American Idol(atry): our precious economy.
I'll go out on a limb here.
The economic zeitgeist is probably impenetrable, but I'll give it a shot.
America is the only country I know of where its citizens run up monstrous
private debts and triple mortgages, then complain about the state the economy
is in. WE must take fiscal responsibility for ourselves. And the government, I
think, needs to impose caps on prices and spending. We have allowed our runaway
tank to drastically affect the world, and we must put an end to this. Obama's
loan relief is a great idea, but we must realize this treats symptomology. The
cause is out-of-control prices. Our paper currency is practically valueless.
And we must take control of this train wreck.
So: back to the gold standard. Have our currency actually backed by something
substantial, so that there are finite limits imposed on inflation and
deflation. Find the instances everywhere costs are out of control, and stage a
series of regulatory Congressional sessions that will culminate in the
reining-in of spending practices across the board.
I don't mean across the board cuts, as McCain proposes. I mean across the board
regulations. I believe government is responsible to the people and must
guide us - but not by spending more. By enacting fair controls.
A recent conversation with a colleague (a claims adjuster) underscores my
point. I told him the real problem with health care costs is the preposterous
salaries of health care providers. He agreed to a point - but added that
providers have to deal with the rising cost of malpractice insurance - which
indicts the insurance industry and as always, lawyers. Further, he cited the
costs of machinery and technology and real estate.... More indictments. They in
turn are sure to blame their own bogeymen.
Another example: when I lived in Alaska (ah, it makes sense now, eh?) I was
struck by exorbitantly high everything was. Even paper and lumber and products
made from same. But why? Well, the mill owners had to be able to afford the new
cars that were being shipped in from Seattle, and the car dealers wanted to
afford the vacations out to Ketchikan to see if they really should lobby for
the Bridge to Nowhere, and the Ketchikan fisherman wanted to be able to afford
the newest video game designed in part by Alaskan geeks but with parts
manufactured in San Francisco.... and so on.
Prices rise in this country because we want them to. I know that sounds
simplistic, but truly, this is the reason. At least that's why they start to
rise - then, when they spiral out of control, we disavow any responsibility and
cry out to the Heavens - or Washington - for monetary relief, in the form of
more spending programs.
We should even consider monetary deflation. Take a zero or two from the value of our bills. (Hey, it continues to work for Poland.)
I want to remind everyone that FDR provided relief by putting people to work,
creating jobs, and not just handing out wads of cash. We must not only create
jobs for people, and encourage the creation of jobs (jobs here on American
land, and not overseas), we must create a mindset of national fiscal responsibility.
To cite FDR again, he rose to the challenge of the times by leading his country
into doing something bold, something heroic.
The time for boldness has come again.





I agree with your point. It's just not the Wall Streeters who are blame. All of us need to learn to live within our means. Don't charge things unless it is necessary. like for an emergency. Instant gratification can be very, very expensive.
I've always wondered why medical costs, and other costs in general, are so outrageous. Why does a hospital box of Kleenex cost $22.00? Don't hospitals realize that they are pricing themselves out of the market?
Something's got to be done about prices in general and I know that CEO's salaries have are a big part of the problem. It's just plain greed on their part. The outrageous salaries are a status symbol to them. Cap them. To hell with them if they don't like it, there will always be someone smarter and more willing to actually work for the paltry 1 mil salary the company offers. It would be good for the shareholders and the company in general if they capped CEO's salaries.
October 21, 2008 11:14 AM | Reply | Permalink