« Ted Kennedy: "Americans want the choice of enrolling in a health insurance program backed by the government for the public good, not private profit." | OldenGoldenDecoy's Blog | Obama: "Americans should have the choice of a public health insurance option operating alongside private plans." (re-posted) »

Obama: Strongly believes Americans should have the choice of a new public health insurance plan that would compete against private insurers



   Which way will Congress go?



WASHINGTON - Laying out in the clearest terms yet what he wants in a healthcare overhaul, President Obama told Congress yesterday that he strongly believes Americans should have the choice of a new public health insurance plan that would compete against private insurers.

Obama said he is also "open" to requiring individuals to obtain insurance coverage - which he opposed during his campaign - as long as there is a hardship exemption for those who cannot afford it, an approach similar to the system in Massachusetts. He said he supports forcing employers to contribute to their employees' insurance but that there should be exemptions for small businesses.

In a detailed two-page letter to key senators released yesterday, the president wrote that he wants to "fully offset the cost of healthcare reform" by cutting an additional $200 billion to $300 billion from Medicare and Medicaid over the next decade, on top of the $309 billion reduction he has already proposed in the government's two main healthcare programs for the poor, elderly, and disabled.

boston.com/news/... /2009/06/04/obama_lays_out_healthcare_overhaul/


And here is the Obama letter. . .

June 2, 2009
The Honorable Edward M. Kennedy
The Honorable Max Baucus
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Senator Kennedy and Senator Baucus:

The meeting that we held today was very productive and I want to commend you for your leadership -- and the hard work your Committees are doing on health care reform, one of the most urgent and important challenges confronting us as a Nation.

In 2009, health care reform is not a luxury. It's a necessity we cannot defer. Soaring health care costs make our current course unsustainable. It is unsustainable for our families, whose spiraling premiums and out-of-pocket expenses are pushing them into bankruptcy and forcing them to go without the checkups and prescriptions they need. It is unsustainable for businesses, forcing more and more of them to choose between keeping their doors open or covering their workers. And the ever-increasing cost of Medicare and Medicaid are among the main drivers of enormous budget deficits that are threatening our economic future.

In short, the status quo is broken, and pouring money into a broken system only perpetuates its inefficiencies. Doing nothing would only put our entire health care system at risk. Without meaningful reform, one fifth of our economy is projected to be tied up in our health care system in 10 years; millions more Americans are expected to go without insurance; and outside of what they are receiving for health care, workers are projected to see their take-home pay actually fall over time.

We simply cannot afford to postpone health care reform any longer. This recognition has led an unprecedented coalition to emerge on behalf of reform -- hospitals, physicians, and health insurers, labor and business, Democrats and Republicans. These groups, adversaries in past efforts, are now standing as partners on the same side of this debate.

At this historic juncture, we share the goal of quality, affordable health care for all Americans. But I want to stress that reform cannot mean focusing on expanded coverage alone. Indeed, without a serious, sustained effort to reduce the growth rate of health care costs, affordable health care coverage will remain out of reach. So we must attack the root causes of the inflation in health care. That means promoting the best practices, not simply the most expensive. We should ask why places like the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, and other institutions can offer the highest quality care at costs well below the national norm. We need to learn from their successes and replicate those best practices across our country. That's how we can achieve reform that preserves and strengthens what's best about our health care system, while fixing what is broken.

The plans you are discussing embody my core belief that Americans should have better choices for health insurance, building on the principle that if they like the coverage they have now, they can keep it, while seeing their costs lowered as our reforms take hold. But for those who don't have such options, I agree that we should create a health insurance exchange -- a market where Americans can one-stop shop for a health care plan, compare benefits and prices, and choose the plan that's best for them, in the same way that Members of Congress and their families can. None of these plans should deny coverage on the basis of a preexisting condition, and all of these plans should include an affordable basic benefit package that includes prevention, and protection against catastrophic costs.

I strongly believe that Americans should have the choice of a public health insurance option operating alongside private plans. This will give them a better range of choices, make the health care market more competitive, and keep insurance companies honest.

I understand the Committees are moving towards a principle of shared responsibility -- making every American responsible for having health insurance coverage, and asking that employers share in the cost. I share the goal of ending lapses and gaps in coverage that make us less healthy and drive up everyone's costs, and I am open to your ideas on shared responsibility. But I believe if we are going to make people responsible for owning health insurance, we must make health care affordable. If we do end up with a system where people are responsible for their own insurance, we need to provide a hardship waiver to exempt Americans who cannot afford it. In addition, while I believe that employers have a responsibility to support health insurance for their employees, small businesses face a number of special challenges in affording health benefits and should be exempted.

Health care reform must not add to our deficits over the next 10 years -- it must be at least deficit neutral and put America on a path to reducing its deficit over time. To fulfill this promise, I have set aside $635 billion in a health reserve fund as a down payment on reform. This reserve fund includes a number of proposals to cut spending by $309 billion over 10 years --reducing overpayments to Medicare Advantage private insurers; strengthening Medicare and Medicaid payment accuracy by cutting waste, fraud and abuse; improving care for Medicare patients after hospitalizations; and encouraging physicians to form "accountable care organizations" to improve the quality of care for Medicare patients. The reserve fund also includes a proposal to limit the tax rate at which high-income taxpayers can take itemized deductions to 28 percent, which, together with other steps to close loopholes, would raise $326 billion over 10 years.

I am committed to working with the Congress to fully offset the cost of health care reform by reducing Medicare and Medicaid spending by another $200 to $300 billion over the next 10 years, and by enacting appropriate proposals to generate additional revenues. These savings will come not only by adopting new technologies and addressing the vastly different costs of care, but from going after the key drivers of skyrocketing health care costs, including unmanaged chronic diseases, duplicated tests, and unnecessary hospital readmissions.

To identify and achieve additional savings, I am also open to your ideas about giving special consideration to the recommendations of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC), a commission created by a Republican Congress. Under this approach, MedPAC's recommendations on cost reductions would be adopted unless opposed by a joint resolution of the Congress. This is similar to a process that has been used effectively by a commission charged with closing military bases, and could be a valuable tool to help achieve health care reform in a fiscally responsible way.
These are some of the issues I look forward to discussing with you in greater detail in the weeks and months ahead. But this year, we must do more than discuss. We must act. The American people and America's future demand it.

I know that you have reached out to Republican colleagues, as I have, and that you have worked hard to reach a bipartisan consensus about many of these issues. I remain hopeful that many Republicans will join us in enacting this historic legislation that will lower health care costs for families, businesses, and governments, and improve the lives of millions of Americans. So, I appreciate your efforts, and look forward to working with you so that the Congress can complete health care reform by October.


Sincerely,

BARACK OBAMA


~OGD~



13 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Someplace I read where Baucus is now bringing single payer back to the table for discussion.

Yelling IS helping.

Pass the throat spray.

user-pic

I haven't had health insurance for four years now. My girlfriend works two part-time jobs and pays for her own. It just went up to $499 a month!

user-pic

Thanks OGD. I really don't see much value in reform if some kind of serious, unrestrained, public option doesn't come forward.

user-pic

that's encouraging, OGD. thanks for the post.

user-pic

.

Here is a post I left . . .

. . . a little over a week ago at Bill Moyer’s discussion thread over the single-payer issue. that outlines my take and our background related to the health care issue over the past 25+ years.

I am 62 years old. My wife of 40 years is 58. We still continue to be able to afford private coverage. We are both very active and in good health. We both continue to be employed, myself part-time and the wife full-time.

Can someone tell all of us what the combined CEO's and fat cats and various board of directors salaries and advertising and marketing budgets are of the top 10 publicly-traded health insurance corporations?

Then to add to that, what's the stock market investors cut of the action?

Plus don't overlook this. What is the amount for the lobbying and legal expenses for those lobbyists in both Washington DC and every state in the Union?

Oh, and then there are the expenses paid out for the various associations who run copious amounts of bat-crazy spin-and-spew fact twisting BS through the myriad of print, TV and internet news outlets throughout the country.

What's all the above add up to?

And here is an eye-opening stat from Health Care for America Now:
Profits of the 10 largest publicly traded insurers increased 428 percent from 2000 to 2007, from $2.4 billion to $12.9 billion.
Has your wage or salary gone up 428 percent?

Now let's get serious, how much does all of that truly benefit the doctor/patient relationship?

On an end note: Our family of three has had the fortunate opportunity to have had health care coverage continuously with the same system since 1982. Over that 27 year period our total outlay for the premiums has been $175,500. Presently our coverage costs $725 per month for only the two of us now.

Thanks to our genetics, our lifestyle of healthy living practices, preventative care, and our fortunate situation of no catastrophic hospitalizations, in addition to the stress alleviated by having health care -- over that same period of time our total doctor and medical bills, including co-payments have added up to a yearly average of $859.72. That's a grand total of $23,212.50 over the 27 years.

I wonder if there's any chance of getting a rebate on what we've saved the system?

And just imagine the hundreds of thousands, no make that millions of people who haven't been as fortunate in that same time period.

Think about that ...


Even if the change to single-payer is incremental through a public option in the upcoming legislation, it still will beats the hell out of treading water in the pond as the alligators in the medical-industrial industry circle for the kill.

~OGD~

user-pic

.

Oh and ... Thanks all . . .

. . . for checking into the pond here.

QUACK!

~OGD~

user-pic

OGD. Gooooood post. Keep us up to date. Baucus is getting scared.

The winds of change are out there!!!!

Keep on keepin on.

user-pic

Watch out for the trigger! Watch out for the fine print! They're trying to promise one thing in one part of the bill and then make it impossible in another. Note that this is not designed to con Republicans, it's designed to screw the Democratic base and anyone who favors the public option or universal healthcare.

I tell you, people better be up all night watching over their shoulders when they finish up this bill because if the Blue Dogs can poison it they will.

user-pic

Point taken. The only way this will even be included as an 'option' is if we all keep up the ruckus.

user-pic

Wow! OGD, that is the best view of this that I have ever seen! Thank you!

user-pic

If you don't have car insurance, you can't drive (legally.) So if you don't have health insurance...what? you can't live?

I REALLY resent the idea of being forced to contribute to the profits of an insurance company!

By the way, in many other countries, paying your taxes covers your health care. I think that is a better use of my tax money than more bombs, or sucking up to Wall street.

user-pic

.

Please take note . . .

I have edited my original post and have included Obama's letter to Kennedy and Baucus dated June 2, 2009. You may wish to read it in it's entirety.

And ... in response to Bluebell's very astute comment about "Watch out for the fine print!"

In my dealings in the music industry over the past 45+ years the first thing I remember learning was, ...the large print giveth and the small print taketh away.... The second thing was, always keep a keen eye peeled for others attempting to use your money to pad their side projects. Thanks for the warning Bluebell.

Nope. You won't find any turnip leaves hanging off my shoulders. My BS detector is always turned up to 10 when dealing with the sweet talking, swagger walking wheeler dealers in the village on the banks of the Potomac, no matter which side of the aisle they profess outwardly to be sitting on.

~OGD~

user-pic

OGD,
Yes, yes, yes. Your letter really rocked me
because it sings to the heart of it.
I'll keep yelling too.

I'm liking the heavy metal,
the way you
nailed it to the post.
Thank you.

I regained some hope toaday because
Ducks Can See Underwater!

Leave a comment

OldenGoldenDecoy

user-pic

Following: 108
Followers: 48

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location Between here and there.
  • Party Yes! When and where?
  • Politics The Golden Bear

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs Silly As It Seems...
  • Favorite Books Library of Congress
  • Favorite Quotes "Always try to keep what's real near." G.R. Murray

Bio

Which century?

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address