Honduras Slips Off the Edge of the World
U.N. suspends support of Honduran elections.
U.N. Security Council Saturday - "Hands-off the embassy, Michelleti!"
Michelleti Ultimatum Saturday - "Brazil must decide on Zelaya's status in 10 days"
Lula tells Michelleti to kiss-off: "We don't accept ultimatums from coup-plotters."
Michelleti threatens to close-down Brazilian embassy. Clamps down on civil liberties.
Honduras detains and deports OAS Officials:
Five OAS technical representatives, three Spaniards, one Columbian, and a US citizen, who arrived at Toncontin International Airport this morning were expelled from Honduras. All four arrived this morning at 9 am. Three were expelled on a COPA airlines flight this morning at 9 am while a fourth was expelled abord a later American airlines flight. El Heraldo reports that all four were deported because they arrived without the authorization of the de facto regime. La Prensa disagrees, and says they were deported because their governments do not recognize the de facto government. A Chilean who accompanied them as part of the team was allowed to remain. All of them were deported after being held for 6 hours, on flights bound for San Jose, Costa Rica.As regards the "clamp down on civil liberties" - NarcoNews got the jump and translated the Michelleti Decree, released Sunday afternoon:
Yesterday Carlos Lopez Contreras, Foreign Minister of the de facto regime, had invited the OAS delegation to visit. In a press release yesterday he emphasized that the political crisis in Honduras needed a Honduran solution, and that it was no threat to international peace, that there were no international interests. None-the-less he invited the OAS delegation to visit "on a precise date", along with the support staff they require, "so that they might witness the level of advance of the internal dialog." Lopez Contreras's statement didn't specify the "precise date" so we can only guess that its not today.
And the constitutional articles which are suspended for the next 45 days.Decree:
Article 1. For a period of 45 days beginning with this decree's publication, the Constitutional rights of Articles 69, 72, 81 and 84, are suspended.
Article 2. The Armed Forces will support, together or separately with the National Police, when the situation requires, to execute the necessary plans to maintain the order and security of the Republic.
Article 3. The following is prohibited:
First: Freedom of transit, which will be restricted according to the parameters established by press releases broadcast on all radio and TV stations by the President of the Republic, which will be in effect in all national territory and during curfews, with the exception of cargo transport, ambulances, and urban traffic in the cities excluded in said communiqués, and medical personell and nurses that in those cities work during curfew hours.
Second: All public meetings not authorized by police or military authorities.
Third: Publication in any media, spoken, written or televised, of information that offends human dignity, public officials, or criticizes the law and the government resolutions, or any style of attack against the public order and peace. CONATEL (the Honduran communications commission), through the National Police and the Armed Forces, is authorized to suspend any radio station, television channel or cable system that does not adjust its programming to the present decree.
Article 4. It is ordered:
First: Detain all persons who are found outside of the established orders of circulation, or that in any manner are suspected by police and military authorities of damaging people or property, those that associate with the goal of committing criminal acts or that place their own lives in danger. All detainees will be read their rights, and at the same time must be brought to be booked in a police station of the country, identifying all persons detained, their motives, the hour of arrest and release from the police station, recording the physical condition of the detainee, to avoid future accusations of supposed crimes of torture.
Second: All persons detained must remain confined in the legally established detention centers.
Third: All public offices, national, state and municipal, that have been occupied by demonstrators or have persons inside of them engaging in illegal activities will be cleared.
Fourth: All Secretaries of State, decentralized institutions, municipalities and other state organisms must place themselves at the orders of the National Police and Armed Forces without any equivocation, along with all means at their disposal, for the development of these operations.
Article 5. The present Decree becomes law immediately, being duly published in the Official Daily "La Gaceta" and will be sent to the National Congress to be made law.
Ordered from the Presidential Palace in the City of Tegucigalpa, municipality of the Central District, on the 22nd of September of 2009.
ROBERTO MICHELETTI BAIN
CONSTITUTIONAL PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC
It looks pretty grim to me, but I've cried wolf before and nothing happened. Two events are scheduled for Monday; the Legal Government's Foreign Minister, Pratricia Rodas, is scheduled to speak at the UN General Assembly, and massive demonstrations in Honduras are planned by the resistance. I find myself hoping that the movement leaders in Honduras will order a stand-down - time to reorient to a lawless autocracy that the coup leaders have become. But I think that many are fed up, stressed out, and inclined to an all or nothing position, which is frightening.Article 69: Personal liberty is inviolable and only through law can it be restricted or suspended temporarily.
Article 72: The expression of thought by any media, without censorship, is free. Those who interfere with this right or through direct or indirect means restrict or impede the communication and circulation of ideas and opinions will held responsible by the law.
Article 81: Every person has the right to circulate freely, leave, enter and remain in national territory.
No one can be obligated to move from his home or residence except in special cases in accord with the law.
Article 84: No one can be arrested or detained except through written order by competent authorities, executed through legal formalities and for motives established by law.
Notwithstanding, open delinquency can be apprehended by any person only to deliver the delinquent to the authorities.
The arrested or detained person must be informed clearly of his rights and the facts of the accusations against him, and, additionally, authorities must permit him to communicate his detention to a family member or person of his choice.
















Oops...link to the NarcoNews article on the decree:
http://narcosphere.narconews.com/thefield/3465/honduras-coup-leader-micheletti-decrees-45-day-suspension-constitution
September 28, 2009 2:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
So we can soon expect to see Michelleti deported in his pajamas for violating the Constitution?
Oop --- it's okay if you are a right winger in the country?
September 28, 2009 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
UPDATE:
Radio Globo and Channel 36 have been shut down completely. Soldiers occupy the facilities, but the staff members got away.
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2009/09/2009928124228951255.html
September 28, 2009 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Neo, I just want to say thanks for all you do...finding all the news, interpreting it, etc. It's very much appreciated and I'm grateful to you and kgb for keeping us all informed.
September 28, 2009 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
My gawd, you've done your hair. You look much younger.
Thnx.
September 28, 2009 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
FYI:
Many media outlets are using the term "rebellion" - for example a headline in the UK Guardian:
"Honduras suspends civil liberties amid calls for 'rebellion.'"
The article goes on to say ...to "calls for insurrection" by ousted president Manuel Zelaya,.."
In Honduras there is an important distinction between terms "rebellion" (rebelion) and "insurrection" (insurrection). That distinction is found in the Honduran constitution itself, which asserts the right of insurrection: Article 3 of the 1982 constitution asserts to right of insurrection against a government if that government has taken power through force of arms.
There is no real debate about the "force of arms" issue. The coup people maintain their rise to power was a legal transition of power, while the resistance maintains that the President was removed at gun point by the military.
September 28, 2009 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
UPDATE:
Reporters Without Borders weighs in on the repression of the independent press:
http://www.rsf.org/Last-freedoms-suspended-leaving.html
What's new in this story is death threats against the director of Radio Progresso, Jesuit Priest Ismael Moreno, and the detention and maltreatment since the 22nd of Agustina Flores, reporter for Radio Libertad.
September 28, 2009 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
UPDATE:
A bit of a bombshell...the Irony Bomb.
http://quotha.net/node/406
Adrienne Pine has been running a (almost) daily diary sent to her by a contact "Oscar", who is a law student in Tegucigalpa. In today's, Oscar writes:
"And if that weren´t enough even the public TV is making disconcerting announcements... They have ordered a new female anchor to say that if by January 27th a new president has not been elected then Micheletti will stay for two more years""
It should be obvious to anyone who thinks about it the Decree which is now in effect for 45 days guarantees that the elections won't take place on November 29. Thus National Party candidate Pepe Lobo (favored to win the election) emerged from a meeting with the other candiadtes and US Ambassador Hugo Llorens at the US Embassy, and made a statement to the press criticizing the Decree and the actions taken: "they damage the image of the country abroad and directly harm the population."
The source is El Tiempo, but the Internet connect fails right now.
I have no doubt Lobo's concerns for the people is genuine, but I also have no doubt that he is seeing his chances of wining the election slipping away.
September 28, 2009 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tiempo's web site sucks. Every time they get a traffic surge ... "SQL failure to connect" errors. The others seem to have fixed their bandwidth problems, but Tiempo has backbone issues (unfortunate for me ... I'm using the same software on some of my sites).
I'm keeping my powder dry on this one. The state department reaction is interesting, while calling on Michiletti for restraint, they mostly seem not happy with Zelaya:
Have you seen a complete account of Tomayo's broadcast that sparked this whole mess? Most reports indicate he called for "a final offensive." Others have said the call was to take the presidential residence without direct quotes. I'd love to see his whole statement.
September 28, 2009 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Reuters is describing it a bit more strongly than you are:
September 28, 2009 5:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's what is so wonderful about our dysfunctional media, AA. We can pick and choose. Check out Anselem's "blast" in this al Jazeera video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkkXWz9wO30&feature=player_embedded#t=156
September 28, 2009 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
So Al Jazeera chose to run a short clip of Anselem blasting only the de-facto government, and Reuters chose to report that he had blasted both sides.
No conflict there, except that the Reuters report is more complete. Unless, of course, you dispute that the U.S. official said:
"The return of Zelaya absent an agreement is irresponsible and foolish ... He should cease and desist from making wild allegations and from acting as though he were starring in an old movie.
"Having chosen, with outside help, to return on his own terms, President Zelaya and those who have facilitated his return, bear particular responsibility for the actions of his supporters."
Sounds quite critical to me.
September 28, 2009 7:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not sure if it's worth pursuing, acanuck, but the article only said "deplorable" about deporting the OAS members. But yes, it was more even handed than al Jezeera, I agree. Maybe we should define "blast" ;-)
September 28, 2009 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's the Tribuna link for Pepe Lobo's comments:
http://www.latribuna.hn/web2.0/?p=45548
State wants the San Jose Accord to fly - that's their position. So Anselem's remarks are understandable and expected. His most significant comment was "...those who have facilitated his return..."
If you truly believe that a Jesuit priest, who isn't even Honduran, has "sparked this whole mess," I think you're not seeing the big picture.
Lula, and many others, have no conviction whatsoever that the San José Accord can work, due to the well known intractability of the basic positions. Lula is absolutely sincere in stating that a another fascist coup in Latin America cannot be allowed to succeed, and the Honduran coup has rattled every government in the region to that possibility. That puts Brazil at odds with US policy on this matters, and the "facilitators" Anselem speaks of is Brazil.
September 28, 2009 5:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, I had already seen Sosa's comments (and Santos' as well). I was curious about Tomayo's.
The Charismatic Catholic priest from El Salvador very clearly went on radioGlobo and said SOMETHING. Whatever that something was, it has been used as the justification for the current government actions. In that regard, his words did indeed precipitate the suspension of constitutional reforms. If you don't know what he said ... just say so.
We won't even get into the question of why a priest who isn't even Honduran has emerged as the primary political spokesperson for Zelaya. Pretty difficult to construe that as a religious vocation.
Interestingly, Lula's creative interpretation of the norms of diplomatic nonintervention are causing him trouble with key allies at home. I'm still digesting if I think this latest round of escalations helps Zelaya's objectives or hurts him.
Congress is taking up the issue of constitutional suspension ... and they don't seem impressed with the idea at first blush.
September 28, 2009 6:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're a day late and a dollar short, kgb. El Heraldo published a report on it's "Minute by Minute" column at 3:19 pm that Michelleti said he would meet with the Supreme Court and presidential candidates to rescind the Decree - at an opportune time withing the next few days!
Meanwhile, the assault on the people will continue, which is completely illegal under Honduran law.
September 28, 2009 6:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm being nice ... but I don't have to be. Lay off the ad hominems.
September 28, 2009 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are you joking? What ad hominens?
September 28, 2009 8:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
It looks pretty grim to me, but I've cried wolf before and nothing happened.
Just mho, reading Al Giordano a lot can do that to you. I really don't trust his stuff much at all, and that comes from reading him in the past. I ended up with the impression that he'd prefer to be a scriptwriter for action/adventure movies. He also can get pretty nasty if challenged on questionable facts, doesn't like anyone ruining his narrative, can get almost Stalinist about that.
September 28, 2009 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Looks like this is going to turn out well :/
September 28, 2009 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
BIG UPDATE:
The Decree signed by Michelleti, translated above, was not, by law, official until the Honduran Congress approved it. So all the actions taken by the government - military and police - today were technically illegal - pending congressional approval.
http://laprensahn.com/Ediciones/2009/09/28/Noticias/Consultaran-con-CSJ-derogacion-de-decreto
La Prensa, in Honduras, released the above, saying that members of the Honduan Congress asked Michelleti to rescind it last night.
The National Party members of congress have stated that they will not endorse the Decree when it comes up for vote.
Radio Global is now broadcasting from a clandestine site, and they reported that the measure likely will not pass.
September 28, 2009 5:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
LaTribuna has more on the congressional meeting (translated).
It seems the decree accomplished it's purpose - no violent march and no new martyrs ... and as an added bonus there is increased pressure on Brazil to muzzle Zelaya's political operation if they are going to keep him in the embassy. If the congress really does back off Michiletti, it could be seen as an indicator that democratic institutions are indeed still functioning. Not seeing an upside for Zelaya here.
September 28, 2009 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
UPDATE:
http://narcosphere.narconews.com/notebook/kristin-bricker/2009/09/dictatorship-unmasked
Tiempo's staff editorial, translated by Kristin Bricker. The Tiempo link is down again.
-------------------------
"The Real Goal of the 45-Day Curfew is to Torpedo November's Electoral Process"
El Tiempo Staff Editorial translated by Kristin Bricker
With Executive Decree PCM-M-016-2009, the dictatorial government has taken off its mask and really outdone itself by keeping Honduras and the Honduras people kidnapped through its use and abuse of the State's weapons and its desire to manipulate the Constitution and the laws of the Republic.
This executive decree, signed by the de facto head of state Micheletti in a meeting with his equally de facto cabinet, establishes a curfew for 45 consecutive days, during which practically all rights and individual freedoms are annulled, leaving the Honduran people completely defenseless before the usurpers.
From the moment this dictatorial edict went into effect, inalienable rights such as personal freedom, the right to free thought, the right to organize and meet, the right to free movement, rights to privacy in one's own home, and protections against arbitrary detentions ceased to exist in Honduras.
Honduras is at the mercy of a dictatorship that has tried to enthrone itself against the will of an entire people. Honduras is an international pariah and a State that has been kidnapped by a group of unscrupulous and adventurous politicians, military officials, businessmen, and religious kingpins who have no consciences. They maintain omnipotent power over the government in order to enjoy absolute impunity, privileges, and canonry.
As for freedom of expression, which is fundamental to human coexistence and democracy, article 73 of the Constitution of the Republic states:
Printing presses, radio and television stations, and whichever other means of emitting and broadcasting thought, as well as their components, cannot be confiscated, nor closed, nor can their work be interrupted on the grounds that they are committing a crime in transmitting their thoughts, their responsibilities under the law notwithstanding.
We cite that constitutional article for informational purposes. We know that for a dictatorial, totalitarian government, like that which holds power in Honduras, "the Constitution is pure drivel" and "can be violated as much as is necessary," according to the subculture of the political "class" that has brought our country to the point of complete political, economic, and social disaster.
Article 3.3 of executive decree PCM-M-016-2009 prohibits: "Publication in any media, spoken, written or televised, of information that offends human dignity, public officials, or criticizes the law and the government resolutions, or any style of attack against the public order and peace." All of this, naturally, is according to the dictatorial regime's criteria and in no way according to democratic mentality.
It is obvious, therefore, that with the 45-day curfew--that is, for the duration of the election campaigns--the real goal is to torpedo November's electoral process through a plan to consolidate the dictatorship's power, unmasking the de facto regime's faked determination to support the general elections at the end of the year.
This is because there cannot be an electoral campaign without individual freedoms, without the freedom of expression or transmission of thought, without the freedom of association and the freedom to hold meetings, without free transit and the right to privacy in one's own home, and without protections against arbitrary detentions. That is very clear.
------------------------
September 28, 2009 6:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Meanwhile ... Michiletti appears to back off of the executive decree and agree to defer to congress and the courts. Not sure of the implications on this ... but it certainly doesn't seem he's taking a hard line.
September 28, 2009 7:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
consolidate the dictatorship's power,
Is there a meta-analysis here surrounding the strange incident of the President who failed to bark in the night?
Meaning, is this the first Latin American coup in history where the local CIA guy was not in at the inception?
September 28, 2009 7:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Company wanted in, Jolly R, but Otto Reich and Robert Carmona-Borjas told them "That's OK, boys, this one's a piece of cake. We've got it covered."
http://machetera.wordpress.com/2009/07/30/otto-reich-and-the-honduran-coup-detat-the-provocateur-his-protege-and-the-toppling-of-a-president-part-one/
September 28, 2009 8:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Otto Reich
Man, there it is! My first flashback (after all these years...)
Ha-ha. The joke's on me
For a minute I thought it was 1985!
September 28, 2009 9:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
UPDATE:
Michelleti issues yet another ultimatum. This time to Mexico, Spain, Argentina and Venezuela.
http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/notas/629591.html
"You have 10 days to recognize the de facto authorities" of Honduras.
September 28, 2009 8:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Michelleti issues yet another ultimatum
Astonishing--while I was distracted, little Honduras, sleepy cigar rolling backwater, became the regional carribean hegemon
The Israel of Central America. Right on!
September 28, 2009 10:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
He said that he was not the coup’s “architect,” which is quite some distance from a total denial.
I like that. I'm gonna try:
"Honey, I am not the architect of the *orgy you just walked in on--I am an innocent victim!"
*Note to Mighty Quinn--I'm always thinkin' of ya' buddy...bringing the magic to a stranger's thread...
September 28, 2009 9:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
We may not be strangers...I think we went to different high schools together.
But I found Quinn:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBJB-nunxgE
September 29, 2009 1:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
You've changed...
September 30, 2009 1:03 AM | Reply | Permalink