stay in their spare bedrooms.
  • We can save money and solve the detainee housing crisis by asking Obama supporters to house terrorists.

Wheeeeeeee. Because it's not like we have maximum security prisons or anything. Those prisoners are coming to your neighborhood and Republicans want you to be hiding-under-your-bed-wetting-your-pants scared.

Honestly. It's not like we should expect anything remotely honest from the people who want you to believe that dinosaurs weren't extinct until a few thousand years ago, at which point we were calling them dragons. But just how stupid do they think we are?

Don't answer that. I can only handle one strawman per day.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cross posted, as usual, at Dagblog.com

Courage, Republican-Leaning Districts, and the Matthew Shepard Act


I live in Indiana, in the 2nd Congressional district. It includes St. Joseph County, which routinely votes Democratic. It also includes a small town, where the grand poobah of the KKK lives. Or something like that. I can never quite get their leadership terminology down. 

My current congressman is Joe Donnelly, Democrat. I've never been all that thrilled with him, but if you believe the hype, the areas that are in his district but outside of St. Joseph County are pretty conservative. So, he often votes a different way than I would prefer. I've heard him address it. He's doing his best to represent all the people who live in his district, he says. He's doing his best to keep his job, I say.

But whatever. I get that anyone the Republicans put up would be worse than Donnelly. If you want a better idea what I mean, take a look at the new Hair Club for Growth chairman, Chris Chocola. He used to be my congressman. 

The Republican who challenged Donnelly in 2008 was Luke Puckett. Compared to Chocola, he really sucks. So I do understand, despite my sometimes simple mind, the need to make compromises and tradeoffs. 

But last week, Congressman Donnelly voted against the Matthew Shepard Act. The Act, which passed in the House despite Donnelly's vote, is going to add gender, sexual orientation, and gender identity to the groups already protected under current hate crimes legislation.

Donnelly's rationale for voting against the legislation is that there are already laws under which we can prosecute those who perpetrate violent acts, no matter what the sexual orientation of the victims.

This is true, and I would almost even buy it as a reasoned decision, except that hate crimes protection for other minority groups has been on the books for a long time, alongside existing laws prohibiting violent crimes. So, maybe hate crimes laws have always been largely symbolic. In this case, however, symbolic legislation says to violent criminals who view members of a minority group as less worthy than they themselves, "If you choose to commit violence for the purpose of expressing your attitude that you are better than another human being not belonging to your identity group, you will be held to account."

The Matthew Shepard Act is important, even if lawyers may argue that it is redundant, and by voting against it, Congressman Donnelly choose to protect his job rather than to protect the safety and human rights of his gay and lesbian constituents. That's not representation. That's not compromise. And that's certainly not courageous. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross posted at Dagblog.com, where our new blogger Larry Jankens has been coming up with new ideas for Florida license plates.

Rachel Maddow and Ana Marie Cox Discuss the Merits of Tea-Bagging


I feel dirty.

And also, somehow, proud of Rachel Maddow and Ana Marie Cox. Tonight on Rachel's show, the found the Holy Grail of double entendre. I wonder if Glenn Beck gets it.

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

The Blame Game: It's Your Fault that America is on the Road to Ruin


These days, everybody is blaming someone. The democrats blame the republicans, who blame them right back. The rich blame the poor. The poor are ordering pitchforks. 

New York blames Detroit. Detroit blames the labor unions. Labor unions blame Walmart. 

George Bush blames Osama bin Laden. DickCheney blames President Obama. Evangelical Christians blame San Franciso values. Gays in California blame the Mormons (although, let's face it, when blame is launched, it can sometimes hit the target spot on). 

While some might accuse me of participating in the willy nilly bestowal of responsiblity, what I really want is to gain an understanding of what happened. Of course, I know this is a pipe dream. Those responsible are generally too busy covering up their own roles in whatever the mess to engage in mea culpas. So, instead of learning the truth of it, I find comfort in screaming myself silly over multi-million dollar bonuses granted to a bunch undeserving fools. (See. It's really easy to play.) 

In this escalating game of who screwed up America, I believe it is time to declare a winner, at least from the perspective of offering a fresh, new scapegoat. (By which I mean an old, tired one.)  

From the pages of NorCalBlogs.com, a local blog site out of Chico, California, comes this gem

What many still consider the greatest step forward in equality for the sexes, was more then just a glancing blow however. It was in fact a deadly strike that entered the very heart of the ship and has been smoldering since. The damage caused by the 19th amendment was slow in its destruction, but after almost 100 years we can now see how complete the destruction really was. 


So, you see, ladies and gentlemen, it's all very simple. The day that American women gained the right to vote, we, as a society, took the first step toward our ruinous end. How can that be, you ask? The author of said blog, OneVike, is only too happy to elaborate: 

From the beginning of time women have been the emotional nurturers of society while men have been the logical protectors and managers. It was the men who had to do the dirty deeds that required more logic then emotion. Men have always debated and discussed what it is they thought was best for their communities. There has always been strong women have stood behind their men and supported them in the tough decisions they had to make. Behind the scenes these strong women would prod and nudge because they thought the men moved to slow at times. 

However it was that slow and methodical thought process that allowed for an orderly progression that worked for thousands of years. And please do not bring up all the wars men have gotten us into. The biggest war in history was WWII, and it happened with men elected after women around the world won the right to vote. 

Unfortunately men eventually abdicated their God given responsibility and allowed their emotional partner an equal footing in deciding the country's fate. From that day forward, men have been vying for the emotional vote of the women and worrying about their reactions after they got in office. Thus they have become more emotional in their legislating then logical. 


Logical. But not grammatical. This link's for you, OneVike. 

And thank you for pointing out the obvious. The mess we're in could have been prudently avoided had male politicians not been forced to find their inner Richard Simmons by pesky women voters who should have kept their place in the background, letting those logical men make the decisions.  

Thank you for sharing your wisdom with the world. I feel better. Now, when my mail-order pitchfork arrives, I won't have to join the mob. I can use it for yardwork instead. But I hate yardwork, so I'll probably just break down and cry. 

-----------------------------------------------------------

Cross posted at Dagblog.com. Rest assured, when the Dag boys make a decision, I never get a vote.

Career Advice and More for (Ex) Bankers


Poor bankers. 

So maligned. So victimized. Forced to do without multi-million dollar "bonuses" that were really just meant to be part of their salaries but were called "bonuses" so that they could avoid paying taxes.

What's a banker to do now that the yearly golf outing to the Bahamas has been canceled and the government is demanding that their employers spend government money on granting credit to the masses? 

I feel for them. I really do. I wouldn't want villagers with pitchforks (or a stern note) showing up at my mansion in Connecticut. Of course, I'll never have a mansion in Connecticut, or any place else. And that got me thinking. For once, I could really contribute to the betterment of society. I have knowledge to share with these poor, downcast souls in their time of need.

Let it not be said that Orlando is not a good neighbor. In fact, I don't like to brag, but my friends sometimes call me State Farm. So, with that in mind, I've made a couple lists. The first is ideas for new careers once they've been found guilty of fraud and are subsequently released from prison. The second is a few ideas for how to pinch pennies when they find their new station  in life.


Top Jobs to Consider During Parole

1. Greeter at Walmart. No skills required and you don't even have to be good at your job. You should be perfectly comfortable in this environment.
2. Loan Officer. The pay is a little bit better than Walmart and you might learn some valuable skills. Some might say too little, too late. I say better late than never!
3. Tarot Card Reader. You can make 20 bucks every 15 minutes if you really hustle. You're past experience convincing your corporate boards that there was unlimited wealth in their future will come in handy.


How to Live Frugally in a Cruel, Cruel World

1. Learn to love Velveta
2. Only put $3.00 gas in your car at any one time. That way, you'll be scared to leave the house because you might run out of gas. Keeps you from spending money on things like beer and movies.
3. While you're spending more time at your house, hang your wash out in the backyard to dry. Saves pennies on the electric bill.
4. Bundle up. Keeping your heat at 55 might not be good for that arthritis you developed due to your weekly squash game at the club, but it's good for your new budget.
5. Say good-bye to Jean Michel and hello to Great Clips.


These lists are by no means exhaustive and these poor guys are going to need a lot of help adjusting. I'm sure some of you have your own tips and strategies to share. Don't be shy.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Don't forget to stop by Dagblog.com, where lately I've been embracing my inner feminist.

Should Free Speech Protect the Japanese Video Game RapeLay?


RapeLay is a Japanese video game that has been around since 2006. You can read about the details in an incredibly disturbing review at HonestGamers.com. Although the game has never been for sale in the United States, it's existence became news last month when an individual put a copy for sale on Amazon.com.  After receiving complaints, Amazon.com removed the game from it's Web site and eBay followed suit. 

Last month, a New York City Councilwoman made a public plea for people not to buy the game. In Poughkeepsie, they held a small protest. Rightwing blogger Kevin McCullough even weighed in at TownHall.com, comparing what happens in the game to the stimulus package. But I'm not linking to that because he's an absolute nutter.

So, should this game be for sale in the United States? After all, rape is depicted in literature, in film, and even on television. What's the big deal if it's also part of a video game, right? 

Wrong. In the video game, the player isn't trying to avoid the rapist or even passively witnessing rape. The player is the rapist, and the point of the game is to rape as many women as possible. That's not just offensive, it's dangerous. There are people who suggest that violent video games lead to anti-social and even criminal behavior. Although I abhor the violence in games like Grand Theft Auto, I tend to dismiss these arguments because even if there is a contributing factor involved, a person is still ultimately responsible for his or her behavior. 

But rape is different. In some cultures, rape victims are still shunned. Rape is used as a systematic tool of war around the world. In our own country, rape is still underreported and while it is no longer acceptable to abuse and sexually assault women, it is still acceptable to objectify and demean them. There is no place in our society for a game like that. American men know better, but not because each and every one of them came to the independent conclusion that women are equal and deserve to be treated as such. Games like RapeLay threaten to dismantle decades of progress by legitimizing rape, and that is not okay.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cross posted at Dagblog.com, where Articleman has been busy dispelling myths about March Madness.

The Vatican Issues a Special Statement in Honor of International Women's Day: Ladies, Love Your Maytag


There is a vast amount of stupidity in this world and an even vaster amount of self-righteous and willful ignorance. So, congratulations to the Vatican for releasing perhaps the most monumentally ridiculous statement of the decade. With Republicans running amok, that is some accomplishment. Says the (all male) Vatican: 

Nothing has contributed more to the emancipation of women than the washing machine. 

Oh, really? Nothing? Not property-owning rights? Not suffrage? Not education? Not birth control so that we don't have to wash the clothing of 10 children in the first place? 

The Vatican. What a bastion of female understanding. What's next? A statement that nothing has contributed more to the economic freedom of women than Susan B. Anthony on the dollar coin? Keep 'em coming, boys. We need all the laughs we can get.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cross posted at Dagblog, where the economic crisis is making people cranky.

A Powerful Noise is a Powerful Film


In honor of the upcoming International Women's Day (March 8th), last night the documentary film A Powerful Noise was screened simultaneously in 450 theaters nationwide. A panel discussion followed the film, and included five individuals involved in some capacity in aide work. They were Helene Gayle, President and CEO of Care; Natalie Portman, actress and activist; Nicholas Kristoff, New York Times columnist and author, Christie Turlington Burns, model, businesswoman, and CARE advocate; and former Secretary of State Madeline Albright.

The event was sponsored by CARE, an organization focused on fighting global poverty by putting women at the center of the effort to improve the quality of life for themselves, their families, and their communities.

The film profiled three women who personify the belief that, in developing nations, it is women who hold the keys to fighting poverty, improving economic circumstances, and real community activism.

Hanh contracted HIV from her husband, who got it from sharing needles. They found out they were HIV positive when the doctor tested their daughter. In Vietnam, there is a stigma attached to HIV that presents a barrier to both prevention and treatment. After the death of her daughter and her husband, Hanh started a support group that has since gone public with education and awareness.

After the war, Nada returned to Kravica, her village near Srebrenica, Bosnia and Herzegovnia. She started a women's community organization there, dedicated to easing ethic tensions in the region through Serbian and Bosniak women working together in an economic co-op.

Madame Urbain is on a mission in Bamako, Mali. In the city, her organization helps to teach young women to read and write, to fight abuse at the hands of their employers, and to understand the value of education in fighting poverty so that these young women will make sure their daughters attend school. In the villages, Madame Urbain conducts outreach about the importance of education for girls.

These three women are a testament to the fact that, when faced with extraordinarily difficult and seemingly hopeless circumstances, women find a way through. The film and the panel discussion that followed were in no way hostile or critical toward the men of the world. But the panelists did repeatedly come back to the point that when women control their own economic means, they use that power to improve the lives of their families, which in turn strengthens their communities. Through microfinance, through public health projects, and through education, women and their daughters are leaders in the effort to make things better.

While speaking to a village gathering about the importance of education, Madame Urbaine says, "When you educate a girl, you educate a village. You educate a nation." Wise words. To find out how you can help empower women and girls in developing nations, please visit CARE.org today.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cross posted at Dagblog.com.

 

Penguins and Dragons and Reason, Oh My: A Visit to the Creation Museum


Because of distance and three adorable and energetic kids, my best friend and I rarely have the luxury of spending time alone. But last Friday, we had the pleasure of spending an entire afternoon together. After lunch, we found ourselves at the Cincinnati Art Museum, and after wandering the galleries for about a half-hour, I asked an innocent question about other museums in the area. With a mischievous grin, my friend informed me that the Creation Museum was just a short drive over the state line into Kentucky.

It took us less than a second to decide to ditch the art museum and head south. I suggested that we might want to sin as much as possible before we got there, going so far as to ask if she wanted to make out. She thought that because there was unlikely to be a confessional or a Catholic priest at a fundamentalist museum, committing sins was kind of pointless.  So, we didn't make out. But I swore a lot on the way, just in case.

As we drove the half-hour distance, we laid out some ground rules. We know ourselves very well, my friend and I, and we laugh a lot--especially over the ridiculous and the unintentionally ironic. The last thing we wanted to be was openly rude and disrespectful. There could be absolutely no eye contact or talking during the visit.

At a quick stop for gas, I was horrified to realize that they would know immediately that we weren't members of their clan. I'd forgotten about my Obama bumper sticker. We spent some time discussing whether it would be necessary to park down the road and walk, but as we neared the museum site, we realized that wouldn't be possible. The Creation Museum is located on a sizeable campus in the middle of nowhere, complete with the 70,000 square foot museum as well as a petting zoo and botanical gardens that I'm sure are lovely in the spring, summer, and fall.

Plan B was to sneak the car into the parking lot and find a spot I could back into so as to hide my bumper. Unfortunately, there was a traffic guard, and he directed us down an aisle where he had full view of my allegiance. I still backed into a spot because I didn't want to take any chances but all my worry was for nothing. The traffic guard was absolutely lovely to us as we walked by him and into the museum. I would have preferred if he hadn't offered the "God bless you, ladies," but when in Rome, right?

Upon entrance, we were greeted, or more like accosted, by a docent-type, who was also lovely, if a little earnest. He talked to us for five minutes that felt like twenty, but he was kind. He tried his best to convince us that we should hang up our coats, since it was a long walk through the warm museum and we'd end up carrying them. But I was wearing my "Blasphemy is a victimless crime" t-shirt, so I demurred. Just kidding. I was freezing. He tried really hard though, so I felt bad.

It was a slow day at the museum, so the docent stayed with us all the way down the entrance hall from the coat check to the ticket counter where we dropped $46.00 for two tickets. He let us know, helpfully, that if we decided to purchase an annual membership, the price of the tickets would be applied to the membership fee. You might be thinking at this point that $23.00 per person is sort of expensive. And I suppose if you're looking at it from the position that you're paying to visit a place that is unmoored from reality, you might have a point. But from my perspective, we were paying for an anthropological experience, so to me, it was worth every penny. Plus, my friend paid.

After purchasing our tickets, we were directed to stand in front of a green screen, look up at some dinosaurs above us, and give the photographer our best frightened face. Had I known then that the reason dinosaurs are extinct is that people killed them to show off, I would have put on my best badass face instead. But I'm getting ahead of myself.

The entrance to the Dragon Hall Bookstore was off to the left of the beginning of the exhibit hall. I wondered for a second at a Christian museum perpetuating what I thought was a pagan myth, but my questions would be answered later. See if you can guess how.

Before I get in to the actual content of the museum, let me say that the exhibit itself is very well done. It has the feel of a natural history museum and makes effective use of multimedia and animatronics to tell its story. It's the kind of place where kids won't be bored to tears, and it tells its story in about two hours, which for me is a sort of museum witching hour. After two hours in a museum, I'd better be getting a nap or some coffee or I'm going to get cranky.

After we entered the exhibit hall, we were pretty much left alone to our wandering, encountering only three or four other groups of people. So we were safe to look and read and listen as we were led through the book of Genesis. We carefully examined everything except the evidence against global warming. It was toward the end and at that point, our capacity to be intellectually indulgent was waning.

We were also fairly proud of ourselves to have mostly kept to our "no eye contact, no talking" rule, with only a couple of slip ups and snickers. There was just one time when we had to move to separate corners of a room until we were able to stop ourselves from shaking with silent laughter. To be fair, it was my friend's fault. A video explained that tectonic plates were basically riding on top of the oceans and that, just like when ice cubes are dropped into a glass of water, external stimuli (i.e., the great flood) could cause the plates to shift. The premise prompted my friend to wonder out loud if everybody in Australia jumped up and down at the same time, whether the island would bob. 

Speaking of Australia, I was very concerned how, without evolution as an explanation, the kangaroos got to the island after getting off of Noah's ark. The museum did address it, but it was the only answer that didn't fit well into their framework of logic. In case you're wondering, to me, that framework boiled down to the following:

  1. I used to have a bike.
  2. I don't have a bike anymore.
  3. Therefore, I am a fish.

But inside the museum, the framework was fairly consistent. Everyone has the same facts, we were told, but we don't all have the same starting point. From the Biblical starting point, it is supposed to make perfect sense that dinosaurs and penguins lived alongside Adam and Eve, and every other creature that has ever existed, in the Garden of Eden.

The genius of the museum is that at every point where doubt started to creep in, the doubt was addressed. For example, just after I wondered about how kangaroos got to Australia, my question was answered, in the framework of the Biblical starting point. My friend wondered about how the tectonic plates shifted and a few minutes later, there was the explanation. It happened again and again during the course of two hours. Whenever you started to wonder, your doubt would (purportedly) be erased.

Doubt is clearly an enemy, as it usually is when trying to disseminate a belief that is contrary to human experience. Another enemy is reason. Frequently in the museum, we came upon comparisons of human reason vs. God's truth.

  • Human reason says the Grand Canyon was carved out over millions of years of slow erosion as the Colorado river wound its way through. God's truth says it created in a few weeks by the force of water during the great flood.
  • Human reason says that Homo Sapiens evolved from Homo Erectus, and before them Neanderthals, and before them Apes. God's truth says that all creatures were created on the sixth day and there is no such thing as evolution. (But, as a neat aside, there is such a thing as change, which species undergo to meet changing conditions in their environments. But it's not evolution, so please don't call it that.)
  • Human reason says that dinosaurs became extinct over 65 million years ago. God's truth leads us to conclude that they were actually on the ark and later (when they were called dragons), they were driven to extinction  by people who killed them because dragons were scary. Or alternatively to show off.
  • Human reason says that the world is millions of years old. God's truth says that it is 6,000 years old. And please don't bring up the footprint they just found and dated to be 1.5 million years old, because that is not a fact, but a conclusion reached by starting at a different starting point.

The heartbreaking genius of the argument is that there is no place for any evolution, even of thought. There is an answer for every "what if" and absolutely no room for unanswered questions. Unanswered questions lead to thinking and thinking is bad. Knowing is good and we know God's truth. Going around in that circle for two hours hurt my head a bit.

There are so many fallacies in the museum's logic that it is impossible to address them all. I encourage everyone to visit, if only to gain a greater understanding of how far some people will go to delude themselves. Also, if you love irony like I do, you can visit the bookstore to lay your eyes on a copy of the book The Fallacy Detective: 36 Lessons on How to Recognize Bad Reasoning

The good news is that, at the museum, I got a "get into heaven" card. All I have to do is sign the back and I've got my ticket. To my friends: I would have picked up cards for everyone, but there was a sign that said I could only take one. Sorry. I'm sure you'll meet nice people in that other place.

And finally, I leave you with the hopeful news that at least some of the museum creators and curators have a sense of humor. In one still empty space a sign was posted, "This space still evolving."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cross posted at Dagblog.com, where whether to legalize pot is a recent topic of conversation. Dinosaurs on Noah's Ark and pot. Hmmmm.

Haiku Advice for Republicans


It's been a while since we had a good poetry thread and goodness knows the Republicans need some advice (and some eloquence). I'll get it started:

Jindahl stay at home
Your state needs the money bad
And you suck on TV

Earth to Roland Burris: RIP THE %*$&*# BANDAID OFF!


Turns out, even I underestimated the stupidity of Roland Burris, a feat, I assure you, that is as difficult as it is unexpected.

Here's the deal, Roland: if you promised to raise money for the governor while you actively lobbied to be appointed to a senate seat that the governor had put up for sale, YOU ARE NOT INNOCENT. It doesn't matter that you're a crap fundraiser or that money for Blago dried up as it became abundantly clear that he was unhinged. And it is not helping you, your party, your state, or your president to keep revealing the details in pieces parts.

Roland Burris, United States Senator, is acting like at 16 year old that wrecks his dad's sports car driving home on Saturday night when he was supposed to be home grounded. On Saturday night, he says that he had to go out because a friend was suicidal. He had no choice. On Sunday morning, he mentions that the friend said to meet him to this other friend's house, but he didn't know the other friend and he didn't know what to expect when he got there, but there were some people just hanging out. Monday, he adds that the friend of the friend and the people hanging out at his house were drinking beer but that he absolutely positively did not drink a beer because he would never do that. Tuesday, he says he only just remember that he might have had one beer. Wednesday, he mentions the girl that was in the car and he really wanted to impress her and she really wanted to drive. On Thursday, he finally tells you that the girl was wasted out of her mind and also not licensed and that when she crashed, she immediately got out of their with some other friends who were driving right behind them. On Saturday night, the parents were so relieved their son was safe that it was his best opening to tell the truth. By the following Friday, they have been led through such increasing levels of outrage and frustration that they are ready to kill him themselves.

I'm revising my opinion that we're stuck with him (that I posted at Dagblog over the weekend). He's digging his own grave. Oh, wait. That's already been dug.

What a clown. The best thing the Democrats can do is show his ass the door. The sooner, the better.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cross posted at Dagblog.com, where Articleman says layoffs are immient and Genghis plays with crayons.

Has Anyone Told the House Republican Whips That They Lost?


When I was a kid, my parents tried to impart the importance of being gracious in victory and polite in defeat. But try as I might, I can't recall the lesson about pretending to be the winner when I had been clearly and overwhelmingly defeated.

If only they had set it to music...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cM2b2oD8pKY

Modern Day Witch Hunting in Papua New Guinea: The Dark Side of Human Nature


Before last week, all I knew about Papua New Guinea was that its capital was Port Moresby and that it was that island on top of Australia. But I've been writing a music series over at Dagblog and while I was searching the internet for examples of the country's musical offerings, I was fascinated to learn that over 700 languages are spoken there, that most of the island doesn't have access to television and can only be reached by airplanes, and that there is an incredible diversity of flora and fauna in the mountains and rainforests.

I watched one particularly interesting video about a still-existing tribe of cannibals. In the video diary, a group travels to the far interior of West Papua, which shares the island of New Guinea with PNG, but is under Indonesian control. There, they encounter a tribe that has never before laid eyes on any Caucasians. The video is about sixteen minutes long, and, at the end provides some insight into why there are reports this week about an increase in witch hunting in PNG.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTRvcROcWHg


Amnesty International reports:

Authorities in Papua New Guinea are being urged to take greater action to prevent further killings related to allegations of sorcery.

A father and son became the latest victims on Sunday. Local men in Ban village shot dead 60-year-old Plak Mel Doa and threw his body into a fire. His son, Anis Dua, was dragged from his home and burnt alive. Local people had accused them both of causing the death of a prominent member of the community by sorcery.

There has been an increase in reports of sorcery-related killings over the last year. According to the media there were over 50 such deaths in 2008.This is either because of an actual increase in such incidents or that more incidents are now being reported.

 

According to another report, this happened close to the city of Mount Hagan, which is the capital of the Western Highlands province and also where the Papua Tribe Festival featured in my PNG music blog takes place each year.

If watched the entire video, you learned that when there is an unexpected death, the Korowai tribe, ignorant of modern science and medicine, attributes the death to black magic, or khakhua. Relatives of the deceased exact revenge for the death by killing and eating the witch deemed responsible. How they determine the identity of the witch seems a little bit arbitrary.

On the east end of the island, in PNG, the witch hunting continues, without the cannibalistic aspect but by the same rationale. People place the blame for untimely death onto black magic, declare a witch, and then brutally murder her or him.

Crazy, right?

Maybe not. All of us look for something or someone to blame when things go amiss. At the moment, I'm fairly certain that, if someone wanted to burn one or two of those Wall Street bankers at the stake, I'd have to take a long, deep breath before suggesting that maybe it's not such a great idea.

When cause and effect is too complicated to be easily understood, we all want a scapegoat toward whom we can direct our anger and pain. Please don't get the idea that I think witch hunting in PNG should be allowed to continue because the grieving need to feel better. I'm with AI on this one, and maybe we could get the PNG Highlands some science textbooks while we're at it.

But why is it such a strong human desire to attribute blame and exact revenge? It's food for thought, hopefully only metaphorically speaking. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cross posted at Dagblog.com, where we promise not to hunt you down and cook your brains if you piss us off.

Orlando

user-pic

Following: 72
Followers: 59

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location Midwest
  • Politics Progressive

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs Dagblog.com TPM washingtonmonthly.com americablog.com
  • Favorite Books The Mists of Avalon; The Poisonwood Bible

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address