An Open Letter to ASU President Crow
Dear Sir:
I wanted to take a moment of your time to question the reasons for your refusal to grant an honorary degree to Pres. Obama.
While I realize that he has many achievements to come, I also think that his current achievements far outstrip those of past honorees. After all, you have bestowed degrees upon the Canadian Prime Minister, the President of the Navajo Nation and noted humorist Erma Bombeck.
Regardless of the intent, you have caused a great deal of suspicion in the rest of the country. We see this as either racist or sour grapes. Most think it has little to do with the qualifications of the President. Please keep in mind that to many Americans who have never visited Arizona it is best known for the Grand Canyon and as the state that wouldn't celebrate Martin Luther King Day. As a visitor who loves your state, I know it not to be true. But that's based on my personal experiences and not what I have read in the news.
While I personally do not think that race played a part in your decision....others will! And the fact that you did not realize this before you announced your decision is troubling. It makes you, personally; appear to be amazingly blind to public relations. (Which one would think would be an important aspect of your job.)
Perhaps if the accomplishments of the President of the United States are not enough to bestow a degree upon him, you should have selected a different, more qualified speaker.
Regardless of your reasons, you should have realized that this will be a publicity nightmare for the University which you serve and the state in which you live. There will be very good candidates for your school who will choose other schools to attend. There will be vacationers who may prefer visiting somewhere other than the Fairmont Scottsdale this year. I will be curious to see if this alters fund raising figures for your school. I doubt the loss will be significant, but it seems foolhardy in these trying economic times to drive away any business. And your university's seemingly partisan decision must take responsibility for those losses.
All in all, this was a poorly thought out decision on the part of the committee declining to honor the President of the United States. Or it was shortsighted on the part of the committee who selected your commencement speaker. Either way it reflects poorly upon you personally, your university and the state of Arizona.
I find it sad that you have chosen a path that leaves you open to charges of racism and political partisanship. On the up side....your graduating students will receive a memorable experience from an eloquent speaker whose' inexperience has led him to the White House in a landslide over one of your state's favorite sons. And since I have heard Sen. McCain speak, I can only say that your students are the real winners here.
THAT'S MY LETTER. BE SURE AND SEND YOUR HERE
















All Hail The Chief and this Post!
Terrific and dare I say, delightfully on point?!? Well, I do!
So appreciate.
Rec'd.
April 11, 2009 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Second of the day. I ditto Auntie in this.
April 11, 2009 6:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
One teeny tiny note: There are two different committees that make selections regarding graduation activities. One selects the commencement speaker. The other bestows honorary degrees based on nominations which come from students and faculty. The two committees are independent of one another. It is the second committee that made the decision regarding Pres. Obama. One's qualifications as commencement speaker (or one's invitation to be commencement speaker) are not relevant with regard to the bestowing of honorary degree. The "fault" lies with the degree committee and not the commencement speaker committee.
IMHO, not addressing the "offending" committee directly muddles your argument. The commencement speaker committee did nothing wrong.
April 11, 2009 7:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
From the Huffington Post:
April 11, 2009 8:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
And now they have!
It is sometimes a great thing to stir the pot. I always suggest we stir the pot because the meat is on the bottom. If you don't stir the pot, you get noting but broth!
April 12, 2009 2:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Jade, I have served on both types of committees. They make recommendations to the President, who can override their decision. Michael Crow surely should have seen this coming.
April 12, 2009 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good letter and good post.....Nicely done!
At this juncture anything other that an honorary degree is nothing but a cop out and/or a dodge. Read at my post, "Degree Or Not Degree...." You will see that the statement made by the ASU spokeswoman is clearly a defense of a 'final' decision made by the university, not an expression of being in a quandry, at a crossroads, or stuck on the horns of a dilemma.
If ASU spokeswoman, Sharon Keeler, couldn't tell the difference between an ongoing process, which should not have been disclosed, and a final decision which, required publication of a press release, she should to be summarily dismissed. The University President's attempt to sidestep the issue is demeaning and an insult to the intelligence of anyone who has ever attended a commencement exercise. I have been a University Professor, and I can assure you that there is at least one person who is on both committees who had the responsibility to ensure that the actions of the committees would been coordinated in such a way as to not cause embarrasment or confusion.
Finally, none of this could have been made public before the top administrators, the University President in particular, reviewed and signed-off on the decision. Another reason to fire Keeler, if this was not the case. Keep in mind that the institution bestowing the honorary degree often derives a greter benefit than the person derives in receiving the degree. As most definitely would be the case in this instance.
April 12, 2009 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Whatever - the President of ASU and it's administration don't give a flying f-bomb about the reputation of the university or the needs of it's students. That's why they've spent it into crippling debt just so President Crow can have another top-tier (but BROKE) research institution under his belt. I'm actually embarrassed that President Obama agreed to speak at this horrible institution. It's an appalling example of the fundamental problems with grand, overpaid egos who are running higher ed into the ground.
What other institution would just redline registered student organizations and force professors into unpaid furloughs, gutting graduate teaching assistantships, laying off entire faculties (leaving grad students unassisted mid-way through their degree programs) - all while giving themselves raises. Their speech team just took 8th in the nation, but, OH NO that doesn't further the institution's reputation for RESEARCH so it's GOT TO GO!
Maybe that's why Obama didn't get the honorary degree - just words!
April 12, 2009 9:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah but they have a great baseball and softball teams.
April 12, 2009 9:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Your post reminded me of this: Henry Kissinger once said,
April 12, 2009 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink