<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>ondioline&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/ondioline/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/ondioline/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/ondioline//1691</id>
   <updated>	2008-11-14T23:57:40Z	2008-11-14T23:56:18Z	2008-11-14T23:38:25Z	2008-11-14T23:08:42Z	2008-11-14T21:58:15Z				2008-11-14T20:18:52Z		2008-11-14T19:44:40Z			2008-11-14T17:40:09Z	2008-11-14T17:23:36Z	2008-11-14T17:18:16Z		2008-11-14T17:16:30Z		2008-11-14T17:12:49Z		2008-11-14T16:34:02Z	2008-11-14T16:29:52Z	2008-11-14T16:17:42Z	2008-11-14T16:15:37Z	2008-11-14T16:11:12Z	2008-11-14T14:52:08Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.244380-comment:3286891</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/obama_meeting_with_mccain_on_m.php#c3286891" />
		
		    <title>ondioline Commented on Obama Meeting With McCain On Monday by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-14T14:52:05Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-14T14:52:05Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Just two sum up:  Two tough-ass guys from IL, one future Viagra spokesman, and South Carolina's most eligible bachelor.  There's a "_____________, ____________ & ___________" walked into a bar joke there, but I'm not gonna tell it.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.244375-comment:3286876</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/election_central_morning_round_208.php#c3286876" />
		
		    <title>ondioline Commented on Election Central Morning Roundup by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-14T14:45:06Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-14T14:45:06Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>I never, ever do this, but...</p>

<p>STFU!</p>

<p>It's the MORNING Roundup, Gomer!  What else would the stories be except the last 12-24 hours worth of news?  Should they tell us how much sleep everyone got?</p>

<p>G.W. Bush<br />
11 hours (Washington, DC)</p>

<p>D. Cheney<br />
2 hours (Suspended upside down from ceiling)</p>

<p>B. Obama<br />
6.25 hours (Chicago)</p>

<p>J. Biden<br />
7.5 hours (Washington, DC)</p>

<p>H. Clinton<br />
5.5 hours (Chicago)</p>

<p>T. Stevens</p>

<p>0 hours</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.244375-comment:3286868</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/election_central_morning_round_208.php#c3286868" />
		
		    <title>ondioline Commented on Election Central Morning Roundup by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        <uri>http://www.xanga.com/deadarts</uri>
			<published>2008-11-14T14:40:57Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-14T14:40:57Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xanga.com/deadarts">
		        <![CDATA[<p>I live in MD and I can tell you that Michael Steele is black on the outside, dirtbag on the inside.  The amount of dirty tricks he and former Governor Ehrlich pulled in a failed effort to get re-elected would shame Steve Schmidt...</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/brbuchwal//4358.244210-comment:3286402</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/brbuchwal/2008/11/lets-solve-gay-marriage-and-en.php#c3286402" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[ondioline Commented on Let&apos;s Solve Gay Marriage and End Bigotry (at the same time!) by brbuchwal]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-13T22:04:32Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-13T22:04:32Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Why not jam all the total absurdity into a pile and see what comes out of the scrum, eh?</p>

<p>I like it!  Government-mandated Superpolygamy for all!</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/brbuchwal//4358.244210-comment:3286400</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/brbuchwal/2008/11/lets-solve-gay-marriage-and-en.php#c3286400" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[ondioline Commented on Let&apos;s Solve Gay Marriage and End Bigotry (at the same time!) by brbuchwal]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-13T22:02:25Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-13T22:02:25Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>What does Jesus have to do with it?  I would just point out that religion also pre-dated Jesus...</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.244282-comment:3286393</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/obama_resigns_senate_seat.php#c3286393" />
		
		    <title>ondioline Commented on Obama Resigns Senate Seat by Greg Sargent</title>
		        <uri>http://www.xanga.com/deadarts</uri>
			<published>2008-11-13T21:59:25Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-13T21:59:25Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xanga.com/deadarts">
		        <![CDATA[<p>As long as Hillary stays in the Senate until it is time...</p>

<p>You know, because the Electoral College will NEVER elect him...</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    




	
	<entry>
		
	<title>ondioline recommended Sixty Senate Seats Still in Sight by Matthew Locke</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/matthewlocke/2008/11/sixty-senate-seats-still-in-si-1.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/matthewlocke//4556.244149</id>
  <published>2008-11-13T01:23:17Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-13T02:12:37Z</updated>
	</entry>
	



	
	<entry>
		
	<title>ondioline recommended Potpourri by FlyOnTneWall</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/flyontnewall/2008/11/potpourri.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/flyontnewall//2060.244058</id>
  <published>2008-11-12T17:17:27Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-12T17:18:49Z</updated>
	</entry>
	




	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.244053-comment:3284933</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/gop_rep_broun_sorry_i_compared.php#c3284933" />
		
		    <title>ondioline Commented on GOP Rep. Broun: Sorry I Compared Obama To Hitler -- But He Is A Socialist by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-12T17:57:20Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-12T17:57:20Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your point there, Kash Money, but don't you think you'd already driven it home before the n-word?  Christ in a Chevrolet!</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/flyontnewall//2060.243983-comment:3284793</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/flyontnewall/2008/11/in-defense-of-gates-at-defense.php#c3284793" />
		
		    <title>ondioline Commented on In Defense of Gates at Defense by FlyOnTneWall</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-12T15:57:06Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-12T15:57:06Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Love the post and many of the comments above.  Eight years ago, I was struck by the Bush Administration's almost allergic reaction to "All Things Clinton".  They campaigned on a platform of restoring dignity to the White House and the Office of the POTUS as though everything Bill Clinton did was immoral, misguided, and wrong.  I remember thinking during the campaign that while Bush was running on a platform of upsetting all apple carts, Gore wasn't doing enough to highlight the successes of the Clinton years which deserved continuation.  </p>

<p>As a liberal and a patriot, I wholeheartedly believe that it would be incredibly foolish for an Obama Administration to come into office with the same attitude about Bush as the Bush Administration held about Clinton.  Examine, question, study, probe...  If your predecessor was doing something wrong, correct it.  If your predecessor was doing something right, improve upon it.  I have my suspicions as to which category will be more heavily populated, but the important thing is making thoughtful, rational decisions about how to proceed.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    




	
	<entry>
		
	<title>ondioline recommended In Defense of Gates at Defense by FlyOnTneWall</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/flyontnewall/2008/11/in-defense-of-gates-at-defense.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/flyontnewall//2060.243983</id>
  <published>2008-11-12T02:16:43Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-12T17:50:57Z</updated>
	</entry>
	




	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.244015-comment:3284762</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/election_central_morning_round_206.php#c3284762" />
		
		    <title>ondioline Commented on Election Central Morning Roundup by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        <uri>http://www.xanga.com/deadarts</uri>
			<published>2008-11-12T15:40:00Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-12T15:40:00Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xanga.com/deadarts">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Palin prayed and prayed for victory, so if you believe in G-d, that should be all the answer you need as to Palin being allowed to serve as a blight on anyone other than Alaska...</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    




	
	<entry>
		
	<title>ondioline recommended The Importance of Being Earnest by Josh Marshall</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/243834.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://2.243834</id>
  <published>2008-11-11T03:25:00Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-11T03:26:27Z</updated>
	</entry>
	



	
	<entry>
		
	<title>ondioline recommended (Self)-Parody by FlyOnTneWall</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/flyontnewall/2008/11/self-parody.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/flyontnewall//2060.243721</id>
  <published>2008-11-10T14:53:21Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-10T15:07:37Z</updated>
	</entry>
	



	
	<entry>
		
	<title>ondioline recommended Of Mandates by FlyOnTneWall</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/flyontnewall/2008/11/of-mandates.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/flyontnewall//2060.243641</id>
  <published>2008-11-09T16:25:48Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-09T23:08:06Z</updated>
	</entry>
	




	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.243706-comment:3282302</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/election_central_morning_round_204.php#c3282302" />
		
		    <title>ondioline Commented on Election Central Morning Roundup by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-10T14:55:18Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-10T14:55:18Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Can't ding him at all.</p>

<p>He won most of those 57 states...  Still awaiting returns from Missouri, but I can personally attest that Barack went THERE!</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.243533-comment:3280410</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/reid_what_lieberman_did_was_im.php#c3280410" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[ondioline Commented on Reid: What Lieberman Did Was &quot;Improper&quot; And &quot;Wrong&quot; by Greg Sargent]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-07T23:40:10Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-07T23:40:10Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>"I was born in a briar patch...  I love it!  So scratchy...  Just don't throw me somewhere soft and fluffy..."</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.243533-comment:3280408</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/reid_what_lieberman_did_was_im.php#c3280408" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[ondioline Commented on Reid: What Lieberman Did Was &quot;Improper&quot; And &quot;Wrong&quot; by Greg Sargent]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-07T23:38:35Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-07T23:38:35Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Barack could offer him a job, wait until he is replaced and then immediately can him...  That would be amusing.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.243533-comment:3280405</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/reid_what_lieberman_did_was_im.php#c3280405" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[ondioline Commented on Reid: What Lieberman Did Was &quot;Improper&quot; And &quot;Wrong&quot; by Greg Sargent]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-07T23:37:08Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-07T23:37:08Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Tena is spot on here (as are many folks upthread).  There is no downside to letting the former Democratic VP nominee twist publicly.  The vast majority of the country outside of the beltway, CT, and folks who are super-tuned in to stuff like this  just don't care.  They don't even know this is happening.  This is "inside baseball" to them.  Will he be a chair or won't he?  Who will he caucus with?  Who cares?  Obviously we do.  But 95% of the people who voted on Tuesday couldn't give a shit about this...  It is procedural.  It doesn't reflect on Barack.  It really only reflects on Al Gore's former running mate.  (I'm done saying or typing his name.  He disgusts me.)</p>

<p>So let him twist.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.243533-comment:3280395</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/reid_what_lieberman_did_was_im.php#c3280395" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[ondioline Commented on Reid: What Lieberman Did Was &quot;Improper&quot; And &quot;Wrong&quot; by Greg Sargent]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-07T23:30:19Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-07T23:30:19Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>I submitted before I completed my thought:  He deserves to lose his Chair.  That should, by rights, be the decision of the caucus as a whole with Reid using his voice as he feels is appropriate.  Then let THAT ONE decide who he wants to caucus with...</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.243533-comment:3280389</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/reid_what_lieberman_did_was_im.php#c3280389" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[ondioline Commented on Reid: What Lieberman Did Was &quot;Improper&quot; And &quot;Wrong&quot; by Greg Sargent]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-07T23:28:28Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-07T23:28:28Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Ab.So.Lutely.</p>

<p>I mean I think THAT ONE (IDiot-CT) certainly deserves to lose his Chairmanship.  If he desides to go play ball with Mitch McConnell, he can see how popular he is with his new brothers when he is voting against Reid on Military/Iraq issues and with Reid on all the other stuff.  I'm sure the Republican Caucus will be happy to hand a 90% Dem the keys to their cloakroom and a plum "Ranking Member" status on an important committee...</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.243494-comment:3279763</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/lieberman_aide_threatens_reid.php#c3279763" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[ondioline Commented on Lieberman Aide Threatens Reid: He&apos;ll Bolt Dem Caucus  by Greg Sargent]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-07T18:52:04Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-07T18:52:04Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Let that be the first infrastructure investment of the new Congress!  Think of the applications!!!  Shrinking investment in education and the arts?  Why not compromise and invest in tiny, tiny instruments for the children!  Hell, name the bill after Joe!  If I could REC a comment, I would break my mouse in this thread today...</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.243494-comment:3279748</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/lieberman_aide_threatens_reid.php#c3279748" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[ondioline Commented on Lieberman Aide Threatens Reid: He&apos;ll Bolt Dem Caucus  by Greg Sargent]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-07T18:47:44Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-07T18:47:44Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Aye!</p>

<p>Keelhaul the lot of 'em...  In a bipartisan way, of course!</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    






	
	<entry>
		
	<title><![CDATA[ondioline recommended It&apos;s Not a Negotiation by Josh Marshall]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/243492.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://2.243492</id>
  <published>2008-11-07T17:30:59Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-07T18:49:22Z</updated>
	</entry>
	




	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/ic05ej3//7567.243470-comment:3279563</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/ic05ej3/2008/11/grow-up-and-put-sen-lieberman.php#c3279563" />
		
		    <title>ondioline Commented on Grow up and put Sen. Lieberman to good use by ErikJ</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-07T17:46:45Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-07T17:46:45Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>I understand what you're getting at and to some extent I agree with you, but I think a few of your thoughts are a bit out of line with the reality of the situation.</p>

<p>Working backwards, you pointed out that the time to deal with Lieberman is during the election...  Only true to the extent that the people of the state of Connecticut are the only arbiters of Senator Lieberman's fate.  And that's just not true.  After all, Joe was a Democrat until a few years ago when he ran in and lost a Democratic Primary.  When Connecticut's Democrats spoke their minds through the system available to them, Joe didn't like the answer and adjusted accordingly.  He opted to run as an Independent in the general election and accepted the comfort and support of Republicans along the way.  He was democratically elected by the people of Connecticut and he serves as their representative, but that doesn't mean that he earned the right to caucus with Senate Dems or to serve as a Committee Chair.  He left the Democratic Party and endorsed the Republican Nominee for President!  Technically speaking, he doesn't deserve to be a Committee Chair on the grounds that his party isn't in power in the Senate.  Short of attempted expulsion (which no one has suggested he deserves), he really doesn't have any room to complain about whatever happens to him.  Our actions have consequences.</p>

<p>"Personally, I think stripping him of his chairmanship will have few positive consequences and will probably cause the republicans to dig in and man their trenches in preparation for a partisan congress."</p>

<p>They're going to do this anyway.  That is what makes them "more effective" as an opposition party than Democrats will ever be.  Setting aside the few GOP moderates left in Congress, the folks that are left have no qualms about being downright obstructionist, and if the media is unwilling to call their tactics a filibuster by name, it is up to the Dem Leadership to spotlight this behavior.  But make no mistake about it, if you look at the leadership transition taking place in the GOP right now, their response to the election is to move further to the right.  They'll kick and scream and cry "partisanship" from here to January 20th, and then spend the next 4 years calling Barack Obama a hypocrit and a typical politician.  They're writing his legacy right now:  Empty promises.  Naive.  False hope.  Status quo.  Changed by Washington.  It will be up to Senator Obama and the Dem leadership to get things done and deliver.  It will be up to his supporters to mobilize and be vocal in supporting that change.  Allowing Lieberman or the GOP to hold us hostage with threats of crying Partisanship is a foolish trap.  Obama could achieve every single goal he ever set out and the talking points on the right won't change.  Good governance that gets results is the only shield against them.</p>

<p><br />
"He is a sitting senator and America has, honest to god,  real humongous problems to deal with. Time to grow up and realize that every vote in the senate should be courted with frantic zeal, especially those that aren't already under the democratic umbrella."</p>

<p>There is something to be said for the lost art of creating a good agenda, drafting coherent legislation to support it, and making a case directly to the American people.  I agree that our challenges are daunting.  I agree that it will take some hard work and some strenuous effort and some compromise and some bending over backwards to make it happen in the current political climate.  But if Barack Obama or Harry Reid has to spend the next four years kissing Joe Lieberman's ass to get enough votes to pass a bill or to invoke cloture, what the hell were the last two years about?  What happened on Tuesday?  What does any of it mean?  If Joe Lieberman has any commitment to (upper AND lower-case D) democratic ideals, he will support the policies he believes in, vigorously oppose the ones he doesn't believe in, and let the chips fall where they may.  But he made the choices he made for a reason.  Either he thought John McCain was the best person for the job, or he thought McCain was the most likely to get elected.  Maybe both.  But either way, he went beyond voting for McCain, beyond supporting him, beyond endorsing him, all the way to directly attacking Barack Obama, speaking at the GOP convention, and campaigning for McCain and down-ticket Republicans.  When you add that to the fact that he set aside the will of his Democratic constituents in the service to his own interests, I don't think the man has any room to do anything but take his medicine.  Life cannot be lived without consequences.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://14.243313-comment:3279457</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/06/rahm_emanuel_is_no_likudnik/#c3279457" />
		
		    <title>ondioline Commented on Rahm Emanuel Is No Likudnik by M.J. Rosenberg</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-07T17:01:44Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-07T17:01:44Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Wow, somebody swallowed the GOP talking points on Fannie and Freddie hook, line, and sinker!</p>

<p>What on earth does that have to do with his ability to be effective as Chief of Staff?  Listen, I hate to break it to you, but this is the big leagues.  If we're voting people off the island based upon their service on Boards of organizations from which CEOs have been forced to resign, Washington will be entirely populated by people who have never served on a Board of Directors.  I'm having trouble getting inaugural tickets, so if we're going to make the rules that stringent, let's roll!  I just hope I'm not being penalized for taking minutes and arranging the catering.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.243442-comment:3279441</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/election_central_morning_round_203.php#c3279441" />
		
		    <title>ondioline Commented on Election Central Morning Roundup by Greg Sargent</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-07T16:52:23Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-07T16:52:23Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>I wore that MoveOn one to the airport the week of the big rally in St. Louis and the guy driving the bus from my parking garage to the terminal yelled out "Hey!  Obama!  What airline are you flying?"  I grinned all the way to the ticket counter!</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.243442-comment:3279380</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/election_central_morning_round_203.php#c3279380" />
		
		    <title>ondioline Commented on Election Central Morning Roundup by Greg Sargent</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-07T16:22:54Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-07T16:22:54Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Not at all!  It's just a good time to wash them... They smell like victory and nervous sweat!  It's also a good time to remember that we have other t-shirts that we love.  The R.E.M. t-shirt from the Monster tour with the mysterious purple stain on it...  The American Apparel v-neck that looks so good with a long sleeve t under it...  that Rolling Rock shirt with the cigarette burns in it.  That's a good one!</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.243442-comment:3279230</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/election_central_morning_round_203.php#c3279230" />
		
		    <title>ondioline Commented on Election Central Morning Roundup by Greg Sargent</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-07T15:06:18Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-07T15:06:18Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Excellent points Alex.  </p>

<p>Some of the hand wringing is to be expected, but people are already pouring concrete around "the Obama Legacy" and putting their grubby little handprints in it.  The man hasn't even been sworn in yet!  It's one thing to have an opinion, but Christ in a Chrysler, we're not even 72 hours into the transition here!  All the electoral votes haven't even been awarded!  We don't even know the composition of either wing of Congress yet!</p>

<p>I want to make a sincere recommendation here:  Let's take the weekend to decompress a little.  If you like to drink, have a glass of wine.  Put on some music.  Take a nice hot bath.  If you've got the scratch, treat yourself to a steak or some good sushi.  Watch some college football.  Catch a movie.  Enjoy the fall colors.  Go for a walk.  Dig into a good book.  Find a local park and just sit on a bench and chill for an hour.  Take off your Obama flair and dig out your favorite ratty old sweatshirt from college.</p>

<p>We've got a lot of work to do.  Tuesday night was not an end, but rather a new beginning.  Barack Obama and Joe Biden are going to need us for the next four years, and we'll be more help to them and to our country if we're rested and ready instead of constantly wound up like a spring like the last 18 months or so.  The work is going to be more demanding than clicking a link in an email and plopping down 30 bucks for a t-shirt.  It is going to require a level of focus and nuance and consideration and patience that most of us have forgotten over the last 8 years.We might very well need to use the skills we've developed over the last few months to Barack the Vote in Georgia in order to get rid of Crappy Chambliss.  We've got a lot of work to do.  We'll all be better served if we press reset and try to get away from campaign mode for a little bit.  </p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    



</feed>

