« Common Wealth Fund: National Health Care Plans Overview 2009 | OldenGoldenDecoy's Blog | The Heritage Think Tank's Battle on Health Care ... Again »
The Big Dick ... and Torture
It's Howdy Doody Time...If there are any paternalistic authoritarian enablers lurking here at the Cafe it would be quite interesting to hear what rationale there is for Big Dick's reasoning here.
BLITZER: We're out of time, but a quick couple of questions and then I'll let you go. Waterboarding, it was used how many times?
CHENEY: It was on three different individuals.
BLITZER: And the information you believe that was received was valid?
CHENEY: I do.
BLITZER: It stopped -- you stopped using it after, what, 2003?
CHENEY: There has not been an occasion since.
BLITZER: Why?
CHENEY: There has not been an occasion since.
BLITZER: Was there no need?
CHENEY: I'm just going to leave it that way. You know, when we get into talking about the application of specific techniques to prisoners, then we'll get into the business of signaling to our adversaries what wemight or might not do and they can train for it.
It has been publicly acknowledged that we did use waterboarding. That we did use it on three different individuals. And I believe it was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Abu Zubaydah and one other, I think al-Nashiri.
Those three individual were subjected to waterboarding during the course of their interrogation. But that's it.
BLITZER: Because I've always been perplexed, if it is so good and so useful, there are bad guys out there right now, why not continue to use it?
CHENEY: Well, you don't use it on somebody because what we were attempting to do and what we did to persuade these individuals who had a lot of intelligence and information about al Qaeda -- remember, we captured Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, I think it was, spring, March of '03, in Karachi.
At the time we didn't know a lot about al Qaeda. On 9/11 we didn't know a lot about al Qaeda. If Dick Clarke was such an expert, how come he didn't have all of this information about al Qaeda when he was running the counterterrorism program?
The fact of the matter is that we were able to persuade them to cooperate, to give us the intelligence we needed, and to give us the basic...
(AUDIO GAP)
CHENEY: ... geography and so forth that was essential in terms of defending our country against further attacks.
Now you don't go in and pull out somebody's toenails in order to get them to talk. This is not torture. We don't do torture.
BLITZER: John McCain says it's torture.
CHENEY: Well, John is wrong. You know, I have a fundamental disagreement on this point. But what the agency did was they sought formal guidance from the senior leadership of the administration, as well as the Justice Department in terms of what was appropriate and what wasn't. And they got that guidance. And they followed that guidance, as far as I know.
I have no reason to believe anybody out at the agency violated any tenet of the obligations and responsibilities we have in terms of statutes or treaty obligations. I think it was done very professionally. I think it was done very few times, when it was necessary.
I think it produced good results and it...
(AUDIO GAP)
CHENEY: ... alive today because we used that technique on those three individuals.
BLITZER: And if necessary, would you authorize it again?
CHENEY: Well, I'm not in the chain of command, but if necessary, I would certainly recommend it again.
BLITZER: Waterboarding?
CHENEY: Yes.
thepage.time.com/cheneys-interview-on-cnns-late-edition
And that little part of, "I'm not in the chain of command..." is so precious.
~OGD~
Advertisement
















Ugh, I'm gonna lose my coffee.
What a total asshat that Cheney is.
January 12, 2009 8:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Er...is there anyway we could kind of stick with asshat?
Oh, and, I love it when they always testify that there was only one person or three person affected by their criminal behavior. I do not believe that.
January 12, 2009 10:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
I watched that interview and noticed that Cheney repeating the mantra that the Bush administration is responsible for nothing whatsoever. The intelligence failures were the result of an established broken system. Pussies!
January 12, 2009 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
If waterboarding is not torture, according to Cheney, perhaps he would consent to a brief session so we can ascertain just exactly what else about his time in office might be of importance... simply to prevent a future attack, you understand. Of course, I only suggest it because he is so sure waterboarding is not torture. If it was, what I suggest would be completely immoral and illegal...
January 12, 2009 10:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, Father, with a priest in attendance. Perhaps he'd like to do a little confessing....
January 12, 2009 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink