« Idiot Watch 9/20 | notmoving's Blog | We Are the Champions »

American Idol(atry): our precious economy.


I'll go out on a limb here.

The economic zeitgeist is probably impenetrable, but I'll give it a shot. America is the only country I know of where its citizens run up monstrous private debts and triple mortgages, then complain about the state the economy is in. WE must take fiscal responsibility for ourselves. And the government, I think, needs to impose caps on prices and spending. We have allowed our runaway tank to drastically affect the world, and we must put an end to this. Obama's loan relief is a great idea, but we must realize this treats symptomology. The cause is out-of-control prices. Our paper currency is practically valueless. And we must take control of this train wreck.

So: back to the gold standard. Have our currency actually backed by something substantial, so that there are finite limits imposed on inflation and deflation. Find the instances everywhere costs are out of control, and stage a series of regulatory Congressional sessions that will culminate in the reining-in of spending practices across the board.

I don't mean across the board cuts, as McCain proposes. I mean across the board regulations.  I believe government is responsible to the people and must guide us - but not by spending more. By enacting fair controls.

A recent conversation with a colleague (a claims adjuster) underscores my point. I told him the real problem with health care costs is the preposterous salaries of health care providers.  He agreed to a point - but added that providers have to deal with the rising cost of malpractice insurance - which indicts the insurance industry and as always, lawyers. Further, he cited the costs of machinery and technology and real estate.... More indictments. They in turn are sure to blame their own bogeymen.

Another example: when I lived in Alaska (ah, it makes sense now, eh?) I was struck by exorbitantly high everything was. Even paper and lumber and products made from same. But why? Well, the mill owners had to be able to afford the new cars that were being shipped in from Seattle, and the car dealers wanted to afford the vacations out to Ketchikan to see if they really should lobby for the Bridge to Nowhere, and the Ketchikan fisherman wanted to be able to afford the newest video game designed in part by Alaskan geeks but with parts manufactured in San Francisco.... and so on.

Prices rise in this country because we want them to. I know that sounds simplistic, but truly, this is the reason. At least that's why they start to rise - then, when they spiral out of control, we disavow any responsibility and cry out to the Heavens - or Washington - for monetary relief, in the form of more spending programs.


We should even consider monetary deflation. Take a zero or two from the value of our bills. (Hey, it continues to work for Poland.)

I want to remind everyone that FDR provided relief by putting people to work, creating jobs, and not just handing out wads of cash. We must not only create jobs for people, and encourage the creation of jobs (jobs here on American land, and not overseas), we must create a mindset of national fiscal responsibility. To cite FDR again, he rose to the challenge of the times by leading his country into doing something bold, something heroic.

The time for boldness has come again.


1 Comment

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I agree with your point. It's just not the Wall Streeters who are blame. All of us need to learn to live within our means. Don't charge things unless it is necessary. like for an emergency. Instant gratification can be very, very expensive.

I've always wondered why medical costs, and other costs in general, are so outrageous. Why does a hospital box of Kleenex cost $22.00? Don't hospitals realize that they are pricing themselves out of the market?

Something's got to be done about prices in general and I know that CEO's salaries have are a big part of the problem. It's just plain greed on their part. The outrageous salaries are a status symbol to them. Cap them. To hell with them if they don't like it, there will always be someone smarter and more willing to actually work for the paltry 1 mil salary the company offers. It would be good for the shareholders and the company in general if they capped CEO's salaries.

Leave a comment

notmoving

user-pic

Following:
Followers:

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs Rionn Fears malechem http://malechem.blogspot.com/
  • Favorite Books Lord of the Rings Night Watch tetralogy If you meet the Buddha on the Road, Kill Him!
  • Favorite Quotes "A single grateful thought toward God is the most perfect prayer."

Bio

An American and an adopted Pole.... all my heroes have been cowboys!

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address