The Ghost of Pontius Pilate
William Sparkman, 51, was a substitute teacher for Laurel County Kentucky. He was an Eagle Scout. He was well liked in the community. He moved to Kentucky when he was transferred by his employer, The Boy Scouts of America. He became interested in teaching and several years ago decided to switch careers. He went back to school to become an elementary school teacher. He loved to teach and was scheduled to graduate college with his teaching certificate in 2007. Unfortunately he was diagnosed with Stage 3 Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma before he completed his degree. He balanced chemotherapy with school work and managed to graduate on time. He was even the key note speaker at his own graduation, where he told his fellow graduates, "I'd been knocked down, but I refused to be knocked out. Those brick walls will appear from time to time in your career. Do not let them stop you. There are no failures, just teaching moments."
Bill Sparkman was also a part-time Census worker.
On September 12th, the decomposing body of Bill Sparkman was found hanging from a tree next to a cemetery near the Daniel Boone National Forest in rural, south east Kentucky. The word "FED" was written on his chest. His truck and the laptop he used for his census work was found nearby.
We don't know much more than that at this time. We don't know how he died. We don't know for sure that it was murder, although the local Census Director says she was told that it was an "apparent homicide".
We do know that a week and a half after the body was found, federal agents have been unable to rule out his connection with the Census as a contributing factor. We know that Census interviews for that area have been put on hold indefinitely.
This summer, I attended the Kansas City Ethnic Festival. It was filled with booths representing the food & crafts of most of the different immigrant groups found in Kansas City. It also had a booth set up for the Census Bureau. I jokingly asked the woman manning the booth if she was one of "those ACORN people" expecting her to laugh in exasperation at the number of times she had been asked that question. Instead she looked at me with a mix of fear and anger. "Not today I haven't", she told me. I immediately apologized for upsetting her and as she calmed down she explained that it was becoming very scary to work for the Census. There were lots of threats made to Census workers this summer and lots of hatred directed at them. She was even reconsidering her job. I felt bad for her but thought she was probably over-reacting. Now I'm not so sure.
We don't know that Mr. Sparkman was killed because he was a census taker. We do know that the following has been said about the census this year. Media Matters.com lists the following examples of Conservative Media discussing the Census.
----------------------------------------------------
On July 23, 2009, Glenn Beck tells radio listeners that people going "door to door collecting information" would be helping to create a "modern day slave state".
------------------------------------------------------
During a June 25 interview with Rep. Michelle Bachmann (R-MN) on his Fox News show, Glenn Beck stated that "there's a lot of people that are concerned" with the census "because they don't want to fill it out. They're not comfortable with ACORN members coming to find out all this information. They don't want to give the government all this kind of information."
-------------------------------------------------------------------
On the June 22 broadcast of Clear Channel's The War Room with Quinn & Rose, Co-host Rose Tennent stated that Bachmann reportedly said that she does not intend to complete the census and stated: "ACORN being recruited by Obama for a mission -- that is so frightening." After listing several questions included in the census, she added that "it's just so intrusive. And you're right. I mean, there's the risk of identity theft and all kinds of things. I'm just -- it scares me to think that these thugs are getting this information from us."
---------------------------------------------------------------
On June 18, using the headline "What Kind of Info Is ACORN Gathering for Census?" The Fox Nation linked to a June 18 Washington Times article reporting that Bachmann stated "she will not fill out anything more than the number of people in her household" for the 2010 census because "the questions have become 'very intricate, very personal' " and because "she feared ACORN."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
On the May 20 edition of his radio show, Neal Boortz told a caller, "I received a census form the other day asking me a whole bunch of questions about my small business. I threw it in the trash. I'm not going to answer it. None of their damn business." He later added that "the federal government and the state government, they have a legitimate reason for knowing how many people live where. They have no legitimate reason for knowing anything else. The rest of the information is -- most of the rest of the information is designed to help the government steal from you in order to pass off your property to the moochers. They're looters."
------------------------------------------------------
On May 20, Neal Boortz said, "My advice to you -- and to all of my listeners -- is always: Obey the law. And the law says you have to answer this stuff. OK? But, if I have received the American Community Survey and I ref-- I personally refuse to respond to it, and once every 10 years I will respond to the census, but the only information I will give them is the number of adults who live in my household and that -- or the number of people -- doesn't, you know -- the number of people who live in my household, and that is it.
And they've knocked on my door. And they've come to my door with badges. And they've come to my door and told me I could be fined. They've come to my door and they've told me that I am breaking the law. And I look at them and I say, "Two adults live here. That is all the information I will voluntarily give you. Waterboard me if you want to learn any more." But that's it.
--------------------------------------------------------------
We don't KNOW that comments like these and others made by the Right were the cause of Mr. Sparkman's death. We don't know that a Glenn Beck fan scrawled the word "FED" across the chest of Mr. Sparkman's body. But anyone with any kind of a sense of morality would at least wonder.
We can however predict the response of Mr. Beck and his fellow harbingers of Socialistic Doom. They will all sigh and explain how they are merely doing their jobs as "journalists". They are innocent! And much like Pontius Pilate, they will wash their hands of the whole affair and continue on in their eternal search for ratings gold. Spreading hatred and fear through lies and exaggeration. They will be oblivious to the consequences of their speech and they will ignore the blood on their hands.
I hope that late at night in the privacy of their home, they hear the ghost of Pontius Pilate whispering, "Remember Bill Sparkman."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"He was such an innocent person, I hate to say that he was naive, but he saw the world as all good, and there's a lot of bad in the world."
Gilbert Acciardo, retired Kentucky State Trooper & co-worker of Bill Sparkman













Highly, highly rec'd. We've heard this news today through at least two other posts, but yours brought home, as none other did, the human aspect.
This will be looked into further, and if it isn't, we'll make sure it is.
Thank you for this.
September 24, 2009 2:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is a tragedy of the first order. You have demonstrated how demagogues can kindle flames from hot coals.
September 24, 2009 2:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
rec'd.
September 24, 2009 8:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
A wonderful tribute to an innocent man and a frightening portrait of fear and ignorance.
September 24, 2009 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
I post mainly on my local Fox news station's blog under the idea that it is important that the Right's craziness be addressed. I think that on a site like Fox, it's important that both sides be represented.
This morning I got up to find that one of the regular bloggers on myfoxkc.com suggested that ACORN actually had him murdered to divert attention from their problems and another blogger had suggested that if Obama had not appointed such radical czars...people wouldn't feel compelled to defend themselves from the Census.
HOW CRAZY IS THAT?
It also proves that it's not just the Glenn Becks of the world who have blood on their hands.
September 24, 2009 10:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
"hanging from a tree" was like getting a kick in the stomach.
It should be a good thing that the Feds are involved.
Fed. Was it written, was it carved? The ugly irony about that is that Mr. Sparkman was doing a job that would ensure those people's representation in government, and would provide demographics for governmental aid that they can obviously use.
Go with God, sir. Your family, too.
September 24, 2009 11:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is terrible. Especially, as you say, the hanging part. It's what instantly turns what may have been "just" murder to implicating a hate crime.
Still, without suspects and motive known, who knows? Our country has a lot of lunatics. Hopefully there is more information that the police have that will help sort this out and the evidence isn't too old.
September 24, 2009 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Believe it or not, there is more than just a handful of people around here in West Virginia that are capable of such a crime.
Mediawise, we don't get much more than Fox, Beck, Rush and Hannity. The elites in NY and Washington do not get it.
September 24, 2009 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've camped in the Daniel Boone. I could hear the dueling banjos playing when I was there, I tell you. Haaard country.
September 25, 2009 1:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
"We don't know that Mr. Sparkman was killed because he was a census taker."
I'm not so sure about that. We may not be 100%certain, but there's no reason to believe that he was not killed because he was a census worker.
September 24, 2009 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Glenn Beck's a goon, and the Census is pretty tame, to be honest.
But the ACORN folks really are scum, too. Not that I believe they killed him (or, necessarily anyone). But what they -do- do is bad enough, even sans-Breitbart-sting-operation-videos.
Assaulting sheriff's deputies at foreclosure sales is bad enough (and it's especially bad when your organization pressures the foreclosed into buying a house they couldn't afford in the first place).
Also, Oleeb willing to believe the worst based on scanty evidence, as usual.
September 24, 2009 12:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are beneath contempt. Acting as an apologist for murderers by attempting to deflect attention from their crime through muddying the waters with your ACORN references?
Really - how low, how repellent, how utterly fucking morally bankrupt can one person be and still have the balls to look at himself in the mirror in the morning?
Go kill yourself. You'll be doing the rest of the world a favor.
September 24, 2009 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Neither you nor I know who the murderers were. Some of us still think things like presumptions of innocence are relevant.
You are grouchy though, aren't you?
September 24, 2009 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would guess that since the Feds are still involved, they have to suspect that his death/murder must have involved with Sparkman's work, or they would have handed the investigation back to the local law enforcemnt folks, yes?
"Presumption of innocence" has to do with soomeone accused of a crime, not whether a crime was committed or not, nor what the motives were.
September 24, 2009 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Full disclosure: I am not grouchy.
El Presidente, not only does you post, supra, demonstrate you live in a fact-free world, it also shows you to be "beneath contempt." Perhaps you would be more comfortable posting at redstate.com or other fact-free, paranoid delusional sites.
September 24, 2009 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Grouchy?
Only to lower life forms such as you.
Address my comment about your deliberate attempt at obfuscation of the fact that someone was murdered rather than your lamentable, pathetic attempt at muddying the waters by misdirection, then, scum.
And then take my advice and go auto-Darwin.
September 24, 2009 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I didn't misdirect anything. Nor did I attempt to obfuscate the fact that, apparently, a killing occurred. I merely pointed out some related (or possibly related) issues.
My point was only that there are, as yet, only a few facts, which do not in fact point to -any- actual person as the perpetrator, and that we may therefore be a little early in ascribing a motive to person or persons unknown.
But of course, in a fact free zone like TPM (or RedState) the rush to partisan judgment is assumed, so I probably shouldn't have bothered you all with the lack of facts in this case.
September 24, 2009 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
So what does FED stand for and what was it doing on the victim's chest?
That alone is evidence sufficient for a preliminary judgment given that I am NOT connected to the investigation or adjudication of this event.
You are a passive-aggressive weiner.
September 24, 2009 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, you can judge all you want based on a tag on the guy's chest. I'm not saying you can't do that. I was defending myself from the opposite accusation; that I wasn't jumping to conclusions fast enough.
I tend to be more hesitant than Grouch to decide the how, why, and who of murders even outside a court of law. Oddly enough, public assumptions can do things like taint juries.
So, not stupid. Just realistic and fact based, unlike the assumptions everyone made here based on nothing but three letters and their own partisan biases.
September 24, 2009 2:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Presumed innocent in a court of law, sure....But this is an investigation. All I know is a Census worker, lynched with "FED" scrawled on his chest is pretty provocative evidence, to be sure. Not to mention it happened in rural Kentucky, where anti-government feelings run pretty rampant.
September 24, 2009 2:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
How exactly is ACORN related to someone murdering a census worker?
You're not really very good at this misdirection thing, you know. Next you're going to tell us he killed himself and wrote FED on his own chest, aren't you?
You are an apologist for murder and you know it. Face the ugly truth about yourself, scum.
September 24, 2009 2:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perhaps I'm not very good at misdirection because I'm not actually doing any?
All I'm doing is pointing out that there are conclusions being jumped to.
September 24, 2009 3:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course. That's why you brought up ACORN.
Really, you're very bad at this. Suicide is your only remaining option. Go. Now.
September 24, 2009 6:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
no, it is just evidence being examined and discussed, tyhere's no such thing as a conclusion until the jury is no longer out, literally.
Until then, it is all dialog, no one seriously accepts opinions as fact around here, but we all appreciate ideas and theories and have our own.
Stating ideas as certitudes is different than just suggesting a scenario. Viewing evidence without considering all the options outside Occam's razor, no matter how outlandish, is naive at best.
Methinks thou doest protest too much.
Let the scenarios be suggested, form your own opinion, then the conclusions you say we are jumping will come at the hands of the judge and jury.
September 24, 2009 6:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Nor did I attempt to obfuscate the fact that, apparently, a killing occurred."
If you read this sentence, it sounds as though you are questioning whether a killing occurred. Umm, when you have a body hanging from a tree, a killing has occurred. This is irrefutable, and evidence of your complete and total abandonment of facts in favor of obfuscation, apparently, so it seems, to some degree, in an incredibly muddy way, all the while attempting to appear pure as the driven snow. Wake up, dude! You've really went too far in your effort to protect what, "freedom of Murder"?
September 24, 2009 2:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or maybe you are just trying to wash your own hands, hoping that your bitterness toward liberals did not, in some way , attribute to this heinous crime.
September 24, 2009 2:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have no bitterness. However, the fact that this is being investigated as a homicide does not rule out the possibility of suicide (to date). Hence, "apparently".
I'm amused by liberals, not angry with them.
September 24, 2009 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Presumption of innocence is for our system of justice. If I were a juror, investigating official, or jurist, then indeed I would don the garb of objectivity per the Constitution.
Otherwise, we are free to judge at will based on evidence. That is where the first amendment comes in.
Don't confuse the two. It makes you look stupid.
September 24, 2009 2:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
It appears lynching may be making a come-back. If the on-going investigation confirms this tragedy to be what we now suspect, we need to call it what it is: a lynching.
September 24, 2009 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
The "presumption of innocence" is an individual right. To assume that this is related to his role as a census worker is supported by the word "FED" on his chest. That is not to say that there is a definite link between the words of a Glenn Beck & the murder. That is less clear (but also well within the realm of possibility.)
But even if this is not connected to the mad ramblings of Beck & kind (which I think it is), the words this summer of the census worker keep coming back to me. Obviously she has heard enough threats to be concerned and those threats are driven in part by the rhetoric of the Right. Then it becomes a question of how long until it does influence someone enough to harm a census employee?
September 24, 2009 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/census_worker_found_dead_in_kentucky_--_what_do_we.php?ref=fpb
The "FED" part of the story was a leak to the AP which may or may not even be accurate. The only facts we really have are that the guy was hanging from a tree, there is a homicide investigation, and the initial report, according to local authorities "contained errors".
See what I mean?
September 24, 2009 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe, since Bachmann is from Minnesota, we should decline to count anyone in her state and leave them to the # of representatives they have now. Given the fact that the other commenters are not Congresspeople, those states can be counted. All but Bachmann's.
September 24, 2009 2:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Since Minnesota is a state that is in danger of losing a seat after the 2010 census, maybe it would just be a matter of redistricting her out of office.
September 24, 2009 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe this is one of the reasons she (and many others, like Steve King of Iowa) want the census to seem threatening to the public in general, because it actually threatens their congressional seat?
Ponder the demographic shifts we have seen over the past decade, and consider just how it has changed some of those deep red areas.
So many of those far-flung districts were already at the top of the age scale, with natural attrition (death, in other words) taking that top rank off the rolls increasingly, and the younger generation moving away from those old bullies, the combination guarantees a major shift in political influence.
The census will accelerate that shift, as it is designed to do. But since it is literally The Status Quo we are speaking of, it is no surprise that they see that change coming and are doing everything they can to fight it.
September 24, 2009 7:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Right wing rabble rousers like Beck, Limbaugh, O'Reilly and Hannity are like the weasel in the schoolyard who egss the bully on to beat up the nerd then when they're called before the principal
the weasel says "Who me? I didn't do anything"
September 24, 2009 8:01 PM | Reply | Permalink