« The 'Tax Avoidance' Problems... | one_wilson's Blog | Re: 'The actual law on torture', by Jesse Lava »

On the Somali Pirate Rescue


I'd very much like to make a sensible comment or two about this event.

That's not really as easy a thing to do as it might at first appear. To acknowledge the event at all seems hard for some people: If that sort of messy business must occasionally be done for the greater good, so be it. Let those low-brows who MUST deal with it pay the penalty, while the rest of us go on obliviously about our more exalted affairs.

On the other hand, there's the matter of TONE. Isn't there something a little off-putting about the puffed-up, bowtied little academics on the cable channels who so transparently and somewhat pathetically GLORY in the matter: Three  ignorant young fools are dead here. People who obviously couldn't bait a fishhook or defend their school lunch money, nowhere to be found when their PERSONAL turn to make a difference came (and went), all of a sudden tranformed in front of the cameras into vicarious participants in the victory "we" achieved? Aren't we sick to death of this sort of easy, juvenile play-acting at a simple-minded distortion of  'patriotism'?

There IS a victory here, but I think it's important to understand what it really was, and what it emphatically WASN'T: Right beat wrong, for sure. It's certainly a personal victory for  the heroic Mr. Phillips and his family and friends. It's a personal victory for the military  and the national security teams who did everything exactly right in a scenario where so much might have gone wrong. It's a victory for President Obama, not least because he has avoided (so far) the premature triumphalist chest-thumping so beloved of  the previous Administration. His cool, restrained demeanor in crisis is perhaps a welcome revelation to some segments of the population. It's a victory for the Democratic Party, as loath as some of us are to admit it: You can't get people's votes in dangerous times, if they aren't convinced you'll play BOTH smart (always) AND for keeps (when necessary).

 

 

 

 


9 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Remarkably well said. One issue never brought up is the fact that for decades now, the shipping industry has registered ships with small nation states in order to avoid taxation and unionization, they've paid ransom to these pirates because it is far cheaper to have their insurance company pay the ransom than it is to refuse to pay and then make reparations to the workers and families injured - it's more cost effective to pay the ransom. They've also formed subsidiaries that charge for protection through the gulf, the cost based on a percentage of the value of the cargo, the average cost 250,000.00

For years they've exacerbated the situation and profited by it - now that it is out of control, they demand that the U.S. navy and this administration fix it. The most obvious solution is for these companies to step up to the plate, pay their taxes for their demand on our navy for their protection, but then, we haven't heard that from anyone.

These corporations want the infra-structure, the protection of the sea lanes and the benefits of this protection, but they don't want to pay for it. All the political posturing, the advice, the policy dictation from these people and not one mention at all as to who is going to pay for it and we know it isn't going to be the shipping and cruise industry.

user-pic

that is interesting, Bev. I didn't look at it that way.

user-pic

Thanks. I hadn't thought much about this either until I started researching it. It would make an interesting discussion on a news show, but then no one ever will talk about fair share taxation.

user-pic

Great comment. Great post too, one_wilson.

user-pic

Thanks, Wilson made some excellent comments in his blog entry.

user-pic

Good point, BevD. In fact, I think your point can be greatly expanded to apply to far too many wealthy Americans with access to sophisticated tax shelters.

When I have debated the subject of taxes with conservatives they often proceed from the assumption that progressives, for some resaon, WANT to pay taxes. I've had to clearly tell them that NO ONE WANTS to pay taxes. The debate between progressives and conservatives should be about the role and services of government. Not whether taxes should be levied to finance that government, whatever scope the elected majority decides for it.

user-pic

Good point Bev!

What a typical sort of story eh? Greedy, cheap capitalist businessmen wanting something for nothing and sponging off those who do pay their taxes and who don't make the millions they make. Not much difference between the shipping interests and the Wall Street Welfare Queens who used their wealth to lower taxes on themselves and their businesses to the maximum extent while bankrupting the government and gutting programs designed to help the common people who are now forced to cough up trillions to keep the fatcats fat. Makes one wonder who the real pirates are doesn't it?

user-pic

I don't have a problem paying taxes. They are a necessary evil. I don't want to pay ridiculously high taxes but I do believe they are necessary

user-pic

I don't think it takes the US Navy to defeat these pirates, nor do I think the US Navy could defeat them. It is too big an ocean for our Navy to be everywhere at once. All it will take to defeat these thugs is to let the ships carry a few ex-military with RPGs and machine guns. As I understand it, that is now against International Law. Well, the thugs are holding 300 hostages, and what - 17 ships? When are we going to change such a rediculous law?

Leave a comment

one_wilson

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 8

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address