Obama to the Muslim World, in the Mirror
In his first interview as president, Barack Obama reiterated a line from his inauguration speech directed at the Muslim world:
Again, Obama was addressing the Muslim world but I suspect he is aware that his statement is just as equally applicable to the former US administration as well as himself. To be sure, Bush tried to achieve presidential greatness through destruction. Whether it be terrorists, Social Security, FEMA, welfare, or banking regulations, Bush was always on the side of tearing things down. (To be fair, I suspect he honestly thought doing so was in the best interest of the country but alas, we know now that it was not, good intentions aside.) And sure enough, the people judged him accordingly and he was ran out of office with his tail between his legs: perhaps the closest we can get in a democratic system to a coupe.
Obama, I think, knows that people will judge him too by what he builds rather than what he tears down and I believe that his choice of words at the inauguration exhibit a degree of intellectual subtlety, nuance, and self reflection we have not seen in a while.
Thanks for commenting and recommending.
To those leaders around the globe who seek to sow conflict or blame their society's ills on the West -- know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy.When I first heard this, I was struck by how the second half of the sentence is a threat of imminent demise, not by the power of US bombs and bullets, but rather by a people who realize their leaders' policies and methods are bankrupt.
Again, Obama was addressing the Muslim world but I suspect he is aware that his statement is just as equally applicable to the former US administration as well as himself. To be sure, Bush tried to achieve presidential greatness through destruction. Whether it be terrorists, Social Security, FEMA, welfare, or banking regulations, Bush was always on the side of tearing things down. (To be fair, I suspect he honestly thought doing so was in the best interest of the country but alas, we know now that it was not, good intentions aside.) And sure enough, the people judged him accordingly and he was ran out of office with his tail between his legs: perhaps the closest we can get in a democratic system to a coupe.
Obama, I think, knows that people will judge him too by what he builds rather than what he tears down and I believe that his choice of words at the inauguration exhibit a degree of intellectual subtlety, nuance, and self reflection we have not seen in a while.
Thanks for commenting and recommending.
Advertisement





Close to a coupe??!!
Have you ever?? heard of Ronald Reagan???
If you're old enough, you should be able to recall the Reagan landslide in which he got almost 60 percent of the vote!!! Odumba didn't come close to this.
I've never heard that characterized as being the closest we've come to a 'coupe' in American history?? Did they teach you ANY math in school??
In addition to math, I'd suggest some remedial history.
January 28, 2009 8:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Reagan was not only a closet far-right wingnut -- and America-hating backstabber -- and a dufus, it was he who initiated the economic "policies" that eventuated in our current economic quadmire:
1. Spend all your savings,
2. Quit your job, and,
3. Your income will INCREASE.
ReagaBushitonomics.
To believe otherwise is to be ignorant, and essentially illiterate. You reveal at least the latter with your excessive punctuation.
January 29, 2009 12:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dear renaye,
Thanks for your comment. To clarify, what I mean is that perhaps the closest thing we can get to a coupe in a democratic country is voting someone out of office and in a resounding way. Bush had to go because it was the end of his term but the US still resoundingly voted out his party.
About the abusive math and history remark: recent scholarship has determined that Obama begins his presidency with a greater mandate than Reagan did due to far greater turnout. It's a shame you don't know about.
And just for your reference, I am old enough to know about Regan and I have a Ph.D. in history. Any questions? (I'm not good at math, however, alas)
January 28, 2009 10:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't feed the feral wingnut. Call animal control. They will pick it up and take it to a rescue, make sure it's OK, and then release it in an environment suitable for its kind and away from human contact where it can best survive.
January 28, 2009 11:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
That wingnut ain't feral. That wingnut is roadkill.
January 29, 2009 1:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
In fact, Bushit lost the election in 2000 because the majority rejected his economic "policies" then. The vast majority knows that Social Security isn't broken, so doesn't need to be fixed.
Upon being unconstitutionally appointed, he implemented those delusional "policies" anyway. And look where it got us: economic quagmire.
January 29, 2009 12:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
I heard Obama's message the same way.
It seems he has an ability to speak directly to many cultures and societies simultaneously. Is this more the result of incredible talent or a reflection of humanities modern hope and desperation?
January 28, 2009 11:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
It isn't desperation. It is intelligence, and pragmatic wisdom.
January 29, 2009 1:01 AM | Reply | Permalink