This user has not started their blog yet!
- It's not a threat, It's a trap. It's a "show cause" order as to why she should not be fined.
- In fact, she's not even interested in winning the case. The courtroom is her soap box, and look at all
- ... if she's sane she'll be contrite, otherwise she's insane?" Nah, she'd be contrite if she was serious about practicing
- This comment meant as reply to Larsthorwald, above
- Ooops, the above reply intended for larsthon, above.
- "... if she's sane she'll be contrite, otherwise she's insane?" Nah, she'd be contrite if she was serious about practicing
- Here ya go: http://www.scribd.com/doc/19905657/RHODES-v-MacDONALD-18-Letter-regarding-from-plaintiff-regarding-withdrawal-of-motion-to-stay-Govuscourtsgamd77605180
- He didn't memorize that part
- "..we on the left..." What do you mean "we" paleface?
- Actually, this "confusion" is no laughing matter and should not be taken lightly. The RW is attempting here to control
- If I'm not mistaken, the contracts are under subpeona by Cuomo!
- Good ... I hate Hip-hop.
- Funny that Roberts, a so-called constitutional strict constructionist, can't even get the correct syntax out when called upon to repeat
- I don't care if he does make it 60. He's already demonstrated disloyalty. Making 60 votes will always be touchy,
- And scroll down on the Rasmussen page and you'll find the have BACHMANN LOSING HER SEAT (MN-06)
