"I Was Only Following Orders"
The President today did a good thing by releasing the Bush regime's "torture memos". Sadly, at the same time he also chose to avoid doing what he was elected to do: bring change to the country. Instead, he chose, once again, to adopt a position that essentially let's every brazen criminal act of the Bush years go unpunished. He defends this position with a weak and, in my opinion, cowardly political dodge about "looking forward". You've heard all that blather before. It is used, always, in order to avoid doing what is right.
The President's refusal to do his job, which is "to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" is a dereliction of duty of the first oder. Looking the other way when we know with certainty that our government has committed these crimes is legally, ethically, and morally indefensible. It's that simple.
If we refuse to investigate and/or prosecute those who torture, those who mock the law by creating bogus legal opinions justifying every illegal act, and those whose criminal conduct costs the lives of other human beings either directly or indirectly then we are inviting more and greater criminality in the future. If we refuse to investigate and prosecute torture is there any crimes that our government, it's leaders and employees can commit that will rise to the level of abhorrent enough, heinous enough, grisly enough that we will then actually go to the trouble of punishing the criminals?
I voted for Obama. I contributed to his campaign as did millions of us. I pray for the success of his administration generally. But I cannot, in any way support what amounts to him sanctioning illegal and immoral conduct on the part of our government it's leaders and it's employees.
Keith Olbermann, in one of the best "special comments" he has done to date, says it all much better and more clearly than I do here. But what Obama's position amounts to is saying "I was only following orders" is a valid defense for criminal and often inhuman conduct that any decent, law abiding person would know is not legal, moral or ethical. We did not accept that amoral defense from Nazi's or from the Japanese after World War II and insisted upon their prosecution which was the only right and just thing to do. Now, right now, is the time to insist that we live up to our own standards. What better example could the USA set for the entire world than to make sure that those who use this defense in our country are brought to justice and made to bear the responsibility for their criminal acts? And I do not mean only those who were physically implementing the illegal policies, but I also mean those who set the policies up to and including the President and Vice President. If we fail to live up to our moral duty in this instance it will come back to haunt our country in the future in the form of much worse and more widespread crimes in violation of the Consitution, our laws and treaties, and in other egregious crimes against humanity.
I recommend Olbermann's special comment tonight to one and all. You can find it at:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677#30254996











