<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Olarte&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/olarte/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/olarte/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/olarte//5258</id>
   <updated>	2008-10-16T16:11:09Z	</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://14.237596-comment:3232338</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/16/obama_wins_with_discipline/#c3232338" />
		
		    <title>Olarte Commented on Obama Wins With Discipline by Art Brodsky</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-16T16:11:09Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-16T16:11:09Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>I agree Obama played all of the debates in a very low keyed manner and that was probably the smart move.  </p>

<p>But I thought there were a couple of moments in the debates where he could have done better-Last night when McCain brought up class warfare he should have said that the only party that embraces class warfare is the GOP.  Why is skewing wealth distribution to the top not class warfare? He could have opened with tying M. to the Bush tax cuts.  Why is income from capital gains bad to tax when income from labor is not?  </p>

<p>McCain sought to paint Obama as a tax and spend politician and  Obama should have done more to show McCain as a borrow and spend (on war) politician.</p>

<p>It could still have remained at the level of a policy debate without bringing up McCain's trophy wife, the fact M. has never had to interview for a job in his life, multiple houses, etc.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    



</feed>

