« Despite Big Taxcuts, 30 year Winning Streak for the Rich Ended by George W. Bush | NobleCommentDecider's Blog | Stephanopoulos Grovels Before McCain Today on Republican's Sleepover with Colonel Gadhafi »

Trolls For Dummies


Most Trolls have the same mode of operation as do the politicians the Trolls support. The identification of the Troll is therefore often the identification of a contemporary Republican. Any one or two characteristics may not be the sole province of the Troll, but the more points noted the higher the chance that the person involved is a Troll.

General characteristics, Trolls:

Fake liberal values.

Lie, confuse or misstate facts.

Try to apply values to Democratic leaders they would never hold for themselves or the GOP.

Demanding or using the government to infringe on the lives of others, while at the same time accusing Democrats of  trying to limit their freedoms.

Fear the government unless it is run by Republicans.

Excel at telling others what they need to do, (while often having serious failures in their own personal life).

Claim they represent only what is best for 'Americans' or another population subset.

Never admit they supported or voted for George W. Bush.

Never admit error, by themselves or the GOP.

Have long memories for everything political;  but not for the empty promises or gross failures of the GOP, George W. etc.

May claim to support the Constitution (but only when Democrats are in the White House).

May select names like 'Progressive Conscience' that sound liberal.

Equate Bush critics and nutjob teabaggers "both sides have their extremes'.

Similarly, feel seeking health care reform is more extreme than starting wars of aggression.

Have little or no record of comments or posts - true trolls when discovered never return with the same name.

May game the recommend system at TPM.

 

Others??


10 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Have little or no record of comments or posts - true trolls when discovered never return with the same name.

This is the only one I don't agree with. There are several folks here who comment and recommend posts on a regular basis, but their blog page has no record of their comments (LimoLiberal is an example of this, as Gregor noted). That doesn't mean LimoLiberal is new around here, however. Go to Limo's Recommended tab on their page, and you'll see Limo's been recommending posts of Josh's (and others) since before the primaries.

user-pic

Right LisB-I should have said a truly Sneaky Troll is one who never returns with the same name.

A Political Equivalent might be a holier than thou Bible thumping Republican who claims to be hiking on the Appalachian Trail while in fact he is cheating on his wife in another hemisphere. They can be very imaginative in their sneakiness.

user-pic

Heh heh -- exactly!

Yeah, as I pointed out to Gregor today, those TPM'ers who do not post on their blog, but do comment on and recommend other posts, they are NOT trolls. Thanks for making that distinction.

user-pic

Yeah, when troll checking I look for history of comments, it would be helpful if Josh put a "TPM member since -----" on the bio page. I haven't noted that info.

user-pic
user-pic

Key point from Karl's link on trolls:

they have no real interest in learning about the topic at hand

Pretty much describes the Bush administration, the Bush Base and Republicans in general.

user-pic

Others??

Claims he's for the "public insurance option" but then, argues that "health insurance cooperatives" can get the cost-control job done (almost as well?) but admits only if nation-wide and when it's pointed out that the co-op plan calls for maybe 50 itty-bitty co-ops (and that no one's ever studied how the twenty or so co-ops we already have are working out), slip slides away by pointing to the Netherlands and Switzerland which have good health care systems and don't have public options or insurance co-ops.

user-pic

What if he says he supports the 'public insurance option' but will support anything that gets the job done?


Sorry, I couldn't resist.

user-pic

Anything Switzerland is good because there 'the militia' is given free anti-tank guns and artillery to keep in their own personal bomb proof bunkers. A total Wingnut Fantasy come true. (except, of course that the Swiss government also keeps every weapon and every militia member under tight supervision))

user-pic

and insists Swiss chocolate is bad for you because it called truffles and what does that have to do with anything but mushrooms and frenchies?

Leave a comment

NobleCommentDecider

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 7

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address